AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/429
1Gynecology-Obstetrics and endoscopy Department, Maternity Souissi, University Hospital Center IBN SINA, University Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
2Gynecological-mammary pole, sidi Mohamed ben Abdallah national institute of oncology, University Hospital Center IBN SINA, University Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
*Corresponding Author: Khalid lghamour, Gynecology-Obstetrics and endoscopy Department, Maternity Souissi, University Hospital Center IBN SINA, University Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco
Citation: Khalid lghamour, Yacir elalami, Hafid hachi., (2024). Advances in Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry: Bridging Mental and Physical Health Care, J Clinical Research and Reports, 17(4); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/429
Copyright: © 2024, Khalid lghamour. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 07 October 2024 | Accepted: 05 November 2024 | Published: 27 December 2024
Keywords: sex cord and stromal tumors of the ovary; steroid cell tumors of the ovary; androgens; adnexectomy; anatomopathology.
Tumors of the sex cords and stroma of the ovary are relatively rare, accounting for around 8% of all primary ovarian tumors. Steroid cell tumors of the ovary are rare, accounting for less than 0.1% of all ovarian tumors. The majority of these tumors produce steroid hormones, and only 10-15% of patients are asymptomatic. Although steroid cell tumors are generally benign, there is a risk of malignant transformation. Surgery is the main treatment.
We report a case of a steroid cell tumour of the left ovary discovered on anatomopathological examination of the left adnexectomy operative specimen in a 47-year-old hypertensive diabetic patient who clinically presented with virilism with severe hirsutism, muscular and clitoral hypertrophy and frontotemporal baldness, and biologically increased androgens without associated hypercorticism, and in whom an abdomino-pelvic scanner showed a left latero-uterine mass measuring 74x66x64 mm, pelvic MRI showed a polylobed left ovarian mass classified ORADS 5, measuring 53x65x87 mm. After histological confirmation of the diagnosis, the patient was taken back for total surgery with total hysterectomy, right adnexectomy, omentectomy, appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, with no signs of malignancy on histological examination, simple postoperative follow-up and our patient placed under surveillance.
Ovarian tumors are subdivided into three main categories: epithelial tumors, germinal tumors, tumors of the gonadal stroma and sex cords, and other rare tumors. Tumors of the sexual cords and stroma of the ovary are relatively rare, accounting for around 8% of all primary ovarian tumors. Their precise diagnosis is essential, as it determines the therapeutic approach.
Ovarian steroid cell tumors are part of the tumors of the sex cords and stroma of the ovary. They are ovarian neoplasms composed of steroid hormone-secreting cells and usually occur in adults. They are very rare, have steroid-secreting capacity and are most often virilizing. Only histopathological examination, with or without immunohistochemical study, can provide an accurate diagnosis. These tumors are generally benign, but the potential for malignancy is not negligible, and treatment is usually surgical. Once malignancy has been confirmed, complementary therapies are required.
47-year-old patient, gravida 4, para 4, type 2 diabetic on Glucophage, hypertensive on triple therapy, history of thyroidectomy for complicated goiter with tracheotomy, hospitalized in the endocrinology department for a clinical and biological hyperandrogenism syndrome, presenting with virilism associated with severe hirsutism, muscular and clitoral hypertrophy, and frontotemporal baldness. Biological workup shows increased androgens without associated hypercorticism: testosteronemia=12.75 ng/ml (14x normal), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (SDHEAS)=850 ng/ml, estradiol=173 pg/ml. Abdomino-pelvic scanner showed a heterogeneous, roughly oval, left latero-uterine mass measuring 74x66x64 mm, pelvic and latero-aortic adenopathies, no signs of peritoneal carcinosis. Pelvic MRI showed a roughly oval, polylobed left ovarian mass classified as ORADS 5, measuring 53x65x87 mm. Chest X-ray showed multiple nodular peri-hilar opacities. Chest scanner showed no suspicious-looking parenchymal lesions, basal subpleural curvilinear condensations that were sequelae of COVID 19 infection.
An exploratory laparotomy was indicated. On exploration, a tumour measuring 8x7 cm was found over the left ovary; the right ovary was unremarkable. A major left adnexectomy of the mass was performed, the postoperative course was straightforward, and the operative specimen was sent for anatomopathological study, which showed a steroid cell tumour of the ovarian stroma associated with a stromal tumour contingent with kitten-ring cells, the ovarian capsule intact, and the tumour classified as stage IA.The decision of the multidisciplinary coordination meeting (MCM) was to measure tumour markers : CA125=21,1 ; CA19-9= 9,2 ; ACE=1,77. After reassessment, the MCM decided to perform total cytoreduction surgery in addition to a left adnexectomy. By subumbilical median laparotomy, a total hysterectomy was performed, with right adnexectomy, omentectomy, appendectomy and multiple peritoneal biopsies. No lymph node dissection was performed. Surgical specimens were sent for anatomopathological study, which showed the absence of histological signs of malignancy on all specimens sent. Post-operative care was straightforward, and the patient was given a follow-up appointment.
Figure 1 : Abdominal and pelvic scannershowed a roughly oval, heterogeneous left latero-uterine mass measuring 74x66x64 mm.
