AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/248
Retired Urologist and Clinician, Reviewer of Articles for Journals, Medical Examiner Member of Royal College of Pathologists, London. United Kingdom.
*Corresponding Author: Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, Retired Urologist and Clinician, Reviewer of Articles for Journals, Medical Examiner Member of Royal College of Pathologists, London. United Kingdom.
Citation: Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo (2025), Sarcoidosis of the Penis, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice, 8(2); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/248
Copyright: © 2025, Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 04 December 2024 | Accepted: 20 January 2025 | Published: 30 January 2025
Keywords: sarcoidosis of penis; rare; biopsy; histopathology
Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown etiology whnich affects multiple organs of the body and which is characterized by the presence of non-caseating granulomas. It is very rare for patients who are afflicted by sarcoidosis of the penis to initially manifest with a lesion of the penis only. Sarcoidosis of the penis manifests with non-specific symptoms that simulate the manifestation more common afflictions of the penis and hence without the clinician having a high-index of suspicion for sarcoidosis of the penis, the diagnosis could be either missed easily or there would be a delay in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis of the penis. Diagnosis of sarcoidosis of the penis is made based upon pathology examination of biopsy specimens or excised specimens of the penile lesion.
Sarcoidosis is a terminology which is used for a systemic disease of unknown aetiology which affects multiple organs and is characterized by the presence of non-caseating granulomas. [1] Even though the aetiology of sarcoidosis is not known, the evidence has been iterated to point to an exaggerated immune response to an unidentified antigen as the most likely cause. [2] Confirmatory evidence of the presence of non-caseating granuloma within the specimen of the penile lesion is required in order to establish the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. In addition, other causes of granulomatous disease need to be excluded before the diagnosis of sarcoidosis of the penis is established or confirmed.[3] Sarcoidosis is known to mainly affect the lungs, lymphoid system, liver, and skin. [3] While sarcoidosis of the male reproductive system, including: the testis, epididymis, and prostate, had been reported sporadically in the literature, sarcoidosis of the penis is rare, and only a few case reports had been reported in the literature. [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
Aim
To provide an update on sarcoidosis.
[A] Overview
Definition, General statements, Practice Essentials. [12]
Signs and symptoms
The presenting signs and symptoms in sarcoidosis are stated to vary depending upon the extent and severity of the organ which is involved by sarcoidosis as follows: [13]
The pulmonary findings on physical examination of patients affected by sarcoidosis had been summarized as follows: [12]
It has been stated that dermatology manifestations of sarcoidosis may include the following: [12]
It has been iterated that ocular involvement, in cases of sarcoidosis which may lead to blindness if untreated, may present as follows: [12]
Other possible presentations of sarcoidosis do include the ensuing: [12]
Diagnosis
The radiology-image studies for sarcoidosis had been summarized as follows: [12]
Staging of sarcoidosis had been summated as follows: [12]
It has been stated that pulmonary function tests and a carbon monoxide diffusion capacity test of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) are used routinely in evaluation and follow-up of individuals afflicted by sarcoidosis. [12] and that some of the possible findings of the tests do include the following: [12]
Routine laboratory evaluation is stated to be often unrevealing, but possible abnormalities include the following: [12]
Management
The management of sarcoidosis has been summarized as follows: [12]
It has been iterated that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are indicated for the treatment of arthralgias and other rheumatic complaints. [12] It has also been stated that patients with stage I sarcoidosis often do require only occasional treatment with NSAIDs. [12]
Treatment in sarcoidosis patients with pulmonary involvement has been summated as follows:
For extrapulmonary sarcoidosis involving such critical organs such as the heart, liver, eyes, kidneys, or central nervous system, corticosteroid therapy is stated to be indicated. [12] It has been iterated that topical corticosteroids are effective for ocular disease. [12] For pulmonary sarcoidosis disease, it has been iterated that prednisone is generally given daily and then tapered over a 6-month course. It has also been stated that high-dose inhaled corticosteroids could be an option, particularly in sarcoidosis patients with endobronchial disease.
