AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/407
Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
*Corresponding Author: Fang Liu, MD Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 68 Gehu Road, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Citation: He-Qi Qu, Yu-Wei Zhang, Yi-Zhuo Guo, Fang Liu, (2024), Prognostic value Analysis of Intraoperative Transcranial Electrical Stimulation motor evoked Potential Monitoring in Postoperative limb Function changes of Neurosurgical Patient, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 17(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/407
Copyright: © 2024, Fang Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 23 February 2024 | Accepted: 22 March 2024 | Published: 30 April 2024
Keywords: intraoperative electrophysiology; motor evoked potential; glioma; intracranial aneurysm
Objective: To explore the predictive value of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential (TES-MEP) monitoring for postoperative muscle strength change in patients undergoing craniocerebral surgery.
Methods: In this study, 166 patients who underwent intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate analysis and binary Logistic regression were used to analyze the influencing factors of postoperative muscle strength changes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of abnormal changes of MEP amplitude in postoperative muscle strength changes.
Results: Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that the abnormal amplitude of MEP during operation was an independent risk factor for short-term and long-term muscle strength decline after operation (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for abnormal changes of MEP amplitude to predict short-term postoperative muscle strength decline was 0.754, with a sensitivity of 0.516, with a specificity of 0.993, and the AUC for long-term postoperative was 0.782, with a sensitivity of 0.591 and specificity of 0.972.
Conclusions: The decrease of MEP amplitude more than 50% as a warning standard has a good predictive value for the change of limb function after operation, and the abnormal changes of MEP amplitude indicate that the muscle strength of patients after operation may be lower than that before operation.
In neurosurgery, the purpose of surgery is to remove the lesion as much as possible, and to avoid new neurological defects related to the operation as far as possible, so as to improve the quality of life of patients. In recent years, transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential (TES-MEP) monitoring has received increasing attention in neurosurgery, which can monitor the disorder of the pyramidal tracts in brain and spinal surgery , thereby increase the safety of surgery and reducing the incidence of postoperative neurologic deficits[1-3]. However, there are different views on the warning standard of intraoperative MEP. The common views of MEP warning standard are as follows: the latency of MEP is prolonged by 10%, the amplitude is decreased by more than 50% or 80%, all or none, and the stimulation threshold is increased[4-6].
In this paper, 166 patients who underwent intraoperative MEP monitoring in the Department of Neurosurgery of the Affiliated Changzhou No.2 people's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2019 to December 2022 were included. The intraoperative MEP amplitude changes were recorded and the decrease of MEP amplitude more than 50% was used as the early warning standard to explore the predictive value of abnormal changes of MEP amplitude for postoperative muscle strength changes.
Patient Selection and Study Design
The inclusion criteria of patients were as follows: (1) craniotomy involving functional and non-functional areas. (2) surgery involving the pyramidal tract and its surroundings. (3) endarterectomy for carotid stenosis. (4) intracranial vascular surgery such as clipping of intracranial aneurysms and resection of vascular malformations. (5) surgery for brain stem or peri-brainstem lesions. Exclusion criteria: (1) patients and their families refused intraoperative monitoring. (2) patients with intracranial implants or history of epilepsy can not be monitored by MEP. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Changzhou No.2 people's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Before operation, we informed the patients or their families of the purpose of this study, and the patients signed the informed consent form after understanding the situation.
Anesthesia
All patients were induced with propofol (150mg) and sufentanil (25ug). Propofol (4-6mg/kg/h) and remifentanil (0.1-0.2ug/kg/min) were used to maintain intraoperative anesthesia. Muscle relaxants were only used during induction anesthesia and not used during other periods of anesthesia.
Neurophysiologic monitoring
According to the International EEG Electrode Placement 10–20 System Standard, the limb stimulation electrodes were placed at C1 and C2 points, and the recording electrode was connected to the abductor pollicis brevis of the upper limb and the abductor muscle of the lower limb. MEPs were generally obtained by 5-8 pulse trains, with a stimulus interval of 1-2ms, a stimulus intensity of 100–400 V, and a stimulus frequency of 250–500 Hz. The band-pass filter range was 30–3000 Hz, with a notch filter at 50 Hz, and the analysis time was 100 ms. When the anesthesia is stable and the dura mater is not opened, the MEP amplitude is recorded as the baseline amplitude, and the MEP amplitude decrease of more than 50% of the baseline amplitude as warning standard. Pay close attention to the changes of MEP amplitude during the operation. When the MEP amplitude decreases more than 50% of the baseline during the operation, report immediately to the surgeon, who will stop the operation and take measures to restore the MEP amplitude as much as possible.
