[email protected]
+1-(302)-520-2644
+1-(302)-520-2644

Sarcoidosis Of the Penis

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. General Medicine and Clinical Practice
  4. Archives
Submit Guidelines

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/248

Sarcoidosis Of the Penis

  • Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Retired Urologist and Clinician, Reviewer of Articles for Journals, Medical Examiner Member of Royal College of Pathologists, London. United Kingdom.

*Corresponding Author: Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, Retired Urologist and Clinician, Reviewer of Articles for Journals, Medical Examiner Member of Royal College of Pathologists, London. United Kingdom.

Citation: Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo (2025), Sarcoidosis of the Penis, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice, 8(2); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/248

Copyright: © 2025, Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 04 December 2024 | Accepted: 20 January 2025 | Published: 30 January 2025

Keywords: sarcoidosis of penis; rare; biopsy; histopathology

Abstract

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown etiology whnich affects multiple organs of the body and which is characterized by the presence of non-caseating granulomas. It is very rare for patients who are afflicted by sarcoidosis of the penis to initially manifest with a lesion of the penis only. Sarcoidosis of the penis manifests with non-specific symptoms that simulate the manifestation more common afflictions of the penis and hence without the clinician having a high-index of suspicion for sarcoidosis of the penis, the diagnosis could be either missed easily or there would be a delay in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis of the penis. Diagnosis of sarcoidosis of the penis is made based upon pathology examination of biopsy specimens or excised specimens of the penile lesion. 

Introduction

Sarcoidosis is a terminology which is used for a systemic disease of unknown aetiology which affects multiple organs and is characterized by the presence of non-caseating granulomas. [1] Even though the aetiology of sarcoidosis is not known, the evidence has been iterated to point to an exaggerated immune response to an unidentified antigen as the most likely cause. [2] Confirmatory evidence of the presence of non-caseating granuloma within the specimen of the penile lesion is required in order to establish the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. In addition, other causes of granulomatous disease need to be excluded before the diagnosis of sarcoidosis of the penis is established or confirmed.[3] Sarcoidosis is known to mainly affect the lungs, lymphoid system, liver, and skin. [3] While sarcoidosis of the male reproductive system, including: the testis, epididymis, and prostate, had been reported sporadically in the literature, sarcoidosis of the penis is rare, and only a few case reports had been reported in the literature. [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] 

Aim 

To provide an update on sarcoidosis.

Results

[A] Overview

Definition, General statements, Practice Essentials. [12]

  • Sarcoidosis has been defined as a multi-system inflammatory disease of unknown aetiology which predominantly affects the lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes and is manifested by the presence of non-caseating granulomas (NCGs) within afflicted organ tissues of the body. [12] 
  • It has been iterated that Sarcoidosis is characterized by a seemingly exaggerated immune response against a difficult–to-discern antigen. [12] [13]   
  • The age-adjusted incidence of sarcoidosis has been stated to be 11 cases per 100,000 population in whites but 34 cases per 100,000 population in African Americans. [12] [13]

Signs and symptoms

The presenting signs and symptoms in sarcoidosis are stated to vary depending upon the extent and severity of the organ which is involved by sarcoidosis as follows: [13] 

  • Sometimes sarcoidosis may be asymptomatic, and incidentally identified upon chest radiography images in about 5% of cases. [12]
  • It has been stated that in 45% of cases, sarcoidosis may present with systemic complaints including: fever, and anorexia in 45% of cases. [12]
  • It has been documented that sarcoidosis in 50% of cases does manifest with pulmonary complaints including: dyspnoea on exertion, cough, chest pain, and haemoptysis on rare occasions. [12]
  • It has been stated that at times, sarcoidosis may present as neuro-sarcoidosis including: cranial neuropathies, leptomeningeal disease, intraparenchymal lesions, and myelitis, which does occur in between 5% to 10% of cases. [14]
  • It has additionally been stated that in sarcoidosis, Löfgren syndrome which manifests with fever, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, and poly-arthralgias does occur and this sarcoidosis affliction is common in Scandinavian patients, but it is not common in African-American and Japanese patients. [12]

The pulmonary findings on physical examination of patients affected by sarcoidosis had been summarized as follows: [12]