Common indications for non-corticosteroid agents in cases of sarcoidosis had been stated to include the ensuing: [12]
Non-corticosteroid agents that tend to be used in sarcoidosis include the ensuing: [12]
It had also been iterated that for sarcoidosis patients with advanced pulmonary fibrosis from sarcoidosis, lung transplantation remains the only hope for long-term survival and that indications for transplantation include either or both of the following. [29]:
[B] Miscellaneous Narrations and Discussions from Some Case Reports, Case Series, And Studies Related to Sarcoidosis of The Penis.
Al-Riyami et al. [11] reported a 63-year-old African man, who presented to the University Health Centre of Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman with a six-month history of painless swelling of his penis. He denied having any history of genital trauma, urethral discharge, or any other urinary tract symptom. He did not have any other skin lesions. He was married and he did not have any extra-marital relationships. His clinical examination showed a 1 cm × 2 cm firm and non-tender nodule within the ventral part of his penis. He was referred to the urology clinic where he had an excisional biopsy of the swelling. Histopathology examination of the lesion revealed epithelioid histiocytes palisading around a nuclear dermis with mucin deposition, which was indicative of granuloma annulare (see figure 1)
Figure 1
Histological section of the penile lesion showing granuloma annulare. Localized necrotic collagen surrounded by lymphocytes. Magnification = 10 ×. Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
One year subsequently, he re-presented with similar painless skin nodules, but over his right upper limb. These skin nodules had subsequently spread to involve his thorax and trunk. He did not have any respiratory symptoms, fever, or joint pain. His family history was unremarkable, particularly for any similar manifestations or malignancies. Upon examination, he was noted to be well-built, and he looked comfortable. He did not have any palpable
cervical or axillary lymph nodes. He was found to have multiple 1 cm × 2 cm, firm and non-tender subcutaneous nodules over his right arm, chest, and trunk. His chest was clear, and his cardiovascular examination was normal. The results of his laboratory tests, which included complete blood count, fasting blood glucose, and liver function tests, were all normal. His renal function tests demonstrated features indicative of an acute kidney injury with high creatinine level and low glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The levels of his potassium and bicarbonate were within the normal range. A summary of the results of his laboratory tests is illustrated in table 1.
Tests | Results | Normal range |
---|---|---|
Hemoglobin | 13.1 | 12.1–16.3 g/dL |
WBC | 8 | 4.0–11.1 × 109/L |
Platelet count | 316 | 150–400 × 109/L |
BUN | 8.8 | 2.8–8.1 mmol/L |
Creatinine | 205 | 59–104 umol/L |
GFR | 28 | 1.73 mL/min/m2 |
K | 4.8 | 3.5–5.1 mmol/L |
Bicarbonate | 25 | 22–29 mmol/L |
ESR | 37 | 0–22 mm/hr |
ALT | 23 | 0–41 U/L |
AST | 87 | 0–40 U/L |
Calcium | 3.35 | 2.15–2.55 mmol/L |
PTH | 0.4 | 1.6–9.3 pmol/L |
Albumin | 45 | 35–52 g/L |
CRP | <1> | 0–5 mg/L |
ACE | 243 | 12–68 ACEU |
Table 1: Summary of laboratory test results in a 68-year-old male with a history of penile swelling.
