AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-2156/060
Heart Institute University of São Paulo Medical School.
*Corresponding Author: Carlos Manuel de Almeida Brandão, Heart Institute University of São Paulo Medical School, Turkey.
Citation: Carlos Manuel de Almeida Brandão, Fabrício J. Dinato, Palma Dallan LR, Fábio B. Jatene, (2023), Hands-On Training Simulation in Cardiovascular Surgery, J Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery, 4(3); DOI:10.31579/2693-2156/060
Copyright: © 2023, Carlos Manuel de Almeida Brandão, this is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 18 May 2023 | Accepted: 27 May 2023 | Published: 07 July 2023
Keywords: cardiovascular surgery; aortic valve implantation
Simulation is an increasingly vital component of graduate medical education and is becoming the standard of practice in many residency programs, especially in the surgical specialties owing to the need, to move basic skills acquisition out of the operating room and into the surgical skills laboratories. Deliberate practice is an educational technique aimed at improving performance by intense training and preparation. These steps include repetition, assessment, and feedback, which lead to performance improvement
Simulation is an increasingly vital component of graduate medical education and is becoming the standard of practice in many residency programs, especially in the surgical specialties owing to the need, to move basic skills acquisition out of the operating room and into the surgical skills laboratories. Deliberate practice is an educational technique aimed at improving performance by intense training and preparation. These steps include repetition, assessment, and feedback, which lead to performance improvement [1].
Training in surgery became progressivelly more complex, as a wave of innovation using new technologies introduced a series of procedures with less invasive potential, such as minimally invasive and robotics. Residents and young surgeons must learn these new techniques in a safe and effective way, so the advent of several simulators in surgery in activities called “Hands-On”. The “Hands-On” is a different strategy of teaching and learning because it allows interaction between the expert (surgeon with recognized expertise and competence) with surgeons in different learning curve phases such as residents, junior surgeons or even those with several years of surgical practice. It differs from other teaching activities once the trainees are directly involved in the whole procedure by “using their hands”. The trainee is incentivized to exercise the observation of all steps of the operation, to perform tactical movements and actions ordered in a logical sequence or may be, to incorporate new skills. All this is happening without urgency of time; and above all, under a qualified and committed guidance and supervision of an expert.
At the same time that it promotes teaching, it allows for both correction and evaluation of performance inducing satisfaction on trainees by creating the pleasant sense of mastery of new skills or consolidation of the previous ones that now could be executed with a more refined technique. These new skills will be definitely incorporated by salutary practice of exhaustive repetition that will make them automated. Once after its final registration in the brain centers that integrate knowledge with motor skills, it will emerge automatically when requested, completing the cycle: see-search-understand-perform [2].
As cardiovascular surgery training programs continue to evolve in response to abbreviated training pathways, patient safety concerns and increasing complexity of procedures, greater focus on simulation-based training to compensate for decreased operative experience has been recommended. Given the growth of transcatheter technologies and minimally invasive techniques, new challenges are imposed on the training of the contemporary cardiovascular surgeon. Nowadays, training of cardiac surgery residents is demanding several modifications to adjust to the rapidly evolving area of structural heart disease. Pelletier and colleagues [3] stated that increasingly, cardiac surgery residents are requesting exposure to the skills and techniques that will enable them to perform these procedures. In addition, they suggested that institutional simulation labs can be ideal to teach certain elements of endovascular procedures and skills, providing novice learners the opportunity to manipulate wires and catheters while objectively measuring performance.
It is also challenging for the institutions responsible for the training programs, since they are expected to offer an efficient and adequate curriculum, which relies on a paradox of providing safe surgical opportunity without compromising the postoperative outcomes and excellent patient care. Operating room surgical training has significant limitations indeed, considering it provides short time to develop technical skills and has low tolerance for learning mistakes.
With respect to one traditional simulation model for surgery training, despite high fidelity, human corpse training has been desincouraged nowadays, for two main reasons. First, there are not always available corpses for use in good preservation conditions. Second is the short period of time that is speared for the training, since those patients have to be hand out to the families for the ceremonial. Conducting the training procedures on animal models offers the closest scenario to surgery in human beings; however, the completion of this kind of training requires the sacrifice of these animals culminating with great opposition by the animals’ protection organizations as well as by the general population. This traditional method has well known limitations such as the need for a broad framework for hosting, maintenance and preparation of these animals and their subsequent disposal; which besides of high costs also requires the involvement of many professionals for the correct execution of these tasks. Routinely, these facilities are available only in medical schools and usually with restricted access to their own undergraduate or graduate students.