  • Usually there has tended to be normal pulmonary examination of patients afflicted by sarcoidosis. [12]
  • In some cases of sarcoidosis, clinical respiratory tract examination of affected individuals might demonstrate audible crackles. [12] 
  • In some individuals affected by sarcoidosis, their clinical examination may demonstrate exertional oxygen desaturation. [12]

It has been stated that dermatology manifestations of sarcoidosis may include the following: [12]

  • Erythema nodosum. [12]
  • A lower-extremity panniculitis with painful, erythematous nodules that often tend to be seen in association with Löfgren syndrome. [12]
  • Lupus pernio, which is documented to be the most specific associated cutaneous lesion of sarcoidosis. [12]
  • Violaceous rash on the cheeks or nose tend to be common in cases of sarcoidosis. [12]
  • Maculopapular plaques tend to be visualised in some cases of sarcoidosis which has been stated to be an uncommon feature of sarcoidosis. [12]

It has been iterated that ocular involvement, in cases of sarcoidosis which may lead to blindness if untreated, may present as follows: [12]

  • Anterior or posterior granulomatous uveitis, which is most frequently seen. [12]
  • Conjunctival lesions as well as scleral plaques. [12]

Other possible presentations of sarcoidosis do include the ensuing: [12]

  • Osseous involvement. [12]
  • Heart failure from cardiomyopathy may be encountered on rare occasions. [12]
  • Heart block and sudden death of the sarcoidosis affected individual. [12]
  • On rare occasions lymphocytic meningitis of the sarcoidosis afflicted individual. [12]
  • On rare occasions, individuals who are affected by sarcoidosis may manifest with stroke, seizure, intracranial mass, hypopituitarism, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and encephalopathy and all these manifestations are stated to be rare. [12] 

Diagnosis

The radiology-image studies for sarcoidosis had been summarized as follows: [12]

  • Chest radiography: It has been iterated that chest radiograph is central to the evaluation of sarcoidosis. [12]
  • Routine chest computed tomography (CT): It has been iterated that the undertaking of computed tomography of the thorax adds little to radiography findings. [12]
  • High-resolution CT (HRCT) scanning of the chest: It has been iterated that high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan may be helpful, in that it does identify active alveolitis versus fibrosis, and findings correlate with biopsy yield. [12]
  • Gallium scans: It has been pointed out that Gallium scans are undertaken infrequently and that Gallium scan has a-low sensitivity and specificity, but may be helpful when the clinical picture remains confusing despite histology examination evidence of non-caseating granulomas, for example in differentiating chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from sarcoidosis. [12]

Staging of sarcoidosis had been summated as follows: [12]

  • Stage 0: Normal chest radiographic findings
  • Stage I: Bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy
  • Stage II: Bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy and infiltrates
  • Stage III: Infiltrates alone
  • Stage IV: Fibrosis

It has been stated that pulmonary function tests and a carbon monoxide diffusion capacity test of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) are used routinely in evaluation and follow-up of individuals afflicted by sarcoidosis. [12] and that some of the possible findings of the tests do include the following: [12]

  • An isolated decrease in DLCO is the most common abnormality found in cases of sarcoidosis. [12]
  • A restrictive pattern is seen in patients with more advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis disease. [12]
  • About 15% to 20% of sarcoidosis patients are iterated to have obstruction. [12]
  • It has been iterated that cardiopulmonary exercise testing is a sensitive test for the identification and quantification of the extent of pulmonary involvement. [12] 
  • Cardiopulmonary exercise testing also may indicate cardiac involvement that otherwise is not evident. [12] 
  • Impaired heart rate recovery during the first minute ensuing exercise had been demonstrated to be an independent predictor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, [15] and it might identify patients who are at high risk for the development of arrhythmias and sudden death.[16]
  • It had been advised that all patients with sarcoidosis should have an annual electrocardiogram, and that patients who report palpitations should have a thorough evaluation with at least Holter monitoring.[12]
  • Diagnosis of sarcoidosis requires biopsy in most cases. [12]
  • Endobronchial biopsy via bronchoscopy is often undertaken. [12] The yield is stated to be high; and it has been iterated that results of the biopsy may be positive even in patients with normal chest radiographs. [12] The central histopathology examination finding is the presence of non-caseating granulomas with special stains negative for fungus and mycobacteria. [12]

Routine laboratory evaluation is stated to be often unrevealing, but possible abnormalities include the following: [12] 

  • Hypercalcemia (about 10-13% of patients)
  • Hypercalciuria (about a third of patients)
  • Elevated alkaline phosphatase level
  • Elevated angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels.

