AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-2757/080
1 Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Private Hospital of Büyükşehir, Konya, Turkey
2 Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey
*Corresponding Author: Moath Zuhour, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Private Hospital of Büyükşehir, Konya, Turkey.
Citation: Zuhour M., Baycar Z., Dadacı M., İnce B., (2023), Successful Multiple Finger Replantation; Procedure and Considerations, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 4(3); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/080
Copyright: © 2023, Moath Zuhour. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 21 April 2023 | Accepted: 28 April 2023 | Published: 10 May 2023
Keywords: fds transfer; finger amputation; replantation; total amputation
Multiple finger amputations require challenging surgeries and special approach. At least, the thumb and middle finger should be replanted to maintain minimal hand functions. Technically, multiple amputations are more difficult than single finger amputation and distal amputations are more difficult than proximal ones. Herein, we present a case of four finger amputation. All fingers were successfully replanted. The patient required a long period of physical rehabilitation. The patient underwent another operation because of the extensor lag of the four fingers. In the second operation a four-tail FDS transfer to the lateral bands was performed. The rehabilitation process is still ongoing.
Finger amputations are one of the most difficult operations of plastic surgery that require special equipment and skills. The degree of difficulty varies according to some factors such as the level of amputation, number of fingers involved, trauma etiology, age of the patient and comorbid diseases. Technically, multiple amputations are more difficult than single finger amputation and distal amputations are more difficult than proximal ones.
While total amputations refer to the complete separation of the finger from the body, revascularization refers to partial amputations in which the finger remains attached to the body with some tissue (1). 7-29% of patients who apply to the emergency department apply due to hand injury (2). In hand trauma, the fingers are mostly affected, with the marginal fingers (1 and 5) being more common (3). Although these traumas are mostly seen in young men, the age of incidence in both genders is 26-28 years for men and 29.31 years for women (4).
Indications for replantation include thumb amputation, multiple finger amputations, trans-metacarpal amputations and any amputation in children (5). Many goals should be considered when performing replantation surgery, such as preserving adequate finger length, maintaining protective sensation, keeping functional recovery at the highest level and preventing joint contractures [6].
In this paper, we aimed to present the operation and postoperative rehabilitation process of a case applied with 4 finger amputations as a result of work accident.
The patient applied after work accident with total amputation of 2nd ,3rd ,4th and 5th fingers of the right hand at the level of MCP joint and a dislocation of the 1st finger at IP joint with a fracture in the proximal phalanx of the same finger (Figure 1). The patient was taken immediately to the operation room. First, exploration and necrotic tissue debridement were done. Then, arteries, nerves and veins in the amputated fingers were marked. When the wound site of the right hand was explored, it was observed that the palmar arch was totally cut and the digital arteries were detached right after the branching point from the arch. It was also observed that the common digital nerves going to the 4th and 5th fingers and 3rd and 4th fingers were defective, and the other nerves were totally cut.
Figure 1: Preoperative view of the amputated fingers.
K-wires were delivered through the amputated joints first and then toward the metacarpal bones (retrograde fashion) (Figure 2). The right wrist was entered with appropriate incisions from the volar aspect, and the muscle groups were exposed. The proximal ends of the cut FDP tendons were passed through the carpal tunnel. The FDS tendons were not repaired because of potential adhesions and to keep them for reconstruction procedures that may be needed later. The FDP tendons were repaired by modified Kessler technique. After repairing the arterial ends for anastomosis; the ulnar digital artery of the 5th finger, the common digital artery to the 4th and 5th fingers, the common digital artery to 3rd and 4th fingers, the common digital artery to 2nd and 3rd fingers and the superficial palmar arch were repaired using an 8-0 Dylon suture. The anastomoses were checked for blood flow and all of them were working well. The radial digital nerve of the 2nd finger, the common digital nerve to the 2nd and 3rd fingers and the ulnar digital nerve of the 5th finger were repaired.
Figure 2: K-wires inserted into the amputated part.
After the bleeding control, the skin incisions were sutured (Figure 3, A). The hand was placed on a plaster splint and the procedure was terminated. On the postoperative 6th month, the patient underwent another operation due to the extensor lag of the IP joints (Figure 3, B). The FDS tendons (4-tail FDS transfer) was transferred to the lateral bands of the four fingers. The patient is still under physical therapy until the time of writing this paper.
Figure 3: A: immediate postoperative view, B: late postoperative view showing the extensor lag of the fingers.
