AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1897/163
*Corresponding Author: Bhattacharyya S. Associate Professor Microbiology, AIIH&PH, Kolkata, India.
Citation: Roy B, Das T, Bhattacharyya S. (2023), Overview on Old and New Biochemical Test for Bacterial Identification, J, Surgical Case Reports and Images 6(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-1897/163
Copyright: © 2023, Bhattacharyya S. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 26 July 2023 | Accepted: 05 August 2023 | Published: 15 August 2023
Keywords: bacteria; isolates; biochemical
Despite the advent of many newer tests, biochemical tests are still pivotal for bacterial identification. Many biochemical tests are there for bacterial identification and they have to be inoculated depending on which bacteria is suspected. Flow charts have to be prepared sequentially for deducing bacterial identification by biochemical tests. These aspects have been elaborated in this chapter.
Surgical and other infections can be caused by bacteria which need to be identified by phenotypic tests like staining and biochemical tests. Proper identification is the prerequisite for empirical therapy. Newer methods like MALDI-TOF and whole genome sequencing are available now in many places for accurate identification of bacteria from colonies, but biochemical tests are still one of the preferred identification methods for decades, not only just because they are reliable and inexpensive but also because of their quick and accurate results [1]. Identification of unknown microbial culture is a key step in medical, industrial and research institutes, and there are more than thousands of methods of identification of a particular species of microbes. However biochemical tests are still more preferable for many reasons from past till now [2]. Microbial identification at first glance is challenging for experienced research scientists also, and different screening steps are there which make classification schemes smaller and smaller and more specific. Firstly one should go for phenotypic and morphological studies; second, nutrient requirements in different nutrient media; third, Gram staining and acid fact staining ; fourth, biochemical properties of particular strain, fifth is PCR and sequencing [1]. After performing following screening tests, a researcher should have all details about that particular species. Although PCR and sequencing is more specific and expensive among all, mostly microbial origin source is identified in fourth step as well but to confirm the results, PCR and sequencing are done [3].
Biochemical tests are the oldest methods to identify microorganisms, by phenotypic traits. The cornerstone of most biochemical tests is the ability of bacteria to use specific biomolecules, producing valuable organic chemicals for themselves. There are several types of biochemical tests where different bacteria are identified or distinguished on the basis of different criteria. Simple visual confirmation of the organism's growth in the presence of essential nutrients by increasing turbidity in the liquid medium is one of the old approaches that is frequently used. However, in other experiments, the results are dependent on how the medium's colour changes as a result of the medium's pH changes. The way that microorganisms respond to these tests can be used to categorize them into distinct categories. Even down to the species level, several tests allow for the differentiation of microorganisms. . Nevertheless, there are several drawbacks to biochemical tests. Although affordable and providing both quantitative and qualitative data regarding the variety of microorganisms present in a sample, these procedures are time- and labour-intensive, and results take several days to appear. False positive results can occasionally be achieved, especially when similar microbial species are taken into consideration [4].
Different biochemical test and their discovery during time for identification of microbial culture are listed below:
Figure : Evolution of biochemical test for microbial identification ( source:- author)
Oxidase test – This test was first postulated by Gordon and McLeod in 1928. The cytochrome oxidase test is useful for identifying bacteria that can manufacture the enzyme. The test aids in identifying the families of Pseudomonaceae that produce oxidase and order Enterobacterales that do not. The mechanism of cytochrome oxidase is the transmission of electrons from the donor (the electron transport chain) to the final acceptor (oxygen), and reduction results in the formation of water. The electron donor will be oxidized by cytochrome oxidase, changing the color to dark purple due to formation of indophenol. This test is carried out by impregnating filter paper with 1 % tetra-methyl-p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride(TMPPD) which serves as an artificial electron donor, and drying it. The bacterial colonies are applied to a paper strip, and changes in color to blue-purple are detected within ten seconds [5]. Alternatively, the liquid reagent can be poured over the colonies directly and seen for colour change of the liquid. In modified oxidase, 6% TMPPD in DMSO is used for better cell wall penetration, in case of Micrococcus spp. Sometimes Bacillus spp. and many yeasts also give Oxidase positivity. Oxidase should never be done from colonies on blood agar because hemoglobin of blood has positive oxidase activity. Also, Oxidase should be done by picking the colony by edge of alme sterilized cover slip or glass slide and not nichrome loop, because Nichrome has Iron which has Positive oxidase activity itself. However,. Platinum loop may be used.
