AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/470
Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sion Canton Hospital, Av. du Grand-Champsec 80, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.
*Corresponding Author: Clelia Dogny, Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sion Canton Hospital, Av. du Grand-Champsec 80, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.
Citation: Clelia D, Sgardello S, Fournier I, (2024), Clinical Presentation and Risk Factors of Acalculous Cholecystitis in Outpatients: Retrospective Study, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 18(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/470
Copyright: © 2024, Clelia Dogny. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 24 May 2024 | Accepted: 10 June 2024 | Published: 10 July 2024
Keywords: acalculous cholecystitis; acalculous cholecystitis - risk factors; acalculous cholecystitis – outcomes; swiss cohort; acalculous cholecystitis – histopathology
Aim: Acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) accounts for only 5-10% of cholecystitis cases, primarily studied in intensive care units (ICU) patients. The aim of this study to identify risk factors and clinical presentation of AAC in non-ICU patients.
Material and methods: We conducted a literature review using PubMed MeshTerms “acalculous cholecystitis” and searched our institution’s database (2018-2022) for “cholecystitis” and “acalculous cholecystitis,” including patients with histopathological findings.
Results: 23 patients met the inclusion criteria. based on histopathology report and diagnosis. The most common co-morbidities were cardiovascular and metabolic syndrome. Abdominal pain was the predominant complaint. Ten patients (50%) presented with elevated CRP, bilirubin, and leukocytosis. No mortality was reported at 30 days.
Conclusion: AAC in outpatients is not associated with high mortality, unlike in ICU settings. However, it is more frequent in polymorbid patients with cardiovascular risk factors.
Acute cholecystitis accounts for 3-10% of emergency room diagnoses of abdominal pain [1]. Of these, gallstones are responsible for the vast majority of cases, whilst approximately 5-10% of cholecystitis are acalculous [1,2]. Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) is usually described in children, in whom it accounts for 50-70% of cholecystitis [3], and in patients within the intensive care unit (ICU), where it is associated in the literature with high mortality rates reaching 30%-50% [4,5]. Patients developing AAC within the ICU typically include males who have undergone major surgery, often vascular surgery, or who have suffered major trauma and who are intubated, ventilated, and on parenteral nutrition [6]. In these patients who are often sedated, a diagnosis is often difficult to make, with no clear clinical signs, except for increased inflammatory markers and fever [1]. Three main mechanisms are thought to contribute to acalculous cholecystitis in ICU patients. The first is an ischemia-reperfusion mechanisms involving reduced blood flow through the cystic artery, which can lead to decreased perfusion and ischemia. This is exacerbated by factors such as vasopressor medications, and hypotension. The second, cholestasis can result from various conditions such as fasting, parenteral nutrition, and dehydration causing chemical aggression of the gallbladder wall. Third, bacterial colonization occurs as a secondary phase [1].
Other causes of AAC in otherwise healthy patients can be infectious (Gram-negative bacteria, parasites, viruses), mechanical (Phrygian cap) [7], autoimmune, and cardiovascular [8]. AAC is however, relatively understudies in healthy patients. In the literature, we found a few studies focusing on AAC in outpatients or inpatients without major comorbidities. The aim of this study is to review patients who have developed AAC in outpatients or non-ICU settings, identify risk factors, clinical presentation, and compare these data with those in the literature.
Retrospective Study: We performed a 5-year (2018-2022) search in our institution’s database, le Centre Hospitalier du Valais Romand (CHVR), Citrix_ HVS with the terms “cholecystitis” and “acalculous cholecystitis”. The inclusion criteria for the retrospective study included adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of AAC by either ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) scan and confirmed at pathology. Exclusion criteria included patients hospitalized within the intensive care unit (ICU), those with AAC resulting from multiorgan failure, and those lacking histopathological evidence of AAC.
Literature Review: We performed a literature review using the PubMed Mesh Terms “acalculous cholecystitis” from march 2023 to June 2023.
Figure 1: Selection of articles, excluding, articles focusing on intensive care patients, in foreign language or with unsuitable study designs
Literature review:
The literature review initially yielded 379 results. Of those, 229 were case reports, 148referred to the pediatric population, ICU patients, had infectious causes or were written in a foreign language, 48 had unsuitable study design. Only 4 were studies focused on AAC in outpatients abd were conducted between 1989 and 2012. Three were retrospective and one of was a prospective study (2,9–11) (Figure 1 & Table 1).
