AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/662
¹Ambulatory Surgery Service, Clinics Hospital of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Avenue Prof. Alfredo Balena, 110, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
²Medical School of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, (UFMG), Avenue Professor Alfredo Balena, 190, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
*Corresponding Author: : Francesco Botelho Evangelista, Department of Ambulatory Surgery Service, Hospital das Clínicas of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Citation: Francesco B. Evangelista, Paula Martins, Letícia M. Peñaranda, Júllia C. Guimarães, Júlio Ardiçon Schneider, et al, (2025), Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans following COVID-19 and Influenza vaccination: A Case Report, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 25(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/662
Copyright: © 2025, Francesco Botelho Evangelista. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 10 March 2025 | Accepted: 21 March 2025 | Published: 09 April 2025
Keywords: dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans; vaccine; covid-19; influenza; skin/subcutaneous sarcoma; immune-mediated reaction
Coronavirus Disease 2019, commonly known as COVID-19, is an infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Symptoms range from mild (fever, cough, fatigue) to severe (shortness of breath, organ failure), with complications often observed in individuals with underlying health conditions or compromised immune systems. The introduction of vaccines to combat the disease is recent, necessitating ongoing evaluation of potential long-term effects. In contrast, influenza vaccination, with over 70 years of use, allows a better understanding of its long-term impacts. This case discusses a 40-year-old male patient who developed Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP) in his right arm with rapid progression, following the simultaneous administration of the COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca and the trivalent Influenza vaccine at the same day and anatomical site, the proximal brachial region of the right upper limb. The patient underwent resection and histopathological analysis of the lesion, which revealed a skin/subcutaneous sarcoma compatible with grade 1 DFSP. The temporal relationship between the emergence of the lesion and the vaccination raises questions about potential uncommon immune-mediated adverse effects, discussed in this article through clinical analysis and a review of studies reporting similar reactions. This case highlights the importance of reporting and investigating rare adverse events that may be associated with vaccines to identify and better understand these complications.
DFSP : Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans
FISS : Feline Injection-Site Sarcoma
MMR vaccine : Measles, mumps and rubella vaccine
Vaccination is one of the most effective strategies for the prevention of infectious diseases, significantly contributing to the reductionof global morbidityand mortality. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the introduction of vaccines specifically targeting the coronavirus marked a milestone in public health, helping mitigate the devastating effects of the disease. At the same time, vaccination against influenza, with over seven decades of use, remains crucial for preventing severe complications. Although vaccines are generally safe, reports of rare adverse effects, including sarcomas at injection sites or adjacent areas, have emerged with the widespread use of the COVID-19vaccine. In light of this, this case report describes a rare cutaneous sarcoma of the Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP) type with accelerated progression following the simultaneous administration of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and the trivalent influenzavaccine at the same anatomical site. The aim of this article is to discuss the potential associations between vaccination and the development of the lesion, with emphasis on clinical findings, surgical management, and histopathological analysis, contributing to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in immune-mediated responses post-vaccination and helping to expand knowledge for supporting future research on uncommon adverse events. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare type of soft tissue sarcoma with a low metastasis rate but high local recurrence. It typically presents as a firm plaque in shades of pink and purple on the trunk and proximalextremities, with slow progression. Surgicalexcision with clearmargins is the preferred treatment, and radiotherapy may reduce localrecurrence, especially in cases wherewide margins are impractical (1).