Figure. 1. Positive Oxidase disk test in P. aeruginosa
Table 1. Oxidase positive and negative bacteria of medical importance
Catalase test - Catalase test is used to identify microorganisms that possess the catalase enzymes. These bacteria create the catalase enzymes, which will neutralize the hydrogen peroxide and cause bubbles by producing nascent Oxygen, indicating a positive test result. O. Loew in 1900 discovered Catalase test. Most commonly, facultative anaerobic bacteria and obligate aerobes produce the catalase enzyme. Bacterial colony is mixed with a few drops of 3% H2O2 on a slide or in a test tube, and observed for bubble formation within 10 seconds (6). Most bacteria are catalase positive because this enzyme helps in neutralization of oxidizing free radicals. Catalase should never be done from colonies on blood agar due to positive Oxidase activity of hemoglobin . Catalase should be done by picking the colony by edge of sterilized cover slip or glass slide and not nichrome loop, because Nichrome has Iron which has Positive catalase activity itself. However, Platinum loop may be used Also, for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, 30% H2O2 is used for semiquantitative catalase test (tube catalase).
Table 2: Catalase positive and negative bacteria
Coagulase test - The subsequent test is performed first by Loeb in 1904 to identify microorganisms that can produce the coagulase enzyme. It generally aids in detecting Staphylococcus aureus, which is a coagulase- and catalase-positive bacterium. Coagulase is one of S. aureus's virulence-inducing components. During the reaction process, the coagulase enzyme will cause the blood plasma to coagulate by converting fibrinogen into fibrin. In order to perform this test, rabbit plasma and bacterial colonies in saline suspension are mixed. Bacteria will produce the coagulase enzyme, which will cause the plasma to coagulate as an indication of a positive reaction [7]. There are 2 types of coagulase tests :- free ( tube) and bound( slide ). Tube coagulase positivity is indicated by gellification of the plasma within 4-6 hours when incubated with liquid bacterial culture. It is to be note here that the gel again liquifies after 18-24 hours if kept at 37 degree C. Rabbit plasma is best for coagulase test but pooled human plasma can also be used. Staphylococcus aureus is positive for both slide and tube coagulase tests.
Figure 3. Picture of positive slide coagulase test (image: author)
Indole production test - The test described below is useful in identifying microorganisms with the capacity to produce the tryptophanase enzyme. Tryptophan is an amino acid that gets transformed into indole and Indole acetic acid by this enzyme. As a result, it can be tested by introducing various reagents like Ehrlich's reagent or Kovac's reagent (which gives red colour). Kovac's reagent has paradimethyl amino benzaldehyde( pDMAB) in isoamyl alcohol and concentrated HCl, whereas Ehrlich's have ethanol instead of isoamyl alcohol. As a result of the reagent and indole reaction, red rosindole dye is produced, a sign of positive test.
Table 2: Table showing Indole test results
< src>
Figure 4: Positive Indole test (image: authors)
Figure 5: Negative Indole test (image: authors)
Spot indole test:- Here cinnamaldehyde is used instead of pDMAB. It is used mostly for anaerobic bacteria, and the isolate is rubbed on a filter paper containing cinnamaldehyde. Development of a dark brown to reddish colour within seconds indicates positive result.
Urease test - A urease test aids in identifying microorganisms that can produce the urease enzyme. Christensen in 1946 threw light on urease rest. Urease is a member of the superfamilies of amidohydrolases and phosphodoesterases. Urea is hydrolysed by urease enzyme into NH3 and Carbon dioxide. The ammonia production will cause the medium's pH to shift to an alkaline level and its colour to pink at pH 8.1 provided phenol red is used as pH indicator, which indicates a positive result. Helicobacter pylori , which is urease positive can be detected rapidly with this test. The bacterium uses the urease enzyme to produce an alkaline environment to tackle gastric acid. Urease test is carried out by inoculating bacterial colonies in urea broth or urea agar. This test needs 18 to 22 hours of incubation for results but for H. pylori and Proteus spp., positive results may appear as rapidly as 4-6 hours after inoculating [9].
