AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2767-7370/030
1 Nimni-Cordoba Tissue Engineering and Drug Discovery Lab, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California.
2 Department of Oncology, National Children Hospital of Vietnam.
3 Department of Traumatology, National Institute of Ophthalmology of Vietnam.
4 Department of Surgery, 198 Hospital of Vietnam.
5 Natural Health Medical Center.
6 Thai Minh Pharmaceutical jsc.
*Corresponding Author: Ba X Hoang, Nimni-Cordoba Tissue Engineering and Drug Discovery Lab, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California.
Citation: Ba X Hoang, Bo Han, Hau D Tran , Cuong Hoang, Truong N Pham, et all. (2022). Zinc Iodide-Dimethyl Sulfoxide Composition in Treatment of Chronic Respiratory Diseases. J New Medical Innovations and Research, 3(1); DOI:10.31579/2767-7370/030
Copyright: © 2022, Ba X Hoang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 06 September 2022 | Accepted: 15 September 2022 | Published: 26 September 2022
Keywords: zinc; iodide; dimethyl sulfoxide; dmso; asthma; copd; pulmonary fibrosis
Zinc iodide and dimethyl sulfoxide (ZIDS) are well-characterized pharmaceutical agents that have been used in the treatment of different acute and chronic diseases. This report presents observational retrospective clinical evidence of using ZIDS for treating respiratory conditions including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although our current report summarizes a series of anecdotal clinical cases, the clinical evidence suggests a possible application of ZIDS as a safe, inexpensive, and potentially effective therapy that can mitigate the symptoms and reduce the morbidity-mortality of patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Given that ZIDS comprises accepted pharmaceutical agents used in practical medicine, possible research and application of this therapeutic composition could potentially open up a new perspective avenue for the treatment of acute and chronic respiratory diseases that have been grown worldwide for the last decades.
SpO2 : peripheral capillary oxygen saturation
DMSO : Dimethyl Sulfoxide
COPD : chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
ZIDS : Zinc iodide and dimethyl sulfoxide
Chronic respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, and interstitial lung disease are the most common non-communicable diseases worldwide [1]. Chronic respiratory diseases have received proportionately less public attention and less research funding than other diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, and Alzheimer's disease [2, 3]. COPD continues to be a significant medical problem and is the third leading cause of death in the United States. Acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of COPD are among the most common illnesses encountered by family physicians and account for more than 14 million physician visits annually. The mortality rate of hospitalized COPD patients because of acute exacerbation is about 10% [4]. The circumstances mentioned above indicate that exploring a more effective, safe, and less expensive approach targeting the prevention and treatment of chronic respiratory diseases is crucial and imperative for global health.
Asthma, COPD, and other chronic respiratory diseases are characterized by chronic inflammation and tissue remodeling of the airways. Remodeling is resistant to pharmaceutical therapies. Our published study reported that zinc and methylsulfonylmethane (organic sulfur compounds) potentially prevent airway wall remodeling in asthma by inhibiting both the Erk1/2 and mTOR signaling pathways [5]. In our prior publication, we have also proposed a possible application of Zinc Iodide -Dimethyl Sulfoxide (ZIDS) composition to treat the respiratory symptoms and complications in patients with COVID-19 [6].
In this retrospective observational study, we have followed up, analyzed, and reported a series of anecdotal cases of patients with chronic respiratory diseases who have been treated with ZIDS composition in adjunction to the standard of care treatment.
ZIDS composition (water solution of 30% DMSO pharmaceutical grade and 0.2% of Zinc Iodide) has been developed in the Nimni-Cordoba Tissue Engineering and Drug Discovery Laboratory of the Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, in cooperation with Thai Minh Pharmaceutical Company. ZIDS has been tested for acute and chronic toxicity, skin and mucosal irritation, and thyroid toxicity by the Pharmacology Department of the National Institute of Drug Quality Control of Vietnam. The testing results showed an excellent safety profile and tolerability.
