AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/488
1Department of Gastroenterology, West China Xiamen Hospital, Sichuan University, Xiamen, China.
2Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
*Corresponding Author: Zeng Yan Xue. Department of Gastroenterology, West China Xiamen Hospital, Sichuan University, Xiamen, China
Citation: Jinkun Guoea, Jinyan Guob, Jianxiong Dengea, Ming Zhangea, Meng Queae, (2025), Profile of Colorectal Polyps in Young Patients: A Retrospective Study., J Clinical Research and Reports, 19(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/488
Copyright: © 2025, Zeng Yan Xue. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 21 January 2025 | Accepted: 15 February 2025 | Published: 31 March 2025
Keywords: colorectal polyps; young; advanced histology
Background and objectives: There is an increased incidence of colorectal cancer in young patients, however, the relationship between polyp characteristics and histology is not clearly understood. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of different histological types of polyps in young patients and risk factors associated with advanced histology.
Methods: Young patients (aged < 45 years) who underwent polypectomy at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (2015-2017, Zhejiang, China) and West China Xiamen Hospital (2023, Xiamen, China) were included. A database of endoscopes was accessed to classify polyps according to endoscopic features. The distribution of polyps and the risk factors associated with advanced histology were reported.
Results: The detection rate of polyps among the youth was 20%. Hyperplastic polyps were second only to tubularadenomas in frequency. Of the 2776 polyps, nearly 85% were sessile, 29.4% were located in the sigmoid colon, and 25.4% were located in the rectum. Among polyps, 87.3% were < 10 mm in diameter. Histological features of advanced adenoma were found in 5.3% of patients. Of these, 30.4% occurred in polyps < 10 mm. Furthermore, 69.6% were distributed in the distal colorectum. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that polyp size and morphology were independent predictors of advanced adenomas.
Conclusions: Large size and pedunculated morphology were independent predictors of advanced polyp histology in young patients. Nearly one-third of the advanced histology cases were associated with small polyps. It is recommended that endoscopists resect all polyps found during colonoscopy, especially pedunculated polyps, and submit them for histology.
The vast majority of colorectal polyps are incidentally detected during colonoscopy. A polyp is defined as a proliferative or neoplastic lesion of the intestinal mucosal layer [1], increased in detection with the widespread use of colonoscopy. Most lesions were small (<2>
A great deal of effort has been done on depicting the clinical and advanced histological aspects of colorectal polyps [3-7], but the disease spectrum is variable in different populations, and the association between the endoscopic characteristics and histology of colorectal polyps is not fully understood. It has been reported that 5.6% of polyps present with advanced histopathological features [8]. The low prevalence of advanced histopathology for some polyps suggests that not all polyps require endoscopic resection or continuous endoscopic surveillance. Given the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in young patients, it is significant to identify the correlation between polyp characteristics and histopathology in such populations. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of different types of colorectal polyps in a young cohort utilizing retrospective data and to explore the relationship between the endoscopic characteristics of polyps and histopathology.
Patients
This retrospective and descriptive study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (Zhejiang University School of Medicine, SRRSH), and West China Xiamen Hospital (Sichuan University, WCXMH). The records of young patients (aged 18-44) who underwent endoscopic polypectomy at SRRSH (2015-2017) and WCXMH (2023) were analyzed. Data, including basic demographics, polyp size, location, morphology, endoscopic diagnosis and pathology, were retrieved from electronic medical records. The approach at our institution was to prepare patients with a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for standard colonoscopy by endoscopists. A senior endoscopist was defined by performing more than 3,000 examinations with more than 10 years of experience in endoscopic procedures. Informed consent was obtained from all patients before colonoscopy.
Polyp characteristics.
The polyps were graded by size as follows: 1–5 mm, 6–9 mm, 10–19 mm, 20-49 mm, and ≥50 mm. The polyp were ranked by location as follows: cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum. The proximal colon was defined as being located from the cecum to the transverse colon, whereas the distal colorectum was classified as being located from the splenic flexure to the rectum. The polyps were stratified by morphology as follows: pedunculated and sessile. Polyps were further stratified by histopathology into inflammatory polyp (IP), hamartomatous polyp (HMP)，hyperplastic polyp（HP）, traditional serrated adenoma (TSA), tubular adenoma (TA), tubulovillous adenoma (TVA), villous adenoma (VA), TA with high-grade dysplasia (TA-HG), sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P), carcinoma, and others (including intestinal mucosa, lymphoid polyps, carcinoid tumors, and neuroendocrine tumors, etc.). Any polyp exhibiting histologic features of TVA, VA, TA-HG, SSA/P, or carcinoma is referred to as a “advanced adenoma”.
