AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/443
1 Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
3 Department of Infectious Disease, Medstar Franklin Square Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Josef D. Williams, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Citation: Josef D. Williams, Jeffrey M. Breton, Georgia Wong, Samir Sur, Michelle L. Bahrain, (2024), Concurrent Extraparenchymal and Spinal Neurocysticercosis in an Immunocompetent Patient Treated for Obstructive Hydrocephalus and Spinal Cord Compression, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 17(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/443
Copyright: © 2024, Josef D. Williams. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 04 April 2024 | Accepted: 17 May 2024 | Published: 11 June 2024
Keywords: neurocysticercosis; clinical trials; case report; central nervous system infection; helminthic infection; taenia solium
Introduction: Neurocysticercosis (NCC) is a condition caused by infection of the central nervous system (CNS) by Taenia solium, or pork tapeworm, larvae. Despite commonly infecting the CNS, it may be easily misdiagnosed for more common pathologies, such as arachnoid cysts or tumors. Though most frequently seen in endemic areas, immigration patterns are altering its traditional distribution. Extraparenchymal neurocysticercosis (including ventricular, spinal, and subarachnoid types) carries a poorer prognosis
Objective: We present a case of NCC presenting in a young immunocompetent patient which was initially thought to be an arachnoid cyst due to non-pathognomonic imaging results and symptoms. This case illustrates a challenging NCC diagnosis.
Case Report: A 24-year-old male without known past medical history presented with 2 years of chronic headache, 2 months of blurry vision in the left eye, and 1 week of progressive nausea and vomiting found to have aqueductal stenosis with obstructive hydrocephalus and bilateral 1.5 cm, peripherally-enhancing cystic lesions of the cerebellopontine angle with associated mass effect, initially described as arachnoid cysts, as well as a left sided foramen magnum cyst. He had an external ventricular drain placed and later underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) insertion. He presented 10 days later with sepsis symptoms and the initial workup was concerning for tuberculosis-associated meningitis and he underwent shunt externalization and re-internalization after clinical improvement, though he was lost to follow up. Two months later he presented with acute urinary retention and right sided weakness. He had spinal cord compression of the cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar spine due to cystic lesion and underwent right C7-T1 and T10-T11 hemilaminotomies for cyst resection, with pathology consistent with NCC.
Conclusion: Neurocysticercosis (NCC) is a complex disease which is largely overlooked and is increasing in prevalence in non-endemic areas such as the United States. NCC has various symptoms and presentations depending on location and progression of larval development, which may mimic more common pathologies. The clinical manifestations depend on the parasite load and the host’s immune response regarding their location in CNS and their evolutionary stage. There are two types of NCC, the parenchymal and the extraparenchymal form. The extraparenchymal racemose NCC has the worst prognosis among all forms of NCC with mortality ranging between 30% and 80%. This reinforces the need for a broad differential diagnosis in these scenarios, as well as the importance of close Infectious Disease follow up for patients diagnosed with concurrent cranial and spinal NCC..
T-Spot TB: Tuberculosis-specific enzyme-linked immunospot assay
TB: Tuberculosis
EVD: External ventricular drain
CSF: Cerebrospinal fluid
WBC: White blood cell
PCR: Polymerase chain reaction
MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
CT: Computed tomography
VP: Ventriculoperitoneal
CNS: Central nervous system
RLE: Right lower extremity
RUE: Right upper extremity
NCC: Neurocysticercosis
DALYS: Disability Adjusted for Life Years
KPS: Karnofsky Performance Scale
Neurocysticercosis (NCC) is characterized by infection of the central nervous system (CNS) by the larva of Taenia solium, or pork tapeworm. Once infected with Taenia solium, CNS involvement is very common, reaching upwards of 60-90% of cases. [1,2] Infection occurs via ingestion of tapeworm eggs, with subsequent release of embryos from the egg that are able to cross the bowel wall and enter the bloodstream, resulting in systemic distribution. Humans are the definitive host for Taenia solium, though both humans and pigs can act as intermediate hosts and can shelter and shed larvae for transmission and infection of others. [1-8]
