AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/208
Assistant Professor in Language Pathology, Centre of Speech Language Sciences, AIISH Mysore
*Corresponding Author: Abhishek. BP, Assistant Professor in Language Pathology, Centre of Speech Language Sciences, AIISH Mysore.
Citation: Abhishek. BP, (2024), Effect of Stimulus related factors on performance of lexical decision task in Aphasia, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice, 7(14); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/208
Copyright: © 2024, Abhishek. BP. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 29 July 2024 | Accepted: 13 August 2024 | Published: 19 August 2024
Keywords: lexical access; word length; imageability
Persons with aphasia flaunt word finding difficulty and this word finding difficulty is attributed to defective lexical access. Lexical access can be tested through naming and priming tasks. Naming tasks tests for the ‘performance’ based aspects of lexical access, while priming tasks tests for the ‘competence factor’.
Persons with aphasia flaunt word finding difficulty and this word finding difficulty is attributed to defective lexical access. Lexical access can be tested through naming and priming tasks. Naming tasks tests for the ‘performance’ based aspects of lexical access, while priming tasks tests for the ‘competence factor’. Priming principle can be incorporated in a lexical decision task (where participants have to say if the given target is a word or non-word) or semantic judgment task. The performance on priming tasks is said to be influenced by stimulus related factors like syllable length & imageability, duration between prime and target (also called as stimulus onset a synchrony). The present study aims at determining the effect of two stimuli related factors i.e syllable length & imageability on the performance of lexical decision task in persons with Broca’s aphasia and neuro-typical individuals. The results revealed that the performance of neuro-typical individuals did not vary with these two stimuli related factors while persons with aphasia performed better on stimulus with short syllable length and high imageability compared to stimulus with longer syllable length and low imageability showing that the stimuli related factors influence the performance of persons with aphasia on lexical decision task Lexical access is a process where the most appropriate word is retrieved from the lexicon. The naming task is used as a referent to explain the chain of events during lexical access [1]. The lexicon access is initiated with conceptual activation, following the conceptual activation, a set of related lemma nodes are activated, eventually phonemic segments related to the lexical node is retrieved. Following this, the phonemic segments is translated through the process of articulation, for which the articulators are programmed and positioned.
Word finding difficulties are the common linguistic deficits seen in persons with aphasia. The word finding difficulties in persons with aphasia is often attributed to defects in these three stages of lexical access [2]. The locus of lexical semantic breakdown in persons with aphasia is dependent on the type of aphasia. Persons with global aphasia would have difficulties at the level of conceptual representation, persons with non-fluent aphasia will certainly have expression related deficits alongside difficulties in retrieving phonemes from the phonological output lexicon and persons with anomic aphasia would have mild deficits in lexical semantic activation [3].
Different tasks can be employed to tap lexical access. The tasks can be roughly divided into categories; tasks that assess the performance related aspects related to lexical access (naming tasks, sentence completion task, rhyme production task etc) and tasks that assess for competence related aspects of lexical access (primed lexical decision, semantic judgment, phoneme judgement task etc). Priming based tasks are commonly used to assess the competence-based factors related to lexical access [4]. Priming operates when a given target word is preceded by semantically related word or phonemically related word, this facilitates the activation of the target word in a quick and accurate way. The duration between the prime (preceding word) and target is called as Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA).
The occurrence of the semantically related word provokes words within the same semantic field as a result of which the activation of the target word takes place more easily. This priming principle can be employed with various tasks such as lexical decision and semantic judgment. Lexical decision refers to the process of deciding whether the given target is a word or non-word (non meaningful word). The performance on lexical decision task is dependent on factors like attention (as it is time bound task), conceptual knowledge, lemma node retrieval and phoneme retrieval abilities [5].
Several stimulus related factors influence the performance on lexical decision, the factors include the length of the target (short v/s long), imageability (low v/s high), duration between prime and target (Stimulus onset asynchrony) and the nature of the target word (concrete v/s abstract). A study reported that it was difficult for persons with aphasia to recognise short words compared to long words as they are not redundant. Words with high imageability can be activated easily compared to words with low image ability (Hardin, 2005). Short Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA) is known to activate the automatic mechanism of lexical retrieval while long SOA is known to activate the volitional mechanism of lexical retrieval. The duration of SOA is known to influence the performance; this in turn is dependent on the type of aphasia also [6,7].