Table 3 : List of urease positive and negative bacteria
Figure 6: Urease positive (left) and negative tubes(right). (image: authors)
Citrate utilization test (CUT) - The identification of microorganisms with the capacity to use citrate as a single source of Carbon, is made easier with the use of this test. For this test, Simmons’ citrate agar is employed, which contains inorganic ammonium and citrate as sources of Nitrogen and Carbon, respectiveily. The CUT test is useful in identifying microorganisms that make the enzyme citrate permease, which transforms citrate into pyruvate and subsequently enters the metabolic cycle of organisms to generate energy and growth on culture media. The ammonium ions are converted into NH3 when microorganisms use citrate, raising the pH of the medium. When the pH rises above 7.6, bromothymol blue's colour will change from green to blue due to the pH change. Bromothymol blue is used as an indicator. As a result it should form colonies on the top of the slant and change colour into royal blue. If colour has been changer but colonies does not appear it also contemplated as negative. Colonies must be there to deduce a positive result [10]. Also inoculum on Citrate agar should be light and colonies should first be suspended in normal saline before inoculation. Colonies should never be directly inoculated form solid media on Citrate agar, because colonies may also contain dead bacterial cells and living bacterial cells may utilise Carbon from dead cells to give false positive Citrate utilization result.
Table 4:- examples of Citrate utilization positive and negative important bacteria.
Figure 7: Citrate utilization positive (right) and negative (left) tubes
Triple sugar iron test
This test is useful in identifying microorganisms that are members of the Enterbacteriacea family. The test medium contains three sugars: lactose, sucrose, and glucose, each at a concentration of 1% (no, glucose is as 0.1%). As indicators, phenol red and ferric ammonium citrate are used. Sodium thiosulphate is also there as source of Sulphur. The medium is butted and slanted and both are inoculated. Since almost all inoculated bacteria use glucose, the concentration of glucose is kept low in comparison to other sugars. Within 16-18 hours of inoculation, the colour of the slant and butt will change to yellow as a result of acid production if the bacteria can use glucose in both aerobic and anaerobic circumstances. The media will continue to be yellow and acid production will continue if the bacteria can use the sucrose and lactose. If the bacteria are unable to use lactose or sucrose, they begin to use amino acids, which turns the medium alkaline and causes it to turn red from phenol red. If the bacteria is a strict aerobe, the colour of the butt remains the same, and the reaction will only happen in slant. Both will react if the bacteria is a facultative anaerobe. Agar media may rise or crack as a result of the production of hydrogen peroxide gas by reduction of thiosulfate by certain bacterial species [11]. TSI is interpreted as a/a and k/k , depending on acid formation in slant and butt. Slant reaction is used as numerator and butt reaction in denominator in a/a and k/k. H2S is detected by formation of black colour due to formation of Iron-sulfur complex.
Mannitol motility test
Mannitol motility test is required for confirmation of weather the bacteria are motile or not. Mannitol is a sugar which are fermented by some bacteria and it turns into pink in colour, if Andrade’s indicator is used in this medium. For identification of Bacillus cereus, mannitol should not be fermented and motility should be positive. It takes 18 to 22 hours of incubation for showing result. It is also useful for detecting Enterococcus casseliflavus.
Voges-Proskaur (VP) Test
This is an expansion of the methyl red test that locates organisms with the capacity to create the product butylene. The intermediate of this reaction, discovered by the use of alpha-naphthol and 40% KOH, is acetoin. Medium used is Glucose phosphate broth and the isolate needs to be grown for 48 hours at least. If KOH is present, acetoin will oxidize to diacetyl. Diacetyl will react with the guanidine component of peptone in the presence of alpha-naphthol, producing a deep red colour that indicates a positive result. The Methyl Red (MR) test is used for this. First identified during 1898. [12]. Write in table examples of VP positive and negative important bacteria. Examples of VP positive bacteria: Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella spp. and Staphylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus aureus is positive for both MR and VP. However, a bacterium that is positive for MR test is not usually positive for VP test.