Data processing and analysis were performed using R version 4.4.0, along with Zstats 1.0 (www.zstats.net). Descriptive statistics were performed for all variables, including means and standard deviations for continuous variables, and frequencies for categorical variables. T-test or chi-square test was used to analyze the differences between variables. Identification of factors influencing advanced adenoma were performed using binary logistic regression analysis. For the multivariate analysis model, only factors with P <0>
Baseline characteristics of the patients and the histological features of colorectal polyps.
During the study period, a total of 10250 young patients（aged 18-44）underwent colonoscopy at both hospitals, among whom 2,050 (20%) underwent polypectomy. Finally, 207 patients were excluded because of incomplete pathology or endoscopy reports, and the remaining 1843 young patients (2776 polyps) were included for analysis. Their mean age was 37.6 ± 5.4, with 1249 (67.8%) male. 50 endoscopists were involved in the colonoscopy of 1843 patients, of which 21 (42.9%) senior endoscopists were involved in the colonoscopy of 1023 (55.5%) patients. The distribution of different histological types of colorectal polyps was shown in Table 1. A total of 2776 polyps were detected, including 1455 (52.4%) non-neoplastic polyps and 1321 (47.6%) colorectal adenomas (neoplastic polyps). Among the colorectal adenomas, there were 1170 TA, 97 TVA, 11 VA, 16 SSA/P, and 14 carcinomas. Details in demographic and endoscopic parameters and the logistic regression analysis of colorectal adenomas were shown in Table 2. The average age of young patients with colorectal adenomas was 38.3± 5.1. There was no significant difference in age (P=0.210) or gender (P=0.086) between patients with advanced adenomas and those with nonadvanced adenomas. Among male patients, 90 (10.2%) were advanced adenomas, and the remaining 89.8% were nonadvanced adenomas (8.8-fold difference), compared to 13.3% of female patients with advanced adenomas and 86.7% with nonadvanced adenomas (6.5-fold difference).
Size of polyps.
There were 2776 polyps, of which 2710 had definite sizes. Of the 2710 polyps, 2367 (87.3%) were <10>
Location of polyps.
Of 2776 polyps, 817 (29.4%) were found in the sigmoid colon, followed by 706 (25.4%) in the rectum. As shown in Table 1, the frequency of advanced adenomas in each part of the colon was 24/289 (8.3%) in the ascending colon, 62/817 (7.6%) in the sigmoid colon, 11/318 (3.5%) in the descending colon, 24/706 (3.4%) in the rectum, 16/527 (3.0%) in the transverse colon, and 7/242 (2.9%) in the cecum. Of the advanced adenomas (n=148), 45 (30.4%) were distributed in the proximal colon and 103 (69.6%) polyps were distributed in the distal colorectum (Table 2, P =0.053).
Morphology of polyps.
Of the 2776 polyps, nearly 85% were sessile. Of the 148 advanced adenoma, 76 (51.3%) were pedunculated polyps and 72 (48.7%) were sessile ones. The frequency of advanced adenoma was 76/412 (18.4%) in pedunculated polyps and 72/2364 (3.0%) in sessile ones. As presented in Table 2, the distributions of advanced adenoma and nonadvanced adenoma were different in both morphology groups (pedunculated vs sessile: 51.3% vs 48.7%, 17.9% vs 82.1%, respectively, P < 0>
Risk factors for advanced adenomas.
Logistic regression models were performed to explore the potential factors associated with advanced adenomas (Table 2). On univariate logistic regression analysis, size and morphology of polyps correlated with advanced adenoma (P <0 OR=8.99, xss=removed OR=27.12, OR =0.50, P =0.001).>0.05) (Table 2). Details of the parameters of colorectal adenomas from the two hospitals were shown in Table 3. Significant differences were observed between the two hospitals regarding the size, location, and morphology of colorectal adenomas (P < 0>
The present study, conducted in two comprehensive tertiary hospitals, provided a profile of colorectal polyps in young patients. The frequency of advanced adenomas of the colon is approximately 5%, which increases with increasing polyp size. Advanced histology was more prevalent in larger pedunculated colorectal polyps, but nearly one third of advanced adenomas were discovered in polyps less than 10 mm.