Patients were asked to give their consent to participate in the trial. Patients have the right to withdraw from the study at any time and for any reason. The study is a retrospective and observational study that had no approved protocol.
Observational clinical evidence
Observation 1:
Eight moderate to severe asthmatics (5 men and 3 women) aged 28–74 years old were treated with 10 ml of ZIDS mixing with 200 ml of water, three times daily orally in 2 hours after meals for 60 days. These patients have been diagnosed with asthma and have had anti-asthmatic drugs for 6–21 years. The patients presented with episodes of dyspnea, excessive mucus expectoration, coughing, wheezing, or chest tightness more than four times a week and woke up at night with asthma symptoms more than four times a week. The patients took moderate and high doses of medications defined as at least 1,800 mcg of β2-agonists (short-acting or equivalent of long-acting) per week and inhaled corticosteroids (400–2000 µg/day) of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent. Their morning peak expiration flow (PEF) was less than 84% predicted as the baseline. Two patients were on oral corticosteroid in the form of prednisolone: 10 mg and 20 mg per day. Results of the treatment with ZIDS in adjunction with a standard of care are summarized and recorded in a diary card of symptoms, PEF, medication use, and quality of assessment life.
The patient’s records were analyzed retrospectively and compared with the baseline data. All patients were followed for 60 days, evaluated every week for the first month and every two weeks for the second month of therapy with oral administration ZIDS solution. The mean PEF of all patients was 72 % as the baseline.
The progression and treatment results of the patients are presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Clinical symptoms, treatment doses, and PEF changes at four time points
After one week from the start of the ZIDS oral treatment, the patients recorded a reduction of daytime asthma symptoms by 70% and nighttime symptoms by 75%. Short and long-acting β2-agonists doses had been reduced by 50%. The corticosteroids dose inhaled was decreased by 50%. The usage of oral prednisolone was lowered to 75%. The mean PEF rate improved by 15%, and no additional side effects were recorded. The patients’ blood pressures and pulse rates were within normal ranges.
After two weeks from starting treatment, the daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms were reduced by 85%. The β2-agonist dose was reduced by 75%, the corticosteroid inhaler dose was decreased by 65%, and the usage of oral prednisolone was lowered to 50%, the mean PEF rate improved by 20%, with no side effects observed.
At the end of 30 days, both daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms were reduced by 90%. The β2-agonists use was reduced by 95%, the corticosteroid inhaler dose was reduced by 90%, and the usage of oral prednisolone was terminated. The mean PEF value increased by 22%, and no additional side effects were recorded.
After 60 days of the treatment with ZIDS, the daytime symptoms of asthma reduced by 95%, and nighttime symptoms were reduced by 95%. The β2-agonist use was terminated, and the corticosteroid inhaler was decreased by 95%. The mean PEF increased by 25 %. 6 out of 8 treated patients have reached an asymptomatic and medication-free state.
From the beginning to the end of treatment, there were no additional side effects observed in ZIDS treated patients compared to the baseline level. The mean PEF rate improved after one week, and this trend continued for two weeks, 30 days, and 60 days following the treatment. The patients’ blood pressures and pulse rates improved in 5 of 8 patients after 30 days and 6 of 8 patients after 60 days of treatment with adjunctive ZIDS solution. The general blood count test, general blood chemistry profiles, and thyroid hormone profiles were normal in 30 days and 60 days points of ZIDS treatment. All patients reported improved general health, quality of life, and sleep patterns.
Observation 2:
Seven patients (6 males and 1 female), age range from 45 to 83, with a history of chronic cough and COPD, all presented with episodes of COPD exacerbations. All patients presented with comorbidity, including asthma (2 cases), diabetes (3 cases), hypertension (5 cases), ischemic heart disease (4 cases), pneumonia (1 case), arthritis (3 cases), liver diseases (2 cases), chronic gastritis (5 cases) and stomach ulcers (2 cases).
