AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/363
Department of Gastroenterology and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD)
*Corresponding Author: Rodríguez-Nogueiras, Department of Gastroenterology and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD)
Citation: Rodríguez-Nogueiras, (2024), Factors Related to The Perception of Hospital Noise in A Neuroscience Unit, J Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 7(14); DOI: 10.31579/2641-0419/363
Copyright: © 2024, Vladimir Ivanovich Ermoshkin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 11 September 2024 | Accepted: 29 November 2024 | Published: 13 December 2024
Keywords: neurological patients: hearing problems; sleep disorders.
Noise has doubled in recent decades; technological advance being its main cause. This means that the figures are well above the recommendations stipulated by the World Health Organization (WHO), which are 35 dB during the day, and 30 dB at night
In general terms we can define noise as an unpleasant and annoying sound, with excessively high levels of decibels that are potentially harmful to hearing1, “as a variation in air pressure that can be detected by the human ear, and can be described by certain physical parameters, mainly intensity and frequency”[2] or as "inarticulate, usually unpleasant sound"3. Noise is one of the triggers of sleep deprivation, patients have described it as a stressor that It increases when they are unable to communicate or move and this triggers a decrease in the duration, time distribution and fragmentation of sleep, with a predominance of stages 1 and 2 and a reduction in the 9 stages 3 and 4 and REM4.
Noise has doubled in recent decades; technological advance being its main cause. This means that the figures are well above the recommendations stipulated by the World Health Organization (WHO), which are 35 dB during the day, and 30 dB at night[5]
The WHO has estimated that approximately 500 million people in the world are exposed to high levels of noise. Similarly, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) considers that 130 million people are exposed to a sound environment higher than 65 dB6. Estimates from these organizations show that 300 million people throughout the world world feel acoustic discomfort, that is, they are exposed to sound levels between 55 and 65 dB[7]
In hospitals, there is a constant flow of noise from alarms, medical equipment, ventilation systems, audible conversations in the hallways, noises from stretchers, cart [8] which influences the patient's recovery. It is estimated that the average noise levels reached in patient rooms exceed double that recommended by the WHO, so it is vitally important that health organizations apply noise measurement devices to control levels. of stridency and implement noise reduction strategies [8]
Noise and light pollution are a cause for concern due to the serious discomfort they cause and their effects on health, both physiological and psychological in hospitalized people[10]
According to the results of a study published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine11, recovery can be compromised in the hospital environment due to noise, which interrupts sleep phases and, consequently, alters brain activity and cardiovascular function. Neurological patients have altered perception of these two stimuli, and for this reason, they are more vulnerable to these stimuli. It has been described that the presence of insomnia associated with excess noise and light is directly related to worse control in chronic diseases [12]
A recent pilot project [13] carried out at the Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital has made it possible to understand how the implementation of an intervention on factors such as noise, temperature, interference from the activity of health personnel at night and pain control can improve the quality of rest perceived by hospitalized patients by up to 10%.
Another study[14] carried out at the Belén de Lambayeque Provincial Teaching Hospital in 2018, through repeated measurements of noise levels in healthcare areas, determined the presence of noise pollution in the vast majority of areas.
The study carried out by the Catalan Institute of Health, [15] which analyzes different areas of several hospitals considered the noisiest, aims to propose interventions to help patients rest. The measurements determined a minimum of 58.6 decibels and a maximum of 69 decibels, both data much higher than the WHO recommendations. We found references in services such as ICU and Emergency Service[17]
In 2017 at the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, a quasi-experimental trial was carried out in the emergency area, whose intervention consisted of structural changes to reduce light and environmental noise, as well as the establishment of a standardized work procedure to modify the plans. night care. The results determined that factors such as pain, nursing interventions or daytime sleep did not impact sleep quality; however, light and environmental noise influence nighttime rest more than other known variables[18]
The Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, through the Commission on Perceived Quality and Humanization, carried out an analysis in 2015 on the perception of patients in relation to noise during their hospitalization process. The need to propose specific interventions to reduce environmental noise and thus help improve the recovery process was analyzed and observed. It was concluded that around 20% of patients and/or family members consider that the noise in the hospital is loud or very loud, which is why they proposed taking intervention measures. relation to the age factor, improving the quality of rest was included as one of the strategies of the 2016-2019 Humanization Plan of the Ministry of Health of the Community of Madrid16 with the aim of reducing the negative effects that noise and other factors have in rest, considered a public health problem, especially in elderly people.
