AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/245
Grodno State Medical University, Gorkogo St, Grodno, Republic of Belarus.
*Corresponding Author: Bon L.I, Grodno State Medical University, Gorkogo St, Grodno, Republic of Belarus.
Citation: Bon L.I, Maksimovich N.Ye, Flurik S.V, Sitsko A, (2025), Retrosplenial Cortex - Morphofunctional Characteristics, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice, 8(1); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/245
Copyright: © 2024, Bon L.I. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 26 November 2024 | Accepted: 13 January 2025 | Published: 20 January 2025
Keywords: retrosplenial cortex; morphofunctional characteristics; brain
Retrosplenial cortex (RSC) is a region of the brain located in the posterior part of the medial cortex. It plays an important role in processes related to spatial navigation, memory, and the processing of contextual information. The main functions of the RSC are: Spatial navigation: The retrosplenial cortex helps to form and maintain internal maps of the surrounding environment. It integrates information from various sensory modalities and is important for spatial orientation.
Memory and context: This region is involved in contextual memory, helping to store and retrieve information based on the surrounding context. This is especially important for associative learning, where context influences recall.
Connectivity with other brain regions: The retrosplenial cortex interacts with the hippocampus, parahippocampal cortex, and other structures, making it part of a larger network responsible for cognitive functions.
Retrosplenial cortex (RSC) is a region of the brain located in the posterior part of the medial cortex. It plays an important role in processes related to spatial navigation, memory, and the processing of contextual information. [5]
The main functions of the RSC are:
Spatial navigation: The retrosplenial cortex helps to form and maintain internal maps of the surrounding environment. It integrates information from various sensory modalities and is important for spatial orientation.
Memory and context: This region is involved in contextual memory, helping to store and retrieve information based on the surrounding context. This is especially important for associative learning, where context influences recall.
Connectivity with other brain regions: The retrosplenial cortex interacts with the hippocampus, parahippocampal cortex, and other structures, making it part of a larger network responsible for cognitive functions.
Studies show that damage to the retrosplenial cortex can lead to memory impairments and difficulties with spatial orientation, highlighting its importance for cognitive processes.[5]
Studies show that damage to the retrosplenial cortex can lead to memory impairments and difficulties with spatial orientation, highlighting its importance for cognitive processes.
Since the late 19th century, when Brodmann first anatomically identified the retrosplenial cortex, substantial experimental evidence has accumulated to support its function. While the exact role of the RSC has not yet been fully defined, research findings from both human and animal studies clearly point to its important role in spatial cognition.
The RSC is a cortical area that Brodmann designated as separate areas 29 and 30, which in humans form a complex with areas 23 and 31 of the posterior cingulate gyrus. Evidence that the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) may act as an interface between memory retrieval and visuospatial processes has also been described. After damage to the retrosplenial cortex, topographical disorientations and navigation deficits were observed, indicating a strong right hemisphere lateralization of the RSC. Patients with small focal hemorrhages localized in the right retrosplenial area exhibit deficits in orientation and experience significant difficulties with spatial navigation. [6]
The retrosplenial cortex is often the subject of research in a number of experiments studying the physiological features of the brain. The development of electrophysiological recordings in animal models has allowed for a deeper investigation of the involvement of the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in the neural network underlying spatial navigation. The hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and retrosplenial cortex are key brain structures involved in the creation of an internal map of the environment. In the brain, location, distance, and direction are represented by place cells, grid cells, and head direction cells, respectively.[7]
Electrophysiological recordings from the RSC in rodents have identified neurons that code for an allocentric representation of location. This small population, about 10% of the cells, is known as head direction (HD) cells. They become active when animals maintain a specific direction in their environment, regardless of their position, and become inactive when the head is oriented in other directions. Allocentric representation of location is a way of encoding spatial information about the relative positioning of objects in relation to each other, rather than to oneself (i.e., egocentrically). In this representation, the coordinates of objects in the surrounding environment are taken into account, which allows understanding where one object is located in relation to another. Studies using lesions, as well as electrophysiological recordings in rodent models, have provided a diverse but sometimes contradictory and inconsistent picture of the role of the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in memory formation. A major drawback of the lesion approach was its high invasiveness. Irreversible damage to entire structures led to undesirable effects, and the need for recovery after damage could trigger compensatory mechanisms. Pharmacological inactivation only partially addressed this issue, as the nonspecific nature of these interventions, targeting the entire structure, remained problematic. The study of the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) is crucial for understanding a range of cognitive processes, such as spatial navigation, memory, and the processing of contextual information.
