AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/434
1 Cardiology department Bogodogo University Hospital Center; Ouagadougou/Burkina Faso.
2 Cardiology department Yalgado Ouédraogo University Hospital Center; Ouagadougou/Burkina Faso.
3 Cardiology department General Hospital of Ndjamena/Chad.
*Corresponding Author: Taryetba Andre Arthur Seghda, Cardiology department Bogodogo University Hospital Center; Ouagadougou/Burkina Faso.
Citation: Arthur Seghda TA, Anna Tall/Thiam, Dan Naibé Temoua, Martin W. Nacanabo, Lea W. Sawadogo, et al, (2024), Use of Streptokinase for intravenous thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism: Practice and results (Data from the pulmonary embolism registry of Bogodogo University Hospital Center in Burkina Faso (PER/UHC Bogodogo-BF), J Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 7(15); DOI: 10.31579/2641-0419/434
Copyright: © 2024, Taryetba Andre Arthur Seghda. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 12 November 2024 | Accepted: 17 December 2024 | Published: 27 December 2024
Keywords: pulmonary embolism, high risk of early death, streptokinase
Objective : The objective of this part of the registry was to evaluate the practices and results in terms of Streptokinase thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism.
Methods : patients included in the pulmonary embolism registry were subdivided into those who had received streptokinase and those who had not. Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests were used in univariate analysis to determine the categorical variables associated with thrombolysis. To assess the clinical efficacy of streptokinase, vital constants at admission (t0) and 1h post-thrombolysis (t1) of thrombolyzed patients were matched and compared using the wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean echocardiographic parameters were compared at t0 (admission) and t1 (24 hours). A p<0.05 value defined the significance threshold for judging a difference not related to chance.
Results: The proportion of thrombolysed patients was 13.7%. Streptokinase was used in patients at high risk of early death. Vital clinical parameters (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate) were significantly improved at the end of perfusion. Right ventricular dysfunction parameters were significantly improved after Streptokinase treatment. The proportion of minor bleeding was significantly higher in the Streptokinase group (11.6% vs 6% OR=2.9).
Conclusion : Streptokinase is used to treat pulmonary embolism in patients who satisfy certain severity criteria. The result is a significant improvement in clinical and echocardiographic parameters, at the cost of an increased risk of minor bleeding.
Pulmonary embolism is defined as the sudden obstruction of the pulmonary artery or one of its branches by a clot, usually fibrinocruoric [1]. It ranks third among cardiovascular diseases in the world after ischemic heart disease and stroke [2]. Data from the literature show an increase in mortality in hospital series. This development is due to serious forms with a high risk of early death. Three essential factors can explain the occurrence of a pulmonary embolism with a high risk of death. It is; the size of the clot; right ventricular systolic function and the state of respiratory function. The stratification of this risk of early death is clearly stated in the European recommendations [3]. If the detection of these forms does not usually pose problems, their therapeutic management can be a challenge. Thrombolysis remains the ultimate therapy in cases of extreme emergency or inaccessibility to interventional embolectomy. This last means of treatment is not common to hospitals in Sub-Saharan Africa. Medicinal fibrinolysis now benefits from the addition of new thrombolytics which offer greater safety in use by reducing iatrogenic hemorrhagic complications. Their high cost limits their accessibility in Sub-Saharan Africa, hence the use of old molecules with a high risk of bleeding. The objective of this part of the registry was to evaluate the practices and results in terms of Streptokinase thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism.
2.1. Type, period and setting of the study This is a prospective cohort with analytical purposes carried out from a single-center hospital register between March 1, 2017 and June 31, 2022. The cardiology department of the Bogodogo University Hospital Center (REP/UHC-B) was the framework of the study. It has 18 beds including 3 intensive care beds. The pyramidal organization of the 3-level health system makes this center a reference center, especially for emergencies and patients requiring admission to intensive care.
2.2. Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were PE diagnosed on chest scann or presumed on cardiac ultrasound in forms with a high risk of early death in which hemodynamic instability or unavailability of the scanner required emergency reperfusion.
2.3. Study variables and operational definitions
The dependent variable of the study was the “thrombolysis” variable. The independent variables were data; clinics; biological; electro-echocardiographic; scannographic upon admission of patients. The risk of early death assessed by the PESI (Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index) score. It was judged high if the PESI score ≥3 or the simplified PESI score ≥1 [4]. Dilation of the right ventricle was defined by a ratio of right on left ventricular diameters measured in 4-cavity incidence ≥ 0.9 [5]. Right ventricular systolic dysfunction was defined as an excursion of the plane of the tricuspid annulus < 17>
2.4. Data collection tools and methods
Data were collected upon patient admission. The search for syncope/lipothymia and other functional signs was carefully carried out by questioning the patient and those around him. An individual collection sheet served as a collection tool.