Figure 2: Pelvic MRI showing a roughly oval, polylobed left ovarian mass classified ORADS 5, measuring 53x65x87 mm.
Figure 3 : chest x-ray showing multiple nodular peri-hilar opacities. No suspicious-looking parenchymal lesions on chest scanner.
Figure 4 : left adnexectomy specimen sent for anatomopathological study: 8x7 cm polylobed mass over the left ovary (A), left fallopian tube (B).
Ovarian tumors fall into three main categories: epithelial tumors (55%), germ cell tumors (30%), tumors of the gonadal stroma and sex cords (8%), and other rarer tumors. Ovarian cancer accounts for 3,7% of all female cancers (6th rank) [1]. Tumors of the sex cords and stroma of the ovary are relatively rare, accounting for around 8% of all primary ovarian tumors and 7% of all ovarian cancer tumors. Most are low-grade. The majority of stromal tumors are diagnosed in women over 50, but they can also occur in adolescents and young women. They may be estrogenic or androgenic. Some are characterized by an element of female differentiation (granulosa and fibrothecal group tumors) or male differentiation (Sertoli or Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors). Some are made up of steroid cells: stromal luteoma, Leydig cell tumor, hilar tumor [2]. These tumors develop at the expense of cells belonging to the supporting tissue of the ovaries, and cover a wide range of heterogeneous lesions characterized by their great morphological diversity. These cells produce sex hormones such as estrogen, progesterone and androgens. Stromal tumors often over-secrete these hormones. Accurate diagnosis of these tumors is fundamental, as it determines the therapeutic approach. The development of medical imaging techniques in recent years has facilitated the diagnosis of ovarian tumours. However, only histopathological examination, with or without immunohistochemical study, can provide an accurate diagnosis. Because of their rarity and morphological diversity, these tumors pose a number of diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic challenges.
Steroid cell tumors include stromal luteoma, Leydig cell tumors and unspecified steroid cell tumors. Only the latter have malignant potential, so metastatic [3]. Clinically, they may be accompanied by signs of virilization or manifestations of hyperoestrogenism.Stage, age, tumour size, presence of necrosis, nuclear atypia and number of mitoses have been reported to have an impact on patient survival [4].
Non-specific steroid cell ovarian tumours account for 60% of all steroid cell ovarian tumours and less than 0.1% of all ovarian tumours [5].
Steroid cell tumours occur at any age, with an average age at diagnosis of 47. In 50% of cases, they are virilizing tumors. They may be non-secreting (25%), cause hyperoestrogenism (10%) [5] or, more rarely, Cushing's syndrome. They are malignant in 25 to 43% of cases [5,6]. They are made up of cells similar to those that secrete steroid hormones. Stromal luteoma and Leydig cell tumors are clinically benign. Approximately one-third of steroid cell tumors without other indications are clinically malignant.
In terms of imaging, the usually small size of these tumours means that they may not be detected by ultrasound or CT scan [7]. Color Doppler, pelvic angioscanner or dynamic MRI appear useful for unmasking the major hypervascularization of these tumors [8].
Steroid cell tumors account for less than 0.1% of ovarian tumors [9]. They are generally benign, although the potential for malignancy is non-negligible in the presence of well-defined histological criteria. Good ovarian imaging is essential in the assessment of hyperandrogenism without associated adrenal abnormalities. Treatment is mainly surgical. Complementary therapies are required once malignancy has been confirmed.
Given that 70% of patients have stage I disease (overall 5-year survival 95%), surgery is the most important therapeutic weapon. Its role is essential, but no precise recommendation can be given as to its modalities : removal of all lesions present remains the basis of treatment. Finally, the prolonged natural history of the disease argues in favor of iterative surgery in the event of recurrence.
Published studies provide no decisive evidence in favor of treatment with radiotherapy, the volume to be irradiated is not defined (it is not obvious that total abdominal radiotherapy will be necessary), and in the publications the doses used, when reported, are highly variable.
Chemotherapy is proposed for tumors with a poor prognosis and in relapse, although no scientific data have been published [4]. Chemosensitivity is evidenced by the numerous responses observed in palliative situations : brief response to alkylating agents, frequent response to adriamycin-bleomycin, actinomycin-fluorouracil-cyclophosphamide and cisplatin-based combinations ; the highest response rate is 80% with the cisplatin- etoposide-bleomycin (BEP) combination, protocol identical to that used for testicular tumours.
In our case, the tumour was confined to the left ovary with stage IA, and left adnexectomy was performed. After confirming the diagnosis of ovarian tumour on anatomopathology, with the presence of a contingent of stromal tumour with kitten-ring cells, we decided to carry out total surgery with total hysterectomy, right adnexectomy, omentectomy, appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, with the anatomopathological result of the absence of histological signs of malignancy on all surgical specimens studied.
Ovarian steroid cell tumors are very rare tumors that belong to the tumors of the sex cords and ovarian stroma, they are seen in adult women and are most often virilizing as in our case described, they are generally benign but the risk of malignant transformation is possible, the diagnosis is confirmed by histopathology, treatment is most often surgical.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
