AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/220
Igor Klepikov, MD, Professor. Retired
*Corresponding Author: Igor Klepikov, MD, Professor. Retired
Citation: Igor Klepikov, (2024), First aid and Prognosis for Acute Pneumonia, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports, 6(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-8794/220
Copyright: © 2024, Igor Klepikov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 04 July 2024 | Accepted: 12 July 2024 | Published: 18 July 2024
Keywords: nanotechnology; targeted drug childbirth; drug happening; nanoparticles; liposomes; polymeric micelles; dendrimers; controlled release; active point or direct at a goal; personalized cure
Acute pneumonia (AP) is one of the oldest nosologies known to medicine, but the causes of acute inflammation of the lung tissue, and even more so the mechanisms of its development, remained unknown for many centuries. And yet, observing these patients allowed ancient medicine to come to the conclusion, which remains relevant to this day, that people get pneumonia and do not become infected. Many years of empirical experience, based primarily on achieving quick and tangible results, have also made it possible in different parts of the world to develop various methods of providing first aid to this complex category of patients. Such approaches to the treatment of AP remained virtually unchanged until the first half of the last century, and their long-term relevance and prevalence reflect the presence of positive effects from the use of such techniques.
The study and discovery of the causes of AP was facilitated, first of all, by the development of microbiology and its success in the discovery of the causative agents of this disease, starting from the end of the 18th century. The introduction of these achievements into practical medicine made it possible to establish and monitor that pneumococcus, which received its name due to its tendency to damage lung tissue, remained the main causative agent of AP for a long period, without reducing its activity to less than 95% [1-5]. The study of the mechanisms of development of the process in the lungs during this period has not yet yielded results that could directly affect practical approaches to treatment. At the same time, detailing the etiology of AP made it possible to establish and, with some success, begin to use sulfonamides in clinical practice as antimicrobial agents [6-7].
The appearance of sulfonamides in the general complex of treatment of AP was an example of the massive use of antimicrobial drugs and one of the first steps towards the spread of this direction. Therefore, by the time of the first clinical use of penicillin in 1943 [8], etiotropic drugs were already considered an important segment of medical care in the treatment of inflammatory diseases. The further introduction of antibiotic therapy brought amazing results in the early years, accompanied by a kind of euphoria, since the new type of therapy was considered an exceptionally miraculous method. The enthusiastic reception of the first effects of antibiotics has distorted a professionally balanced and scientifically based assessment of the basic principles and concepts. For example, it was initially known that the effect of antibiotics is directed only at pathogens and does not affect the mechanisms of the inflammatory process itself, but this did not prevent the treatment of AP from concentrating soon after the start of this therapy on the principle of “antibiotics alone”.
The entire course of subsequent events is evidence of the formation of views on the problem that do not correspond to and contradict the ever-growing facts of reality. On the one hand, this was due to a sincere desire to achieve effective care for seriously ill patients, when, first of all, efforts were aimed at constantly improving antimicrobial action, and information about side effects, known since preclinical studies [9-10], did not attract serious attention.
On the other hand, the emerging preferences and exaggerated assessment of the role and place of antibiotics in the complex treatment of AP continued to be replicated and taken root in the professional consciousness by making appropriate changes to educational programs. Over the past decades, numerous generations of doctors have been trained in the leading role of the AP pathogen in the occurrence and development of the disease, as well as the direct dependence of the success of therapy on its rapid and effective suppression. An example of such didactics can be sections of manuals and textbooks describing etiology, pathogenesis and treatment of AP, published in different periods. The difference between such presentations was that the lists of pathogens, their virulent properties and the most recommended antibiotics were only periodically updated in accordance with changes, but the essence of the approaches remained the same.