The patient applied after work accident with total amputation of 2nd ,3rd ,4th and 5th fingers of the right hand at the level of MCP joint and a dislocation of the 1st finger at IP joint with a fracture in the proximal phalanx of the same finger (Figure 1). The patient was taken immediately to the operation room. First, exploration and necrotic tissue debridement were done. Then, arteries, nerves and veins in the amputated fingers were marked. When the wound site of the right hand was explored, it was observed that the palmar arch was totally cut and the digital arteries were detached right after the branching point from the arch. It was also observed that the common digital nerves going to the 4th and 5th fingers and 3rd and 4th fingers were defective, and the other nerves were totally cut.
Figure 1: Preoperative view of the amputated fingers.
K-wires was delivered through the amputated joints first and then toward the metacarpal bones (retrograde fashion) (Figure 2). The right wrist was entered with appropriate incisions from the volar aspect, and the muscle groups were exposed. The proximal ends of the cut FDP tendons were passed through the carpal tunnel. The FDS tendons were not repaired because of potential adhesions and to keep them for reconstruction procedures that may be needed later. The FDP tendons were repaired by modified Kessler technique. After repairing the arterial ends for anastomosis; the ulnar digital artery of the 5th finger, the common digital artery to the 4th and 5th fingers, the common digital artery to 3rd and 4th fingers, the common digital artery to 2nd and 3rd fingers and the superficial palmar arch were repaired using an 8-0 Dylon suture. The anastomoses were checked for blood flow and all of them were working well. The radial digital nerve of the 2nd finger, the common digital nerve to the 2nd and 3rd fingers and the ulnar digital nerve of the 5th finger were repaired.
Figure 2: K-wires inserted into the amputated part.
After the bleeding control, the skin incisions were sutured (Figure 3, A). The hand was placed on a plaster splint and the procedure was terminated. On the postoperative 6th month, the patient underwent another operation due to the extensor lag of the IP joints (Figure 3, B). The FDS tendons (4-tail FDS transfer) was transferred to the lateral bands of the four fingers. The patient is still under physical therapy until the time of writing this paper.
Figure 3: A: immediate postoperative view, B: late postoperative view showing the extensor lag of the fingers.
The thumb constitutes 40% of the functions of the hand. Grasping and opposing movements cannot be performed without the thumb (7). However, in order for the thumb to perform these functions, there must be at least one more finger at the opposite direction to meet it. In order to provide maximum function in multiple finger amputations, the replantation priority order proceeds as follows; thumb, middle finger, index finger, ring finger and little finger (8). In our case, only the thumb was preserved with bone fractures, while all the other fingers were amputated as an en-bloc. We replanted all of the fingers to achieve maximum function. Blood flow returned without any problems.
During replantation surgery, Priority should be given to vessels and nerves after necrotic tissues and foreign materials are debrided. The neurovascular structures are first marked in the amputated parts, and then the recipient vessels are explored. This is followed by bone fixation and tendon repair. The purpose of this is to stabilize the bones after the anastomosis is done so that the anastomosis is not damaged during the fixation. After these procedures, anastomoses are made and checked for blood flow (8). If there is soft tissue loss, it is repaired with local flaps, interpolation flaps or free flaps (9). Since the incision in this case was relatively clean, no further debridement was required. However, because the trauma was in zone 3, it was very close to the joints and required careful bone fixation. According to our observation, retrograde bone fixation is easier in such a region. In order to achieve this, first retrograde entry is made through the joints on the amputated side and the wire is advanced until it exits the PIP joint. Then the wire is sent back to the metacarpal bones.
The ultimate goal of replantation is a painless limb, good soft tissue coverage and a functional hand. When the acute recovery process is over, physical therapy exercises should be started. While the replanted fingers are in the splint, the patient should learn the passive and active exercises of the healthy fingers (10). In addition, intact joints that are not included in the fixation should not be forgotten. As an example, in our case, MCP and PIP joints were fixated. But the DIP joints were kept free and the patient was taught how to move them. When bone healing was confirmed by direct radiographs, K wires were removed and active and passive exercises were initiated. In such complicated cases, postoperatively, the patients should not be left to the control of physical therapy only. The surgeon who performed the operation should also follow-up the patient at frequent intervals.
Multiple finger amputations require challenging surgeries and special approach. At least, the thumb and middle finger should be replanted to maintain minimal hand functions. With good planning and analysis of the existing situation, all of the fingers can be salvaged without any loss. The patient should be informed before and after the surgery, and the importance of physical therapy should be emphasized frequently.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