Management

The management of sarcoidosis has been summarized as follows: [12]

It has been iterated that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are indicated for the treatment of arthralgias and other rheumatic complaints. [12] It has also been stated that patients with stage I sarcoidosis often do require only occasional treatment with NSAIDs. [12]

Treatment in sarcoidosis patients with pulmonary involvement has been summated as follows:

  • Asymptomatic patients may not require treatment at all and would need to be observed. 
  • In sarcoidosis patients with minimal symptoms, serial re-evaluation is important. [12]
  • Treatment is indicated for sarcoidosis patients with significant respiratory symptoms. [12]
  • Corticosteroids can produce small improvements in the functional vital capacity and in the radiographic appearance in sarcoidosis patients with more severe stage II and III disease. [12]

For extrapulmonary sarcoidosis involving such critical organs such as the heart, liver, eyes, kidneys, or central nervous system, corticosteroid therapy is stated to be indicated. [12] It has been iterated that topical corticosteroids are effective for ocular disease. [12] For pulmonary sarcoidosis disease, it has been iterated that prednisone is generally given daily and then tapered over a 6-month course. It has also been stated that high-dose inhaled corticosteroids could be an option, particularly in sarcoidosis patients with endobronchial disease.

Common indications for non-corticosteroid agents in cases of sarcoidosis had been stated to include the ensuing: [12] 

  • Steroid-resistant disease
  • Intolerable adverse effects of steroids
  • Patient desire not to take corticosteroids

Non-corticosteroid agents that tend to be used in sarcoidosis include the ensuing: [12]

  • Methotrexate (MTX) had been a successful alternative to prednisone. [12]
  • Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine had been used for cutaneous lesions, hypercalcemia, neurologic sarcoidosis, and bone lesions. [12]
  • Chloroquine had been found to be effective for acute and maintenance treatment of chronic pulmonary sarcoidosis. [17] [18]
  • Cyclophosphamide had been rarely used with modest success as a steroid-sparing treatment in patients with refractory sarcoidosis. [19] [20]
  • It has been iterated that Azathioprine is best used as a steroid-sparing agent. [12] [21]
  • It has been iterated that Chlorambucil might be beneficial in patients with progressive disease unresponsive to corticosteroids or when corticosteroids are contraindicated. [12] [22] 
  • It had been stated that cyclosporine might be of limited benefit in skin sarcoidosis or in progressive sarcoid resistant to conventional therapy. [12] [23]
  • It has been documented that Infliximab, [24] [25] and thalidomide, [26] [27] had been utilised for the treatment of refractory sarcoidosis, particularly for cutaneous disease, as well as for the long-term management of extrapulmonary sarcoidosis. [28]
  • It had furthermore, ben stated that Infliximab appeared to be an effective treatment for patients with systemic manifestations such as lupus pernio, uveitis, hepatic sarcoidosis, and neuro-sarcoidosis. [12]

It had also been iterated that for sarcoidosis patients with advanced pulmonary fibrosis from sarcoidosis, lung transplantation remains the only hope for long-term survival and that indications for transplantation include either or both of the following. [29]:

  • Forced vital capacity below 50% predicted [12]
  • Forced expiratory volume in 1 second below 40% predicted. [12]

[B] Miscellaneous Narrations and Discussions from Some Case Reports, Case Series, And Studies Related to Sarcoidosis of The Penis.

Al-Riyami et al. [11] reported a 63-year-old African man, who presented to the University Health Centre of Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman with a six-month history of painless swelling of his penis. He denied having any history of genital trauma, urethral discharge, or any other urinary tract symptom. He did not have any other skin lesions. He was married and he did not have any extra-marital relationships. His clinical examination showed a 1 cm × 2 cm firm and non-tender nodule within the ventral part of his penis. He was referred to the urology clinic where he had an excisional biopsy of the swelling. Histopathology examination of the lesion revealed epithelioid histiocytes palisading around a nuclear dermis with mucin deposition, which was indicative of granuloma annulare (see figure 1)

                                                                                                                                        Figure 1

Histological section of the penile lesion showing granuloma annulare. Localized necrotic collagen surrounded by lymphocytes. Magnification = 10 ×. Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License. 