According to the change of MEP amplitude during operation, the change of MEP amplitude can be divided into MEP amplitude without abnormal change and MEP amplitude abnormal change. The abnormal change of MEP amplitude includes the following two situations: 1）the decrease of MEP amplitude is always less than or equal to 50% of the baseline amplitude, which is called no deterioration of MEP amplitude. 2）the MEP amplitude decreases by more than 50% of the baseline amplitude and then returns to more than 50% of the baseline amplitude, which is called the reversible deterioration of MEP amplitude. The abnormal amplitude of MEP shows that the decrease of MEP amplitude is more than 50% of the baseline amplitude and has not recovered to more than 50% of the baseline amplitude at the end of the operation, which is also called irreversible deterioration.
Clinical follow-up evaluation
The changes of muscle strength at 1 week and 1 month after operation were evaluated. The grading standard of muscle strength was the six-stage grading method of 0-5 grade. According to the change of muscle strength after operation, the selected patients were divided into two groups: 1) no decrease group: the muscle strength of the patients remained unchanged or improved by at least 1 grade compared with that before operation; 2) decrease group: the muscle strength of the patients decreased by at least 1 grade compared with that before operation. The short-term muscle strength decline was defined as the decrease in muscle strength at 1 week after operation as compared with that before operation. The long-term decline of motor function was defined as the decrease of muscle strength 1 month after operation as compared with that before operation.
SPSS22.0 (IBM, Chicago, Illinoi, USA) and R (Ver.3.6.3) were used for statistical analysis. The classification variables were expressed as frequency or percentage and analyzed by Pearson chi-square test, continuous correction chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Determining whether a continuous variable is normally distributed using the Shapiro-wilk test. The data of normal distribution were expressed by mean ± standard deviation (SD), and the independent sample t-test was used for comparison. The continuous variables of non-normal distribution were expressed by median and inter-quartile range (IQR), and compared by Mann-whitney U test. Binary Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors of postoperative muscle strength. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the ability of abnormal changes of MEP amplitude to predict the change of muscle strength after operation. P < 0>
Patient Characteristics
A total of 166 patients who underwent intraoperative MEP monitoring were included. There were 81 males and 85 females with an average age of 57.90 ±14.25. The preoperative GCS score was 5-15, with a median score was 15. There were 87 cases of Patients with intracranial tumor or function, 40 cases of aneurysm, 20 cases of severe stenosis of internal carotid artery, 19 cases of intracranial vascular malformation. Preoperative MRI showed that the lesions in 67 patients were located in the motor function area and corticospinal tract (CST) .39 patients had lesions located in non-motor functional areas and CST regions, and CTA showed lesions in the vessels in 60 patients（Table1）.
MEP monitoring and postoperative muscle strength
Short-term follow-up results showed that among the 166 patients included, 31(19%) patients had decreased muscle strength and 135(81%) patients had no decrease in muscle strength. Among the 31 patients with decreased muscle strength, the MEP amplitude without abnormal change in 14 (45.2%) cases (11 with no deterioration, 3 with reversible deterioration) and MEP amplitude abnormal change in 17 (54.8%) cases. Among the 135 patients with no decrease in muscle strength, the MEP amplitude without abnormal change in 134(99.3%) cases (125with no deterioration, 9 with reversible deterioration), and the MEP amplitude abnormal change in 1(2.0%) case (Table1, Figure1).
Long-term follow-up result showed that among the 166 patients included, 22 (13.3%) patients showed decreased muscle strength, while 144 (86.7%) patients did not. Of the 22 patients with muscle strength decline, 3 (13.6%) showed MEP amplitude without abnormal change (no deterioration in 1 case, reversible deterioration in 2 cases) and 19(86.4%) showed MEP amplitude abnormal change. Of the 144 patients with muscle strength did not decrease, the MEP amplitude without abnormal change in 140 (97.2%) cases (no deterioration in 130 cases, reversible deterioration in 10 cases) and the MEP amplitude abnormal change in 4(2.8%) case. (Table 1, Figure 1).
