AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9406/162
1 Professor in Mansoura Ophthalmic Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University.
2 Lecture in Mansoura Ophthalmic Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University.
*Corresponding Author: Mona Abdel kader, Professor in Mansoura Ophthalmic Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University.
Citation: Mona Abdel kader, Ayman Fawzy, (2023),Triamacinolone Alone Versus Triamacinolone with Laser in Diabetic Macular Odema, J. Biomedical Research and Clinical Reviews. 8(4); DOI:10.31579/2692-9406/162
Copyright: © 2023, Mona Abdel kader. this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 24 August 2023 | Accepted: 01 September 2023 | Published: 08 September 2023
Keywords: ERG & OCT of DM
Background:Macular oedema is responsible for a significant decrease of vision in this population. Aim of the study is to assess retinal function by multifocal electroretinography (MF-ERG) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection and to compare the effect of IVTA alone and after its combination with argon laser photocoagulation.
Methods: The study included eighty patients (120 eyes), divided into two groups. Group 1 included sixty eyes (60) of forty patients (40) with DME treated with triamcinolone acetonide injection alone, group 2 (laser group) included another sixty eyes (60) of forty patients (40) with DME treated with triamcinolone acetonide injection followed by argon laser photocoagulation (after 3 week). The response to treatment was monitored functionally by visual acuity measurement and MF-ERG and anatomically by foveal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The changes in functional and morphometric parameters were followed at 1 week and 1, 2, 3,6 months.
Results:Visual acuity and MF-ERG values increased after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. There was statistically significant increase in mean P1 amplitude compared with pretreatment. The mean P1 peak latencies were shortener. There were also statistically significant decreases in the mean foveal thickness after treatment. In group 1, there was deterioration of the initial improvement that started after 2 months from IVTA while in group 2, there was more stability of the initial improvement.
Conclusion: IVTA injection causes transient improvement of macular function and decreases of retinal thickness in diabetic patients. This study suggests the combination of IVTA, and argon laser photocoagulation causes more permanent improvement. Argon laser photocoagulation effectively maintains improvement occurring after IVTA and reduces recurrent DME after IVTA.
Macular oedema affects approximately 29% of diabetic patients with disease duration of 20 years or more and is responsible for a significant decrease of vision in this population. [1]
The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) demonstrated a significant benefit of focal laser photocoagulation for the treatment of clinically significant macular oedema. [2] However, eyes with diffuse diabetic macular edema carry a particularly poor prognosis despite laser photocoagulation. In the ETDRS, only 17% of the eyes had an improvement of visual acuity (V.A) and less than 3% had a visual improvement of [3] or more ETDRS lines.2 Laser photocoagulation is at best supportive rather than curative [2-3], prompting interest for alternative therapeutic approaches.
Intravitreal administration of triamcinolone acetonide has provided the ophthalmologist with an extra tool for the treatment of eyes with diabetic oedema. [4-5]
Triamcinolone acetonide, has been proposed to decrease macular oedema6, the probable mechanisms are increase in tight-junction protein, which diminish vessel leakage by a local vasoconstrictive effect, [7-8] and angiostatic properties through inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).[9]
IVTA is reported to generate favorable results in the treatment of DME, however the chief limitation of IVTA is the recurrence of DME which develops after a relatively short duration of action. Although repeated administration of IVTA might be an option. Yet, repeated IVTA may potentiate the toxicity of the intraocular corticoid as elevation of intraocular pressure [10], cataractogensis [11] and endophthalmitis.[12]
The aims of this study are to assess macular function by MF-ERG and foveal thickness in eyes with diabetic macular oedema after IVTA injection and to determine whether macular argon laser photocoagulation after IVTA might be helpful in the maintenance of improvement after IVTA or not.
Patients and Methods:
This study was carried out on patients attending the outpatient's clinic of Mansoura Ophthalmic Center during the period from December 2012 to February 2014. This study included one hundred and twenty eyes of eighty patients with diabetic macular edema with no sign of vitreo-macular traction on either biomicroscopy or Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). The patients were divided into two groups :Group 1 included sixty eyes (60) of forty patients (40) with DME treated with triamcinolone acetonide injection alone, group 2 (laser group) included another sixty eyes (60) of forty patients (40) with DME treated with triamcinolone acetonide injection followed by argon laser photocoagulation (after 3 week).The determination of group for the individual was randomized (dependent on last digit of hospital ID number .If it was an even number the patient was located in group 1, if it was an odd number ,the patient was allocated into group 2.
