AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/485
Emeritus Professor of Pediatrics, Pathology, & Decision Science, University of New Mexico; former Director, Center for Healthcare Policy, Texas Public Policy Foundation; and former Director, New Mexico Health Insurance Exchange.
*Corresponding Author: Deane Waldman, Emeritus Professor of Pediatrics, Pathology, & Decision Science, University of New Mexico.
Citation: Deane Waldman, (2025), COVID’s Six Victims, J Clinical Research and Reports, 18(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/485
Copyright: © 2025, Deane Waldman. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 January 2025 | Accepted: 27 January 2025 | Published: 04 February 2025
Keywords: fake crisis; mRNA injection; lockdown; public health; tyranny; censorship
The COVID pandemic was a fabricated, false medical crisis used to scare the public into accepting federal abrogation of constitutionally protected rights. Governments of constitutional republics across the globe imposed forms of medical martial law or outright totalitarianism. The tyrannies that supplanted liberty severely damaged public health, personal as well as national finances, trust in official institutions, and the education of children. The greatest damage, however, was to the most precious public possession: freedom. Loss of information freedom by government censorship prevented clinical physicians from practicing good medicine on their patients.
The technical name for what is commonly called COVID is SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome associated with a coronavirus (Co V), and the “2” indicates this the second outbreak of a SARS epidemic, the first occurred in 2003 in the Middle East.
In November 2019, a large SARS-CoV-2 (“COVID”) outbreak was first noted localized to Wuhan, China. It quickly spread. The official explanation was this was a naturally occurring, highly contagious virus that made the leap from animals (bats in a “live” market) to humans. Wuhan housed a viral research laboratory supported in part by the NIH [1] that was engaged in gain-of-function research using coronaviruses. Despite vehement denials by Dr. Fauci and stonewalling by the Chinese government, the logical question remained unresolved whether the outbreak was due to a lab leak.
In January 2020, the first COVID death was reported in the U.S. In March 2020, the World Health organization declared COVID a worldwide pandemic and a health hazard to tens of millions of people. [2] A statistically questionable study from Oxford, England projected a U.S. death toll of more than two million individuals from COVID [3-5]. One infectious disease expert claimed COVID was “more deadly than Ebola” with its 50-90 percent fatality rate [6].
Official governmental responses in the U.S. and globally to the COVID pandemic were excessive and frankly unscientific. Lockdowns were imposed on the entire, mostly healthy population without any epidemiologic support or historical proof of benefit. Facemasks were mandated despite both theory and evidence they did not prevent viral spread or contagion [7]. Predictions of existential threat provided a perfect excuse for governments in constitutional republics to impose a form of medical martial law.
This report confirms the damage done by the COVID scam [8] it provides details of COVID’s victims: general health, personal and national finances, education, socialization, and public trust in major institutions [9, 10]. However, the most grievous damage was done our most precious possession: freedom.
With a contrived public health crisis as pretext, the U.S. federal government justified the imposition of a medical tyranny. Drs. Anthony Fauci (director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), Rachel Walensky (Administrator of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) [11], and Francis Collins (director of National Institutes of Health) conflated public health with the practice of medicine and took control when they should be strictly advisory [12].
Public health addresses general problems that involved the entire population like clean water, soil contamination, or infected foods [13]. Practicing medicine involves caring for and being responsible for a single patient. Public health officials have no business dictating to clinical, responsible, and accountable doctors what they can and cannot do for their patients. Proper procedure notwithstanding, the Washington medical bureaucracy (mal)practiced one-size-fits-all medicine on 330 million Americans.
The federal bureaucrat-MDs promulgated and implemented a draconian emergency response plan to COVID with three elements: prevention of contagion through PPE (personal protective equipment such as facemasks) and social isolation, effectively mass quarantine; vilification and prohibition of treatment options; and mass vaccination [14].
The so-called “vaccine” was an experimental genetic substance – mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) – never used on a population. It was poorly tested, of substandard quality, with no evidence of moderate or long-term effects [15, 16]. Published data of early effects were both manipulated and fabricated. Information contrary to official pronouncements and mandates was censored [17-20]. Gradually, reliable and accurate scientific data became publicly available proving the mandated “jab” did not provide lasting protection and worse, mRNA COVID treatment caused severe, widespread medical injury [21-24].
With no epidemiological justification, Washington and other governments imposed strict lockdowns on their populations preventing hundreds of millions from going to work and thus stopping their income. In the first year of COVID in the U.S., more than 200,000 small businesses closed [25]. Entertainment and other gatherings were canceled with venues locked. National productivity plummeted dramatically reducing federal income from numerous sources. The U.S. Congress passed legislation [26] which paid out billions of dollars to partly compensate workers thrown out of work by the federal lockdowns. (Other countries did likewise.) Printing trillions of fiat dollars increased the U.S. 2023 national debt to more than $35 trillion. The combined GDP of all nations on earth is $111 trillion.
Not only did the federal government harm the health of the same people they claimed to protect, Washington’s ill-conceived COVID response also victimized the people’s wallets and solvency of the national treasury.
Another group of COVID victims were the children in the U.S. and 57 other countries that locked their student populations out of school [27, 28], first claiming it was to protect the students from cross-contamination. Data proved that children were at essentially no risk of death from the virus or even serious illness [29]. They were at risk from the mRNA jab. Subsequently, teachers’ unions kept schools closed claiming they were protecting teachers from being infected by the students.
Cessation of the educational process will have long-term adverse consequences. Even in the short-term, damage is apparent [30, 31]. The loss of learning is particularly hurtful in impoverished minorities since many lacked home computers and internet access that allowed the more affluent to have virtual home schooling.
COVID victim #3, or more precisely governments’ victim, were the children.