One year subsequently, he re-presented with similar painless skin nodules, but over his right upper limb. These skin nodules had subsequently spread to involve his thorax and trunk. He did not have any respiratory symptoms, fever, or joint pain. His family history was unremarkable, particularly for any similar manifestations or malignancies. Upon examination, he was noted to be well-built, and he looked comfortable. He did not have any palpable 

cervical or axillary lymph nodes. He was found to have multiple 1 cm × 2 cm, firm and non-tender subcutaneous nodules over his right arm, chest, and trunk. His chest was clear, and his cardiovascular examination was normal. The results of his laboratory tests, which included complete blood count, fasting blood glucose, and liver function tests, were all normal. His renal function tests demonstrated features indicative of an acute kidney injury with high creatinine level and low glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The levels of his potassium and bicarbonate were within the normal range. A summary of the results of his laboratory tests is illustrated in table 1.

TestsResultsNormal range
Hemoglobin13.112.1–16.3 g/dL
WBC84.0–11.1 × 109/L
Platelet count316150–400 × 109/L
BUN8.82.8–8.1 mmol/L
Creatinine20559–104 umol/L
GFR281.73 mL/min/m2
K4.83.5–5.1 mmol/L
Bicarbonate2522–29 mmol/L
ESR370–22 mm/hr
ALT230–41 U/L
AST870–40 U/L
Calcium3.352.15–2.55 mmol/L
PTH0.41.6–9.3 pmol/L
Albumin4535–52 g/L
CRP<1>0–5 mg/L
ACE24312–68 ACEU

                                                           Table 1: Summary of laboratory test results in a 68-year-old male with a history of penile swelling.

WBC: white blood count; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; K: potassium; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; PTH: parathyroid hormone; CRP: C-reactive protein; ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme. Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License. His chest radiography demonstrated a superior mediastinal mass with a bilateral hilar enlargement (see figure 2). He had computed tomography of his thorax, which demonstrated multiple enlarged mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes with no parenchymal infiltrations (see figure 3). He underwent a repeated excisional biopsy of one of the nodules upon his right arm which upon histopathology examination was noted to show non-caseating discrete granulomata with minimal lymphocytic cuff without vasculitis or panniculitis (see figure 4). Based upon the clinical features of the lesions and the results of the investigations, a diagnosis of sarcoidosis was made

Figure 2: Chest X-ray showing superior mediastinal mass (red arrow). Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License. 

Figure 3: Axial computed tomography scan showing lymphadenopathy at the mediastinal area (red arrows) with clear lung parenchyma. Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

                                                                                                                                     Figure 4

Histological section of right arm nodule showing a collection of epithelioid histiocytes surrounded by a thin cuff of lymphocytes, which composes non-caseating discrete granulomata. Magnification = 20 ×. Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License.  Given the patient’s acute kidney injury and hypercalcemia, he was admitted to the hospital for hydration and treatment with calcitonin, following which he improved, and 

his renal function test results became better. He was commenced on prednisolone 35 mg/day (0.4 mg/kg) and this was tapered down later once his clinical and biochemical parameters had improved. During his follow-up assessment after four weeks, he was asymptomatic. His serum calcium level and renal function tests had normalized. He had a repeat chest radiograph, which was undertaken three months subsequently, which demonstrated regression in the size of the mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy (see figure 5). The dose of his steroids was reduced gradually until a maintenance dose of 10 mg daily was reached. He had been seen regularly at the outpatient clinic and had remained in good condition since his discharge from hospital.