In a study investigating the activity of neurons in the retrosplenial cortical area during instrumental food-seeking behavior in rats of different ages, conducted by researchers from the Laboratory of Psychophysiology at the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and the Laboratory of Functional Neurochemistry at the P.K. Anokhin Research Institute of Normal Physiology, A.G. Gorkin, E.A. Kuzina, and others, it was found that the behavior of old and young rats did not differ significantly. However, older rats were significantly more likely to check empty food trays compared to the adult animals.[8]. Similar results were obtained in a series of repeated comparative studies. A comparison of the average firing rate of neurons during food-seeking behavior revealed a significantly higher level of activity in the RSC neurons of adult animals.[8] These findings are consistent with other studies that also reported a decline in the average firing rate of neurons in the prefrontal cortex with age, as well as a decrease in the proportion of highly active neurons in the hippocampus and sensorimotor cortical areas.
The obtained data led to the suggestion that in old age, during learning, there is less "fine-tuning" of existing experience through the formation of new neuronal specializations compared to earlier stages of life. Additionally, it was proposed that the internal systemic structure of newly formed behaviors becomes more "homogeneous" in older animals.[9]
During training rats on new behavioral tasks, E.A. Kuzina found a significant increase in the proportion of neurons in the retrosplenial cortex that were specialized for behavioral acts related to approaching and pressing a lever, compared to the number of cells specifically active during food-seeking acts in the feeding cycle.[10]
E.V. Loseva, N.A. Loginova, and V.V. Gavrilov noted reactive gliosis in layer V of various neocortical areas in rats that were raised in darkness. The results of the study revealed reactive gliosis in all the areas of the cortex examined, with the most pronounced changes observed in the retrosplenial and visual cortical areas.[11]
Earlier, in the same rats raised under conditions of visual deprivation, it was shown that there was a reduction in the overall thickness of the visual and retrosplenial cortices. A detailed analysis revealed a thinning of certain cortical layers across all the brain areas studied. [12]
From the studies conducted by Ivashkina O.I. and Toropova K.A., it can be concluded that the CA1 area of the hippocampus is specifically involved in the formation and retrieval of associative memory for complex signals from the natural environment. To investigate the neural substrates of this memory, immunohistochemical mapping of the neural expression of the c-fos gene in the hippocampus and associative retrosplenial cortex was conducted. It was found that only the CA1 area of the hippocampus, and not other hippocampal regions or the retrosplenial cortex, is activated during the retrieval of associative memory related to a complex conditioned signal, but not its components. Furthermore, a strong positive correlation was found for the CA1 area between the level of freezing during memory retrieval and the number of neurons activated during this retrieval.[9]
In an experiment conducted by E.A. Kuzina on rats trained in a cyclic food-seeking task involving pressing a lever to obtain food from a feeder, single-neuron activity was recorded during the first two weeks after the behavior was acquired, as well as after 30 sessions of daily repetition. A general trend was observed in the dynamics of the neuronal composition specialized for different acts within the behavioral cycle, with an increase in the time interval after training, regardless of the number of repetitions of the new behavior.[9]
In their studies conducted on mice, K.A. Toropova and D.V. Trochev demonstrated that protein synthesis blockade, both during the exploration of a new environment and during the application of an immediate unconditioned stimulus (US) in a familiar environment, disrupts the conditioned reflex freezing response to that environment. The association of a retrieved memory trace of the environment with the unconditioned stimulus (US) was accompanied by the activation of the transcription factor c-Fos expression in the retrosplenial cortex. The retrosplenial cortex was specifically activated during the subsequent retrieval of associative memory of the environment as well. This activation was not observed in mice with impaired memory. No such differences were found in the hippocampus, where c-Fo’s expression was activated during the exploration of the new environment but not due to its association with the US. These results suggest that the retrosplenial cortex may function as an area of the neocortex responsible for forming associations between the environment and an aversive unconditioned stimulus.[9]
Behavioral analysis of animals acquiring the first (drinking) and second (food-seeking) skills, conducted by I.I. Rusak and A.I. Bulava, showed that among animals with individual behavioral differences, there were subjects who did not acquire either the first or the second skill. The average speed of these animals was several times lower, and the total time spent in movement was also significantly reduced. It was found that the number of neurons that changed gene expression in the barrel field of the somatosensory cortex during the formation of the second skill depended on how quickly the animals learned the first "whisker" skill. The number of such neurons differed significantly between these two groups of animals. However, the number of such neurons in the retrosplenial cortex did not show significant differences.