Biological models, compared to animal models “in vivo”, have the advantage of storage capacity for days in the refrigerator, and lower costs, which is very desirable considering the current financial constraints of most residency training programs. In addition, they enable a realistic tissue feel and excellent anatomical correspondence. In this context, we believe that incorporating simulation on biological models in our residency program could improve surgical training and patient safety, due to its potentiality to avoid surgical technical failure that would compromise the outcomes, bringing more safety, efficacy and better longer-term results.
Recognizing these challenges about technical skills acquisition for cardiovascular surgery, we started our simulation training program on biological models for the medical residency of cardiovascular surgery at our institution in 2015. A practical evaluation that addressed performance on specific skills was applied at the end of training program. The high notes obtained by our residents revealed the efficiency of the simulation in the acquisition of skills. Also, the resident responses in the subjective analysis revealed high satisfaction with the training program [4]. They highlighted as positive aspects the realistic tissue feels and anatomical representation, as well as the possibility to perform a specific technique multiple times thereby improving skill acquisition. In general, most believed that the program provided a realistic experience and was valuable in teaching surgical skills. We observed that biological models with porcine or bovine hearts provided a high degree of realism and in the case of cardiac surgery, where surgical failure may result in patient morbidity and mortality, such a realistic simulation could reproduce better surgical results, which is essential before clinical application.
The incorporation of new training techniques, such as “Hands-on” simulation, allows an improvement in residents formation, the training of new technologies for senior surgeons, minimazing possible technique fails and allowing better efficacy in the procedures and better results”. These moments are a unique opportunity for a desirable interaction, in that the more experienced ones can help to qualify this critical mass of professionals eager to learn new knowledge, but also willing to incorporate special technical skills as a basic support for their professional performances [5]. In the cognitive domain, the transmission and retention of the essential theoretical knowledge are required and of paramount importance for the judgment and proper handling of each patient. That part has been widely covered by many mini-courses offered at numerous conferences in many different areas of the specialty, and also through continuing medical education programs carried out by schools and educational institutes created and maintained by the specialty societies and supported by pharmaceutical companies for equipments and instruments in surgery [6].
Congresses of some specialties has been modified each year to discuss the incorporation of new technologies by presenting the results of numerous studies well designed and well conducted on searching to validate, to disseminate and to extend their use in the daily practice. Watch an operation, usually a complex case or a new procedure, performed at distance in a specialized center and broadcasted to an audience of the event, offers to the participating surgeons an opportunity to interact with the team that performs the surgery and to learn from them some useful surgical aspects; however, this do not endow observers in developing new skills. Additionally, this format has limitations, including legal matters. The surgical team responsible for the operation is subjected to a stress level above the usual. They cannot repeat tactical maneuvers ever performed by the imperative need to continue the operation. Steps or details which were not clear, even if well explained, cannot be repeated. The operation needs to have its normal course and the patient must not be subjected to additional risks, such as stopping at each step of the procedure to allow controversial debates and opinions. The traditional video sessions, in which procedures can have their technical details presented and discussed, allowing for pauses or repetitions, when necessary, are very instructive in providing opportunities for learning technical and tactical details without putting pressure on the surgical team and not subjecting patients to additional risks. This mode helps to understand how to overcome the difficulties in their implementation and the new ways of executing it. Although it is a very useful and attractive format, it does not provide new psychomotor skills for those attending this activity. Therefore, these creative and innovative ways of transmitting knowledge, as described above, do not directly involve the community of observers in surgical procedures fields. The observer surgeons can even assimilate the steps and various tactical maneuvers essential to the operation; however, these do not give them the ability to implement it.
The task of producing scientific knowledge and validate it through the current methods of evidence-based medicine belongs primarily to the universities, which through its institutes and research laboratories, are prepared for this important and crucial stage of development of medical science. Some studies have validated the need for simulation in surgery [7]. Certainly, surgical simulation allows the medical resident to perform in a less stress environment and may provide structured graduated training for technical skills. Furthermore, educators recognize this activity as one method by which expertise may be developed and assessed. Another positive aspect of simulation-based skills training in surgery has been the notion that educators can spend more time teaching in a less stressful environment, promoting better understanding and retention of skills.
Surgical simulation is effective in the development of technical skills in cardiovascular surgery with numerous examples of low and high-fidelity simulators and several studies have validated the need for simulation in cardiac surgery residency programs. Ribeiro et al. [8] in a systematic review of 16 studies about simulation-based skill training for trainees in cardiac surgery concluded that simulation-based training is associated with improved learning outcomes for cardiovascular surgery trainees with large effect sizes. They observed that junior residents seem to benefit most and low-fidelity simulators are most frequently used and seem not to inhibit learning outcomes. Another systematic review performed by El-Andari et al. [9] investigated the current literature regarding the use of simulation-based training for trainees learning surgical valve repair and replacement. They observed that studies in which outcomes were evaluated showed improvement in surgical trainees’ time to completion of tasks and skills scores, concluding that simulation-based training has been shown to improve the surgical skills of trainees in a relatively short period.