Figure 5: Chest X-ray showing regression of the superior mediastinal mass after treatment with steroid. Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

Al-Riyami et al. [11] made the ensuing educative discussions and iterations: 

  • Sarcoidosis is stated to be a systemic disease of unknown aetiology affecting multiple organs of the body and which is characterized by the presence of non-caseating granulomas. [1]
  • Even though about 80% of cases of sarcoidosis affect people between the ages of 20 years and 50 years, a second peak of sarcoidosis may occur in those between 50 years and 65 years of age. [1] [30]
  • Even though sarcoidosis may affect anyone, it is more commonly found in specific ethnic populations such as Swedes, Danes, and African-Caribbeans.[1] 
  • Dry cough, dyspnoea, and chest pain are stated to be the common clinical manifestations of sarcoidosis and they occur in almost 50% of cases. [1] 
  • Constitutional symptoms such as pyrexia, weight loss, and fatigue are stated to occur in one-third of patients.[1] 
  • Lungs, lymphoid system, liver, and skin are often involved in cases of sarcoidosis. 
  • The penis is stated to be rarely affected by sarcoidosis. 
  • Diagnosis is stated to be usually made based upon the clinical manifestation and radiology-image findings. Nevertheless, the presence of non-caseating granuloma is typical and needed to confirm the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. [3] 
  • Other differential diagnoses such as tuberculosis, infections, and malignancies need to be excluded before confirming the diagnosis to be due to sarcoidosis.
  • It is very uncommon for patients with sarcoidosis to manifest initially with a penile lesion only. 
  • A total of five similar case reports had been published prior to the publication of their case. 
  • The manifestation of the first was similar to their reported case in which a patient had manifested with a six-month history of a penile mass and he was subsequently diagnosed with sarcoidosis based upon the histopathology examination findings of specimens of the lesions. [6] 
  • The second case was a reported case of a 29-year-old man, who developed a penile lesion five years after being diagnosed with sarcoidosis. [7] 
  • The third and fourth case reports were similar as they had both reported patients who had ulcerated penile lesions and they responded well initially to steroids, but the penile lesions recurred subsequently. Both patients underwent partial penile amputation and one of them required ablation by radiotherapy due to recurrence of the lesion at the scar site. [8] [9] 
  • The fifth case report involved a 53-year-old man, who presented initially with tender and erythematous swelling together with multiple yellowish subcutaneous nodules upon the dorsal aspect of his glans penis and he was diagnosed subsequently with sarcoidosis. [10] 
  • The first histopathology report of their reported patient demonstrated features of granuloma annulare. This is stated to be a self-limiting and benign inflammatory skin lesion of unknown aetiology. [31]
  • Even though it is rare, penile granuloma annulare should have raised the clinician’s suspicion of chronic granulomatous disease given the suggestive clinical presentation of the patient. [32]
  • Their patient subsequently developed widespread skin lesions over his chest and trunk. This is stated to be a much more common manifestation of the disease and had been reported to occur in 25% to 35% of patients. [33] 
  • Acute kidney injury had been reported as a rare and serious presentation of the sarcoidosis disease. [34] The most common underlying pathology was iterated to be tubulointerstitial nephropathy. [34] Hypercalcemia is stated to occur in 2% to 10% of patients with sarcoidosis and is stated to be due to dysregulation of calcium metabolism. [3] 
  • The inflammatory process in sarcoidosis has been iterated to enhance the conversion of the inactive 25-hydroxyvitamin D to the active 1,25 dihydroxy-vitamin D, which does lead to increased absorption of calcium and hence the occurrence of hypercalcemia and/or hypercalciuria. [33] It has been iterated that although serum angiotensin-converting enzyme is raised in 75% of patients with sarcoidosis, it has low specificity. [35] It has been stated that while utilisation of systemic corticosteroids in sarcoidosis has remained controversial, certain features may necessitate its use. Hypercalcemia, cardiac, and neurological involvement are considered clear indications for treatment with steroids. [1] 
  • With regard to the prognosis of sarcoidosis, it has been iterated that nearly two-thirds of patients with sarcoidosis would experience spontaneous remission while 10% to 30% might progress to develop a chronic and progressive stage of the disease. [1] 

Al-Riyami et al. [11] made the ensuing conclusions:

  • Because of the multi-system involvement of sarcoidosis, it could manifest in many different ways. 
  • Clinicians need to consider sarcoidosis as one of the possible differential diagnoses, whenever they encounter a patient with a suspicious penile lesion. 
  • Sarcoidosis should be considered a possibility even if histopathology examination of the specimen demonstrates only granuloma annulare in the presence of suggestive clinical features. 
  • Steroids, when indicated, are the mainstay of treatment for this clinical condition.

