AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/706
Department of General Surgery, Bartin State Hospital, Turkey
*Corresponding Author: Yüksel Doğan, Department of General Surgery, Bartin State Hospital, Turkey
Citation: Yüksel Doğan, Semra Salimoğlu, Fatma Dikişer, Ekrem Kocatürk, (2025 Rectus Sheath Hematoma Causing Intraperitoneal Hemorrhage: An Atypical Emergency Diagnosis, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 23(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/706
Copyright: © 2025, Yüksel Doğan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 07 February 2025 | Accepted: 18 February 2025 | Published: 28 February 2025
Keywords: rectus sheath hematoma; trauma; bleeding
Rectus sheath hematoma (RSH) is a rare but notable cause of abdominal pain, commonly associated with trauma or anticoagulation therapy. It occurs due to the rupture of a branch of the inferior epigastric artery at its attachment to the rectus abdominis muscle, often without effective hemostasis. Diagnosing RSH can be challenging, as it frequently mimics other intra-abdominal conditions. Preoperative identification is uncommon, with most cases diagnosed intraoperatively, and only a limited number of cases reported in the literature. Here, we present the case of a 57-year-old male who developed RSH following blunt trauma to the left lower abdomen caused by a motorbike rim during repair work. The patient reported left lower paraumbilical pain, and intraperitoneal bleeding was confirmed via clinical evaluation and CT imaging. This case highlights the diagnostic complexities of RSH in acute abdominal presentations and emphasizes the importance of thorough examination and imaging for timely diagnosis and management.
Rectus sheath hematoma (RSH) is a rare but increasingly recognized cause of acute abdominal pain, often resulting from blunt trauma or anticoagulation therapy.1 Its incidence appears to be rising with the growing use of anticoagulants. RSH typically arises from the rupture of an epigastric artery or a tear in the rectus abdominis muscle, often triggered by direct trauma 2 or excessive muscle contraction. Despite its rarity, RSH presents significant diagnostic challenges, frequently mimicking critical conditions such as bowel perforation, ruptured aneurysms, or internal bleeding. Early recognition through clinical examination and imaging is vital to avoid misdiagnosis and ensure effective patient care.
A 57-year-old male presented to our emergency department with left-sided lower groin pain and swelling following blunt abdominal trauma
caused by a motorbike rim piece during a repair incident. On examination, his vital signs were stable, including a sodium level of 78 mmol/L, blood pressure of 112/84 mmHg, and oxygen saturation of 95%. A 5 mm laceration was observed in the lower left abdomen, approximately 4 cm from the umbilicus. The patient exhibited localized tenderness and a palpable mass in the left groin without peritoneal irritation signs such as rebound tenderness or guarding.
Laboratory tests revealed an elevated white blood cell count of 15.2 × 10⁹/L (reference: 4-10 × 10⁹/L), C-reactive protein of 28 mg/L (<5>(Figure 1).
Figure 1: Abdominal Pelvic Computed Tomography showing foreign body in left rectus sheath
Initially, the patient’s stable condition warranted observation in the emergency department. However, during monitoring, the patient developed tachycardia. Repeat blood tests revealed a hemoglobin drop to
10.9 g/dL and hematocrit to 31.8%. Follow-up tomography showed a hematoma in the left rectus sheath with evidence of intra-abdominal bleeding (Figure 2). As the patient’s condition worsened, including hypotension, an urgent exploratory laparotomy was performed.
Figure 2: Left Rectus sheath hematoma leaking to intrabdominal on Abdominal Pelvic Computed Tomography.
Intraoperative findings showed intact small intestine, colon, spleen, and other abdominal organs. A large hematoma in the left rectus muscle extended into the peritoneal cavity. Hemostasis was achieved by suturing the bleeding vessels within the rectus muscle. A Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain was placed between the muscle planes, and a silicone drain was positioned in the pelvic region. During surgery, the patient received two units of erythrocyte suspension and one unit of fresh frozen plasma and was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) for postoperative monitoring. During the surgery, the foreign body was removed from the sheath hematoma. Postoperatively, hemoglobin dropped to 7.6 g/dL, and hematocrit fell to 22.2%. While the JP drain remained inactive, the pelvic silicone drain collected 500 cc of hemorrhagic fluid. Despite this, the patient remained stable and received further transfusions. A follow-up CT on postoperative day 3 showed regression of the hematoma (Figure 3), The patient gradually improved and remained hemodynamically stable throughout the ICU stay.
Figure 3: Resolution in Left Rectus sheath hematoma after surgery
Rectus sheath hematoma (RSH), though rare, is a critical cause of acute abdominal pain and often difficult to diagnose in emergencies. It can mimic serious conditions like appendicitis, bowel perforation, or ruptured aneurysm, leading to misdiagnosis or delays in treatment, potentially resulting in poor outcomes.
RSH usually results from ruptured epigastric arteries or tears in the rectus abdominis muscle due to forceful contractions.3 The prevalence of RSH associated with trauma remains low, but it poses significant diagnostic and treatment challenges. While RSH accounts for less than 2% of acute abdominal pain cases, its incidence has increased with the expanded use of oral anticoagulants and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). While direct trauma (4 and anticoagulation are known risk factors, RSH can also occur after non-contact exercises, minor movements, or sudden muscle strains.5 Studies show that anticoagulants are involved in up to 70% of RSH case .