NCC has been cited as the most common helminthic disease of the CNS in humans and accounts for upwards of 30% of epilepsy cases within endemic areas (Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa, India, and Southern Asia) [8,11,13-15,36,40,44]. However, immigration is associated with increases in non-endemic areas, including the United States and Europe. [7-9,13,30,35,37-39,41-42] The Global Burden of Disease Atlas in 2019 estimated that NCC caused 1.37 million Disability Adjusted for Life Years (DALYS) globally, which places a large burden on not only those patients, but also on the health systems providing care to these patients. [30]
NCC has multiple forms, the most common being intraparenchymal followed by extraparenchymal, each having different presentations, management, and treatment.[32] The intraparenchymal presentation is characterized by embryos forming cysts within the brain parenchyma, which may lead to seizures, chronic headaches, or in some cases focal neurologic deficits.[29,43] In extraparenchymal cases, cysts are located within the cerebral ventricles, subarachnoid space, or within the spine.[32,43] Extraparenchymal NCC involving the subarachnoid space primarily present with symptoms of intracranial hypertension, with some reported cases of hydrocephalus, as well as stroke. [23-29] Spinal NCC can occur when cysts are located within the subarachnoid space or within the parenchyma of the spinal cord proper. The most common clinical presentations of spinal NCC are myelopathy and progressive weakness caused by cord compression, though this may differ depending on relevant spinal levels. [2,3,5,6] The subject of our case report is an interesting presentation of NCC where the initial radiologic findings were more suggestive of other non-parasitic cystic pathology, but was later found to have concurrent subarachnoid and spinal NCC. Ultimately this case presents an excellent teaching opportunity and addition to the discussion surrounding NCC
Our patient is a 24-year-old male without known past medical history who presented with 2 years of chronic headache and 2 months of blurry vision in the left eye. In particular, one week before presentation he developed persistent nausea and vomiting associated with constant left sided headaches. He was seen by an ophthalmologist, who noted papilledema and sent him to the emergency department. On exam, he was awake, alert, and fully oriented, following commands full strength without any focal neurologic deficit or sensory changes.
He was born in Guatemala and moved to the United States approximately one year before presentation and he now works as a dishwasher. He denied any known infectious history, such as known tuberculosis exposure. He stated that when he was 10 years old he had severe head trauma, though did undergo any medical evaluation at that time. He previously lived with his family on a farm with many animals, including dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. A tuberculosis-specific enzyme-linked immunospot assay (T-SPOT.TB) was positive for tuberculosis (TB) in the Emergency Department.
MRI brain with and without contrast was obtained, which revealed aqueductal stenosis with associated enlargement of the bilateral lateral and third ventricles, as well as mild transependymal edema consistent with obstructive hydrocephalus. He was also found to have bilateral 1.5 cm, peripherally-enhancing cystic lesions of the cerebellopontine angle with associated mass effect, initially described as arachnoid cysts, as well as a left sided foramen magnum cyst (Figure 1). A right frontal external ventricular drain (EVD) was placed and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was sent for analysis, with mildly elevated white blood cell (WBC) count (60/mm3), normal glucose (56 mg/dL) and elevated protein (126 mg/dL). Infectious disease was consulted and recommended a CSF meningitis/encephalitis panel, in addition to broad serum antigen testing, with the highest concern for TB meningitis. CSF TB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing was negative. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest revealed a left upper lobe lesion consistent with calcified granuloma. He remained clinically well during this time and underwent right ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement before discharge home with planned clinic follow up.
Figure 1: Post-contrast T1-weighted MRI of the brain, with axial and coronal sections revealing bilateral peripherally enhancing cystic lesions in the cerebellopontine angles and associated obstructive hydrocephalus.
Approximately 10 days post-insertion, he returned with fever, chills, nausea, and headaches concerning for sepsis. He was started on empiric antibiotics and underwent VP shunt tapping, lumbar puncture, and VP shunt externalization. CSF revealed very elevated WBC (961/mm3), low glucose (<4>2500 mg/dL). He was also started on a central nervous system (CNS) TB regimen, including isoniazid and pyridoxine, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and levofloxacin. Repeat CSF testing revealed improvement in values and the patient underwent VP shunt internalization and revision. He was discharged on long term anti-mycobacterial treatment, though he was lost to follow up.