Macular oedema was defined by a zone or zones of retinal thickening one disc area or larger at any part within one disc diameter of the center of the macula on biomicroscopy and, by diffuse fluorescein leakage involving most of the macular area on fluoresein angiography or/ and areas of pooling of flourscein dye within two disc diameters at the center of the macula in cystoid macular edema.[13] Another criterion involved significant reduction in the reflectivity of the outer layer and/ or subfoveal collection on OCT or cavities of low reflectivity in posterior retinal layers or full retinal thickness with tiny walls in cystoid macular edema.[13] Central macular thickness had to be more than 300µm(normal 170±18µm).[13] Patients were thoroughly informed about the injection procedure, postoperative results and possible complications and written consents were taken from all patients. All tests were carried out in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration Of Helsinki(1989) of the world medical association. The study was approved by Mansoura University Hospital trust ethics committee
Exclusion Criteria: it included patients who previously received intravitreal injection either triamcinolone or bevacizumab, those with evidence of macular ischaemia, epiretinal membranes or vitreo-retinal traction, patients with past or current history of glaucoma. patients who had undergone cataract surgery or vitre-retinal surgery and patients with renal insufficiency. other ophthalmic disorders associated with macular oedema, such as uveitis and branch or central retinal vein occlusion
Pre-Injection Evaluation:
Medical history (with special stress on age of onset of diabetes mellitus (DM), condition of metabolic control and presence of associated systemic complication related to DM such as hypertension and renal impairment).
Ophthalmological examination included: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) determined using Snellen charts in a standardized fashion ,best corrected visual acuity were transformed to logarithmic scale ( log MAR:logarithm of the minimum angle of result), pupillary reaction (direct and consensual), slit lamp examination (with special focus on: presence of any corneal opacities that may affect vision, presence of any lens opacities, intraocular pressure (IOP)(it was measured by slit lamp mounted Goldmann's applanation tonometry), fundus biomicroscopy ( it was done after maximum pupillary dilation by tropicamide 1% and phenylepherine 2.5% using both slit lamp biomicroscopy with non-contact (+90D) Volk lens and Goldman contact lens in order to detect diffuse macular oedema, to evaluate vitreo-retinal interface relationship, to check any pre-retinal membranes and previous macular laser treatment), fundus photography, fundus fluorescein angiography to confirm macular leakage, optical coherence tomography (OCT) to confirm macular thickening, assess vitreoretinal relationship and demonstrate cystoid spaces and multifocal electro-retinagram MF-ERG to assess macular function.
MFERG:
All ERG data were recorded using (Roland Consult, Brandenburg, Germany). Stimulation and recording of MF-ERG responses were performed using the ISCEV guidelines. [6] The stimulus, consisting of (61) hexagons covering a visual field of 30o was presented at a frame rate of 75Hz on a monitor 30cm from the patient’s eye. The luminance (97%) of each hexagon independently alternated between black and white. The amplifier gain was set at 100,000, the lower cutoff frequency
were 5 Hz and the upper frequency being 100 Hz. After maximum dilation of the pupil, Dawson Trick litskow (DTL) electrode were applied to topically anaesthetized cornea with one ground electrode in the forehead and two temporal reference electrodes and the opposite eye occluded. The
Eyes were optically corrected for near vision in order to see clearly the small fixation spot in the center of the stimulus matrix. and the patients were instructed to fixate at the intersection of the spokes. The recording period was comprised of eight segments of 30 second, providing a total recording time of 4minute. The quality of the recording was controlled by real-time display and contaminated segments were discarded & repeated
The MF-ERG stimulus location and anatomical areas corresponded roughly to the following: ring 1 to fovea, ring 2 to the parafovea, ring 3 to perifovea, ring 4 to the near periphery and ring 5 to central part of the middle periphery.[11]
The response density (amplitude per unit of retinal area (nv/deg2) of each local response and latency were estimated over central ring and four quadrants.
OCT:
OCT was performed on every patient using (Topcon, three dimensional (3D) OCT, -1000, -USA). After dilation of the pupil. Central retinal characteristics were analyzed by optical coherence tomography utilizing 6 radial line scans (6mm) directed on the fovea as determined by simultaneous evaluation of the red-free image on the computer monitor of the OCT scanner. The retinal thickness of the 1mm central retina was obtained using the macular thickness map for calculation
Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection:
For IVTA injection, topical 1
The study included one hundred and twenty eyes of eighty patients, forty patients were bilaterally studied (50%) and forty patients were unilaterally studied (50 %). Forty five (45) patients were female (56%) and thirty five (35) patients were male (44%). All procedures were carried out in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki (1989) of the world medical association. The study was approved by Mansoura University Hospital Trust Ethics Committee.
The patients aged from forty (40) years up to sixty – five (65) years with a mean age fifty (50) years. Most of them suffered from type II diabetes (46 patients (57.5%) with mean duration of the disease 10 years (SD±3) (table 1)
Fifty eyes suffered from diffuse maculopathy, fifty eyes suffered from cystoid maculopathy and twenty eyes suffered from mixed maculopathy. Macular edema has been present for 6 month(8±2months) All patients were treated with intra-vitreal injection of 4 mg. triamcinolone acetonide using the same technique. Among (120) eyes: sixteen eyes (13.3%) had marked improvement in visual acuity (3 lines in landolt chart ), 32 eyes (26.6 %) had moderate improvement (2 lines), 60 eyes (50 %) had mild improvement in visual acuity (one line in londolt chart ) and 12 eyes (10 %) had no improvement in visual acuity after one week. The improvement noticed in the first six months is included in table 2.