Herodotou et al. [36] reported the case of a man, who manifested with several months’ history of distal penile swelling and progressive inability to retract the foreskin. Firm, non-tender subcutaneous nodules were palpated near the base of his penis during his examination. He ultimately underwent penile skin resection, partial scrotal resection, and split thickness skin graft to the penis after failure of multiple conservative treatments. Pathology examination of the specimen showed non-caseating granulomatous lesions which in addition to his computed tomography (CT) scan of thorax findings of bilateral hilar adenopathy suggested a diagnosis of sarcoidosis of the penis. 

Semiz and Kobak. [36] stated the following:

  • Sarcoidosis may present with bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, skin lesions, eye, and musculoskeletal system involvement. 
  • Rare involvement of the genital organs including the prostate gland, the testis, and the epididymis had also been reported. 
  • Nevertheless, sarcoidosis involvement of the penis is observed quite rare. 

Semiz and Kobak. [36] reported a patient with penile mass who was diagnosed with sarcoidosis on the basis of the laboratory, radiological, and pathological investigations. Semiz and Kobak. [36] made the ensuing conclusions: 

  • The diagnosis of sarcoidosis of the penis was made as a result of the biopsy and the other investigations. 
  • In patients with penile and genital lesions, sarcoidosis should be kept in mind, and biopsy should be considered to establish the true diagnosis.

Rubinstein et al. [37] reported a case of sarcoidosis which was identified histologically as the cause of chronic painful erythematous induration of the penis with several subcutaneous nodules and cutaneous ulceration in a 37-year-old African-American man, who presented with a 3-month history of an extensive, pruritic, eczematous eruption upon his scrotum with associated oedema and tenderness. Clusters of dark papules and plaques had developed upon his face over the preceding one month. He also reported having recent fevers, intermittent nausea and vomiting, difficulty in voiding, and occasional wheezing but he did not have any shortness of breath. Pathology examination of biopsy specimens of his lesions demonstrated features indicative of sarcoidosis. The lesions improved in response to topically applied corticosteroids but they reappeared later and persisted despite treatment. Rubinstein et al. [37] suggested that sarcoidosis, even though rare, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any chronic lesion involving the penis in adults.

Algoet et al. [38] stated that sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown origin affecting patients who are aged between 25 years and 40 years, and it has a higher incidence in women and in patients of African descent. Algoet et al. [39] reported the first case of sarcoidosis of the glans penis and penis, without systemic manifestations, in a patient of North African descent. Local treatment was commenced for the treatment of the sarcoidosis. Algoet et al. [38] advised that regular monitoring should be undertaken to assess for the possibility of systematization.

Wei et al. [39] reported a 31-year-old African-American man, who presented with cutaneous lesions upon his penis and scrotum over the preceding 2 years. The genital lesions were so prominent as to interfere with his coital life. Sarcoidosis was demonstrated upon pathology examination of biopsy specimens of his lesions on the penis and scrotum. Wei et al. [39] made the ensuing conclusions: 

  • Sarcoidosis lesions may affect any skin area, but are rarely reported arising on the genitalia. 
  • Dermatologists need to be aware that genital sarcoidosis is a rare entity which should be included in the differential diagnosis of genital papules and nodules. 
  • Furthermore, genital sarcoidosis may cause urinary problems and may represent a therapeutic challenge.

Conclusions

  • In view of the multi-system involvement of sarcoidosis, it can manifest in many different ways and in many organs of the body. 
  • Clinicians need to regard sarcoidosis as one of the possible differential diagnoses whenever they encounter a patient who has a suspicious lesion of his penis. 
  • Clinicians including pathologists should consider sarcoidosis as a possible diagnosis even if histopathology examination of the specimen of the penile lesion and lesions elsewhere demonstrates features of only granuloma annulare in the presence of suggestive clinical features. 
  • Steroids, when indicated, have most often been the mainstay of treatment for this clinical condition.

Conflict of Interest – none

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements to:

  • Oman Medical Journal (OMJ): For granting permission for reproduction of figures and contents of their journal article under the Creative Commons Attribution License under copyright iteration: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 License. 

