Occupational Health Network in the Literature from 2019 to 2022

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2767-7370/037

Occupational Health Network in the Literature from 2019 to 2022

Arturo Sánchez, Sánchez ^1*
Cruz Garcia Lirios ²
Gilberto Bermúdez Ruíz ³
Victor Hugo Merino Cordoba ⁴

1 Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala

2 Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Mexico

3 Universidad Anahuac

4 Universidad Católica Luis Amigo

*Corresponding Author: Arturo Sánchez Sánchez, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala.

Citation: Arturo Sánchez, Sánchez, Cruz G. Lirios, Gilberto B. Ruíz, Merino Cordoba VH (2023), Occupational Health Network in the Literature from 2019 to 2022, J New Medical Innovations and Research, 4(1); DOI:10.31579/2767-7370/037

Copyright: © 2023, Arturo Sánchez. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 02 February 2023 | Accepted: 13 February 2023 | Published: 22 February 2023

Keywords: governance; health; disease; intervention

Abstract

Governance is institutional when common objectives, tasks and goals prevail in its relationship structure. The isomorphism that distinguishes health institutions can be seen in their care protocols, but also in the findings reported in the literature and external observations. The objective of the study was to establish the structure of relationships between the findings reported in the literature to compare them with the observations of experts. A documentary study was carried out with a sample of sources published in institutional repositories, considering the search by keywords over a period of 25 years. The results show a centralized government in the isomorphism, but conflictive, as well as a peripheral corporate government. In relation to the consulted literature, lines of study related to the dimensions of institutional governance are indicated.

Introduction

The promotion of self-care, for the purposes of this work, refers to a system of joint management of health services aimed at the prevention of diseases and accidents in the workplace, education or home [9]. It is a process of establishing priorities in the personal agenda, although with a view to collective or environmental public health. However, the promotion of self-care is distinguished by the degree of interdependence between the actors involved in the construction of a community, public and collective agenda. Unlike prevention programs and health care strategies, the promotion of self-care implies a degree of entrepreneurship in which information access and processing are fundamental [16]. This implies differences between those who allow themselves to be influenced by prevention campaigns and those who adopt criteria of choice aimed at building a favorable environment for their health and that of their peers. This is the case of civil organizations dedicated to monitoring the quality of health services, but also of those aimed at building a system for disseminating and transferring knowledge to avoid drug monopolies or the management of medical units, specialized centers in strategic areas. In this way, self-care, within the framework of institutions, implies the construction of a public health system guided by a constant dialogue between users and authorities, but without excluding the specialized participation of experts and medical organizations that not only affect the political health, but also local and community lifestyles. Precisely, in the case of dermatological health, disease prevention implies the collaboration of specialists, civil society and authorities to generate a campaign and dissemination of hygienic lifestyles, as well as immediate attention to root local problems [4]. It is a system of co-government or consensual management of economic resources and health professionals. The governance of public health is a line of research that is part of the Division of Social Sciences, discipline of Social Work, area of specialization in adherence to treatment of diseases and prevention of accidents, but also the disciplines of sociology, administration, nursing , anthropology and psychology are involved in diagnosis, intervention and evaluation as central axes of the public health agenda with an emphasis on the prevention of health risks and the promotion of health and self-care. The theoretical frameworks that explain co-responsibility are

1) social reliability theory,

2) agenda setting theory,

3) socio-political co-responsibility theory.