Need for the study
Through studies it is clear that stimulus related factors influence performance of lexical decision task. The effect of stimulus related factors on the performance of lexical decision task has not been explored in persons with aphasia much. Owing to this reason, there arises a need to carry a study exploring these facts
Aim of the study to study the effect of stimulus related factors (word length and imageability) on the performance of lexical decision task in persons with aphasia.
Total of 6 males’ participants in the age range of 45-65 years were recruited for the study. The six participants with cerebro vascular accident were diagnosed by a neurologist, Western Aphasia Battery (Shymala, Vijaya Shree & Ravi Kumar, 2001) was administered on the participants and these participants were diagnosed to have Broca’s type of aphasia on WAB (see table 1). In order to compare the performance 5 neuro- typical individuals were also recruited.
| Sl No | Age/Gender | Post stroke duration | Duration of therapy |
| 1 | 52/M | 3 months | 2 months |
| 2 | 42/M | 6 months | 1 month |
| 3 | 45/M | 6 months | 6 months |
| 4 | 52/M | 8 months | 6 months |
| 5 | 61/M | 6 months | 5 months |
| 6 | 64/M | 9 months | 3 months |
Table 1. Details of participants
The stimulus for the lexical decision task was derived from a priming based study (Prema, 2010). The stimulus comprised of 90 prime-target word pairs. The length of prime and target was uniform. The stimulus further was divided into two DMDZ programs. The first program had 18 short syllable length prime target pairs (2 and 3 syllables) 18 words with long syllable prime and target (5 and 6 syllables) and 14 non words. These word pairs were randomized and presented on DMDX software Similarly to study the effect of imageability 40 separate prime target pairs were considered (13 with low imageability, 13 with high imageability and 14 non words) The duration of the prime was 500 milliseconds, Duration between prime and target was 500 milliseconds and the target display duration was 1000 milliseconds and the maximum response duration was 4000 milliseconds. The prime was aligned at the top of screen and the target was aligned at the centre of the screen. The participant had to decide if the target word was a true word (word which has meaning) or not by pressing button “1” on key board for word and button “0” for non word press 1. If the participants failed to respond within the stipulated duration of 4000 milliseconds, it was recorded as error. A trial block of 10 words was used to acclimatize the participants with the DMDX program and thus it was ensured that they understood the instructions. The output file saved separately for the two programs (syllable length and Imageability) saved in MS Excel format was analyzed.
As persons with Broca’s aphasia had motor deficits, the reaction time was ignored and only the accuracy scores were taken into consideration. The accuracy scores for persons with Broca’s aphasia- pwBA on short syllable and long syllable prime-target programs were 56% and 48% respectively. For the neuro-typical individuals, the accuracy scores were 87% and 85% respectively (see Figure 1)
Figure 1. Accuracy scores of neurologically and persons with Broca’s aphasia on short and long syllable target
Further in order to verify if there was any significant difference for persons with Broca’s aphasia and neurologically healthy individuals on short syllable and long syllable target statistical analyses was carried out through non parametric statistics as the data did not abide by the properties of normal distribution. (Since the objective of study was to study the effect of stimulus related factors on performance, only within group comparisons were carried out by using Wilcoxon’s sign rank test) The Z scores of persons with aphasia for short v/s long prime target pairs was 4.14 and the corresponding p values
(p<0>
Figure 2: Accuracy scores of neurologically and persons with Broca’s aphasia on low imageable and high imageable target
The Z scores for persons with Broca’s aphasia and neurologically healthy individuals on low imageable and high imageable target words was 4.34 and 2.64, the corresponding p value (p<0>
The stimulus related factors (syllable length & imageability) influenced the persons with Broca’s aphasia only and did not influence the performance of neuro typical individuals. Persons with aphasia performed better on stimulus with short syllable length and high imageability compared to stimulus with longer syllable length and low imageability).
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