Approximately two months after VP shunt revision, he presented to the ED with 3 days of urinary retention and right sided weakness (R hang grip strength ⅗, otherwise ⅘ strength diffusely) and diminished right upper and lower extremity sensation. An MRI of the spine revealed multiple cystic lesions, with associated mass effect on the cervical and thoracic cord. The two largest lesions were eccentric to the right near the cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar junctions, for which the patient underwent urgent right C7-T1 and T10-T11 hemilaminotomies for cyst resection (Figure 2). Pathology was consistent with neurocysticercosis and serum cysticercosis IgG was positive. Postoperatively, his strength improved with right lower extremity (RLE) full strength and his right upper extremity (RUE) with handgrip 4+/5 and otherwise full strength, with mild persistent paresthesias. He was started on long term albendazole and praziquantel, as well as latent TB treatment, with plan for outpatient follow up and possible enrollment in neurocysticercosis clinical trials.
Figure 2: T2-weighted sagittal and axial MRI of the spine at the A.) C7-T1 and B.) T11 levels revealing right-sided hyperintense, cystic lesions with notable mass effect on the spinal cord with associated signal change.
NCC may be easily mistaken for other pathologies, such as arachnoid cysts, tumors, or in this case manifestations of TB meningitis. In our patient, the initial imaging was read as arachnoid cyst and the Infectious Disease work up did not point to NCC. Park et al. documented a case of spinal NCC in a 72-year-old man which was initially believed to be either a herniated disk or a subarachnoid tumor, given a history that was not initially suggestive of NCC, such as not hailing from a traditionally endemic country (Republic of Korea), as well as non-pathognomonic imaging studies. [6] Pal et al. reported a similar case in a 44-year-old man who was planned for an arachnoid cyst excision, though during surgery it was discovered to be multiple cystic lesions, later confirmed to be spinal NCC. The preoperative MRI showed non-enhancing elongated cystic lesions which were more characteristic of an arachnoid cyst rather than NCC. [5] Though quite rare, NCC should be included in the differential diagnosis for patients that are presenting with arachnoid cysts, even when not presenting from naturally endemic areas or if there is non-specific imaging studies.
Radiographic Diagnostics
Magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) and CT allow for greater detection of NCC and current guidelines advocate for the use of both studies when available.[14] As stated, NCC has varying radiographic presentations depending on the stage of larval development.[33] Raibagkar et al documents and discusses the intricacies and nuances of the radiographic impacts of NCC larval staging. The initial stage is the vesicular stage which is described as one or more spherical cystic lesions with a central hyperintense/hyperdense focus (scolex); this stage should present with no surrounding edema or contrast enhancement. Upon entering the subarachnoid space these NCC cysts are referred to as racemose cysts. Once within the brain parenchyma this becomes concerning for neurocysticercosis encephalitis and non-encephalitic NCC, with the distinction being edema surrounding the cystic lesions which is characteristic of NCC encephalitis. Colloidal and granular (also known as granular nodular) stages display thick-walled contrast-enhancing lesions that have noted surrounding edema; the thicker the wall and the greater contrast enhancement is the distinction between the two stages with granular being the greater of the two. There is also a calcified stage (also known as calcified nodular) that is identified as punctate hyperdense lesions on CT. CT has greater sensitivity for NCC once in this calcified stage, while MRI possesses greater utility for staging and identification of cysts, in particular those that are within the subarachnoid space and the ventricular system.[15] Higuera-Calleja et al. performed a study testing the diagnostic merit of intrathecal gadolinium MRI as a possible radiographic technique for NCC detection and visualization. Their study concludes that it can be a particularly useful tool for the diagnosis of intraventricular and subarachnoid NCC, though admittedly this is not a standard imaging modality.[4] The initial read on the imaging studies described arachnoid cysts, which when combined with somewhat atypical features (i.e. mild peripheral contrast enhancement) may raise suspicion for NCC or another diagnosis.