By OCT studying (table 3,fig 4) ,the study revealed marked improvement ( more than 120 μm ) in 20 eyes (16.6 % )with macular edema depending on the retinal thickness measured from the retinal surface to the retinal pigment epithelium before and after treatment as central retnial thickness ( before treatment ) ranged from 550 micron (μm) to 700 μm with mean thickness 570 μm ±SD 90 μm reduced into mean thickness 400 μm ±SD 50 μm after treatment with mean reduction ( 170 μm ), 36 eyes ( 30 % ) with moderate reduction as central thickness ranged from 450 μm to 350 μm before treatment with mean thickness was 400 μm reduced into mean thickness was 300 μm with mean reduction was 100 μm after treatment , 48 eyes ( 46.6 %) with mild reduction as retinal thickness ranged from 350 to 305 μm with mean thickness was 300 μm reduced into mean thickness 255 μm with mean reduction 45 μm and eight eyes had no improvement after treatment .Although macular thickness was significantly reduced ,values were higher than normal (<200>
There was good correlation between retinal thickness and visual acuity (R=-5.00, P=0.01). The reduction in retinal thickness was associated with improvement of visual acuity
Flourescein Angiography showed leakage from macular area in all cases before IVTA. After IVIA, there was reduction of the macular leakage in most of the cases (116 eyes) (96.6 %)
The retinal response density of MF-ERG in affected eyes before treatment ranged from 15 nv/deg2 to 2 nv/deg2 (mean value ± SD 7.4 ±5.5 nv/deg). After treatment, the response density ranged from 22 to 17 (mean value ±SD 15.3 ± 6.4). Table 4 (Fig.1-3)
The latency of MF-ERG in eyes before treatment ranged from 70 millisecond (ms ) to 59 ms ( mean value ±SD 65 ±2 ms)
After treatment the latency ranged from 54 to 58 ms (mean ± SD 55± 3.1 ms )
There was good correlation between increased amplitude of MF-ERG and decreased macular thickness by OCT ( R=0.54 , P=0.008 )
The IVTA effect (OCT improvement, MFERG changes and visual acuity improvement) regressed 2 months after injection in group 1 while in group 2, there were more stabilization of improvement.
Post-Treatment Complication:
Intra-ocular pressure: The mean pre-injection IOP was 15 ± 2.2.
The mean post injection IOP was 17 ±3.5 . There was only four cases (3.3%) develop mild increase in IOP (It was 26 mm Hg) and was controlled with B-blocker
Minor local adverse events related to the treatment procedure (conjunctiva hyperemia and subconjuctival haemorrhage) were presented in 6 cases only (5% ) during the first week
Lens status: The lens was clear in all patient before treatment. At the end of follow up, none of the eyes displayed any cataract.
There were no cases of endophthalmitis, clinically evident inflammation, retinal tear, retinal detachment or thrombi embolic.
Diabetic macular edema is a major complication of diabetic retinopathy that faces a challenge in its management . Although several treatment modalities have been tried for the management of diabetic macular edema, these modalities have many limitations. Focal and grid laser photocoagulation have remained the primary treatment option for diabetic macular edema for several years. However most eyes treated with laser photocoagulation do not have an improvement in visual acuity. Although ETDRs,[2] demonstrated that immediate focal photocoagulation reduced moderate visual loss by 50%, 12% of treated eyes still lost vision at the 3-year follow up interval and 24%of immediately treated eyes had thickening involving the center of the macula at 36 months .In addition , laser treatment of eyes with diffuse macular edema has been disappointing .[15,16]
In the past years, attempts to understand the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy had led to other strategies in the management of diabetic macular edema . The development of diabetic retinopathy is a multifactorial process. Much of retinal damage that characterizes the disease is now understood to result from retinal vascular leakage and non perfusion mediated by numerous growth factors.[17,18] The up regulation of growth factors is associated with breakdown of the blood – retinal barrier with increased vascular permeability resulting in retinal oedema, stimulation of endothelial cell growth and neovasculization.[19]
For years, corticosteroids have been used in ophthalmology to suppress intraocular inflammation and reduce leakage from retinal blood vessels . Local application of cortisone was used to decrease the adverse side effects of systemic cortisone and at the same time achieve a higher concentration at the site of action . The use of intraocular corticosteroids for diabetic macular oedema started after the significant observations of McCuen et al , [20] and Young et al, [21] on the lack of toxicity of intra-vitreal triamcinolaone (9-fluoro – 16 – hydroxyl prednisolone ) . Subsequently , there have been several studies documenting the antiangiogenic , anti proliferative and antiedematous effects of IVTA. The landmark study by Martidis et al [22] involved sixteen eyes with clinically significant macular oedema that failed to respond to at least two previous sessions of laser photocoagulation at least 6 months after laser therapy, the response was measured by clinical examination and OCT. Eyes with residual central macular thickness more than 300 µm. were administered an intravitreal injection of 4mg in 0.1 ml of trimacinolone acetonide. The central macular thickness deceased after injection by 55%, 57
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