Despite the pressing need to train cardiovascular surgeons to perform transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), Tam et al. [10], in research about the current status of TAVI in Canadian cardiovascular surgery residency programs, through questionnaires designed for residents and program directors found only 14 residents (18%) and 4 program directors (36%), reported that TAVI training in their program was adequate. In addition, only 3 program directors (27%) reported that their residents had access to a TAVI simulator, suggesting that, currently, there is a lack of structured didactic and hands-on training of TAVI in cardiac surgery residency programs.
Virtual reality such as Simantha (Medical Simulation Corporation, Denver, CO, USA) and Simbionix AngioMentor (Airport City, Israel) offer simulation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation to teach catheter wire and lead handling skills [11], however its use as an educational tool for official cardiac residency training programmes is unknown and probably very sparse or no-existent.
Whether improved performance in the simulation laboratory is transferable to the operating room is not easily addressed, but most trainees reported that they felt much better prepared and less anxious to perform each skill in the operating room environment. These findings support those found in the published literature that providing structured teaching sessions improves the confidence level of the learners [12]. In addition, concerns have been raised about the safety of training surgeons in the performance of surgery. In fact, there is growing demand for improved clinical results and excellent outcomes, with intense public scrutiny of their clinical performance. That's why surgical training in this field requires balance between standard of care delivered to patients and provision of sufficient operative exposure to trainees who are the cardiac surgeons of the future.
Training programs dedicated to robotic surgery are still very limited. This creates a physical barrier that does pulls back the widespread use of this technique [13]. Learning curve is steep and the senior’s surgeons that would be responsible to teaching the residents and trainees, are not able to offer this modality. To share knowledge, stimulate learning and disseminate the use the robot, the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) have offered postgraduate and fellowship programs [14]. However, since the number of centers performing robotic surgery is still low, it has been hard to determine the best training method to teach new surgeons.
Based on that, a randomized trial evaluated the best method to simulate robotic surgery was published in 2016. On this trial, 40 surgical trainees had to dissect 10 cm of the left internal mammary artery and to place sutures on the mitral annulus. After that they were exposed to four types of training and reevaluated: wet lab, dry lab, virtual reality and control group [15]. A score was used to evaluate their improvement in these two tasks, focused on depth perception, bimanual dexterity, force sensitivity, autonomy, and robotic control, making it a far more robust evaluation tool than time-based scoring systems. The results of this trial showed that wet lab simulation was the most efficient training for robotic surgery. If wet labs are not available, the virtual reality simulation also proved to be good alternative, because it provides for familiarization with the robot’s instrumentation. Moreover, virtual reality training has a lower cost and the advantage of being more readily available.
After finishing robotic training, it is necessary to start your surgical practice in your hospital, performing at least 1 case per week. In order to do that, there must exist both institutional and provider alignment in the commitment to education and staff training, as well as to program development to ensure sustained patient volume. Institutions that succeeded with the robotic program kept good administrative support and created a selected, limited, and dedicated team of providers committed to the program [16]. That includes a clearly identified surgeon leader, bedside first assistant, anesthesiology, scrub nurses, circulating nurses and perfusionists [17].
The development of new technical innovations will be of paramount importance to help the future of robotic cardiac surgery, such as other robotic platforms, new instruments and new devices. Creating new softwares aligned with artificial intelligence will play an important role if they are able to overlay the image visualized in the operating field with the ones from the 3D echocardiography and computed tomography. Close collaboration between surgeons and engineers will be essential to set research priorities and ensure incorporation of new tools in clinical practice.
The perception that a procedure requires fellowship training is a possible explanation for why most core and advanced surgical skills are considered above residency training. Proving competency in a controllable environment may allow residents to gain more autonomy in the operating room [18]. A pressing need exists to incorporate simulation-based training into existing and future cardiovascular surgery residency programs [19]. As mandates for quality measures and shorter training periods emerge, teaching alone using the traditional ‘‘apprenticeship’’ model in the operating room will no longer be sufficient. High-fidelity, low-technology tools such as a fresh tissue cadaver laboratory and a virtual operating room might be important adjuncts to successful curriculum implementation.
During the past several years, major shifts in surgical education have brought into question whether surgical residency programs are truly producing competent and technically proficient surgeons [20]. The combination of patient safety concerns, changes in resident education and more complex procedures in high-risk patients have generated greater interest in simulation-based learning in cardiovascular surgery training. Considering the current educational environment and the importance of training the next generation of surgeons, simulations seem an attractive alternative. We strongly believe that simulation may contribute to the development of technical skills and procedural knowledge required for adequate performance in the operating room in cardiovascular surgery.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