Thus, the conclusion was drawn that the more errors the animals made during the acquisition of skill 1, the more neurons were involved in the reorganization of the old experience from skill 1 when forming the new skill 2..[10].
In 2023, researchers from the Engineering-Physics Institute of Biomedicine at the National Research Nuclear University "MEPhI" (S.A. Gulyaev, L.M. Khanukhova, and A.A. Harmash) conducted a study on the bioelectric activity of the retrosplenial cortex of the brain. The study involved 36 healthy volunteers of various ages who had signed informed consent forms. Of these, 19 participants were under 30 years old, and 17 were older than 30 years. The average age of the participants was 29.1 years.
All participants underwent EEG recordings, including the study of baseline brain activity during passive relaxed wakefulness with closed eyes in a "sitting" position and a similar study in a "lying" position (with monitoring of the onset of physiological sleep). The analysis of alpha activity in occipital and parietal leads, conducted for the entire group, revealed a decrease in alpha activity frequency before falling asleep. Notably, in the group older than 30 years, the decrease in alpha activity frequency before sleep onset was statistically significant. The study also showed that the alpha activity detected during classical EEG studies is not a single "baseline" rhythm characteristic of brain structures but rather a combination of several rhythms with similar frequency-amplitude characteristics. These bioelectrical activities are produced by different brain structures, including the retrosplenial cortex. This finding allowed for a new interpretation of results from studies revealing the heterogeneity of alpha rhythm spectra in individuals with various mental deviations. According to the authors of the study, the use of frequency analysis of brain bioelectric activity in the classical EEG methodology cannot be considered an effective method for investigating higher nervous functions, a conclusion that the authors refuted in their work. [11]
An experiment conducted by Auger SD and Maguire EA, in which male and female participants were asked to read three different types of sentences during an fMRI scan, provided insights into the role of the retrosplenial cortex (RSC). The sentences described either something permanent or transient, with the first two types being imagery-based, focusing either on spatial landmarks or actions, while the third type involved non-imagery-based abstract concepts.
The study showed that the RSC was engaged in processing permanent landmarks and stable, sequential actions, but did not respond to transient landmarks or actions, nor to abstract concepts, even those embodying the idea of stability. The researchers concluded that the RSC may not only assist in mapping spatial environments but also potentially provide information about the reliability of events occurring within those environments. [12]
An analysis of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from healthy aging participants and patients with subjective cognitive impairment, conducted by Kim NH Dillen, Heidi IL Jacobs, Juraj Kukolja, and others, revealed a connection between the activity of the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) and memory functions, as well as neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's disease. Changes in RSC activity may be one of the earliest signs of dementia. These findings are supported by several other studies. The most notable results regarding RSC function come from studies involving patients with damage to this area of the brain. Patients with RSC damage exhibit a deficit in personal autobiographical memories while retaining overall intellectual function. In a study by Edward Valenstein and Dawn Bowers at the University of Florida, they observed a 39-year-old male patient who developed both retrograde and anterograde amnesia following a hemorrhage from an arteriovenous malformation near the corpus callosum. MRI scans revealed damage to the corpus callosum and the area containing the retrosplenial cortex and cingulate gyrus. Although the fornix was anterior and inferior to the damage and may have been involved, the terminal stripe likely remained intact. Structures critical for memory, such as the hippocampus, thalamus, and basal parts of the anterior brain, were preserved. The retrosplenial cortex receives input from the subiculum and projects to the anterior thalamus, thus providing an alternative pathway between the hippocampus and thalamus. More importantly, medial temporal structures involved in memory receive input from the anterior thalamus directly through the cingulate gyrus and indirectly via relay in the retrosplenial cortex. This thalamocortical part of the Papez circuit is likely crucial for memory, and damage to the cingulate and retrosplenial cortices could disrupt this pathway, leading to amnesia.[14]
A study of taxi drivers navigating through central London in a virtual environment showed complete activation of the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) both during route planning and when making spontaneous decisions to alter their route during navigation. This suggests that the RSC plays a key role in the cognitive processes involved in spatial navigation, particularly in flexible decision-making and the ability to adapt one's route based on changing circumstances. [15]
Thus, the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) is an important part of the brain involved in cognitive processes such as memory, spatial navigation, and context perception. Anatomically, the RSC is located in the cortical area that Brodmann identified as areas 29 and 30, which in humans form a complex with areas 23 and 31 of the posterior cingulate gyrus. The primary functions of the RSC include spatial navigation, memory preservation, and context perception, as well as its connections with other areas of the brain. Although the functions of the RSC are not yet fully understood, this makes the RSC a relevant topic for ongoing research.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