2.5. Data processing and analysis
The data were entered into Excel and analyzed using Stata software. The patients were subdivided into two groups depending on whether the dependent variable was found or not: Thrombolysis (+) vs Thrombolysis (-). The Khi2 and Fisher Exact tests were used in univariate analysis to determine the categorical variables associated with the realization of thrombolysis. For quantitative variables, Student average comparison test was used after checking normality. In the absence of normality of the variable, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for a comparison of medians. The normality of the distribution of continuous variables was tested by graphical methods. A p value <0>
The vital constants on admission (t0) and post-thrombolysis 1 hour later (t1) of thrombolyzed patients were matched and then compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The average of the echocardiographic parameters were compared at times t0 (admission) and t1 (at 24 hours). A p value <0>
3.1. General characteristics of the study population
During the study period (March 2017 to January 31, 2023), 2464 patients were hospitalized in the department, including 502 for PE, representing a prevalence of 20.37%. There were 269 women, representing 53.5%, and a sex ratio (M/F) of 0.86. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 96 years with an average of 54 years +/- 16.8 years. Figure 1 shows the distribution of patients by age group. The modal class is that of [40; 50 years] with 112 patients representing 22.31%.
3.2. Prevalence of thrombolysis according to the level of risk of early death
The proportion of thrombolyzed patients was 13.7%. Figure 2 compares the proportions of thrombolyzed patients according to the level of risk of death assessed by the PESI score. The proportion of thrombolyzed patients ranged from 1.8% for PESI class 1 to 72.7% for PESI class 5. This involved intravenous thrombolysis in all cases on a peripheral venous route. The infusion regime was 2 hours in 92.7% (64 patients). In five patients, the infusion lasted 1h30. In these cases, these were patients with intracavitary thrombi at high embolic risk. The average dose of Streptokinase was 1.5 million international units.
3.3. Thromboembolic risk factors, functional and general clinical signs associated to the realization of thrombolysis
Tables 1 and 2 report the thromboembolic risk factors, functional and general signs associated to the realization of thrombolysis. Blood pressure collapse, tachycardia and syncope were the variables significantly associated to the realization of thrombolysis. No TERF was statistically associated to the realization of thrombolysis.
3.4. Electroechocardiographic variables associated to the realization of thrombolysis
Table 3 reports the univariate analysis of the electro-echocardiographic variables associated to the realization of thrombolysis.
3.5. Evolution of clinical and echocardiographic parameters in patients thrombolyzed with Streptokinase
Table 4 shows the evolution in thrombolyzed patients; clinical parameters before and one hour after thrombolysis; and ultrasound parameters 24 hours later. All clinical and echocardiographic parameters were significantly improved by the treatment.
3.6. Intra-hospital complications Table 5 reports a comparison of complications in the 2 groups. Thrombolysis was significantly associated with the occurrence of minor hemorrhage (11.6% vs 6%; OR=2; p=0.05).
The hospital prevalence of PE in the PER/CHU-B at the date of the analyzes was 20.51%. The proportion of thrombolyzed patients was 13.7%. The objective of our work was to report the practices and results in terms of Streptokinase thrombolysis in PE. Our results show that thrombolysis is performed almost exclusively in patients at high risk of early death. No thromboembolic risk factor was statistically associated to the realization of thrombolysis. The assessment of cardiovascular risk by the PESI score alone is not optimal. In fact, patients with a PESI score of 1 or 2 had been thrombolyzed. These are patients with right intracavitary thrombi whose hemodynamic state was stable. Indeed, several authors have also shown the limits of the PESI score in assessing the severity of PE [6,7]. An association of echocardiographic parameters with the PESI score showed a significant improvement in the prediction of PE severity with an AUC going from 0.76 to 0.86 [8]. Approximately 9.9% of patients are accurately reclassified.
Blood pressure collapse, tachycardia and syncope were the variables significantly associated to the realization of thrombolysis. In several studies the predictive value of syncope on the severity of PE was controversial [9–13]. In a more recent metaanalysis, syncope was associated with a high rate of death explained by more frequent hemodynamic instability [14]. The use of Streptokinase in our study therefore complies with the standards found in the literature.
The ultrasound profile of thrombolyzed patients shows severe right ventricular dysfunction parameters. The presence of right intracavitary thrombi was the factor most associated to thrombolysis (10.4% vs 0.4%; OR=24.31). There are no guidelines for the management of pulmonary embolism with right intracavitary thrombi without collapse or shock [15]. The therapeutic resources available are unfractionated heparin, embolectomy, most often interventional, and thrombolysis. The latter seems to be the most judicious according to several studies [16–20]. The usefulness of thrombolytics in reducing mortality in severe forms and the recurrence of embolisms has been proven, however these treatments are associated with an increased risk of minor and major hemorrhages [21–24]. All clinical and echocardiographic parameters were significantly improved after Streptokinase infusion in our study. In addition, the risk of minor hemorrhage was multiplied by 2.2. In a recent metaanalysis, Li et al. showed that 4 thrombolytics (Streptokinase, Alteplase, Tenecteplase, urokinase) significantly reduced mortality compared to heparin alone [25]. Alteplase offered greater safety in terms of reducing the risk of bleeding. Financial accessibility to this molecule remains limited in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Our study shows that Streptokinase is used in pulmonary embolism in patients who present severity criteria. This results in a significant improvement in clinical and echocardiographic parameters at the cost of the increased risk of minor hemorrhage. The success of thrombolysis is conditioned by good patient selection and the choice of a good perfusion protocol.
This work is based on data from the pulmonary embolism registry of the Bogodogo University Hospital. The authors declare that they have no links of interest.
This study did not receive any funding
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
