AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5142/072
Department of Urology, People's Hospital of Guang’an City, Sichuan Province, China
*Corresponding Author: Jianhua Lan, Department of Urology, People's Hospital of Guang’an City, Sichuan Province, China, No. 1, section 4, Binhe Road, Cheng nan, Guang'an City Sichuan, 638000, China
Citation: Jianhua Lan, Dong Lan, Wenqiang Yuan, Qiao Ying, Jiahong He et al, (2023), Radical nephrectomy for a giant chromophobe renal cell carcinoma diagnosed > 17 years previously: A case report and literature review. International Journal of Clinical Nephrology, 5(6); DOI: 10.31579/2834-5142/072
Copyright: © 2023, Jianhua Lan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 27 November 2023 | Accepted: 08 December 2023 | Published: 20 December 2023
Keywords: gigantic renal cancer; radical nephrectomy; chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; kidney cancer; kidney
Early diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma relies on imaging tests such as ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Since surgery is associated with a favorable prognosis, the standard treatment for clinically limited renal cell carcinoma remains surgical resection. Among asymptomatic patients with localized renal cell carcinoma, a small number refuse surgical treatment and survive. We report a case involving a 59-year-old female who underwent difficult radical nephrectomy 17 years after being diagnosed with malignant tumors due to primary renal cell carcinoma.
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 5% of malignant tumors in males and 3% in females.[1] With the development of medical imaging technology, an increasing number of RCC cases are diagnosed at an early stage. Therefore, presentation as a very large mass is very rarely encountered unless the patient has no symptoms, does not undergo regular physical examinations, or refuses treatment after diagnosis.[2] The main histological types of kidney cancer include clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe renal cells, and collecting duct carcinoma. Other rare types of RCCs include renal medullary carcinoma and unclassified RCC.[3] Most patients diagnosed with kidney cancer opt for active treatment, while a small minority may choose active surveillance.
In this article, we report the treatment of a patient with a huge renal mass of 5.5 kg that had been diagnosed 17 years previously.
The reporting of this study conforms to CARE guidelines.[4] A 59-year-old female was referred to our hospital with a large abdominal mass and abdominal pain. She reported early satiety, anorexia, weakness, and weight loss within one month of admission. Seventeen years previously, the computed tomography (CT) examination that revealed a 13-cm right renal mass without gross hematuria (Figure.1). She was advised to undergo surgery; however, owing to financial constraints, she refused.
Figure 1: A computed tomography (CT) scan conducted 17 years ago revealing a mass with a maximum cross-sectional diameter of 13 × 8 cm in the right kidney is shown. Several calcifications within the tumor are observable.
Physical examination in the supine position revealed significant abdominal distension, mainly on the right side (Figure. 2). The body mass index (BMI) of the patient was 21. On hematological evaluation, hemoglobin （Hgb） was 8.4 g/dl. Other biochemical parameters were normal. Abdominopelvic ultrasonography revealed a large mass measuring 28 × 16 cm. A large hypervascularized mass occupying the right side of the abdomen without evidence of direct inferior vena cava invasion was evident on computed tomography urography （CTU）(Figure. 3). Chest CT was negative for metastasis. Tumor marker levels (CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen) were within normal ranges.
Figure 2: Abdominal distension, mainly on the right side in the supine position, is observable
Figure 3: Computed tomography scans show a massive abdominal mass.
A. CT scan revealing a massive
abdominal mass with dimensions of approximately 25.8 × 22.1 × 15.6 cm exhibiting irregularity and enhancement is shown.
B. Vascular reconstruction revealing an extremely rich blood supply for the mass and the presence of a few calcifications within the mass is shownThe patient underwent right radical nephrectomy via a laparotomy incision. Owing to the extremely large size and abundant blood supply of the tumor, it originated in the right kidney and displaced all intestines to the opposite side. Preoperatively, right renal artery embolization was performed to reduce tumor blood supply and minimize intraoperative bleeding. Bowel preparation was performed preoperatively to reduce complications related to intestinal injury. Due to the massive size of the tumor, midline abdominal, right upper abdominal oblique, and left midline transverse incisions were made (Figure. 4A). Abdominal cavity exploration revealed tumor surface veins were significantly dilated and tortuous, making separation prone to bleeding (Figure. 4B). After opening the outer side of the ascending colon, gradual separation of the ascending colon and duodenum from the tumor was performed. Subsequently, an inferior incision and separation of the tumor were performed, followed by ligation and division of the right ureter and right ovarian vein. Gradual dissection of the tumor from the surrounding tissues was performed upward and inward. Preoperative renal artery embolization was performed preoperatively, and ligation and division of the right renal vein were performed during surgery, followed by ligation and division of the right renal artery. Finally, the tumor was excised from the liver. Owing to the tight adhesion between the right adrenal gland and the tumor, complete resection was performed.
Figure 4: Abdomen incision and vascular condition of the tumor surface. Page 10/10A. The skin incision selected was a midline abdominal incision, along with right upper abdominal oblique and left midline transverse incisions. B. The veins on the surface of the mass are noticeably enlarged and dilated.