The growing desire to maintain the effectiveness of etiotropic therapy for AP has gradually and steadily moved away from the goal as a result of such obvious consequences of this treatment as increased microflora resistance, a decrease in the effect of existing antibiotics and the constant need to develop and produce more advanced drugs, periodic changes in the main pathogens and diversity of etiology. Of the listed consequences, only bacterial resistance caused serious concern among specialists, which was associated primarily with a decrease in therapeutic results. In the early decades, the decline in the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy was supported by the release of new drugs, most of which were developed before 1970 [11]. Subsequently, the process of creating new drugs slowed down the pace of their generation, but the goal of these efforts remained the same. Antibiotics continued to play a major role in the treatment of AP, and efforts to effectively suppress the microbial factor were transferred to the development and application of methods for accurate diagnosis of the pathogen for the early targeted use of appropriate drugs. Over a long period, this company failed to achieve the expected success, and experts, including forums of societies on this problem, were forced to admit the absence of any influence of bacteriological diagnosis of AP on the results of its treatment, as well as the remaining empirical choice of antimicrobial drugs [12-14]. However, such recognitions did not lead to a logical revision and reassessment of the prevailing worldviews on the problem under discussion.
The decrease in the antimicrobial potential of antibiotics was accompanied by their gradual displacement from the list of drugs with reasonable indications for use in AP. The latter circumstance was associated with the growth of viral forms of the disease, the number of which reached almost half of all cases of AP in the world two decades ago [15-16]. The increase in the frequency of viral pneumonia in recent years has begun to be mentioned in discussions with recommendations for the inclusion of already known antiviral drugs in the etiotropic therapy of AP. However, the practical implementation of suppression of viral pathogens has not brought tangible results, since the effect of antiviral drugs can be expected only during the period of infection, until the virus has penetrated the cell, and not during the disease, when it is already surrounded by the cell membrane [17].
As a result of all the transformations described above, which changed the conditions for the emergence and development of AP, as well as the initial effectiveness of etiotropic therapy, in recent years there has been a clear trend toward an increase in the number of severe forms of CAP [14,18-19]. It is noted that the results of treatment depend on the clinical manifestations of the disease, and if the overall mortality from CAP has decreased slightly, in severe forms it continues to increase [18-19]. This circumstance was the reason for the active use of auxiliary and supportive methods of assistance. The choice and direction of action of such techniques completely depended on the currently dominant ideas about the main causes and mechanisms of the development of the disease. At the same time, to eliminate the pathogen and its supposed effect on the vital functions of the body in case of AP, methods of assistance began to be used, similar to the treatment of many other inflammatory processes.
Ultimately, the most standard scenario for caring for CAP patients admitted to hospitals in various parts of the world today is the following set of actions and decisions. The patient is initially insufflated with oxygen, trying to use techniques that give the best results, such as a nasal cannula or prone positioning. In parallel, based on an empirical choice, antibiotic therapy is started, which in a hospital setting is carried out by intravenous administration of drugs. This procedure is considered basic first aid, but its effect is usually assessed after 48–72 hours [12–14]. For this purpose, permanent access to the venous bed is established. In most patients, after antibiotics are prescribed, intravenous administration of solutions is continued, which is considered as a measure to reduce the risk of developing hypovolemia.
A decrease in systemic blood pressure in patients with AP is regarded as the development of sepsis or (depending on the clinic and indicators) septic shock. These factors serve as an indication for bolus infusions, and if there is no effect, for the use of vasopressors [12–14]. The latest additions to the therapeutic package are usually carried out in intensive care units, where the next step in case of further deterioration is to transfer patients to mechanical ventilation. A set of methods for helping patients with AP is currently considered scientifically based, so the surprise of a number of specialists that, despite early antimicrobial therapy and ventilation, mortality in this disease is increasing is quite sincere [20]. However, from my point of view, the described approaches to the treatment of AP, especially in the case of their intensive use, practically program the development of subsequent stages of the disease, when the possibility of timely provision of successful pathogenetic assistance is lost.
The presented scenario for the treatment of patients with AP in a hospital setting is focused on the leading role of the pathogen in the nature of the disease and does not take into account a number of important factors and circumstances that inevitably affect the dynamics of the inflammatory process. Therefore, if we really want to achieve real success in the treatment of this category of patients, then we should completely transform the system of views on the problem under discussion and pay serious attention to the classical provisions of medical science, directly related to the topic under discussion. Such objects of attention should include the stages of development of the inflammatory process, the originality of its manifestation depending on the affected area in the body, the characteristics and originality of pulmonary blood flow, as well as its role and influence on the systemic circulation. This interpretation allows us to understand the reasons why modern therapy does not bring the expected results, and in publications one can increasingly find revelations about the progression of AP during and despite treatment [18,20-22].