Medical Management: Cysticidals
This patient was ultimately placed on a regimen of albendazole and praziquantel which are both antihelminthic agents used in the treatment of NCC. [10,12,17-20,34] Albendazole is the first line treatment for NCC, which inhibits glucose channels in the helminthic cell membrane, reducing glucose uptake and leading to death of the parasite. [17,45] Albendazole has also been shown to penetrate certain areas, such as the eyes and cerebral ventricles, that other antiparasitic agents do not. Multiple studies have found that albendazole is considered the superior agent when compared to praziquantel alone. [12,16,20,24,26,27,31,34] Praziquantel has also been shown to be effective in the treatment of NCC and has particular utility when treating the intraparenchymal variant of the disease. Praziquantel’s mechanism of action is not well understood in the treatment of larvae as seen in NCC. An important consideration for prescribers is that praziquantel may have its plasma levels affected by interactions with common therapeutic agents used in NCC treatment, such as antiepileptics (phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and primidone) or corticosteroids, such as dexamethasone.[45] A study conducted by Mahanty et al. theorizes a potential synergistic and beneficial therapeutic effect with combined praziquantel and albendazole therapy, which our patient is taking as they pursue clinical trials. They also proposed that alkaline phosphatase microassay could be as a quantitative marker of therapeutic effects of anthelmintic agents such as Albendazole and Praziquantel.[10] This can be useful in the treatment of NCC because it will give clinicians a quantitative measure in order to ensure therapeutic levels of these agents are reached inorder to treat this difficult disease.
Surgical management
NCC, specifically the extraparenchymal presentation of the disease, may be associated with increased intracranial pressure and hydrocephalus, as documented in this case. Multiple studies have described hydrocephalus occurring at onset of disease in 16-51% of patients with NCC, though this increases to closer to 64-72% in patients with the extraparenchymal form. [21-24,46] This patient was found to have developed obstructive hydrocephalus and was treated initially with EVD placement and eventual VP shunting. Cruz. et al. conducted a study in which 108 patients with definitive extraparenchymal NCC underwent VP shunt placement, of which nearly 80% presented with hydrocephalus. Their study found that 44.4% of VP shunts experienced some form of dysfunction and the vast majority of these occurred within the first year of placement (66.7%). Clinical impact was determined via the use of The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) which is a clinician reported a score between 0 and 100 (0 is death, while 100 is normal) which assess performance and functionality. Patients 2 years after VP shunt placement with regular follow up showed a KPS of 84.6 with a standard deviation of ±15.2. The author’s compared the outcomes of their 108 patients compared to recorded outcomes of other published works covering VP shunting in NCC patients which had historical showed poorer outcomes some which showed upwards of 50% mortality within the first two years of VP shunt placement.[27] Their study ultimately found that VP shunts showed a statistically and clinically significant improvement in patients with extraparenchymal NCC that developed hydrocephalus and only documented one patient dying due to factors relevant to VP shunt placement within that two year period. Endoscopic tools have also allowed for additional management of hydrocephalus via endoscopic third ventriculostomy.[46] This procedure has been used in the treatment of NCC related hydrocephalus and is an additional option for treatment in this regard, though it does have risk of failure in some cases due to pronounced inflammatory reactions which can lead to the close of the ostomy site.[46] Hamamoto Filho et al. provided additional considerations surrounding the surgical treatment of NCC with regard to the surgical removal of cysts [46]As discussed earlier, endoscopic tools have allowed for additional means of treating conditions such as NCC, so when surgeons are performing the endoscopic third ventriculostomy they are able to extract intraventricular cysts during the operation.[46] Depending on the locations of cysts there are several options which can be used for cyst extraction. Cysts which are located within the lateral and third ventricles can be extracted using rigid endoscopes, while cysts within the fourth ventricle can be managed with flexible endoscopes.[46] Though fourth ventricle cysts can also be extracted via telovelar approach posterior fossa craniotomy.[46] Jang et al. documented a case of recurrent primary spinal NCC in which the patient had previously only received surgical therapy, concluding that subarachnoid NCC is more optimally treated with the combination of surgery and medication, such as albendazole.[3] Patients that are found to have spinal NCC commonly are found to have concurrent intracranial disease and it is believed that it is due to larval migration through the ventricular system. When spinal NCC is present it has been found that approximately 80% of the time cysts are located intradural within the subarachnoid space.[3] In these patients it is important to screen for both intracranial as well as spinal NCC due to their high likelihood of occurring concurrently.
For our patient, an initially clinically uncertain case of suspected TB meningitis and obstructive hydrocephalus thought secondary to an atypical arachnoid cyst was treated with CSF diversion and antitubercular therapy. Upon representation with right sided weakness and multiple areas of spinal cord compression by cystic lesions, he underwent urgent decompression with pathology concerning for NCC. This reinforces the need for a broad differential diagnosis in these scenarios, as well as the importance of close Infectious Disease follow up for patients diagnosed with concurrent cranial and spinal NCC.
author commitments, author data (containing data deposition statement, competing interest declaration and corresponding author line), tables and figure legends
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