References

  1. Newman LS, Rose CS, Maier LA. Sarcoidosis. N Engl J Med. (1997). Apr 24;336(17):1224-1234.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  2. Nunes H, Bouvry D, Soler P, Valeyre D. (2007). Sarcoidosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. Nov 19; 2:46.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  3. Statement on sarcoidosis. (1999). Joint Statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders (WASOG) adopted by the ATS Board of Directors and by the ERS Executive Committee, February 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Aug;160(2):736-755.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  4. Ryan DM, Lesser BA, Crumley LA, Cartwright HA, Peron S, et all., (1993). Epididymal sarcoidosis. J Urol. Jan;149(1):134-136.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  5. Primary sarcoidosis of the scrotum: case report. (1961). J Urol. Aug; 86:269-272.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  6. Semiz H, Kobak S. (2017). Sarcoidosis presenting as penile mass. Lung India. May-Jun;34(3):275-277.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  7. Vitenson JH, Wilson JM. (1972). Sarcoid of the glans penis. J Urol. Aug;108(2):284-289.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  8. Vitenson JH, Wilson JM. (1972). Sarcoid of the glans penis. J Urol. Aug;108(2):284-289.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  9. Whittaker M, Anderson CK, Clark PB. (1975). Sarcoidosis of the penis treated by radiotherapy. Br J Urol. Jun;47(3):325-330.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  10. Mahmood N, Afzal N, Joyce A. (1997). Sarcoidosis of the penis. Br J Urol. Jul;80(1):155.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  11. Rubinstein I, Baum GL, Hiss Y. (1986). Sarcoidosis of the penis: report of a case. J Urol. May;135(5):1016-1017.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  12. Al-Riyami HA, Al-Kiyumi MH, Al-Harthi RR, Al-Mahrezi AM. (2020). Sarcoidosis Presenting as a Penile Lesion: A Case Report. Oman Med J. Feb 18;35(1): e94.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  13. Kamangar N, Mosenifar Z, MD, FACP,  (2024). Sarcoidosis. Medscape. Updated July 21.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  14. Ten Berge B, Kleinjan A, Muskens F, Hammad H, Hoogsteden H C, et all., (2012). Van Den Blink B. Evidence for local dendritic cell activation in pulmonary sarcoidosis. Respir Res. Apr 18. 13:33.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  15. Shen J, Lackey E, Shah S. Neurosarcoidosis: Diagnostic Challenges and Mimics. A Review. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2023 Jul;23(7):399-410.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  16. Arai Y, Saul JP, Albrecht P, Hartley LH, Lilly LS, et all., (1989). Modulation of cardiac autonomic activity during and immediately after exercise. Am J Physiol. Jan. 256(1 Pt 2):H132-141.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  17. Shetler K, Marcus R, Froelicher V F, Vora S, Kalisetti D, Prakash M. (2001). Heart rate recovery: validation and methodologic issues. J Am Coll Cardiol. Dec. 38(7):1980-1987.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  18. Baltzan M, Mehta S, Kirkham TH, Cosio MG. (1999). Randomized trial of prolonged chloroquine therapy in advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Jul. 160(1):192-197.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  19. Zic JA, Horowitz DH, Arzubiaga C, King LE Jr. (1991). Treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis with chloroquine. Review of the literature. Arch Dermatol. Jul. 127(7):1034-1040.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  20. Demeter SL. (1988). Myocardial sarcoidosis unresponsive to steroids. Treatment with cyclophosphamide. Chest. Jul. 94(1):202-203
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  21. Doty JD, Mazur JE, Judson MA. (2003). Treatment of corticosteroid-resistant neurosarcoidosis with a short-course cyclophosphamide regimen. Chest. Nov. 124(5):2023-2026. 
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  22. Muller-Quernheim J, Kienast K, Held M, Pfeifer S, Costabel U. Treatment of chronic sarcoidosis with an azathioprine/prednisolone regimen. Eur Respir J. 1999 Nov. 14(5):1117-1122. 
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  23. Kataria YP. Chlorambucil in sarcoidosis. Chest. 1980 Jul. 78(1):36-43.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  24. York EL, Kovithavongs T, Man SF, Rebuck AS, Sproule BJ. (1990)., Cyclosporine and chronic sarcoidosis. Chest. Oct. 98(4):1026-1029.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  25. Doty JD, Mazur JE, Judson MA. (2005). Treatment of sarcoidosis with infliximab. Chest. Mar. 127(3):1064-1071. 