The presented scenario for the treatment of patients with AP in a hospital setting is focused on the leading role of the pathogen in the nature of the disease and does not take into account a number of important factors and circumstances that inevitably affect the dynamics of the inflammatory process. Considering the pathogen as the main cause of the disease, and etiotropic drugs as the main hope for a cure, we must not forget that the laws of living nature will continue to influence current processes regardless of our ideas. In this regard, the most reasonable and rational step in understanding and solving the problem under discussion may be a thorough analysis of scientific information, already considered proven facts, which will expand and deepen our understanding of the unique features of AP.
First of all, numerous studies of AP in accordance with the basic concept of the disease “antibiotic versus microbe”, despite the lack of expected results, still provided answers to the essence of the problem being studied, but these indirect data did not attract the attention of researchers. For example, many years of attempts to differentiate AP depending on the pathogen proved futile not only among bacterial forms, but also in attempts to separate bacterial from viral forms [23-25]. The very fact that the same picture of the disease is preserved, regardless of the type of pathogen, suggests that the etiology of the disease does not have such an impact on the severity of clinical manifestations and the development of complications, which they always try to attribute to this.
On the other hand, all specialists are well aware that the same pathogen can cause diseases with completely different clinical manifestations. For example, it is impossible to imagine an equivalent clinical picture of the inflammatory process in pneumococcal meningitis and pneumococcal pneumonia, is it? And this fact brings us back to the assessment of those functional disorders that accompany damage to the corresponding structures of the body, and forces us to recall the fifth classic sign of inflammation - loss of function, which was first described by Galen at the beginning of our era and verified by centuries-old practice. If we take into account all the currently known information about the development of the accident, we will get a completely different scenario for the development of events.
The occurrence of inflammation in the lung tissue is associated not only with the presence of certain pathogens in the body, which, as is known, can be present in the microbiota of healthy people without causing any side effects. The latest confirmation of this rule is the statistics of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, when up to 20-40% of infected people did not have any clinical signs and learned about contact with coronavirus only on the basis of tests [26-29]. Currently, specialists in this field are only beginning to remember the long-known facts about significant differences in our reactions to the same situations and stimuli, paying attention to the individual characteristics of the course of AP and a wide range of protective and adaptive capabilities [30-31]. The results of recent reports once again indicate that the development of AP can have a huge range of differences in its intensification, regardless of the type of pathogen. In the case of a relatively slow development of inflammation, the body has time to fully adapt to the emerging disorders without the use of etiotropic drugs, which could recently be observed in patients with Covid-19 pneumonia during the pandemic. Therefore, a description of a scenario with aggressive development of the disease will be more indicative and understandable.
The mechanisms of AP development were studied by the author of these lines more than 30 years ago. The reason for this work was reasonable doubts about the dominant role of the pathogen in the development of the disease and the leading importance of antibiotics for successful treatment, which arose as a result of our own observations and analysis of the dynamics of various examinations of seriously ill patients with AP during treatment. The purpose of the study, which refuted the generally accepted interpretation of the nature of the disease and the principles of its treatment at that time, was met with complete misunderstanding in the professional environment, but the work was continued and brought to its logical conclusion with excellent results of clinical approbation of pathogenetic methods of treatment of this category of patients. Since then, a lot of new information and facts have appeared confirming the main conclusions of the work done. Given the current importance of the AP problem in the world and the significantly increased amount of evidence indicating the possibility of solving it using already proven principles, the main fragments of the work in recent years have been published in numerous articles and summarized in two recent monographs [32-33]. Therefore, in this context, a brief overview of the pathogenesis of AP and the dependence of treatment results on various methods of medical care is presented.