Bile asculin agar test
This test was first described by Rochaix in 1924 and Swan first introduce the use of bile Esculin agar in 1954, is used to determine which bacteria hydrolyze esculin when bile is present. This test is a selective and differentiating medium for enterococcus identification. Bile and sodium azide are the selective media, while esculin is the differential medium. In contrast to sodium azide, bile will prevent the growth of Gram-ve bacteria, with the exception of enterococci and a few species of streptococci. When bile is present, some bacteria can hydrolyze esculin to produce esculetin, which reacts with ferric citrate in the medium to form phenolic iron complex, changing the color of agar from dark brown to black to indicate a positive test, such as for Enterococcus and Streptococcus bovis. The color will not alter in negative case [13]. Write in table examples of Bile aesculin hydrolysis positive and negative important bacteria.
Methyl Red-
Discovered by Clark and Lubs in 1915. This test used to identify coliform bacteria and their potential to produce acid from the glucose. And ultimately lowered the pH at about 4. Medium used is Glucose phosphate broth. A few drops of methyl red as an indicator when added to the 48-hour old microbial culture, a bright red colour is contemplated as positive. Shades fall intermediate between yellow and red result as doubtful positive. Methyl red indicator is prepared by dissolving 0.1 g methyl red in 300 ml 95% ethyl alcohol, which is then diluted to 500 ml with distilled water [14].
β-Galactosidase (ONPG)- This test is to identify late-lactose-fermenting paracolon organisms (like Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., Shigella sonnei) known by their unique β-galactosidase activity which make them different from non lactose- fermenting bacteria like Salmonella and Proteus spp. From o-nitrophenyl-/3-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG), β – Galactosidase releases o-nitrophenol. Test organism should be grown in ONPG broth made by adding 250ml of ONPG solution to 750 ml of peptone water and stored at 4°C before use. The ONPG solution contains 0.6% ONPG in 0.01M Na2HPO4 buffer at pH 7.5. Alternatively, it can be done with ONPG disk. Normal saline is taken in 2 ml amounts and inoculated with loopful of the test bacterial culture previously grown on agar and ONPG disk. If there is yellow colour within 4-5 hours, it means that o-nitrophenol is formed, which indicates β -galactosidase activity. The colour may be change to bright yellow within 3 hours of incubation at 37°C. Tubes showing no colour change between 24 h considered as negative [14]. It is useful for detecting Late lactose fermenters like Shigella sonnei, Citrobacter spp. and some Enterobacter species([4].
Aesculin Hydrolysis
Discovered by Gemmell and Hodgkiss in 1964 to detect lactobacilli by incorporating 1
Surgical site infections and many other infections can be caused by medically important bacteria. Despite new identification methods like PCR and sequencing, phenotypic and biochemical tests still hold the key for laboratory identification due to their lower cost and ease in carrying out and interpretation. Newer modifications of biochemical tests have come like Rapid carbohydrate utilization test, API -20E and others, but they have not been able to replace old conventional biochemical tests. Hence they are still very important to know and discuss. Tests like Catalase, coagulase and Indole production are still the mainstay for proper laboratory diagnosis of many bacterial infections. Also, one needs to form flow charts for proper and accurate identification, like if one gets Gram positive cocci in clusters and golden-yellow pigmented colonies on Nutrient agar or Salt-milk agar, and if the isolate is catalase and coagulase positive, it is most likely to be Staphylococcus aureus. Likewise if one gets Lactose fermenting Gram negative bacilli and the isolate is catalase positive and Indole positive with no Citrate utilization and Urease activities, and in TSI one gets a/a with gas but no H2S, it may be Escherichia coli. Such flow charts help in more precise and accurate identification. Also sometimes 2 or 3 biochemical tests can be combined in 1 medium or tube to reduce workload, like SIM medium (Sulfide-Indole-motility), MIU (Motility-Indole-Urease) medium and others. They also yield satisfactory results.
Among the biochemical tests, assays such as catalase test, amylase and nitrate test are used to identify the gram positive bacteria while oxidase test, urease test, indole test, arginine dihydrolase test, hydrogen sulfide test, methyl red test, and voges-proskauer test are used to encounter gram negative bacteria. Some special test like heamolysis test, phosphatase test, amino acid decarboxylase test, phenylalanine deaminase test and aromatic ring cleavage test is used to illuminate some special groups of bacteria carrying unique properties. Through this paper, one can get a clear overview of biochemical test and their advancement with time can be understandable easily. Biochemical test is the key for easily microbial identification for researchers in past, present and also in future, from various sites of infections.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