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  26. Yee AM, Pochapin MB. (2001). Treatment of complicated sarcoidosis with infliximab anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy. Ann Intern Med. Jul 3. 135(1):27-31.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  27. Baughman RP, Judson MA, Teirstein AS, Moller DR, Lower EE. (2002). Thalidomide for chronic sarcoidosis. Chest. Jul. 122(1):227-232.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  28. Fazzi P, Manni E, Cristofani R, Cei G, Piazza S, et all., (2012). Thalidomide for improving cutaneous and pulmonary sarcoidosis in patients resistant or with contraindications to corticosteroids. Biomed Pharmacother. Jun. 66(4):300-307. 
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  29. Russell E, Luk F, Manocha S, Ho T, O'Connor C, et all., (2013). Long term follow-up of infliximab efficacy in pulmonary and extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis refractory to conventional therapy. Semin Arthritis Rheum. Jan 16.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  30. Nathan SD. (2005). Lung transplantation: disease-specific considerations for referral. Chest. Mar. 127(3):1006-1016.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  31. Baughman RP, Teirstein AS, Judson MA, Rossman MD, Yeager H Jr, et all., (2001). Case Control Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis (ACCESS) research group. Clinical characteristics of patients in a case control study of sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Nov 15;164(10 Pt 1):1885-1889.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  32. Barron DF, Cootauco MH, Cohen BA. (1997). Granuloma annulare. A clinical review. Lippincotts Prim Care Pract. Mar-Apr;1(1):33-39.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  33. Chopra A, Mitra D, Sharma L, Agarwal R. (2018). Granuloma Annulare Skin Lesions in a Case of Sarcoidosis. Indian Dermatol Online J. Mar-Apr;9(2):117-119.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  34. Iannuzzi MC, Rybicki BA, Teirstein AS. (2007). Sarcoidosis. N Engl J Med. Nov 22;357(21):2153-2165.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  35. Mahfoudhi M, Mamlouk H, Turki S, Kheder A. (2015). Systemic sarcoidosis complicated of acute renal failure: about 12 cases. Pan Afr Med J. Sep 30; 22: 75.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  36. Soto-Gomez N, Peters JI, Nambiar AM. (2016). Diagnosis and Management of Sarcoidosis. Am Fam Physician. May 15;93(10):840-848.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  37. Herodotou CA, Burns RT, Whaley R, Idrees M, Mellon MJ. (2022). Sarcoidosis: A rare cause of penile edema. Urol Case Rep. Jul 19; 44:102167.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  38. Rubinstein I, Baum GL, Hiss Y. (2024). Sarcoidosis of the Penis: Report of a Case. Journal of Urology [Internet]. 1986 May 1 [cited Oct 14];135(5):1016–1017.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  39. Algoet C, Vanhooteghem O, Theunis A, Henrijean A. Nodules of the Glans Penis and Penis as the Only Manifestation of Non-systemic Sarcoidosis; an Exceptional Location. Dermatology Case Reports. 202; 8(5): 1 - 2.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  40. Wei H, Friedman KA, Rudikoff D. (2000). Multiple Indurated Papules on Penis and Scrotum. Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery.;4(4):202-204.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.

img

Gomez Barriga Maria Dolores

The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.

img

Lin Shaw Chin

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.

img

Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.

img

Dr Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.

img

Dr Maria Regina Penchyna Nieto

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.

img

Dr Marcelo Flavio Gomes Jardim Filho

Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”

img

Zsuzsanna Bene

Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner

img

Dr Susan Weiner

My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.

img

Lin-Show Chin

My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.

img

Sonila Qirko

My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.

img

Luiz Sellmann

I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.

img

Zhao Jia

Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."

img

Thomas Urban

I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.

img

Cristina Berriozabal

To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.

img

Dr Tewodros Kassahun Tarekegn

"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".

img

Dr Shweta Tiwari

I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.

img

Dr Farooq Wandroo

Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.

img

Dr Anyuta Ivanova

We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.

img

Dr David Vinyes

My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.

img

Gertraud Teuchert-Noodt

To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina

img

Dr Elvira Farina

Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.

img

Dr Oleg Golyanovski