Figure 1: Venn diagram of the relationship between MEP amplitude change and postoperative muscle strength decline. (A) Venn diagram of changes in MEP amplitude and short-term postoperatively reduced muscle strength. (B) Venn diagram of changes in MEP amplitude and long-term decline in postoperative muscle strength. MEP: motor evoked potential.
The abnormal changes of MEP amplitude were an independent risk factor for postoperative muscle strength decline
Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in preoperative GCS score, postoperative imaging features and changes of MEP amplitude between short-term decreased muscle strength group and non-decreased group (p < 0>
preoperative GCS scores and MEP amplitude changes between long-term decreased muscle strength group and non-decreased group (P<0>0.05). Gender, age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, preoperative changes of muscle strength had no statistical significance on postoperative changes of muscle strength (P > 0.05) (Table 1）
SD. standard deviations. GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale. IQR, interquartile range. MEP: motor evoked potential. CST: Corticospinal tract. Comparison of postoperative muscle strength between non-decreased group and decreased group.SD. standard deviations. GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale. IQR, interquartile range. MEP: motor evoked potential. CST: Corticospinal tract. Postoperative imaging abnormalities include intracerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction. Asterisks indicate significant differences.
Table 1: Comparison of postoperative muscle strength between non-decreased group and decreased group
The factors with statistical significance in the univariate analysis were subjected to binary logistic regression analysis to determine the independent predictors of postoperative muscle strength changes. The results showed that the abnormal change of MEP amplitude was an independent risk factor for short-term (OR:218.145, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.491-2115.828, P<0>
OR, odds ratio. CI, confidence interval. GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale. MEP, motor evoked potential. Postoperative imaging abnormalities include intracerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction.
Table 2: Analysis of multiple factors affecting the changes of postoperative muscle strength.
Using ROC curve analysis to assess the ability of MEP amplitude abnormal change to predict the change of muscle strength. The short-term postoperative AUC was 0.754 (95% CI 0.639-0.870), the sensitivity was
0.516, the specificity was 0.993. The long-term postoperative AUC was 0.782 (95% CI 0.652-0.911), the sensitivity was 0.591 and specificity was 0.972. (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Univariate analysis of potential factors affecting postoperative muscle strength changes.（A）Univariate analysis of potential factors affecting short-term postoperative muscle strength changes. (B) Univariate analysis of potential factors affecting long-term muscle strength changes after operation. GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale. CST: Corticospinal tract
MEP reversible deterioration and postoperative muscle strength changes
Further study on the relationship between the change of MEP amplitude and the change of postoperative muscle strength showed that there were significant differences in no deterioration, reversible deterioration and irreversible deterioration of MEP between the postoperative muscle strength decrease group and the non-decrease group (p<0 p=0.001) p=0.003)>
MEP, motor evoked potential. Fisher exact test for data analysis
Table 3: Comparison of the changes of MEP amplitude between the decreased muscle strength group and the non-decreased group after operation.
MEP，motor evoked potential. OR, odds ratio. CI, confidence interval.
Table 4：Odd ratios of factors affecting postoperative muscle strength changes.
Figure 4: The histogram shows the relationship between the non-deterioration, reversible deterioration and irreversible deterioration of MEP and the decrease of muscle strength after operation. (A) Short-term after operation. There is a significant difference between no deterioration and irreversible deterioration of MEP. (p<0>
This research found that a reduction in MEP amplitude by more than 50% independently predicts a higher likelihood of postoperative muscle strength decline. Patients experiencing this level of MEP reduction faced a greater risk of losing muscle strength after surgery compared to those with less than a 50
Our study shows that the decrease of MEP amplitude more than 50% as an alarm standard has a good predictive value for postoperative muscle strength changes. Abnormal changes in MEP amplitude is an independent risk factor for postoperative muscle strength decline, and intraoperative MEP amplitude abnormal changes indicate that patients may have muscle strength decline after operation. In addition, reversible MEP deterioration can reduce the risk of postoperative muscle strength decline compared with irreversible deterioration.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
This work was supported by the international cooperation program of Changzhou (grant number CZ20200039), the "333" talent project of Jiangsu Province (grant number BRA2020151) and the Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province (grant number BE2019652).
This study was approved by the Ethical Review Boards of The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. The ethics committee waived the need to obtain informed consent from eligible patients, because of the retrospective design of this study.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
