Opinion Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9392/080
*Corresponding Author: Francesco Carelli, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Milan, Italy.
Citation: Francesco Carelli (2021) One hundred years ago New and original way for teaching, learning, going under the surface. J. Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study, 4(4); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/080
Copyright: © 2021 Francesco Carelli, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 27 August 2021 | Accepted: 06 September 2021 | Published: 10 September 2021
Keywords: teaching; learning; interested; involvement; maintaining; like a joke; new different method
It is the explanation and the unusual and special way through new and original ways for teaching and learning, also in very young ages, going under the surface, involving and how to create the interest and how to maintain it through the time. It involve active participation, creativity, imagination, looking from different points of view so to maintain this attitude lifelong and to maintain interest as well, sustaining interest for further discoveries. In teaching our medical students, we push and encourage and motivate them, for instance, asking how they feel about themselves in situations they have to face going under the appearances.
Children, even if so young, are very interested in anything in the world and can easily learn lots of information and attitudes. They can also appreciate Art in Museums and Exhibitions, provided you don't bare nor stress them with long inappropriate speeches or requiring too difficult performances.
If you are able to introduce them to the topic making them to participate actively, they'll amuse themselves and learn to look around them from many different points of view, that can make them become open minded, hoping they'll maintain this attitude lifelong.
F. went with his grandchild, three years old, to visit an exhibition concerning Chagall.
At the end, F. consider these questions: “ Does this small example demonstrate that very young people can be introduced to, involved and interested in matters not usually considered suitable for them ? Do we believe such young people are not interested in or cannot be introduced to great art? What, anyway, is “interest “? How can we be sure there is none? What signs of interest might we see in such a young person, and how can we strive to both induce it and maintain it over time? How to maintain memories to as to sustain interest for further discoveries?”
F. try to find an answer with a second round, a visit at an exhibition about Kazimir Malevich, introduced by a tale.
“One hundred years ago there was a wizard, with a little devil as helper. One day, the little devil suggested that the wizard could become a great painter. With his magic wand he put shapes and colours on the canvas, moved a red spot here, a yellow circle there, but notwithstanding his work, the final result was horrible ! a disgusting bulk of colours contrasting one against the others ! The angry wizard hid the colours into a black cube. Kazimir, a Russian peasant, found in his field a black square and inside it he found coloured circles, squares, rectangles, and started to put them together, studying which could be the best combination. So, he produced beautiful pictures that made him one of the most famous painters in the world”.
This is the didactic introduction elaborated for a particular student, F.’s four years old grandson Matteo, during their visit to the exhibition “ Kazimir Malevich one hundred years after the black square “.
So, a method to teach is “ Kazimir and the conquest of colors “. Another method of teaching is to find the opposites: Kamizir painted the country, the workers. Among his most remarkable works is the isolated red house without doors and windows, also in this case he returns to the scheme of square. At the same time, we can speak about the ways, habits, ideas of the past and the new possible and future developments.
We must go beyond the appearances: in Malevich when look at “ the black cross “, we should understand that it is not more than the association or grouping of five squares blacks ( or wishbones ) and four white squares. When we look at a patient and visit and let him / her speak, are we able the see all these different aspects, to see all the components, all the different co-morbidities and concurrent causes realizing the uniqueness of that patient?
In teaching our students, we push and encourage and motivate them, for instance, asking how they feel about themselves in situations they have to face. Adapting this method to grandson M., observing Malevich’s works, F. ask him: “what colour do you feel today ?“ “did you ever feel yourself a black square ?“ , “what would make you feel like a red circle ? “.
When we teach our students, we act to create “role- plays“, to form groups in contrast each other , each other prepared to defend an idea or a position about what they are learning or seeing. So, for Matteo. “Make square “(as the Malevich’s squares) means joining forces to defend own ideas. We can divide into two, F. and M. create square
for defense, make a triangle or a wedge to go on the attack, join forces making a circle…or a solid defense through a new square, incorporating circles and triangles.
“The head of farmer “ is a key opera for Matteo, from which he get ( and learn ) the most of the philosophy of Malevich.. Matteo has seen the work and take a white sheet with only checkerboard contours of the face where to put the colours. Here, he is able to enter colours as he like or he have learned and understood. Then he is pushed to cut the work done along and, combining different pieces like a jigsaw puzzle, he is able to create new positions or new compositions (….creativity , imagination step ) .
At the end, Matteo goes to the great hall where is created, for the first time, the atmosphere of the opera “ Victory on the Sun “ one of the most important works in Russian Cubofuturist Theater ”. Now, he is in front of the theatrical figures drawn and designed by Malevich, for the first time reproduced life-size in that great room. What was hypothetical , as seen in costumes drawn in pencil and seen in frames, now it is the reality , mannequins with the most fantastic costumes, each one different, as in medicine when the student sees for the first time the real patients , each with its own large and different problems.
Matteo is really involved all the time, even listening to the tape and do a lot of questions.
He has learned a lot. F. explain how the artist, at beginning painted figures, to switch to triangles, circles and squares, to return to the figures ….but many of these figures, for a time, were painted as empty faces . Without eyes and mouth and nose.
“But, why of that?” ask Matteo. “In this period, he went back to the figurative, but figures stand motionless in an elementary landscape, they are faceless, without beard, without arms, eyes, nose, and ears. Malevich doesn’t see any more the man of the future, or better, the future for men has become an unfathomable enigma. There is dominating the bolscevich dictature. People become mutilated mannequins, prisoners in a criminal gulag, concentration camp; his peasants become robots with a metallic appearance: a humanity in the throes of a nihilistic, apocalyptic destructiveness, stiff in anticipation of the end of the world.”
Matteo is impressed by the straight and long nose painted for the head of the farmer. Everything is going to create interest and memory in him. He has a lot of questions. He paints also at home. Two weeks later, he show me to have created three similar “farmer heads “built with Lego plastics.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, What distinguishes International Journal of Clinical Case Report and Review is not only the scientific rigor of its publications, but the intellectual climate in which research is evaluated. The submission process is refreshingly free of unnecessary formal barriers and bureaucratic rituals that often complicate academic publishing without adding real value. The peer-review system is demanding yet constructive, guided by genuine scientific dialogue rather than hierarchical or authoritarian attitudes. Reviewers act as collaborators in improving the manuscript, not as gatekeepers imposing arbitrary standards. This journal offers a rare balance: high methodological standards combined with a respectful, transparent, and supportive editorial approach. In an era where publishing can feel more burdensome than research itself, this platform restores the original purpose of peer review — to refine ideas, not to obstruct them Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi, FCCP PULMONOLOGIST AND THORACIC IMAGING.
Dear Reader: We have published several articles in the Auctores Publishing, LLC, journal, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports in recent years (CMRR). This is an ‘open access’ journal and the following are our observations. From the initial invitation to submit an article, to the final edits of galley proofs, we have found CMRR personnel to be professional, responsive, rapid and thorough. This entire process begins with Catherine Mitchell, Editorial Coordinator. She is simply outstanding, and, I believe, unparalleled in her capacity. I cannot imagine a more responsive and dedicated Editorial Coordinator. As I read the dates and timing of her correspondence with us, it seems that she never sleeps. I hope Auctores Publishing, LLC, appreciates her efforts as much as these authors do. Thank you to Auctores Publishing, LLC, to the Editorial Staff/Board, and to Catherine Mitchell from a grateful author(s).