The estimated intraoperative blood loss was 1,200 mL, with six units of blood transfused. Postoperatively, the tumor weighed 5.5 kilograms (Figure. 5). Pathological examination indicated chromophobe RCC, and immunohistochemistry revealed weakly positive RCC expression, focally positive expression of PAX-8, and positive expression of CK7, CD10, and CD117. Downregulation of CK20, VIM, P504s, CATX, and HMB45 levels were observed. Ki67 accounted for only 2% of cells. The patient was followed up for three months, throughout which time no recurrence was detected. Adjuvant therapy was not administered.
Figure 5 : The hyper vascularized tumor after excision is shown.
Here, we report the use of radical nephrectomy via a laparotomy incision to treat a patient with a giant RCC tumor. Currently, there is no clear definition of gigantic cell carcinoma in terms of size and tumor characteristics. Takeda et al.[5] reported the world’s largest renal tumor, measuring 43 cm and weighing 13 kg. The pathological type of the tumor was identified as type 1 papillary RCC. There are several reasons why kidney cancers grow into large masses. Our patient did not undergo regular health checkups for the urinary system. Further, RCC tends to produce erythropoietin and can generate new blood vessels to support its growth. [6 ] In our patient, CTU and intraoperative findings confirmed that the tumor had a rich blood supply. Furthermore, the absence of symptoms and knowledge of a pathological type also contribute to the formation of a large mass in renal cancer.
The relationship between giant renal cancer and sex remains unclear. However, case reports indicate that males are more prone to developing giant masses than females.[5,7-10] Our patient underwent surgical treatment > 17 years after her tumor was discovered primarily because she had been asymptomatic. To the best of our knowledge, this is the longest reported survival time in a patient with kidney cancer who did not receive any treatment. Moslemi et al.[11]reported a patient who underwent surgery nine years after their initial malignant kidney tumor diagnosis. Interestingly, the pathological results of Moslemi’s and our current patient differed, with those of the prior case indicating clear cell carcinoma and the current pathological result suggesting chromophobe carcinoma.
Most patients with renal cancer undergo immediate surgical treatment; therefore, the natural progression of renal masses has not been adequately studied. Historically, RCCs have had slow growth rates of approximately 1–10 mm/year.[12]The growth rate of tumors may be influenced by multiple factors including tumor size, number and type of genetic mutations, blood supply, and host immune status. Studies conducted by Ameri et al.13 revealed differences in the linear tumor growth rates before and after six months. No correlation was shown between tumor linear growth rate and the Fuhrman grading system, gender, histology, or age.[13] In our patient, the tumor grew approximately 0.89 cm per year after diagnosis.
Surgical intervention is the optimal treatment for localized renal tumors, whereas smaller tumors may be treated with radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy. Giant renal tumors require open surgery because they occupy a significant portion of the abdominal space. The procedure should be performed by an experienced team including urologists, interventional physicians, vascular surgeons, gastrointestinal surgeons, and anesthesiologists. Preoperative CTU examination can provide information about the nature of the mass, the patient’s blood supply status, and the relationship between the tumor surrounding organs, aiding in surgical planning. Because the renal vein is located anterior to the renal artery, ligating the renal artery during open surgery for giant renal tumors can be challenging. Preoperative embolization of the renal artery is an alternative approach. The timing of renal artery embolization is crucial, as early embolization may lead to adverse reactions and perirenal edema, which increase bleeding during surgery. We chose immediate embolization before surgery without any evidence of peritumoral edema. During embolization, we prioritized ligation of the renal vein, followed by ligation of the renal artery. Adequate bowel preparation before surgery is essential, and if intestinal injury occurs, prompt repair should be performed.
The fact that the tumor coexisted in our patient for more than 17 years without distant metastasis may be related to multiple factors. Several large studies have indicated that the prognosis of chromophobe RCC is much better than that of clear cell and papillary RCC. Most chromophobe RCCs have a favorable prognosis and a low risk of metastasis. Nonetheless, there is evidence suggesting that chromophobe RCCs are prone to metastasize to the liver.[14] High expression levels of CK7 and CD117, and low expression levels of VIM are considered characteristics of chromophobe RCC.[15] Ki-67 accounts for only 2% of cells, indicating low tumor cell proliferation activity, which may be a reason why our patient’s tumor grew significantly over time without distant metastasis. A multi-institution study conducted by Ohashi et al[16] concluded that age and T stage were the main independent factors that predicted survival in patients with chromophobe RCC. Our patient was followed up for six months. No recurrence or metastasis were observed. Long-term follow-up will be continued in the future.
This is the first report of massive renal tumor observation for 17 years without evidence of metastasis. A minority of renal tumors can grow into large masses owing to their rich blood supply and lack of obvious symptoms. The data from this case report support the observation that even larger cell carcinomas can be managed through surveillance and that delayed intervention does not appear to have adverse effects.
Authors’ contributions
JHL and DL collected relevant literature and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. WQY and JHH participated in the surgery and image processing. YLG provided the initial idea and report design, revised the final manuscript and gave some important recommendations. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that there is no conflflict of interest.
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Not applicable
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal.
This work was supported by the fund of the high quality development of Guang 'an People's Hospital (grant no. 21FZ013) and Key project of science and technology innovation in Guang'an City (grant no. 2022SYF01).
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