WBC: white blood count; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; K: potassium; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; PTH: parathyroid hormone; CRP: C-reactive protein; ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme. Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License. His chest radiography demonstrated a superior mediastinal mass with a bilateral hilar enlargement (see figure 2). He had computed tomography of his thorax, which demonstrated multiple enlarged mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes with no parenchymal infiltrations (see figure 3). He underwent a repeated excisional biopsy of one of the nodules upon his right arm which upon histopathology examination was noted to show non-caseating discrete granulomata with minimal lymphocytic cuff without vasculitis or panniculitis (see figure 4). Based upon the clinical features of the lesions and the results of the investigations, a diagnosis of sarcoidosis was made
Figure 2: Chest X-ray showing superior mediastinal mass (red arrow). Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Figure 3: Axial computed tomography scan showing lymphadenopathy at the mediastinal area (red arrows) with clear lung parenchyma. Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Figure 4
Histological section of right arm nodule showing a collection of epithelioid histiocytes surrounded by a thin cuff of lymphocytes, which composes non-caseating discrete granulomata. Magnification = 20 ×. Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Given the patient’s acute kidney injury and hypercalcemia, he was admitted to the hospital for hydration and treatment with calcitonin, following which he improved, and
his renal function test results became better. He was commenced on prednisolone 35 mg/day (0.4 mg/kg) and this was tapered down later once his clinical and biochemical parameters had improved. During his follow-up assessment after four weeks, he was asymptomatic. His serum calcium level and renal function tests had normalized. He had a repeat chest radiograph, which was undertaken three months subsequently, which demonstrated regression in the size of the mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy (see figure 5). The dose of his steroids was reduced gradually until a maintenance dose of 10 mg daily was reached. He had been seen regularly at the outpatient clinic and had remained in good condition since his discharge from hospital.
Figure 5: Chest X-ray showing regression of the superior mediastinal mass after treatment with steroid. Reproduced from: [11] under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Al-Riyami et al. [11] made the ensuing educative discussions and iterations:
Al-Riyami et al. [11] made the ensuing conclusions:
Herodotou et al. [36] reported the case of a man, who manifested with several months’ history of distal penile swelling and progressive inability to retract the foreskin. Firm, non-tender subcutaneous nodules were palpated near the base of his penis during his examination. He ultimately underwent penile skin resection, partial scrotal resection, and split thickness skin graft to the penis after failure of multiple conservative treatments. Pathology examination of the specimen showed non-caseating granulomatous lesions which in addition to his computed tomography (CT) scan of thorax findings of bilateral hilar adenopathy suggested a diagnosis of sarcoidosis of the penis.
Semiz and Kobak. [36] stated the following:
Semiz and Kobak. [36] reported a patient with penile mass who was diagnosed with sarcoidosis on the basis of the laboratory, radiological, and pathological investigations. Semiz and Kobak. [36] made the ensuing conclusions:
Rubinstein et al. [37] reported a case of sarcoidosis which was identified histologically as the cause of chronic painful erythematous induration of the penis with several subcutaneous nodules and cutaneous ulceration in a 37-year-old African-American man, who presented with a 3-month history of an extensive, pruritic, eczematous eruption upon his scrotum with associated oedema and tenderness. Clusters of dark papules and plaques had developed upon his face over the preceding one month. He also reported having recent fevers, intermittent nausea and vomiting, difficulty in voiding, and occasional wheezing but he did not have any shortness of breath. Pathology examination of biopsy specimens of his lesions demonstrated features indicative of sarcoidosis. The lesions improved in response to topically applied corticosteroids but they reappeared later and persisted despite treatment. Rubinstein et al. [37] suggested that sarcoidosis, even though rare, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any chronic lesion involving the penis in adults.
Algoet et al. [38] stated that sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown origin affecting patients who are aged between 25 years and 40 years, and it has a higher incidence in women and in patients of African descent. Algoet et al. [39] reported the first case of sarcoidosis of the glans penis and penis, without systemic manifestations, in a patient of North African descent. Local treatment was commenced for the treatment of the sarcoidosis. Algoet et al. [38] advised that regular monitoring should be undertaken to assess for the possibility of systematization.
Wei et al. [39] reported a 31-year-old African-American man, who presented with cutaneous lesions upon his penis and scrotum over the preceding 2 years. The genital lesions were so prominent as to interfere with his coital life. Sarcoidosis was demonstrated upon pathology examination of biopsy specimens of his lesions on the penis and scrotum. Wei et al. [39] made the ensuing conclusions:
Conflict of Interest – none
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements to:
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina