AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8816/060
Associate Professor, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Western, Royal Hobart Hospital, 48 Liverpool Street Tasmania 7000 Australia.
*Corresponding Author: Adel Ekladious, Associate Professor, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Western Australia. E-mail: ekladiou@gmail.com
Citation: Ekladious A. (2022). Neuromyelitis Optica and differential diagnosis (mimics). J. Clinical Research Notes. 3(4); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8816/060
Copyright: © 2022 Adel Ekladious, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 05 March 2022 | Accepted: 01 April 2022 | Published: 05 May 2022
Keywords: neuromyelitis; optica; diagnosis; channelopathy; cerebrum
Neuromyelitis Optica is an inflammatory neurodegenerative demyelinating autoimmune channelopathy affecting brain and spinal cord, for which Aquaporin-4(AQP4) water channels are the main target.
Discovery of the AQP4 immunoglobulin (IGG) antibody in 2004 was a major step for understanding the disease which helped to distinguish from multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases.
Aquaporin -4 (AQP4) is a water channel protein expressed in two major isoforms which includes a short isoform M1 and a isoform M23 , AQP4 is expressed heavily on astrocyte endfeet end process at blood brain barrier, nodes of Ranvier and neuronal synapses processes in spinal cord, optic nerves , brain stem, thalamus ,hypothalamus, dorsal medulla at area postrema, diencephalon, subcortical white matter, gray and white matter in spinal cord, periaqueductal and periventricular region.
Neuromyelitis Optica is an inflammatory neurodegenerative demyelinating autoimmune channelopathy affecting brain and spinal cord, for which Aquaporin-4(AQP4) water channels are the main target [1].
Discovery of the AQP4 immunoglobulin (IGG) antibody in 2004 was a major step for understanding the disease which helped to distinguish from multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases [2].
Aquaporin -4 (AQP4) is a water channel protein expressed in two major isoforms which includes a short isoform M1 and isoform M23 , AQP4 is expressed heavily on astrocyte feetend process at blood brain barrier, nodes of Ranvier and neuronal synapses processes in spinal cord, optic nerves , brain stem, thalamus ,hypothalamus, dorsal medulla at area postrema, diencephalon, subcortical white matter, gray and white matter in spinal cord, periaqueductal and periventricular region [3].
Binding of NMO-IGG to AQP4 cause downregulation of NMO-IGG mainly IGG subclass causing classical complement cascade activation which result in impairing the water flux directly independent of the AQP4 dawn- regulation, binding of the NMO-IGG to Astrocyte AQP4 in a astrocyte has isoform specific outcome,
M1 is completely internalized but M23 is resistant to internalization and activate the complement more effectively than M1,
Autoimmune attack is believed to cause astrocyte damage, this caused disruption of blood brain barrier by increasing the permeability resulting in influx of eosinophils and neutrophils into the Central nervous system, this result in death of astrocyte. oligodendrocyte and neurons, [4].
AQP4-IGG levels had been found to fluctuate during the disease course and treatment, usually escalated during relapse and decrease during remission, AQP4 is found in abundance in optic nerves, spinal cord, area postrema in dorsal medulla, brain stem, diencephalic region includes
Thalamus, hypothomes and cerebrum,
Glial Fibrillary Acid Protein (GFAP) is highly sensitive biomarker for astrocytes and gliosis, during relapse attack of NMO, GFAP increases in CSF due to astrocyte damage and correlate with the Expanded disability Status Scale (EDSS), in contrast with serum GFAP which remains without change [50] or occasionally decreased
Neuromyelitis Optica was published in the late 19 century by Eugen’s Devices where he diagnosed a monophasic disease characterized by bilateral optic neuronitis (simultaneous or sequential) and long extensive spinal cord myelitis, spanning three contiguous vertebrae or more which was called devic’s disease [6].
Devic’s NMO cases and other reports of the same disease were also published,
Since the clinical concept had broadened and changed after the discovery of AQP4 IGG antibody,
Many organs specific autoimmune antibodies had been found in association with NMO including acetylcholine receptor antibodies, Anti RO, anti-LA, anti SM, thyroid antibodies, DNA binding, ANA, parietal cell antibodies, in addition to association with non-organ specific autoimmune disease like pernicious anemia, SLE and sjogren’s syndrome
The concept had been broadened from neuromyelitis Optica to Neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disorder due to its association with autoimmune diseases, and different phenotypes,
In 2006 requirements for Diagnose NMOSD are seropositivity of the serum for AQP4 IGG antibody and two core criteria (optic neuritis, longitudinal extensive transvers myelitis or area postrema syndrome, acute brain stem disease) and exclusion of any alternative disease including any silent demyelination in the cerebrum
In 2015, consensus diagnostic criteria by international NMOSD panel concluded
Either seropositivity of the serum and one core criteria which could be
Optic neuritis, extensive longitudinal myelitis, (lesion spanning more than three continues vertebra)
Area postrema syndrome
Acute brain stem syndrome (opthalmoparesis, involvement of corticospinal tract, ataxia, encephalitis)
Panel was reluctant to call seropositive and sero negative after the discovery of another antibody called Myelioligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies,
We looked at the NMO cases from the literatures before the discovery of AQP4 and we found that NMO cases whith relapse resemble very much AQP4 seropositive and monophasic cases are quite different phenotype similar to ADEM and most of them had element of encephalitis and very similar to seronegative NMO acute demylenating encephalopathy, these findings are reported before by Wingerchuk et al [6],
AQP4 –IGG- AB is very disease specific if tested by the right assay methods, it is very unlikely to be find it healthy person or other neurological disease, also seropositivity of AQP4 IGG antibody can predict the long-term prognosis and response to medication (7), and residual disabilities
AQP4 AB can be detected by the following method
Enzyme linked immunoassay (ELISA)
Indirect immunofluorescences (IIF)
Flow Cytometry
Assay (FACS -assay)
Cell- based Assay (CBAs)
Strong recommendation from the panel on 2015 for CBAs as it is very accurate, sensitive and specific,
Sensitivity up to 70% and specificity close to 100%
CBA can be done using either live cells expressing Human M23-AQP4 or a commercial kit expressing human M1 -AQP4
The advantage of the fixed one is it is easy to use, not expensive and have good accuracy, good sensitivity and specificity,
The live CBA is more accurate but more expensive and require technical experience and time consuming,
The consensus from the panel is, if the result of fixed BCA is not consistent with the clinical signs, it is reasonable to retest with the live CBA,
Recently Scientists found that FACS assay have the advantage of providing quantitative and cutoff discriminator with a good accuracy [8].
Immunofluorescence is a rapid test and can be used as a screening,
Ethnicity and race are important factors for disease phenotype, response to treatment and prognosis
It is a rare disease among Caucasian, prevalence ranged up to 0.5to 4 cases in 100000 population [9].
Most of the cases reported in Indian, black African and Asian population, in studies performed in south East Wales, found that disease is frequent in populations of Northern European non-Caucasian [10].
Studies in Latin America found high prevalence of NMO in non-white descendants,
Disease is common in females, disease predilection in female is stronger than MS with a gender ratio varies from 2; 1 to 8;1 female to male ratio
females with NMO have a high ratio of miscarriage due to imbalance in TH1and TH2 cytokines [11].
AQP4-IGG NMO is a serious acute relapsing disease with severe disability, common manifestation is optic spinal phenotype in Asian people, it was diagnosed previously as optical-spinal multiple sclerosis
Seronegative for AQP4 -IGG antibodies with seropositivity to MOG has different phenotype characterized by,
Monophasic disease, Male to female ratio is equal 1:1,
Disease is more common in children, has element of encephalitis, similar to (ADEM) acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and association with autoimmune diseases are very rare
Spinal cord lesion mainly in the lumbar region including conus medullaris,
Relapse is less common than NMOSD,
More commonly to involve bilateral optic nerves in the same time, rather than spinal cord
Patient usually have a poor visual acuity and even loss of vision and a thinner peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer with optical coherence tomography (OCT) 12
Myelin oligodendrocyte antibodies titer is elevated in patient with sever impairment of visual acuity ,affecting mainly anterior compartment of optic nerve , and involve perineural fat which enhance with contrast in T2 weighted MRI , diagnosis on MOG-NMOSD is confirmed if MOG IGG antibodies is positive in CSF during relapse even if negative in serum(14), this is in contract with AQP4 – IGG seropositive which involve posterior compartment and extend to optic chiasma and optic tract
Study of optic neuritis in patients with MOG NMO in Africa showed that optic neuritis was retrobulbar in 20 cases out of 23 cases and the rest has papillitis. [14].
And involvment of optic nerve wether unilateral or bilateral, associated by pain during eye movement,
decreased acuity of vision, impaired colored vision, and altitudinal defects,
most patients will be blind in 5 years if not diagnosed or treated, MRI in the acute phase showed hyperintensity in T2 and enhancement with gadolinium in T1, in chronic stages atrophy of the optic nerve with variable intensity in T2
Neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disorder without AQP4 antibody had been called seronegative for AQP4 IGG antibody, this includes NMOSD positivity for Myleene oligodendrocyte antibody [12].
Longitudinal Extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) usually include central grey matter and lateral cord Causing anterolateral cord syndrome, mostly involve thoracic and cervical cord, causing motor, sensory and sphincteric disturbance,
area postrema syndrome affecting dorsal medulla manifested by intractable nausea, vomiting, hiccough, and sometimes intractable pruritis, acute brainstem syndrome is a core criterion in AQP4 -IGG NMOSD manifested by
Oculomotor dysfunction, facial palsy, vertigo, hearing loss, vestibular and trigeminal neuralgia, Intractable vomiting, [3,14] and even death due to respiratory failure due to involvement of respiratory center in brain stem, absence of cortical lesion in the neuroimage is considered a red flag and needs to revise the diagnosis
Epileptic seizures are common in MS and not in NMOSD
Cutaneous manifestations in the form of Erythematous rash, sclerodactyly, bilateral oedema of hands, Reynaud’s phenomenon, cutaneous, manifestations of dermatomyositis had been reported in patients with NMOSD [15].
Other core criteria which occur less often is acute diencephalic syndrome, symptomatic narcolepsy, and acute cerebral syndrome characterized by asymptomatic demyelination disseminated in space,
Autoimmune diseases had been reported with NMOSD commonly SLE, sjogren’s Syndrome, dermatomyositis, polymyositis, pernicious anemia, scleroderma and celiac disease,
Patient with NMOSD reported to have subacute combined degeneration of the cord and have low B12 due to inhibition of intrinsic factor and gastric acid secretion by partial cells due AQP4 antibody in the stomach which result in low vitamin B12 causing subacute degeneration of the cord, neuroimaging of the brain during a symptomatic attack showed that abnormalities which are quite unique, usually lesions involving corticospinal tracts, posterior limb of internal capsule and cerebral peduncle periependymal lesions surrounding the aqueduct, third and fourth ventricles, medullary lesions extending to the cervical cord, extensive hemispheric white matter involvement are often edematous and have the appearance of tumefactive lesions.
These brain lesions are typically represented vasogenic edema as confirmed by diffusion -weighted and apparent diffusion coefficient maps causing
Lesions to be similar to posterior reversable leukoencephalopathy (PRES), and ADEM,
Cerebral demyelinated lesions inAQP4 -NMOSD are characterized by absence of central vein sign (very common in MS) which is the perivenous localization of demyelinated lesions in the white matter of the brain and spinal cord, APQ4 IGG was found in lungs, kidney and stomach in Autopsy with no significances
NMOSD with seropositivity for myelin oligodendrocyte antibody has a different phenotype,
By being mostly monophasic rather than relapsing remitting affecting mainly optic nerve, and not uncommonly spinal cord, had prediction to affect the lumbar cord and conus medullaris, less likely to be associated with autoimmune diseases, affect males and females equally, unlike in AQP4 positive which affect mainly females,
monophasic disease is less likely to have relapse, more likely to involve brain stem and cerebellum and less likely to involve supratentorial region,
few studies had shown a monophasic disease had no sex predilection, not associated with autoimmune disease, not relapsing up to 5 years, presented with simultaneous optic neuritis and transvers myelitis, occurring in a relatively young age, seronegative for both AQP4and MOG antibodies. [15].
findings in MRI brain which is not compatible with the diagnosis of AQP4 NMOSD but needs to rule out multiple sclerosis, Characteristic MRI findings in multiple sclerosis includes,
Lesion involving U – fiber Juxtacortical region,
Dawson fingers in periventricular area,
White matter involvement of inferior temporal lobe,
Lesion adjacent to lateral ventricles [16].
CSF during relapse in AQP4 NMO usually show pleocytosis with lymphocytes, neutrophils more than 50 cells /mm and elevated protein, CSF oligoclonal band could be detected in 6% of patient but usually transiently and not sustained, unlike MS which characterized by sustained oligoclonal, in 90% of patients, IL6 was found to be elevated during relapse [17].
Level of neurofilament light chain protein and glial Fibrillary acidic protein (markers of axonal and astrocyte destruction) are higher in NMOSD patients [18].
Patients tested seronegative for AQP4 -IGG antibody from the serum, should have repeated test from CSF [19].
Patient tested positive for AQP4 -IGG antibodies, has a predictive value for relapse and having more sever disease [20]. patient can convert to sero negative during remission (21)
Mortality rate is higher than multiple sclerosis and most commonly due to acute brain stem syndrome causing acute respiratory failure [22]. most recent studies showed drop-in mortality rate from 30 to 10% due to awareness of the disease and early diagnosis [22]. diagnosis of autoimmune diseases in the same patients are very common, some studies reported high ratio up to 50%, common autoimmune disease coexisting with AQP4 NMO like SLE, Myasthenia gravis, Sjogren syndrome [23].
Explanation for co-existence of both autoimmune diseases could be genetic susceptibility to autoimmunity [24].
Differential diagnosis and mimics of AQP4 NOMSD
Accurate diagnosis is of paramount importance as disease can be brought under control during acute stage and prevent relapse with immunosuppressive medication, Failure to diagnose AQP4 NMOSD and add instead treatment of disease modifying agents for Multiple sclerosis like interferon beta, fingolimod and Natalizumab are not effective and even harmful [25].
Also correct diagnosis and treatment was found to decrease mortality and disability, mainly paraplegia and blindness.
Differential diagnosis of optic neuritis (core feature of NMOSD)
Acute disseminated demyelinating disease (ADEM)
Commonly affect children, phenotype is mainly polyfocal monophasic phenotype, although it can relapse in 10-18% of cases [26] usually preceded by viral infection or vaccination, encephalopathy is common, although it might be a difficult diagnosis when it does not fulfill all the criteria of acute demyelinating encephalopathy (ADEM),
It affects white matter and deep grey matter [27], it also differs from NMOSD in it does not affect mainly females and more polyfocal and serum is negative for AQP4- IGG AB,
Leber hereditary optic neuropathy,
It is a hereditary disease, commonly affect males, at the age of 20-30, considered as a mitochondrial disease due to mutation in the mitochondrial DNA (28) presented with painless loss of vision in both eyes, it has low penetrance in both males and females, neuroimage characterized by absence of gadolinium enhancement, disease is incurable,
Disease of leber hereditary optic neuropathy plus had been described where posterior column was involved
Idiopathic optic neuropathy
It is a common remitting relapsing disease, all patients with idiopathic optic neuropathy should have neuroimaging and serum for AQP4 – IGG and MOG antibodies to exclude NMOSD, demyelination lesions of MS and longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis,
Multiple sclerosis
Usually smaller longitudinal extension than NMOSD, (30)), usually affect the dorsal and lateral of white matter of the cord, cervical cord is the most commonly affected (44.63), typical Dawson fingers lesions, ovoid and perpendicular to the lateral ventricles. in addition to involvement of inferior temporal lobe and Juxtacortical U – fiber lesion,
Coexistence of autoimmune disease is not common like NMOSD, CSF is positive for oligoclonal band in 90% of patients [31].
Sarcoidosis,
Granulomatous noninfectious, non-demyelinating, remitting relapsing, inflammatory disease which can affect optic nerves and optic chiasma, common in black African females typically indistinguishable from NMOSD causing bilateral optic neuronitis and extensive longitudinal transverse myelitis,
Neurosarcoid can affect cranial nerves causing, bilateral fascial palsy, leptomeninges, hypothalamus, respiratory and lymphoreticular organs are mostly affected and support diagnosis, positive ACE is neither specific nor sensitive, CT-PET scan is highly sensitive to detect highly suspicious areas for biopsy and confirmation of the diagnosis, [32,33]
Dural Spinal A-V fistula,
Not Uncommon vascular disease affecting spinal cord mainly males in their fifth or sixth decades,
Causing decreased arteriovenous pressure which result in decreased perfusion to the spinal cord
Which can cause longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), which resembles LATEM due to APQ4-IGG NMOSD, patient usually experience subacute course, symptoms usually occur with exercise or prolonged rest, Spinal MR Angio and catheter angiogram will confirm diagnosis which usually treated with surgical ligation or endovascular embolization (15) conventional MR is not diagnostic (34, 35. 36)
Primary CNS Lymphoma,
Primary CNS lymphoma can cause LATEM and brain lesions can resemble AQP4 NMOSD,
40% of patients with spinal cord lymphoma will have intramedullary lymphoma at presentation,
Both cord lymphoma and NMOSD can respond to steroid [37].
If patient serum is negative for AQP4-IGG and MOG – IGG antibodies,
patients should not be treated with methyl prednisolone or plasmapheresis, pending confirmation of the diagnosis with biopsy, flow cytometry, protein immunoelectrophoresis and and tissue biopsy for cytology [38].
Neuro- Bechet ‘s disease
Is a vascultic disease affect arteries and veins in addition to other organs which includes optic nerves, cerebrum, brain stem, meninges, skin, peripheral nervous system, it is associated with LATEM which can resemble NMOSD, it is a rare disease, common in the middle east, and very uncommon among Caucasians, from literature, to diagnose neuro Becht, requirements are,
Painful oral ulcer plus two minor criteria which includes, genital ulcers, eye lesion, skin lesion, Positive Pathergy test, (39), neurological manifestation of Bechet’s disease includes meningoencephalitis, cerebri-tis, cerebral atrophy, and LATEM,
Of note, involvement of spinal cord is considered a poor prognostic marker of the disease,
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