A thorough history and focused physical exam help distinguish RSH from other abdominal conditions, avoiding unnecessary surgery. Ultrasound is valuable for bedside assessment, while CT scans offer nearly 100% sensitivity, accurately pinpointing hematoma location.6
In this case, RSH developed after trauma from a motorbike rim during repair, rupturing a branch of the inferior epigastric artery and extending into the peritoneal cavity, causing rare intraperitoneal bleeding. Early diagnosis was challenging due to non-specific symptoms, stable vital signs, and an unremarkable abdominal exam. CT confirmed the diagnosis and revealed intraperitoneal extension, necessitating surgery. Ultrasound is valuable for bedside assessment, while CT scans offer nearly 100% sensitivity, accurately pinpointing hematoma location.7 Intraperitoneal bleeding in RSH often requires surgical intervention, as with this patient.
Diagnosing RSH is difficult due to its rarity and non-specific symptoms, accounting for less than 2% of acute abdominal pain cases. Initial localized pain and swelling in our patient were managed conservatively, but rapid deterioration with tachycardia and hypotension required urgent surgery. 8,9 Imaging, especially CT 10, is crucial for accurate diagnosis, offering high sensitivity and localization.
RSH management depends on hematoma severity and patient stability. Most cases are treated conservatively 11, but surgery is required for instability, large hematomas, or intraperitoneal rupture. 12,13. This case highlights the importance of detailed history, physical exams, and imaging to distinguish RSH, prevent unnecessary surgery, and ensure timely treatment. Intra-abdominal spread: Rare but serious, as in this case. Other reports emphasise complications such as abdominal compartment syndrome or necrosis of the rectus muscle12,13.
Intraoperatively, the hematoma was found to have breached the peritoneum, a rare but serious complication requiring immediate hemostatic intervention. Surgical exploration is typically reserved for cases with significant hemodynamic instability or imaging indicating active bleeding, as in this patient. RSH management depends on hematoma severity, patient stability, and ongoing bleeding. Conservative measures, like observation and transfusions, may be sufficient in stable cases. However, in this instance, the patient's tachycardia, hypotension, and significant hemoglobin drop necessitatedsurgical intervention to prevent further hemorrhage and ensure survival. Postoperatively, the patient experienced a persistent but regressing hematoma, as seen on the followup CT scan. This case highlights the need for close monitoring after surgery, as RSH patients can face delayed complications like hematoma reaccumulation, infection, or abdominal compartment syndrome. The patient remained hemodynamically stable with appropriate transfusions and intensive care support, and minimal drainage from the JP drain indicated effective hemostasis in the rectus sheath regio.
This case underscores the need for a high suspicion of RSH in patients with abdominal pain and a trauma history, especially with anticoagulation or other risk factors. Timely imaging and intervention can avert severe complications like intraperitoneal bleeding. It also highlights the importance of careful monitoring in stable patients, as sudden clinical deterioration can occur. The patient was monitored in the ICU, and on postoperative day 3, a follow-up CT scan showed regression of the rectus muscle hematoma(Figure 3), though it had not fully resolved. Throughout the ICU stay, the patient remained hemodynamically stable and showed gradual improvement. This case intersects with other specialties like radiology, hematology, or critical care, and underscores the need for high suspicion of RSH in trauma cases, timely intervention to prevent complications, and vigilant monitoring during recovery. The need for protocols to diagnose and manage atypical RSH presentations and further investigation are recommended. When deciding between surgery and conservative treatment for rectus sheath hematoma (RSH), patient stability and the extent of bleeding are key factors:
Conservative treatment is preferred in hemodynamically stable patients with no evidence of active bleeding or significant hematoma progression. Management includes observation, analgesics, and possible blood transfusions.
Surgery is indicated in cases with hemodynamic instability, ongoing bleeding, large or expanding hematomas, or intraperitoneal extension.
In this case, surgery became essential due to worsening tachycardia, hypotension, and significant hemoglobin drop, emphasizing timely intervention to prevent life-threatening complications. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
There are many publications and case reports on rectus sheath hematoma but very rare in combination with intraperitoneal hemorrhage, this case underscores that rectus sheath hematoma (RSH), though rare, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen in patients with trauma or anticoagulationhistory. Early diagnosis and timely intervention-either conservative or surgical-are essential forimproving outcomes and preventing serious complications. Ongoing awareness and documentation of RSH cases are vital for optimizing management strategies
Informed Consent
The patient was monitored in the ICU, and on postoperative day 3, a follow-up CT scan showed regression of the rectus muscle hematoma (Picture2b), though it had not fully resolved. Throughout the ICU stay, the patient remained hemodynamically stable and showed gradual improvement.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. A signed consent form is available from the authors.
Presentation(s) or Awards at a meeting: NO
NO
None declared.
None.
SS,EK: Data collection, data improvement, original draft writing, review writing, and editing, final approval. FD, YD: Data collection, software, data improvement, review writing and editing, and final approval. Each authors have approved the submitted version (and any substantially modified versionthat involves the author's contribution to the study);
Each authors have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. X(TWİTTER) @drydogan49
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