The promotion of self-care, in the context of the three theoretical approaches, is the result of the guidelines of the Earth Summits on the effects of climate change on environmental public health, although the degree of participation of civil society establishes differences between approaches. Explaining the balance between the challenges and opportunities of the environment and personal, group or collective capacities is a response to these external requirements. Thus, the promotion of self-care refers to despair, according to the theory of social reliability, in the face of an environmental contingency, the citizen assumes the role of victim and delegates his health to his authorities [5]. In this sense, social trust emerges as the guiding axis of civil lifestyles, indicating the control of the government in private life with respect to public health, as would be the case of dermatological diseases whose epidemic outbreaks can reach vulnerable sectors. If social reliability is indicated by the control of a pandemic, the promotion of self-care will consist of the civil protection of vulnerable groups, such as children, women and the elderly, but if this social reliability is accentuated in electoral elections, it will be extended to all sectors through proselytism and political campaigns. It is a phenomenon known as the establishment of an electoral political agenda, which explains the transition from an epidemic to health promotion based on political leadership, candidates, parties, and government systems. In other words, an increase in homelessness not only generates greater reliability, but also intensifies electoral contests that no longer focus on employment problems but on Health. In such an agenda-setting scenario, the differences between authorities, experts and citizens become more acute, since each actor develops discourses that exclude their counterparts and interlocutors. This is because health problems tend to be represented according to the available information about an epidemic or pandemic [1]. Once the phenomenon is mediated, prevention programs and strategies depend on the bias of the media when it comes to disseminating information, since an abstract dissemination generates disinterest and a simplistic dissemination generates distrust, the media are now in charge of preventive actions, recommendations to contain the problem or changes in lifestyles necessary to eradicate the epidemic or pandemic. In an agenda setting context, experts are limited to guiding the public, governments are exposed to the judgment of the media, and civil society is defenseless against the media's interests in reducing or intensifying information related to the epidemic. In such a scenario, socio-political co-responsibility is necessary, which refers to lifestyles and communication based on disease prevention, but also first aid to reduce the spread of the disease. It is in this context that the promotion of self-care acquires greater meaning because it is a propaganda that is not always consistent with the diffusion of the media, which almost always consists of discrediting the authorities and causing civil desperation. If the theory of social trustworthiness explains a high degree of impotence and mistrust of society towards its rulers, the theory of agenda setting exacerbates this mistrust by showing that the authorities have different priorities than those of civil protection, but it is the theory of responsible civil society that will end. suggesting that the actors participate in the construction of a public health system [3]. Unlike the theory of social reliability, which highlights the emergence of a sector in favor of the government in matters of health policy, the theory of co-responsibility focuses on observing the opportunities and their relationship with the capacities of the actors. In an epidemic or pandemic context, co-responsibility implies self-care to avoid contagion and the spread of infection. illness. While the agenda setting theory focuses its interest on observing the effect of intensive media dissemination, the co-responsibility theory warns that knowledge cannot be disseminated in the media and, in any case, must be produced by experts and not by communicators., advertisers, journalists or columnists [7]. Precisely, the responsible dissemination of information could not be observed in communication professionals, but in health professionals who, in any case, would use the media to guide the civil protection strategy or collective action. Dermatological health studies show that prevention is a low-cost factor with respect to the treatment of a disease acquired by parasite contamination [4]. In this sense, a model for the study of an outbreak of dermatological contamination implies intervention strategies of social work in basic education institutions such as the propagation model, although the integration of other models explains the problem of contagion and treatment scenarios, recontagion and prevention, warning of the need to carry out prevention strategies and promotion of disease-free lifestyles, as well as individual and collective personal care (see Table 1).

Author

Results

1996

Garcia et al.

Negative and significant associations between the climate dimensions and the job satisfaction dimensions (r = .63 p < .05). They established eight dimensions of professional training related to perceptions as determinants of actions (β = .45 p < .05).

1997

Garcia et al.,

The sociodemographic variables affect the organizational climate (β = -.24; p .05). The climate had a negative influence on the results of the service (β = -.13; p.05) and a positive influence on the quality of the service (β = .12; p = .05).

1998

Quintero et al.

The climate of conflicts and tasks is correlated with the organizational culture (r respective r of .31 and .34 with a meaning less than .010).

1999

Velez et al.

The organizational climate influenced the security climate (β = .54), security and the climate in security knowledge (β = .58), security k now in security procedures (β = .35) and in security. participation in safety (β = .28), safety climate in safety motivation (β = .43) and participation in safety (β = .23), safety motivation in safety procedures (β = .57) and over participation in safety (β = .29).

2000

Quintero et al.

Authoritarian leadership determines job satisfaction (β = .40; p = .05). Work commitment was positively related to leadership, performance and satisfaction (respective r 105, .433, .431 and .281; p = .05).

2001

Busts et al.,

They established significant differences prior to the Test between the safety experiences in terms of attitude management (F = 4.7, p = 0.01), action management (F = 5.83, p = 0.01), training (F = 2.66, p = 0.05).

2002

Juarez et al.,

Significant differences between transformative, transactional and free leadership (respective F of 16.56, 317.53, 54.03 with a meaning less than .010)

2003

Quintero et al.

The factors intrinsic to the job, psychological identification, the feeling of duty of obligation and the interaction between achievements with identification determine satisfaction (β = -.391, F = 21.561, R2 =. 165 first model β =. 314, F = 40.009, R2 = .33 second model β = -.229 and β = -.587, F = 16.887, R2 = .337 third model) Job satisfaction was negatively related to each of the mabinga dimensions.

2004

Busts et al.

Gender, job, and life satisfaction are predictors of organizational commitment. It established differences between the male and female sexes (t (78) = 2.259, p = 0.027). and significant differences between age ranges (F (2.27) = 4.04, p = .021) for physical conditions and (F (2.77) = 3.41, p = .018)

2005

Lemon et al.

Job satisfaction affected the actual time of permanence by intention (β = .423 and β = .288, respectively), settling at 8.9;

Method

A documentary study was carried out with a selection of sources indexed to university institutional repositories such as Redalyc and Latindex, considering the search for keywords that defined a review period from 1996 to 2022, as well as the selection of articles published by authors from the sponsored universities. by institutional search engines (see Table 2).

	latindex	Redalyc
Governance	19	twenty
Reputation	10	twenty-one
Identity	twenty-one	26
Image	17	25
Corporate	22	17
Responsibility	eleven	fifteen
Satisfaction	twenty	19
Resilience	23	18
Reputation	18	13
Satisfaction	15	14
Leadership	14	23
Confidence	13	26

Table 2: Selected sample

Source: Prepared with data study

The Scientific Communication Inventory was used, which includes records of findings related to a topic. A score of 0 is assigned to results that are not connected to the central axis of analysis, which is institutional governance in health. The findings related to the analysis node are assigned a value of 1. The sum of the records corresponded to a governance index according to the dimensions found in the literature review. The Delphi technique was used to contrast the inventory record. A selection of experts was made from the h index published in Research gate. Respondents were contacted through their institutional email, informing them about the purpose of the study and the guarantee of confidentiality and anonymity of their responses to the inventory. Expert judges in the matter, considering the same qualification criteria of the findings used in the inventory. In three rounds, a rating, another comparison between the average and the initial rating, as well as a final round referring to the reconsideration or reiteration of the rating. The dimensions of the findings were established using the multidimensional scaling technique, considering the weights of the relationship between the finding and the associated dimension. Next, we proceeded to observe the structure of the relationships using the technique of profusion and connectivity. Versions 22 and 4.0 of Matlab and CytoScape software were used. The results were interpreted from the threshold that goes from -1 to 1, assuming that values close to zero show no relationship and those close to negative or positive units show a strong association. Chi-square parameters were used to test the null hypothesis, suggesting that there are significant differences between the structure of the nodes and the dimensions reported in the literature with respect to the observations of the expert judges.

Results

Figure 1 shows the positive edges of the structure. It means that the relationship with the nodes is immersive. That is, nodes depend on positive relationships between edges. On the other hand, the nodes maintain negative relationships that translate into a non-corporate, but participatory governance with respect to the edges. At the periphery of the edges, negative relationships imply corporate governance, even if their image and reputation relationships are inconsistent. The prevalence of relationships between responsibility, leadership, satisfaction, corporatization and reputation warn of an institutionalized governance in health. That is, the structure follows established objectives, tasks and goals, prevails as an isomorphism of health.

Figure 1: Institutional Health Governance Networks

Source: Prepared with data study

Figure 2 shows the centrality parameters. The distance and proximity values between edges and nodes suggest that the governance structure is rich and immersive. That is, it permeates the administrative and bureaucratic institutions above innovation, entrepreneurship or improvisation.

Figure 2: Centrality of Institutional Governance in Health

Source: Prepared with data study

Figure 3 shows the pool values. The edges and the nodes are circumscribed, by their immersive centrality, in an institutional dimension. The evaluations of the judges according to the registry of the bibliographic review show that the grouping in the short, medium or long term is in the logic of centrality and periphery. Governance is a structure of relationships between nodes and edges, being more corporate in its edges than in its centrality, since it is in this area where discrepancies are possible in the face of a health risk event such as the pandemic. It is true that governance is institutionalized in its administration and bureaucracy, but in the face of an uncertain event it is more flexible and contradictory. In other words, governance is in process, reconfiguring itself because COVID-19 has impacted it at its core and strengthened it at its periphery.

Figure 2: Grouping of the Institutional Governance of Health

Source: Prepared with data study

The immersive and profuse logic of the periphery versus the isomorphic and conflictive logic of the centrality suggests that the pandemic affected governance processes according to the literature consulted and the evaluation of the experts. Although almost three years have passed, COVID-19 continues to affect the governance observed in the aforementioned period.