By their nature, humans are social animals. Preventing them from socializing, distancing one from others, and impairing communication by covering up facial expression with non-protective, possibly infectious facemasks [8, 32, 33] did harm to psyches by exacerbating feelings of loneliness. This isolation was especially detrimental for those in nursing homes or hospice who were denied solace of their loved ones. It was no less than torture to force our elders to die alone [34, 35]. The young were also psychologically harmed by lack of socialization: youth suicide rate rose during COVID’s imposed solitary confinement [36].
It was not just physical health that was injured by the COVID scam, mental health was victim #4.
The fifth victim was trust, quickly lost and slow to recover, if ever. Official sources and legacy (complicit) media would say one thing but direct observation and alternate sources that evaded government censorship would report the opposite. People began to doubt the veracity of the so-called experts who claimed they were following the science, when they clearly were not [10, 37]. Dr. Fauci made the following public pronouncements. “Masks don’t work.” “Wear a mask to protect yourself and to prevent infecting others.” “Two masks are better than one.” “I’m simply following the science.” Yet an early well-constructed double-blind scientific study from Denmark and numerous subsequent reports showed masks don’t prevent COVID contagion [7, 8].
NIH personnel swore before Congress that COVID was a naturally occurring virus transmitted from bats to humans and that the virus did not come from the Wuhan lab in China. Evidence not stonewalled by the Chinese government and summarily rejected by Washington proved that COVID was produced through gain-of-function work in the Wuhan Research facility [38]. Furthermore, NIH officials testified under oath their agency had nothing to do with developments at Wuhan of the COVID. Records showed grants from NIH to Wuhan of more than $3 million [39]. The premier U.S. medical research agency lost credibility with the public.
The FDA vilified ivermectin as a “horse dewormer” and banned its use, even though clinical physicians had evidence and experience that it helped ameliorate COVID illness [40-42]. The CDC repeatedly manipulated COVID data and censored reports contrary to the official narrative, using their exaggerated COVID threat as justification for draconian measures such as lockdowns, masking, and mandatory injections [40-42]. Meanwhile legacy news outlets and social media canceled and/or banned those who would question official statements or federal mandates. [46-49].
The American public, whip-sawed with conflicting reports and official orders, and observing people with big titles repeatedly lying, lost faith in those institutions they needed the most at this time such as CDC, FDA, and NIH.
Even the World Health Organization (WHO) lied to the world about the virus’ origin, lethality of COVID, vaccine protective efficacy, and even dissembled about an outbreak at WHO headquarters [50-53]. Despite stonewalling and repeated falsehoods, people learned the truth: the Wuhan lab origin, health hazard only in the immune-impaired by disease or old age, and limited protection as well as medical harm of the jab. Like many American institutions, WHO credibility reached a new low.
Trust was the fifth but not the worst victim of the COVID big con.
After 200 years in Australia, 249 years in the U.S., and more than eight centuries in England, tyranny returned to those ostensibly freedom-loving constitutional republics [9, 54]. Accepting a false but officially reiterated existential threat to life from COVID, people gave up freedom in return for protection from a global pandemic likened in the British press to bubonic plague [55].
While government actions did grave harm to public health, both physical and mental, as well as the public purse, public trust, and learning, the worst victim was our most precious and hard-won possession, freedom.
In the U.S., the First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, assembly, and religion. Washington censored speech [17-20], shuttered churches and synagogues [56], and locked down the entire population [57].
The imposition of medical tyranny was especially hard on patients and physicians. The federal government abrogated medical autonomy (medical freedom) by forcing people to accept injections of a dangerous, experimental gene treatment, the so-called “vaccine” [58].
With a cancer diagnosis in 2021, this author’s wife would have been denied chemotherapy if she and I refused the unwelcome jab. In Boston, a heart failure patient was taken off the transplant list for refusing mRNA injection [59].
Physicians had to practice medicine as dictated by Dr. Fauci. Those who tried to treat patients according to their best judgment or to report data counter to the official narrative, were threatened, censored, cancelled, and fired. The same thing happened to thousands of other critically needed medical workers who exercised their medical freedom and refused the federal injection mandate [60, 61]. Doctors who wanted to prescribe Ivermectin could not do so as pharmacies refused to dispense a drug (Ivermectin) prohibited for use in COVID [40, 62].
Even the U.S. military, which should be the ultimate apolitical meritocracy in defense of freedom, chose woke-infused political correctness over fighting prowess. Navy Seals, arguably some of the healthiest, fittest people on earth, were declared “undeployable” for refusing to take the jab. [63].
In the birthplace of the Magna Carta Libertatum, hard-won freedoms were taken away from Britons by central authority. Using the false existential threat as justification, the British government enacted a series of mandates in response to COVID like those in the U.S. Acts of parliament granted emergency powers to the government, which invoked facemasks, lockdowns, censorship, and mass vaccination. These measures were also imposed on Scotland and Wales [64].
In addition to draconian measures identical to the U.S. and Great Britain, the Australian government established internment camps for those who refused the mRNA shots [65].
Every physician understands that providing optimal clinical care requires solid facts, backed by proper science. Practicing good medicine starts with difference, disagreement, and dialogue followed by the scientific method: thesis, antithesis, synthesis. The loss of information freedom through governmental censorship and suppression of data contrary to the official narrative such as the Great Barrington Declaration [66] caused severe clinical harm to millions of patients for whom clinicians were ostensibly responsible.
The COVID pandemic was a scam, an exercise in unconstitutional extension of governmental power. A fake public health crisis was successfully deployed to reestablish tyranny in countries where personal freedom was supposedly assured by history, tradition, and legal documents.
In the future, if government should announce a new “emergency” such as a new pandemic requiring suspension of freedoms, to paraphrase ancient Roman law and 1603 English common law, caveat populus (Let the people beware)!
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