Due to the above, the purpose of this project is to know if the factors related to the perception of noise by patients and how this affects the rest and comfort of patients admitted to the Neurosciences Unit of the center, since as As previously justified, neurological patients often have altered noise perception. It is interesting to study the results of this study in this group of patients in relation to the results of the study about the noises that were most annoying for the patient.
In addition, the Princess University Hospital is a member of the international movement of Hippocratic Hospitals as a Humanist center with the collaboration of the Humans Foundation. This movement responds to the need to raise awareness among current health profesionals19.
Main objetive:
Describe the related factors in relation to the perception of noise of people hospitalized in the Neurosciences Unit of the Hospital Universitario de la Princesa and the impact on the rest and comfort of patients.
Specific objectives:
1. Know the factors related to patients' perception of hospital noise in the Neurosciences Unit.
2. Know the tolerability of patients regarding the noise level in a hospitalization unit.
3. Know how patients perceive the impact of hospital noise on their rest and comfort.
4. Know the decibel level of noise in the Neurosciences Hospitalization Unit through measurement using a sound level meter.
Prospective descriptive observational study in which it is proposed to describe the factors related to noise perception in the Neurosciences Unit of the Hospital University of La Princesa, considering the perception of patients and/or family members participants in the study, also in objective terms, the measurement of noise environment of the unit. To collect the patients' perception, two surveys are proposed: one regarding perceived quality of sleep and rest, validated by the Quality Commission Perceived and humanization of the hospital center itself and another of noise perception, called “noise pollution” validated by the Madrid Health Service.
To collect noise intensity level data measured in decibels, uses a portable sound level meter as a tool. The measurement is planned in three days different and at different times.
To evaluate the cognitive capacity of the participating subject who responds to the survey, the use of the T@M test (Memory Impairment Test) is required.
Sample size
Patients hospitalized in the Neurosciences Unit of the University Hospital of the Princess who meet the proposed inclusion criteria within a period of time limited to 60 days. Estimating the number of patients who have been discharged in the unit studied in the previous 3 months as a universal sample, a calculation is made sample size of 35 patients, considering 8% losses.
Inclusion criteria:
· Over 18 years old.
· Signed informed consent to participate in the study.
· Sufficient cognitive capacity, evaluated through an assessment test
neurological T@M (Memory Impairment Test) (18) (Annex 1).
Exclusion criteria:
· Revocation of informed consent.
· Patients diagnosed with sleep disorders.
· Patients diagnosed with hearing problems.
Variables
- Descriptive: Age, Sex, Cognitive ability.
- Noise perception: very high, high, acceptable, low, very low.
- Perception of sleep quality.
- Quantification in decibels of the sound level.
Instruments
To obtain data on the neurological status of the patients, the T@M test (Memory Impairment Test) is used. It consists of five sections: immediate memory, temporal orientation, semantic remote, free evocation, evocation with cues; It is used in the assessment of cognitive ability on a regular basis.
To obtain data regarding the patient's perception of Quality of Life in relation to noise, the survey of perceived quality of sleep and rest was used, validated by the Commission on Perceived Quality and humanization of the hospital center.
To obtain data regarding the patient's perception of noise, the so-called “noise pollution” survey validated by the Madrid Health Service was used.
To quantify the noise level in decibels, objective measurements were taken with a portable sound level meter as follows: 3 daily measurements for 21 days, including the three work shifts on each measurement day. The measurement is carried out at the two existing nursing controls in the unit and at the entrance door to the patient rooms.
Data Collection And Analysis
Data Collection Notebook (CDR) for each of the participants, identified with a participant number.
To exploit the data, the CDR data were incorporated into a SPSS v.21 database, verifying the information before and during inclusion in it, in order to detect possible errors. Subsequently, descriptive statistical techniques were applied.