The onset of inflammation is accompanied by a classic vascular reaction with increased blood flow to the affected area and a sharp increase in the permeability of the vascular walls. Excessive blood filling and slow blood flow increase blood pressure in the affected area, which is immediately accompanied by a response from the baroreceptors of the pulmonary vessels. The presence of baroreceptors in the vessels of the lungs has been known for a long time, and the role of the reflex emanating from them was proven back in the first half of the last century [34]. Currently, this reflex most often appears under the term “unloading reflex”, since it allows the vessels of the pulmonary circulation to unload during blood flow disturbances and overloads, in particular, due to the deposition of part of the circulating blood on the periphery.
Such reactions in our body act autonomously, without our conscious control, and turn on automatically when an appropriate stimulus occurs. Acting in this way, these reactions greatly facilitate our existence, quickly relieving us of many dangerous influences. The intensity of the development of subsequent pathological deviations is determined by the individual reaction of the body to a suddenly appearing trigger. In turn, at the same pace, defensive reactions develop, aimed at eliminating emerging violations and acting in the exact opposite direction. The more vigorously the violations develop, the more actively the defense counteracts. However, in the most aggressive cases of the development of the disease, the autonomous nature of such reactions does not prevent them from going beyond acceptable limits, when protective mechanisms begin to play a negative role.
A clear example of the negative role of protective mechanisms is the reaction of the vessels of the pulmonary circulation to the sudden involvement of their small segment in the inflammatory process. The zone of inflammation is capable of exerting its reflex effect on the pulmonary vessels of unaffected parts of the organ, and this influence intensifies and spreads in cases of intensive development of the inflammatory process. This fact was confirmed using cervical vagosympathetic blockades and comparative registration of rheopulmonograms in patients with aggressive development of AP [32-33]. Currently, new evidence of this fact has emerged. A study of tomograms of blood filling of the lung tissue in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia showed its significant decrease at the level of vessels with a diameter of 2 mm or less due to their generalized spasm [35-36]. However, the authors did not find parallels between these disorders and the size of the inflammation zone. At the same time, attention was drawn to a greater oxygen requirement in patients with a more significant decrease in blood supply [36].
The above materials indicate that the severity of clinical manifestations of AP depends not so much on the volume of inflammation in the lung, but on the intensity of the process. At the same time, supplying patients with oxygen does not eliminate the cause of breathing disorders, which are caused not by the blockade of gas diffusion in the area of inflammation, as many believe today, but by the next link in gas exchange, which is the circulatory system. This is why AP should be considered primarily as a cardiovascular disaster rather than a respiratory one. Elimination of reflex spasm of the pulmonary vessels during this period of the disease and elimination of obstacles to the general blood flow at their level can bring a significant improvement in the condition of patients.
However, currently, pathogenetic approaches to emergency care for patients with AP are considered through the prism of the leading role of the pathogen and its aggressive qualities. Therefore, the main task that they try to solve when providing first aid to such patients is the selection and use of etiotropic drugs, mainly antibiotics. Since an immediate effect from etiotropic treatment is not expected, and the patient’s condition in the initial period of the disease is variable and requires additional assistance with the rapid development of the process, such assistance is usually aimed at maintaining the volume of circulating blood to avoid possible hypovolemia. This plan of action is directly opposite to the mechanisms that arise in patients with AP. Intravenous administration of solutions to such patients additionally strains the pulmonary circulation and the right side of the heart. The result of the unloading reflex and signs of peripheral hypotension serve as a reason for bolus infusions.
Attaching importance to infusions in the acute period of AP and assessing the condition of patients according to the parameters of peripheral blood flow, no one remembers that blood pressure in the systemic and pulmonary circulation has an inverse proportion and its slightest changes in the pulmonary vessels affect peripheral parameters, which is due to their inextricable connection and general regulation. This “forgetfulness” is responsible for the overdiagnosis of sepsis and septic shock in these patients, although in fact such manifestations are pulmonary rather than septic in nature [32-33]. It is no coincidence that the bulk of “septic” patients today are patients with AP, the number of which exceeds the number of septic complications in all other localizations of inflammation combined.
