AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/NPCP.2021/012
*Corresponding Author: Abdulwahab Alahmari, Radiology Department, Al-Namas General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Al-Namas City, Saudi Arabia.
Citation: Abdulwahab Alahmari (2021) Reporting Radiographers: Hope or Hype. Neural Plasticity and Clinical Practice 4(1); DOI: 10.31579/NPCP.2021/012
Copyright: © Abdulwahab Alahmari , This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 16 March 2021 | Accepted: 29 March 2021 | Published: 09 April 2021
Keywords: reporting radiographers; radiology; advanced practice, radiologists
For more than 20 years and Reporting Radiographers practice exists in the UK. Today no other country joined the UK to legislate Radiographers’ reporting practice. The aim of this paper is to put a focus on the issue, look is there a necessity to allow Radiographers in the reporting business, and find is there any benefit that can change the decision of health authorities worldwide to allow Radiographers to make clinical reports
The story of Radiographers report findings in radiographs when Radiographers started using the “Red Dot” system which helps Radiologists with an initial interpretation of any abnormality. In World War II, there was a shortage of Radiologists to read the x-rays, so Weber State University in collaboration with the US Army, trained large numbers of Radiographers a.k.a “Radiologic Technologist in the American system”. Those Radiographers were trained to make radiology diagnoses for the patients(soldiers). Today Radiographers in America, in order to be allowed to interpret radiographs, they need the United States’ Congress to pass a legislation that legalizes Radiographers to interpret radiographs, sonograms, or CT scans.
The Reporting Radiographers started in the UK due to the shortage of Radiologists in the UK and especially in Scotland. There was a time in cotland, where the radiological service required awaitingof more than 6 weeks (test to report time) which is catastrophic [1]. In London, the waiting time for a radiology report was 1 month in 2017 [2]. The total number of radiologists in the UK is 3622 radiologists in 2018 [3].
There are two types of reporting among radiographers in the uk;
Initial commenting: This is not a report, but a “Red Dot” placed in the corner of the radiographs to give warning or alert to the radiograph interpreter that something wrong within these radiographs. Any radiographer can use the “Red Dot” system. The issue with the Red Dot system is ambiguous and it gives no comment to describe what the Radiographer is seeing as wrong within the radiograph. The training course for Radiographers to use the Red Dot system is one day which is another negative point for this system see (Figure 1).
Clinical Reporting: This is writing a full report that will be sent directly to the Physician incharge of this case. The treatment plan will be based on the Radiographer’s interpretation. These reports must be made by a qualified Radiographer who finished (a postgraduate certificate, postgraduate diploma, or a master’s degree in interpretation of radiographs that is approved by the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) in the UK, three years of training after graduation from post- graduate degree under the supervision of a Radiologist, two years of experience as a radiographer post-bachelor degree, and a bachelor's degree approved by HCPC in the UK).
Radiographers can be specialized in chest x-ray reporting, abdomenx-ray reporting, and skeletal x-ray reporting for the emergency. As well, reporting for ultrasound can be made by a qualified Sonographer. Some curriculum of M.Sc. in Diagnostic Imaging programs, (like the master’s degree in The University of Hertfordshire 2019 catalogue of post- graduate programs)which contain a CT brain interpretation module.This program has an accreditation from the Society of Radiographers in the UK [4].
North America
There is no role of reporting Radiographers in the United States and Canada, but they have what is called “Radiologist Assistant” where they allowed to do chest, abdomen, and pelvis examinations with administration of contrastmedia (i.e. IV, oral, and rectal). As well, lumber puncture, joint injection under fluoroscopy guidance, etc. The R.R.A which is an abbreviation for Registered Radiologist Assistant is focused mainly on radiographic and angiographic procedures, but they cannot report a radiographs or sonograms. The total numberof R.R.As in the United States and Canada is 657 according to the (Society of Radiology Physician Extenders website, 2020).
The United Kingdom
After a huge conflict between the Royal Society of Radiologists and Society of Radiographers, the Radiographers in the UK, won the right to interpret radiographs with different scops (chest, abdomen. skeletal (appendicular or axial)). The Radiologists in the UK, were worry about losing their jobs to Radiographers who will undertake similar job duties.
The total number of reporting Radiographers in the UK today is 259 registered Radiographers [5]. The shortage of radiologists and delay of reporting lead the government to take action which legalization Radiographers’ reporting practice.