| Authors | Savoca et al.(9) | Ganpathi et al.(10) | Ryu et al.(11) | Nikfarjam et al.(2) |
| Publication Year | 1989 | 2006 | 2002 | 2012 |
| Number of patients | 47 | 11 | 22 | 35 |
| Ratio (M/W) | 36:11 | 9:2 | 15:7 | 18:17 |
| Male % | 77% | 82% | 68% | 51% |
| xAges (years) | 65.5 (27-89) | 52.4 (30-69) | 63 (40-85) | 69 (45-94) |
| Outpatients (n) | 36 | 11 | 20 | unknown |
| Inpatients (n) | 4 | - | - | 2 |
| ICU (n) | 7 | - | - | - |
| Presentation | ||||
| RUQ pain (%) | 83% | 73% | unknown | 25% |
| Fever (%) | 55% | 27% | unknown | 46% |
| Leukocytosis (%) | 96% | 81% | unknown | 34% |
| Co-morbidities | ||||
| No-co-morbidities | unknown | 36% | 60% | unknown |
| Hypertension (%) | 56% | 45% | 25% | unknown |
| Diabetes (%) | 15% | 18% | 20% | 23% |
| CV risk factors (%) | 72% | unknown | 35% | unknown |
| Diagnostic | ||||
| US (n) | 18 | 10 | unknown | unknown |
| CT (n) | 3 | 2 | unknown | unknown |
| HIDA scan (n) | 36 | - | unknown | unknown |
| Histopathology | ||||
| Necrotic (%) | 28% | 36% | 63% | 37% |
| Perforated (%) | unknown | unknown | 13% | unknown |
| Mortality (%) | 6.4% (ICU) | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Table 1: Summary of results from previous studies. RUQ: right upper quadrant, CV: cardiovascular
Retrospective Study
23 of the 115 patients who were initially identified were included in this study (Table 2). We excluded 70 patients because of coding errors or the presence of gallstones following the pathology exam or during the operation, 20 additional cases were treated conservatively, without histopathological confirmation of the AAC. Of the 25 patients diagnosed with AAC, we excluded two, one was an ICU inpatient, and the other was a long-term inpatient with significant vascular co-morbidities and multi-organ failure. The patient cohort included patients between 48 and 87 years of age (mean age was 75 years), 22% were female (5/23) and 78% were male (18/23).
The outpatients cases were 19 and 4 developed symptoms during their hospitalization. 3 of them had their gallbladder removed in an elective setting, rather than at the first presentation due to initial conservative treatment. Amongst inpatients, three were post-operative patients, (orthopedics, urological, and visceral surgery) and the latter was a cardiology patient who was hospitalized for investigations of basithoracic pain. The most frequent co-morbidities were cardiovascular: arterial hypertension [11] and ischemic heart disease [8] as well as metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease such as diabetes [7] and hypercholesterolemia [10]. Four patients had no comorbidities (Table 2) The patients were mainly ASA III (57%), following ASA II (30%) only three were ASA IV (13%).
Table 2: patients’ co-morbidities OSA: obstructive sleep apnea, CRF chronic renal failure, PAD: peripheral arterial disease
The most common complaint was abdominal pain (18). 4 patients had basithoracic pain and one presented with delirium. We considered the
presence of leukocytosis (>10 G/L), CRP (>5mg/L) and total bilirubin (>17µmol/L) at patient admission, we did not include the three post-
operative patients in these results since leucocyte counts and CRP are increased postoperatively. Ten patients (50%) presented to the emergency department with an increase of at least two of three biological markers, six (30%) presented with an alteration in only one of the three biological markers, and four (20%) patients did not present any biological alteration. Abdominal US and CT were the primary imaging modalities. Thirteen patients underwent both exams, five were diagnosed with US alone, and four with CT alone. One patient required MRCP following an inconclusive US to diagnose a thickened gallbladder wall.
Regarding management, four patients had an intravesicular transhepatic drain placed before surgery. Three subsequently had elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and one within 24 hours. The remaining patients underwent cholecystectomy at presentation. A laparotomic approach was repeated in two inpatients who had already undergone a previous laparotomy during their same hospitalization; no conversion to laparotomy was reported in the other patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. At the histopathological level, half of the cholecystitis (12/23) were described as acute cholecystitis, seven were necrotic with one being perforated, and five ulcerophlegmonous. The rest were chronic with eight described as acute attacks of chronic cholecystitis, two were perforated. No malignancy was reported, and all were described as acalculous on histopathological final analysis. Upon discharge, 3 patients were admitted for rehabilitation, and 20 were discharged home. No mortality or morbidity greater or equal than Clavien-Dindo III was reported up to 30 days post-operative, one patient developed pneumonia treated with antibiotics.