Discussion

The contribution of the study to the state of the question lies in the establishment of a relationship structure in accordance with the dimensions found in the literature review and corroborated in the judges' assessments regarding the findings published from 1998 to 2022. institutionalized and isomorphic governance, but conflictive in its centrality, as well as a more corporate orientation in the periphery [19]. The results can be interpreted considering the pandemic and its effects on public health governance published from 2019 to 2022. The following lines of research to follow should observe the isomorphism in the dimensions reported by the literature, as well as corroborate corporatism at the edges of institutions that were not impacted by COVID-19 and emerging dimensions prevailed. Emerging dimensions of governance, such as innovation climate, goal climate, relationship climate, and task climate, suggest that institutions follow protocols regardless of contingent scenarios. In this study, the negative relationships between the dimensions associated with governance suggest that in the face of the health crisis, governance may be isomorphic, but asymmetric within the observed structure [10]. If such a structure reflects the impact of the pandemic on the health institutions that were studied in the last three years, then it is possible to see that the lines of research will be oriented towards corroborating the assumption that the health crisis is the cause of governance. The governance of institutions in their symbolic dimensions are often a reflection of the scenarios that unite their members, or confront them. In the case of the health crisis, isomorphism prevailed, but not corporatism [18]. In other words, identity, reputation and image did not establish positive relationships. Rather, its American relations suggest a corporate break, except at the edges. Consequently, studies related to governance as an instance of conflict interpret the results as an incipient phase of governance. This budding assumption needs to be corroborated to explain the business failure.

Conclusion

The contribution of this work to the state of the question consists in the specification of a model for the study of the promotion of self-care as a conglomerate of factors that influence health policies and strategies in the face of an epidemic contingency. The type of selection and the type of information analysis limit the contrast of the model to a specific context that would not include other variables such as the management, production and transfer of knowledge. The expansion and deepening of the study is recommended from international repositories such as Ebsco , Copernicus and Scopus , as well as the use of text mining to sophisticate the analysis and to be able to elaborate a model applicable to contexts and samples different from the present work. . Regarding the theoretical, conceptual and empirical frameworks, which highlight the role of reliability, agenda and co-responsibility, this work has integrated each of the three factors, but has reduced its application to a very specific context in which the civil society depends on their governments by being exposed to the media that broadcast a prevailing scenario of risk, threat and uncertainty. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out a study that includes other factors related to state institutions and citizen participation in prevention campaigns, as well as immediate attention to vulnerable groups. In addition, it is advisable to include approaches that explain human behavior in situations of health crisis, or theories that describe the government's action in the face of resource scarcity. Regarding identity as a hegemonic factor to explain the effects of public health on individual lifestyles, this work warns that the promotion of self-care is a public problem and, as such, it is necessary to involve other non-civilian or governmental actors. to explain the complexity of a public health system. However, it is advisable to include the theory of social identity in the model in order to broaden the scope of the model to communities that are distinguished by their degree of attachment to place, their rootedness in origin and their sense of community. Adherence to treatment is the key factor of coincidence between experts, authorities and citizens, the present work warns that social reliability is an exacerbated adherence to treatment of medical service users with respect to their authorities. In this sense, the exclusion of citizens from their own personal and collective health presupposes an agenda focused on state protection and biomedical care, ignoring the importance of the family in treatment or rehabilitation. It is necessary to include adherence to treatment as an indicator of sociopolitical reliability, since both show a scenario of dependence of citizens regarding the knowledge or management of community or public health services. If the dependence of civil society on public health institutions consists of medical care in the event of a contingency and this is reflected in the degree of social reliability as well as in adherence to treatment, then the cases of older adults, such as vulnerable groups, must explain the causes of such dependency. The differences between the representations of young people, referring to an exacerbated confidence in vigor and risk taking, with respect to the representations of old age, are indicated by an increase in tiredness and a decrease in the ability to react, explains the dependency of the groups that have been violated. In the present work we prefer to consider reliability as the prelude to the establishment of an agenda that, in symbolic terms, reflects the priorities of the actors regarding a public health problem, although the incorporation of the factor of social representation is recommended. explain the origin of social reliability regarding health contingencies and the hegemony of the corresponding institutions in the promotion of self-care.