Male patient, 40 years old, self-identified as black, obese, rural worker, former alcoholic, diagnosed with systemic arterial hypertension controlled with Losartan, Atenolol, and Hydrochlorothiazide, with a surgical history of cholecystectomy in 2018 without complications. The documents provided by the patient indicate a vaccination history including: one dose of the diphtheria and tetanus vaccine, the yellow fever vaccine, one dose of the hepatitis B vaccine, the MMR vaccine, and the trivalent influenza vaccine. Regarding COVID-19 immunization, the patient received two doses of the Coronavac vaccine and one dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine. In 2022, following the simultaneous (i.e., same arm and day) administration of the AstraZeneca and trivalent influenza vaccines in the brachial region of the right upper limb, the patient initially experienced localized pain. One month later, he noticed the development of a small exophytic nodule in the proximal and lateral region of the right upper limb, specifically in the long head of the bicepsmuscle. The nodule exhibited rapid growth, acquiring characteristics of a tumor mass, and was accompanied by pain, bleeding, redness, ulceration, a putrid odor, and purulent discharge (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Ulcerated exophytic tumor in the brachialregion 10 monthsafter vaccination
During the progression of the lesion, the patient sought treatment at low-complexity health services in his hometown. However, due to the unfamiliarity of the lesion among professionals, no definitive treatment was provided. The only measures taken were dressing the lesion, prescribing analgesics, and referring the patient to a specialized regional service, the Clinics Hospital of the Federal University of Minas Gerais. Two years after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine, the patient was seen at the Ambulatory Surgery Service of the ClinicsHospital of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, presenting the lesion. Upon medical evaluation, the following was noted: an ulcerated exophytic tumor with infection, measuring approximately 15x10x5 cm (Figure 2),
Figure 2: Ulcerated exophytic tumor in the brachialregion 2 years after vaccination
as well as a second adjacent lesion measuring 2x1x0.5 cm (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Adjacent exophytic tumor
The patient was referred for surgical excision and biopsy of the lesions. After consultation, the patient underwent surgery for lesion excision. Antisepsis of the right deltoid region was performed with chlorhexidine, and a sterile fenestrated surgical drape was positioned to isolate the lesion (Figure 4).
Figure 4: tumor isolatedby fenestrated surgicaldrape
Regional anesthesia was administered using 1% lidocaine with vasoconstrictor for local anesthesia and to reduce bleeding.A peritumoral incisionwas made, followedby careful hemostasis to control abundant bleeding. During the procedure, a large amount of friable tissue surrounding the lesion was noted. Next, a new incision was made with electrocautery, and the lesionwas excised via biopsy without safety margins. The excised tissue was sent for priority histopathological analysis for rapid diagnosis. Topical prophylactic antibiotics were applied to the lesion site. The surgical wound was sutured subcutaneously with Vicryl 3-0, and the skin was closed with simple Nylon 3-0 sutures (Figure 5).
Figure 5: operative scar immediately afterthe excision
All remaining tissues were carefully washed with saline solution and soap to prevent infection, and a compressive dressing was applied. Dipyrone and Ibuprofen were prescribed for potential postoperative symptoms. At the postoperative wound review one week after the procedure, the lesion showed effective tissue repair with hyperemia and local pain (Figure 6).
Figure 6: operative scar one week after tumor excision
Prophylactic Cefalexin 500 mg was prescribed every 6 hours for 10 days, with a follow-up appointment scheduled for the following week. The official histopathological report from the Clinics Hospital of the Federal University of Minas Gerais described the analysis of the collected specimens: a tissue fragment measuring 2.0 x 1.0 x 0.3 cm and a main sample measuring 9.5 x 8.0 x 4.0 cm, partially covered with skin presenting hemorrhage and erythematous nodules. Sections of the specimens showed evidence of a malignant mesenchymal neoplasm with spindle cell proliferation, discreetly hyperchromatic nuclei,forming bundles and storiform arrangements permeating adipocytes in a "chicken wire" pattern. Areas with a myxoid pattern and up to 10 mitoses per high-power fieldwere observed, with no necrosisdetected. The lesionreached the surgical margins. The report concluded it was a fusocellular sarcoma of the skin/subcutaneous tissue, consistent with grade 1 Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (FNCLCC/WHO). The patient was referred for complementary immunohistochemical analysis. At the postoperative follow-up four weeks after surgery, the patient reported nocomplaints and denied pain, hyperemia, or discharge at the healing site. The surgical sutures had fallen off naturally. Physical examination of the operative scar showed effectivewound closure, with the presenceof dark and dry scabs and no inflammatory signs (Figure 7).
Figure 7: operative scar four weeks after tumor excision
The patient was referredto the oncology surgery service. The patient returned eight weeks after surgery, showing good wound healing (Figure 8).