Saudi Arabia
There are 34 (Sudanese) Radiographers, work in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as Reporting Radiographers (in private medical centers) [6]. Radiographers are not allowed in K.S.A to report any scan based on the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties description of Radiographers’ roles. There is no statistical analysis in most of the Middle East countries which allow us to make a judgment wither Reporting Radiographers are a necessity or not? In rural areas of Saudi Arabia, there is a shortage of Radiologists which can be filled by Reporting Radiographers. In Saudi Arabia, there is a 4-year fellowship program for Radiographers which will allow them to study extensive pathophysiology, but they do not teach them radiographic interpretation which is a huge disadvantage of this program [7]. This fellowship program has three tracks; axial imaging, ultrasound, and nuclear medicine. This program named Saudi Specialist Certificate Program for Radiology Technology & Medical Imaging which will give extensive training on all aspect of the chosen field to become a mentor or have executive duties in clinical settings. This program adds nothing to Radiographers except more practice and testing in the same field. This is a professional program that has no similar program worldwide.
Australia and New Zealand
The Royal Australian and New ZealandCollege of Radiologists published a 20 pages statement opposing the idea of allowing Radiographers to make any clinical reports, but they accept the red dot system or initial commenting [8].
Radiographers Vs Radiologists
In the UK, Radiographers’ ability to interpret radiological exams was non−inferior to Radiologists based on many published papers [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. The comparisons between Radiologists and Radiographers were tested on interpreting x-rays, barium enema studies, CT colonoscopy, and upper abdominal ultrasounds. Here is a list of published papers on comparing between Radiologists and Radiographers:
The advantages of legislating Reporting Radiographers’ practice:-
The Royal Society of Radiologists opposed the Society of Radiographers−both in the UK− publically when they were campaigning to allow Radiographers to study and trained on interpreting the radiographs, but eventually the Society of Radiographers won when the UK’s government allowedthe Radiographers to be trainedon interpreting CXR, AXR, skeletal x-rays. The government instructed the HCPC to recognize the Reporting Radiographers and their training programs due to the pressure that was made by the Society of Radiographers and the bad conditions of the patients in Scotland where they use to need to wait for more than 6 weeks before theirscan can be read and reported. In many cases, cancer patients in Scotland suffered spread of the disease (metastasis), and due to the delayed of the radiological service their conditions worsen.As well, in London they use to wait for one monthfor a radiology report to come out. Due to the Brexit and when the qualified European work force started leavingthe UK, it may have complicated the issue in the UK. In the UK, they have measured the need based on "test to report time" which in many undeveloped countries do not have any statistic to see if there is any need for Reporting Radiographers. Radiologists should be afraid of artificial intelligence (AI) being implemented in radiology more than being afraid from Reporting Radiographers.
Crucial Point about Radiographic Reporting
In the UK, when they allowed Radiographers to make the diagnoses and join Diagnostic Imaging programs, at the beginning Radiographers made some reporting mistakes, but the government did not shut the programs down or prohibits Radiographers reporting. The British government let Radiographers to learn more, acquire more experience, and with time Radiographers started to adapt to the new work roles in the clinical practice and started to learn how to make the right diagnoses. If any country will began a Radiographers' reporting program, they need to give the Radiographers some time and supervision until they succeed.
Names of the Interpretation Programs
Some British universities still use the old name like radiography or medical imaging for radiologic reporting programs like Cardiff University which is a big mistake [14]. If the program includes only radiographs reporting, it should be named radiographic reporting. If the
program has ultrasongrams reporting, it should be named diagnostic ultrasongraphy. If the program has different imaging modalities and interpretations, it should be named diagnostic imaging, diagnostic radiology, or just radiology similar to the names of Cambridge University’s radiology programs [15].
Proposed Programs & Advanced Practice
While many countries sufferfrom Radiologists’ shortage, it’s essential to have more advanced practice and programs for Radiographers. Since Radiographers graduated from high school, they have been seeing different radiologic scans in their under & post−graduate degrees and during their clinical practice. Therefore, they are more prepared than any Physician who just finished any m.b.b.s or MD degree. There is a proposed master’s program in neuroradiology that can help –in a short period of time− any Radiographer to learn how to interpret neuroradiology scans [16]. As well, Physicians can join this program instead of doing a residency then a fellowship program which will take too much time that many patients and health care systems can’t afford it.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