References

Amemiya Ramírez, M., Bustos Aguayo, JM, & García Lirios, C. (2018). Reliability and validity of an instrument that measures the establishment of the local water agenda. Realities Journal of the Faculty of Social Work and Human Development, 8 (1), 45–54
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Bustos Aguayo, J., García Lirios, C., & Juárez Nájera, M. (2021). validity of a habitus model of coffee entrepreneurship. SUM. Disciplinary Journal in Economic and Social Sciences, 3 (1), 1-21.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Bustos-Aguayo, JM., Juárez-Nájera, M., & García Lirios, C. (2022). Review of entrepreneurship in the COVID-19 era. Wit Magazine, 19 (1), 60–66.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Carreón Guillén, J., Hernández Valdés, J., & García Lirios, C. (2014). Empirical testing of an agenda setting model. University Act, 24 (3), 50–62.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Carreón Guillén, J., Lirios, C., Castro, A., Hernández, G., & Rubio, S. (2017). Governance of public security in the construction of sociopolitical identity. Journal of Psychology of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, 6 (12), 32-51.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Garcia Lirios, C. (2021a). Perceived biosecurity and cybersecurity in the face of COVID-19 in Mexico. Studies In Security and Defense, 16 (31), 137 - 160.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Garcia Lirios, C. (2021b). Water Scenario in Mexico City: Review 2019-2021. Spaces Geography Magazine, 11 (21), 48-63.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Garcia-Lirios, C. (2021c). Tutorial networks in the elaboration of the research protocol. Communication, Culture and Politics, 12.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
García Lirios, C., Bermúdez-Ruíz, G., & Juárez-Nájera, M. (2022a). Entrepreneurial dimensions of the reactivation of the economy based on tourism in central Mexico. Ara: Journal of Research In Tourism, 11 (1), 100–114.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
García Lirios, C., Bolivar Mojica, E., Blaness Ugarte, A., Coronado Rincón, O., & Molina González, M. (2021a). CONTRAST A PATTERN OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN THE ERA OF COVID-19. Journal of Academic Research Without Borders: Division of Economic and Social Sciences, (35), 13.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
García Lirios, C., Carreón Guillén, J., Bustos Aguayo, JM, & Hernández Valdés, J. (2020). Perception of coffee entrepreneurship in the Huasteca region, central Mexico. Assets Magazine, 18 (1), 235-266.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
García Lirios, C., Carreón Guillén, J., Bustos Aguayo, J., Hernández Valdés, J., Aguilar Fuentes, J., & Rosas Ferrusca, F. (2014). A sociopolitical approach to shortages, tariffs, subsidies and tandems related to water services. Pedagogical Essays Magazine, 9 (1), 73-98.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
García Lirios, C., Carreón Guillén, J., Bustos Aguayo, JM, & Juárez Najera , M. (2016). Scenarios related to agenda setting for transgenerational governance of water resources and services. Civilize: Social And Human Sciences , 16 (31), 83–112.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
García Lirios C., Carreón Guillén J., Hernández Valdés J., Bustos Aguayo JM, & Aguilar Fuentes JA (2016). Specification of a model of sociopolitical hyperopia. Luna Azul Magazine (On Line), (42), 270 - 292.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
García Lirios, C., Carreón Guillén, J., Bustos Aguayo, JM., Hernández Valdés, J., Espinoza Morales, F. ., Quiroz Campas, CY ., & Juárez Nájera, M. . (2021b). Transition towards the governance of the return to the face-to-face classroom in the face of anti-Covid-19 policies. Changes And Stays, 12 (2), 32–54.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
García Lirios, C., Carreon -Guillen, J., Sanchez-Sanchez, A., & Martinez -Muñoz, B. (2022b). Modeling of spatiality, habitus and capabilities in the Covid-19 era. Journal of Academic Research Without Borders: Division of Economic and Social Sciences, (38), 23.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
García Lirios, C., Hernández Valdés, J., Peralta Buendía, M. de V., Aguilar Fuentes, JA, & Morales Flores, M. de L. (2016). Reliability and validity of an instrument that measures electronic Harassmentia / Reliability and validity of an instrument that measures perceptual determinants of harassment through the Internet. Encounters , 14 (1).
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Garcia Lirios,. C., Juárez Nájera, F., Bustos Aguayo, JM., Juárez Nájera, M., & Juárez Nájera, FR. (2022c). perceptions about Entrepreneurship in the COVID-19 Era. Critical Ratio, (12).
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
García Lirios, C., Martínez Muñoz, E., Molina Ruiz, HD, & Hernández Valdés, J. (2019). Specification of a self -care model. Medical Lux, 14 (42), 15–25.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Martínez-Muñoz, E., López, S., & García-Lirios, C. (2019). Governance of perception of risk-benefit and intention to vote in favor of bikeways. Academic Quorum, 16 (2), 114-152.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Molina Ruíz, HD, Martínez Muñóz , E., Bustos Aguayo, JM, Juárez Nájera, M., & García Lirios, C. (2019). PERI-URBAN SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL REPRESENTATIONS. Kuxulkab', 26 (54), 05-12.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

Khurram Arshad

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.

Gomez Barriga Maria Dolores

The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.

Lin Shaw Chin

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.

Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.

Dr Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.

Dr Maria Regina Penchyna Nieto

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.

Dr Marcelo Flavio Gomes Jardim Filho

Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”

Zsuzsanna Bene

Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner

Dr Susan Weiner

My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.

Lin-Show Chin

My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.

Sonila Qirko

My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.