International guidelines recommend CRC screening in average-risk adults over 45 years of age for early detection of CRC and adenomatous polyps [8]. Recently, physicians have called for increased awareness of CRC in young populations because of the increased incidence of CRC in young populations [10]. The reported prevalence of colonic polyps varies widely, possibly due to differences in the structure of studies, screening methods, and even genetic and environmental factors. Data on the prevalence and distribution of polyps in young Asians are limited. It was estimated that 30% of the Western population suffers from colon polyps, while lower rates (10-15%) have been recorded in Asia and Africa [11]. In our study, the colorectal polyp detection rate is 20% in youth (average age 37.6 ± 5.4), compared with 17.5% in Chinese patients under age 50 (average age 41.0 ± 6.8 years) [12]and 16.3% in the asymptomatic Chinese (average age 56.6±10.7 years) [13]. The adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been regarded as a primary benchmark for colonoscopy [14, 15]. In a multinational Asian study, the ADR for patients aged 20-39 years and patients aged 40-49 years were 4.7% and 13.9%, respectively [16]. Aging is a risk factor for colorectal adenomas and is associated with the development of high-grade dysplasia in adenomas, irrespective of the size and histology of the adenoma [17]. In the 40-49 years and 50-59 years groups, Leshno et al. noted significant disparities in Western and East Asian populations regarding total and advanced ADR [18]. There was also a tendency for ADR to increase with age in our study population. We found a higher ADR in men than in women, and the ratio of ADR in men to women was 2.0 (men vs female, 886 vs 435), which is consistent with other studies in Asian population studies [19-22] (odds ratios ranged from 1.7 to 2.4). Our findings support the conclusion that optimal the ADR targets should be stratified according to gender and age. Several studies have confirmed that gender and age are risk factors for advanced adenoma or CRC [23-27], which was not found in our youth cohort study.
Clinicians make judgments regarding particular polyps based on histology. The proportion of each polyp type appeared to provide the most visually and clinically meaningful information. Our study and others have shown that the histological features of advanced adenomas become more prevalent as the polyp size increases [7, 8]. Martínez et al. demonstrated that patients with baseline adenomas of 10-19 mm and ≥20 mm have a substantially higher risk of developing advanced neoplasms than those with adenomas of < 5>10 mm). Some small polyps may regress or grow slowly [29], and overdiagnosis of tiny polyps appears to incease the cost of colonoscopic surveillance. However, since the majority of all polyps were tiny, a substantial proportion of all polyps with characteristics of advanced adenoma were observed in polyps less than 10 mm. The trend was analogous to the results of a large national database study [7]. We then recommended the removal of all polyps, regardless of polyp size, whether the patient is young or old [4, 5, 30].
The malignant potential of adenomas is generally considered to correlate with their size, location, and morphology. Our findings indicate that the polyp location is closely, but not independently, associated with abnormal developmental changes in colorectal adenomas. Adenomas detected by screening colonoscopy were more frequent in the distal colon than in the proximal colon, especially advanced adenomas [12, 31, 32], which was in line with our study. Studies [12, 33, 34] also focused on the status of the proximal colon based on findings in the distal colon. They found that the relative risk of proximal colorectal adenomas was higher in patients with distal colorectal adenomas than in those without. Right-sided CRC increases in older adults, and Yamaji et al. [35] have revealed a right-side shift in the location of new colorectal adenomas with age. In our study, together with that of Saudi Arabia [36], the majority of neoplastic polyps were located in the left colon. That seems to support the development of an adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that pedunculated polyp was an independent predictor of advanced histology (OR=1.5, p=0.001). In short, we emphasized the necessity of biopsy and colonoscopic surveillance in young populations with pedunculated polyps.
This was a retrospective study with some limitations. First, the inclusion cohort included patients from two endoscopic centers who underwent polypectomy, therefore, a selection bias exists. Second, it was not a population-based screening study, and the current data cannot permit the establishment of the absolute prevalence of colorectal polyps in the young population. Measurements by endoscopists are generally used for clinical decision making. The proportion of polyps shown here may not be sufficient to establish a benchmark for clinical practice, but we provide some indicative value for designing effective population-based CRC screening. Prospective studies in more centers and with larger sample sizes are needed in the future. Finally, our study relied on polyp size reported by the endoscopist, the accuracy of which may be affected by individual differences. However, there are no standards on how to measure the size of polyps, so such a limitation probably applies to most studies concerning polyp size measurement.
In summary, our study demonstrated that specific characteristics of colorectal polyps, such as large and pedunculated, are associated with advanced histology in young patients, highlighting the importance of excision. In addition, owing to the large proportion of advanced histopathology related to small polyps, it is recommended that endoscopists resected all polyps detected during colonoscopy and submit them for histology.
This study was supported by grants (no. 2021KY749 to Meng Que Xu) from the Medical Health Technology Project of Zhejiang and (no. 3502Z202374037 to Zeng Yan Xue) from the Xiamen Natural Science Foundation. We thank all the doctors, nurses and pathologists who helped to manage the patients during the study.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this study will be made available by the authors upon request.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization and funding acquisition: Meng Que Xu and Zeng Yan Xue; Acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data: Yu Qin Shen, Ming Yong Di and Yi Fang Deng; Writing – original draft: Yu Qin Shen; Writing – review & editing: Meng Que Xu and Zeng Yan Xue.
Ethics approval
This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committees of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University and West China Xiamen Hospital, Sichuan University.
Funding: This study was supported by the grants (no. 2021KY749 to Meng Que Xu) from the Medical Health Technology Project of Zhejiang and (no. 3502Z202374037 to Zeng Yan Xue) from the Xiamen Natural Science Foundation.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