Figure 8: operative scar eight weeks after tumor excision
Immunizations play a key role in the prevention of infectious diseases, but in rare cases, they may trigger cutaneous and subcutaneous adverse events. Although most of these reactions are benign and transient, some sporadic reports have documented the development of atypical proliferative lesions, including soft tissue sarcomas, at vaccine injection sites or adjacent areas. Such occurrences raise the hypothesis that an exaggerated immune response may be associated with oncogenesis in previously sensitized tissues. This clinical case describes the rare development of a grade1 dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), a fusocellular soft tissue and subcutaneous sarcoma, at the site of simultaneous (i.e., same arm and day) administration of the AstraZeneca and trivalent influenza vaccines. The tumor exhibited rapid and progressive growth over the course of two years. DFSP is a rare soft tissue tumor, typicallylocated on the trunk or proximal extremities, with an incidence of 0.8 to 4.5 new cases per million people annually, and can manifest in both sexes equally and at all age ranges. Typically diagnosed between the third and fifth decades of life, these lesions tend to grow slowly but may ulcerate and become painful(1), as observed in the described case. The temporal proximity betweenvaccination and tumor development, along with the coincidence of the tumor's location at the injection site,suggests a possiblecausal association, despitethe rarity of the event. Clinical reports have documented the appearance of proliferative lesions at vaccination sites, raising questions about the interaction between the immune stimulus of the vaccine and oncogenesis. However, the absence of robust studies with appropriate methodologies and representative sample sizes prevents confirmation of this relationship. Most available evidencecomes from a few case reports, making it difficult to generalize the findings. Although some hypotheses have been raised, such as the action of vaccine adjuvants or an exacerbated inflammatory response in predisposed tissues, these mechanisms remain speculative. The rarity of tumors like DFSP also complicates the conduct of large-scale epidemiological studies. To support these assertions, Bae et al. (2023) documented the occurrence of pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma near the COVID-19 vaccination site in a 73-year-old woman, following the second dose of the Moderna vaccine (2). Althoughcausality has not been proven,the temporal association and the location of the lesion also raised the hypothesis that the immunological stimulus from the vaccine could have contributed to tumor development (2). Additionally, Martínez-Ortega et al. (2024)reported the occurrence of Kaposi's sarcoma in an HIV-negative individual seven days after receivingthe third dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine, suggesting a possible link between vaccination and reactivation of oncogenic factors, such as the herpesvirus associated with sarcoma (3). Soyfer et al. (2021) discussed the phenomenon of "radiation recall", in which an inflammatory response is reactivated in previously irradiated tissues after vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. While not directly related to sarcomas, this phenomenon illustrates how immune stimuli can affect sensitized tissues (4). Although no documented reports suggest an association between the trivalent influenza vaccine and the development of malignant tumors, Toci et al. (2022) observed the development of an injection granuloma mimicking soft tissue sarcoma after the administration of the seasonal flu vaccine (5). Similarly, Quintero et al. (2022) reported a granulomatous mass that resembleda sarcoma after COVID-19 vaccination with the Moderna vaccine (6). Furthermore, studies since 1990 have investigated the development of high-grade sarcomas as rare adverse effects of vaccination in felines, with the hypothesis that these tumors may be induced by an intense and chronic inflammatory response to the vaccine or injection. The malignant transformation of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts as a result of this inflammation is supported by the characteristic histological appearance of Feline Injection-Site Sarcoma (FISS), which includes the presence of increased inflammatory cells, multinucleated giant cells, central areas of necrosis,and, in some cases, a grayish-blue material inside macrophages, compatible with aluminum-based vaccine adjuvants (7). The connection between vaccination and the development of cutaneous sarcomas, such as Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans, remains hypothetical due to the lack of conclusive evidence. The rarity of these events, combined with the absence of solid scientific evidence, prevents definitive conclusions but emphasizes the importance of ongoing surveillance. Reporting adverse reactions, even the most uncommon ones, is crucial for monitoring vaccine safety, allowing the early identification of patterns that may suggest potential risks. Further investigations are essential to understand the underlying mechanisms of these reactions and determine if a causal relationship truly exists. In the meantime, it is important to reinforce confidence in vaccination as an indispensable strategy for global public health.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