From an epidemiological standpoint, the characteristics of this study's population align with other studies. The majority of patients were male (18:5, 78%), consistent with literature values ranging from 51% [2] to 82% [10]. Patients in this study were older (average age 75years) compared with an averages of 52.4 [10] to 69 [2] years of age. The ICU patients were excluded from the study, but they represented only two patients out of 25. Savoca et al [9], which also included ICUs patients, described only 15% of AAC from ICU patients. Most of our patients were ASA III (57%), which suggests that this pathology concerns more polymorbid patients.
The main identified risk factors for the development of AAC were cardiovascular risk factors with diabetes II (30%), hypertension (48%), hypercholesterolemia (43%) and ischemic heart failure (35%) being the main co-morbidities. Hypertension was frequently found to be the most frequent co-morbidity in the literature. However, diabetes was slightly more prevalent in our study (30% vs. between 15% and 23%) [2,9]. It is however interesting to notice that we found up to 17% of patients without known co-morbidities, which is less than other studies (up to 60% [11]). This highlights the fact that AAC can occur in healthier patients and not just in the initially identified group of ICU patients. However, since patients who were treated conservatively were excluded from the study, there could be a selection concerning the proportion of patients without co-morbidities.
The impact of cardiovascular disease in AAC can be partly explained by what is known about its pathophysiology. Several studies report two main mechanisms for AAC namely ischemia-reperfusion injury and chemical injury with biliary stasis and infiltration of bile into the wall of the gallbladder [1,12]. Both mechanisms are histologically reported by Laurila and al. Ischemia-reperfusion is identified via the presence of leukocytes at the margin of blood vessels, similar to what is found in myocardial infarction. In outpatients, the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, may be correlated with advanced visceral atherosclerosis [12] which, with a small drop in flow, could cause ischemia-reperfusion injury. The mechanism of ischemia-reperfusion in ICU patients is also due to the use of vasopressors and the state of shock inducing vasoconstriction of the terminal cystic artery. In the same study, chemical injury through bile infiltration in the wall of the gallbladder was described, indicating endothelial disruption or biliary stasis. For ICU patients, biliary stasis is partially due to parenteral nutrition and a nil by mouth (NBM) diet. In outpatients this mechanism seems less important. Furthermore, infectious, and parasitic causes were found in the literature for outpatients, including some tropical diseases (Appendix 1). These pathologies were not found at histopathology in our study, which focus on diseases that are present in Europe.
An interesting point, which is similar to the ICU patients, was the relative difficulty in making a diagnosis. At presentation, while most patients presented with the classic right upper quadrant pain, only 50% of patients presented with two elevated biomarkers, and half of the remaining patients either presented with only one or no biomarker alteration. While studies have shown leukocytosis in over 80% of patients[9,10), our study found it in only 60% of patients. Right upper quadrant pain, whether associated with leukocytosis or not, seems to be the main decisive factor requiring further investigation.
Abdominal US is considered the diagnostic technique of choice with the diagnostic criteria being a thickening of the wall of 3.5mm [13], peri-vesicular fluid and gas in the wall [14]. CT has been shown to have good specificity, allowing to rule out cholecystitis [15]. The hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan also known as cholescintigraphy which has been mentioned in several studies, is used to study the dynamics of bile flow [1]. It is a time-consuming exam and is not an exam of choice for diagnosis in the emergency department.
Histopathology, on all the AAC, three were perforated (13%) and nine were necrotic (39%), similar results were found in the literature, with necrotic AAC representing (28-63%) in outpatients. Ryu et al. [16] found the same rate of perforation 13% with 68% of necrotic cholecystitis.
This study faces limitations primarily from the small sample size, which is inherent to the relative rarity of the disease. Additionally, since we included only patient which an histopathological confirmation, we may have excluded patients for whom conservative management of AAC was opted. This approach could have led to the exclusion of more polymorbid patients.
In this study, we had no mortality reported at 30 days, which is in line with what was found in other studies, only Savoca et al [9] reported death in the specific subgroup of patients from ICU. This supports the already-mentioned hypothesis that AAC is not a fatal disease in itself but is made more deadly by the difficulty and delay in diagnosis and the severe co-morbidities of ICU patients [2,10,16].
In this study we found that acalculous cholecystitis in outpatients does not exhibit the high mortality rate previously attributed to it, aligning with findings from prior studies. However, it is more frequent in poly-morbid patients with cardiovascular risk factors, but can also occur in healthy patients. We highlighted that this diagnosis should not be underestimated in particularly in the emergency department. Clinical setting and presentation are roughly standard and should provide an opportunity for prompt treatment. Regardless of the sample size this study provides a good sample of the European cohort presenting with AAC and provides support for surgical management to avoid complication due to AAC (perforation and necrosis) and favorable post-operative outcome.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