By the time the first results of etiotropic therapy are assessed, on which great hopes continue to be placed, in the most aggressive cases of the development of AP and in this treatment scenario, precious time and the opportunity to provide timely and adequate assistance are lost. By this point, the situation for many patients may already be lost. Convincing confirmation of the hopeless and bleak results of treatment of severely ill patients with AP is currently the frank confessions of a number of specialists, which they shared in the open press [37-40]. When work carried out in accordance with all instructions and recommendations not only does not bring the expected results, but, on the contrary, leads to a state of confusion and depression, it is urgent and radical need to re-evaluate the validity of the existing system of views on this problem, isn’t it?Giving antibiotics not only a leading role in the treatment of patients with AP, but also assigning them the function of providing first aid has long become a familiar and strictly observed rule of practical medicine. Possessing a biologically active effect, antibiotics during the period of their use have steadily changed the primary conditions under which this therapy began to be used. Today, the emergence of numerous resistant strains of bacteria, a significant decrease in the effectiveness of antimicrobial drugs, the steady growth of pathogens outside the spectrum of action of antibiotics, the variability and unpredictable severity of the etiology of the disease are the consequences of the use of these drugs, which have long and persistently demonstrated the need for a radical reassessment of their place and role in the treatment of this disease. However, all hopes are still placed on etiotropic drugs, among which the role of the main and most common drug continues to be played by antibiotics, the effectiveness of which in this group of patients in recent years has begun to raise well-founded doubts.
In recent years, due to the growth of viral aggression, the search for antiviral drugs has been carried out, the intensity of which has especially increased during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. These efforts are aimed at developing agents that can replicate the initial results of antibiotic therapy. Such aspirations are based on the old concept of “etiotropic drugs against pathogens”, but do not take into account many important points, including the experience and consequences of antibiotic therapy. In addition, the very fact of the appearance of signs of a viral disease indicates the penetration of pathogens into the cells of the body, which is how a viral infection differs from a bacterial one. In the latter connection, as is already known, the effectiveness of antiviral drugs manifests itself with their early use, that is, we can talk more about prevention than about treatment.
Continuing to adhere to the old learned concept and trying to find a way out of the current situation, in modern medicine the popularity of a new direction is increasing every year. Many experts working in this field are now trying to find the most reliable prognostic indicators on which to triage patients at the onset of illness to determine the optimal level of care for them [14,18-20,41-43]. So far this endeavor has not brought significant success and, from my point of view, will not lead to the desired results. This confidence is based on the fact that the principles of treatment of AP, used since the advent of antibiotics, remain the same and there is no reason to expect that small tactical innovations will affect the strategy for solving the problem.
In fact, one of the main goals of developing such predictions is to determine the probability of death one month after the start of treatment and, based on these results, to admit patients at high risk of this outcome to intensive care units. The very formulation of the question indicates a submissive readiness to expect fatal results, and the guideline is a month, the limits of which are quite sufficient for the complete cure of patients with AP. Such a tactical method of distributing AP patients to the place of treatment is simply not capable of radically improving overall results if the principles and approaches to providing medical care remain the same. To ensure that such a conclusion is not considered unfounded, the following data must be provided. Finally, they began to pay attention to such a feature of the AP problem as an increase in adverse outcomes due to severe forms of pneumonia [14,18,19]. However, attempts to screen out such patients in order to intensify treatment do not bring satisfaction with overall results. In the total mass of such patients, there is always a group of patients who do not meet the applicable criteria, and at the same time, the unpredictability of the further development of their inflammatory process requires timely and effective assistance. In the event of a negative development of the AP, attempts to urgently make up for lost opportunities no longer allow them to be compensated for and bring unpleasant surprises. For example, Kolditz M. et al. [44] demonstrate results when mortality among patients with AP immediately admitted to intensive care units is 17%, and upon admission on days 4-7 of the disease it increases to 48%.
Thus, materials reflecting the current state of the AP problem clearly indicate the main reason preventing its solution. Attempts to further search for effective solutions to the problem will remain futile until ideas about the nature of the disease and the priorities for the development of such processes are brought into line with the laws of biomedical science.
This manuscript is a full initiative of the author and does not have any funding.
Conflict of interest: the author states that he has no conflict of interest.
*MD, professor, retired Renton, WA, USA
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