All patients received treatment with 10 ml ZIDS solution mixed with 200 ml of water three times daily 2 hours after meals at home. The patients were allowed to take all the medications for COPD and comorbidities in the same regimen and doses before exacerbations; no additional medications were added besides the ZIDS solution.
Monitoring clinical changes and paraclinical parameters was performed at three-time points: enrolment day (day 1, baseline), 15 days of the treatment (day 15), and 30 days (day 30) of the treatment with ZIDS in addition to a baseline standard of care. Clinical parameters, including severe cough, dyspnea, sputum secretion, fever, chest tightness, capacity for exercise and activities, sleep quality, and energy levels, were scored based on the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) questionnaire [7, 8].
Other paraclinical parameters such as general blood count tests, general blood biochemistry profiles, and Pulmonary Function Tests (Spirometry) were recorded. (Table 2)
As shown in Table 2, the patients reported improvement in all symptoms related to COPD exacerbation after 15 and 30 days of therapy with ZIDS in addition to baseline treatment for COPD and comorbidity compared to the baseline.
Table 2: Clinical Changes at Three Time Points (Day- 1, Day-15, and Day- 30)
The mMRC dyspnea scale was used in our study to assess the effectiveness of ZIDS treatment on an individual basis. From a clinical viewpoint, the mMRC scale correlates well to such objective measures as pulmonary function tests [9, 10]. (Table 3)
Table 3: Modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC)
As presented in Table 4, the recorded mMRC scale showed the patients' improvement in functional activities, quality of life, and general health after 15 days and 30 days of treatment with adjunctive ZIDS to baseline treatment for COPD and comorbidity. (Table 4)
Table 4: Clinical changes at three time points by mMRC scale
The improvement of patients’ pulmonary function compared to baseline with adjunctive SIDS treatment is reported in Table 5.
(Table 5)
Table 5: Functional pulmonary test results
Retrospective analysis of the patients showed that oral ZIDS was effective as adjunctive therapy for COPD exacerbation leading to a fast reduction of the patients’ symptoms, improvement in pulmonary functional parameters, quality of life, and physical function. All these were documented in Tables 2, 4, and 5.
After 30 days of treatment, all seven patients showed an overall improvement; no additional adverse effects were reported in the treated patients compared to the baseline.
Treatments for chronic respiratory diseases are challenging and costly. Currently, none of the approved drugs or treatments can cure asthma, COPD and respiratory complications of autoimmune diseases. Treatments can reduce symptoms and prevent exacerbations; however, the need for life-long administration and severe side effects of the most common anti-inflammatory and symptomatic therapeutic agents are the challenging problems in respiratory medicine.[4, 11-13]
The clinical evidence of our current retrospective study indicated a possible implementation of old and approved pharmaceutical (nutritional) agents such as Zinc, Iodine, and organic sulfur compounds for management of asthma, COPD and other respiratory diseases.
The comprised ingredients' synergic and complex biological properties might produce viable anti-inflammatory, immunoregulatory, antioxidant, antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, and antifibrotic therapeutic activities that resulted in favorable clinical benefits with a good safety profile of ZIDS composition [6, 14, 15]. ZIDS composes of well-characterized OTC pharmaceutical ingredients with a favorable safety profile. Therefore, it is a significant advantage for developing and applying ZIDS as a repurposed therapeutic product for acute and chronic respiratory diseases since new medications may take many years.
A future well-designed clinical trial is warranted to explore more potential therapeutic activities of ZIDS and promote a possible wider application of this potential therapeutic composition for the management of respiratory diseases.
The current observational retrospective study results demonstrate that ZIDS might effectively treat respiratory diseases. More extensive control trials will be needed to confirm the study findings.
None of the authors declares a conflict of interest regarding the data presented in this publication.
This study was investigators initiated and non-funded.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