Regarding attribute variables:
Regarding the dependent variables:
Ethical Aspects:
This study was carried out respecting the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent modifications (latest Fortaleza 2013), the recommendations relating to Good linical Practice.
The guidelines of the General Data Protection Regulation (RGPD) 2016/679 and Organic Law 3/2018, Protection of Personal Data and guarantee of digital rights, were followed.
Patients will participate in this study only after having been informed of the nature of the study, its objectives, confidentiality and legislation, in order to protect their integrity. No analysis related to this study will be carried out before signing the informed consent (IC).
Regarding the conservation of the CRD, they will be collected and guarded by the researchers.
The project has been approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the La Princesa University Hospital.
Personal information of patients will not be revealed in any case and patient data will be encrypted to protect their identity. Only data relevant to the study will be used after prior authorization by the patient.
The project respects the four ethical principles of bioethics. The patient at all times has the full right to decide about himself, whether or not he may participate in the study, or after having decided to participate in it, he may deny its continuity at any time he considers appropriate. So that the patient can make the necessary decisions, he or she will be properly informed and explained about the entire process.
Likewise, the reason is the improvement in the quality of patient care; whose maximum is not to cause harm to the participants, not posing any risk to the patient.
This study will allow other patients to benefit from the knowledge obtained in the future; as well as carry out specific intervention programs. It is important to know the patient's perception and the impact on their rest and well-being, in order to plan improvement actions, both educational and furniture, that can provide the patient with a quiet stay, focused on rest and well-being. Better rest ultimately means better recovery.
Regarding the description of the sample under study:
• The age range is between 41 and 75 years and practically equal between men and women.
• Half of the patients claim to have sleep problems and more than half consider that noise, in general, bothers them.
• More than 90% of patients consider that once they have been woken up by a noise they find it difficult to fall asleep.
Regarding the dependent variables:
• Almost half of the patients consider that the noise in the hospital is loud, although the rest consider it acceptable.
• More than 80% consider that the noise in the hospital does not allow them to rest as they would at home.
• More than 40% consider that nighttime noise in the hospital wakes them up at night.
• Three thirds of patients consider that during the night shift, noise becomes more annoying.
• Half consider that the morning shift is the noisiest.
• Most patients tolerate the noise produced by the activities of hospital professionals.
• A small percentage of those surveyed consider that the activities involved in turning on the light in the room are more annoying than the noise itself.
• A group of patients states that professionals could do something to reduce noise while carrying out their activity.
• The majority of patients believe that professional activities on patients during the night should be brought forward or delayed to respect rest.
• Almost three-quarters of patients consider that their roommate at some point interrupted their sleep and more than half consider their roommate to be annoying.
• More than half consider that noise causes sleep disturbances and even some difficulty in communicating. A small percentage reports feeling irritable.
• More than half consider that cars and doors are the main cause of noise.
• A small percentage consider that the visits are annoying because of the noise they generate and also the repair works in the hospital.
• Almost half say that the most annoying outside noise is the sound of ambulance sirens.
• The noise levels in decibels are slightly higher than recommended.
In the future, this study will allow other patients to benefit from the knowledge obtained, since specific interventions can be carried out aimed at establishing a calm stay, focused on rest and well-being. Incorporating the patient's point of view allows planning improvement actions, both educational and furniture. Better rest ultimately means better recovery.
It should be noted that the healthcare professional must be aware of the importance of reducing annoying noise for the patient. In addition, proper maintenance of the furniture in hospitalization units is necessary, such as work carts, hinges and gears on doors and windows.
The use of a double room generates, in itself, sharing physical space with another unknown person. It is necessary, therefore, to adapt each person's habits, and for there to be a situation of mutual respect. The visits generated by each of the cohabitants during the hospitalization time must be adjusted taking into account the rest and meal times of the other patient.
The perception of noise is highly subjective data. This may be influenced by other aspects other than those taken into account, such as light pollution or the discomfort caused by the professional interventions on the patient, which would be a bias.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.