AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8965/193
1 Obstetrician-Gynecologist. Pediatric Gynecology Section, British Hospital of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
2 Pediatrician, Pediatric Service, British Hospital of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
3 Pediatrics Resident, British Hospital of Buenos Aires.
4 Pathology Physician, British Hospital of Buenos Aires.
5 Chief of Pediatric Service, British Hospital of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
6 Chief of Pediatric Gynecology Section, British Hospital of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
*Corresponding Author: Othatz L, Obstetrician-Gynecologist. Pediatric Gynecology Section, British Hospital of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Citation: Othatz L, Graziani MP, Azula ME, Toscano M, Rojo G, (2023), Clinical Features and Decision making of Congenital Vaginal Agenesis Combined with Cervical Aplasia: Case Report and Literature Review, J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 8(1) DOI:10.31579/2578-8965/193
Copyright: © 2023, Othatz L. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 18 December 2023 | Accepted: 28 December 2023 | Published: 08 January 2024
Keywords: vaginal atresia; cervical aplasia; hysterectomy; abdominal pain; kbg syndrome
Objective: To present the case of a teenage girl with vaginal agenesis and review current literature on recommended courses of action.
A 12-year-old girl with KBG genetic syndrome was admitted to the Pediatric Unit with recurrent acute abdominal pain, vomiting, dehydration, and primary amenorrhea. Physical examination revealed advanced pubertal development, and a negative swab test. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) showed complete vaginal agenesis, septated uterus with cervical aplasia, hematometra, and hematosalpinx. Open hysterectomy was decided upon due to acute abdominal pain and the risk of endometriosis and infection. She progressed favorably and was discharged two days after surgery.
Conclusion: Congenital complete vaginal agenesis with cervical aplasia is a rare obstructive malformation of the genital tract. Generally, hysterectomy is recommended due to the high risk of stenosis, infection, and adhesions. Vaginoplasty is an option when the patient is mature enough to undergo the procedure. Attempts to preserve the uterus and fertility in patients with complete cervical atresia have a small sample size. In this case, the decision to perform a hysterectomy was considered the most appropriate to suit her social circumstances.
Congenital complete vaginal atresia with cervical aplasia/agenesis is a rare obstructive malformation of the genital tract, classified as complete or partial atresia. (1) Cervical agenesis is a rare congenital Müllerian anomaly, with an incidence of 1:80,000 to 1:100,000 newborns. Its association with vaginal agenesis is even more uncommon, reported in 39% of cervical agenesis cases (2). Cervical or cervicovaginal agenesis typically presents around the age of menarche with primary amenorrhea and/or cyclic abdominal pain. In these cases, the endometrium functions normally, but menstrual blood lacks an outlet. Partial vaginal atresia cases may also present with hematocolpos. (3).
The condition may worsen with hematosalpinx and endometriosis if left undiagnosed. Early diagnosis and management are crucial in these cases to prevent disease progression (4,5,6).
The KBG Syndrome is a rare genetic disorder with approximately 59 reported cases worldwide. It is caused by a mutation in the ANKRD11 gene, inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, affecting neurodevelopment and characterized by macrodontia From the incisors, neurological delay, craniofacial anomalies, short stature, among other conditions (7). Little is known about gynecological malformations associated with the KBG syndrome.
We present a clinical case of a 12-year-old adolescent girl with non-evolving chronic encephalopathy and the KBG genetic syndrome, who sought emergency care for recurrent acute abdominal pain. She was admitted to the pediatric unit with vomiting and dehydration for intravenous hydration and diagnostic evaluation.
As a relevant background, she had several visits to the pediatric emergency department two months prior due to abdominal pain, vomiting, oral intolerance, and dehydration. The mother stated that for the past 6 months, the patient used to cry for a few days each month due to abdominal pain.
The patient had not yet experienced menarche, and within this context, the pediatric gynecologist performed an abdominal-pelvic physical examination, revealing pubertal development at Tanner stage 4 for breast and genitalia, normal insert urethral meatus, absence of vaginal opening, and a negative swab test.
An abdominal ultrasound (US) (Figure 1) was performed, and she was evaluated by pediatric surgery, which ordered a computed tomography (CT) scan showing an incomplete septate uterus, hematometra, and hematosalpinx. No differentiation between the cervix and uterus was found, and no vaginal cavity was observed. A Müllerian anomaly was suspected, prompting a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for further details.
The MRI revealed bilateral ureteropelvic calyceal ectasia, an enlarged uterus with endometrial cavity distension and the presence of a septum, a 22mm hematometra, with no recognizable external cervix (Figure 2A). The vagina was not visible (Figures 2B, 2C, 2D, and 2E). Other findings included dilated Fallopian tubes (hematosalpinx), normal bilateral ovaries, and superficial endometriosis.
Figure 1: Gynecological Pelvic Ultrasound: In the left iliac fossa, an irregular and heterogeneous image with echoes and vascularity measuring 53 x 44 x 51 mm.
The day before surgery, the patient had a fever with a recorded temperature of 38°C. The parents provided their consent for the surgery, including the option of a hysterectomy if deemed necessary.
Figure 2. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (RMI)
Figure 2A: The yellow arrow indicates an enlarged uterus with hematometra. The anteverted uterus measures 100 x 32 x 59 mm, with the endometrium divided by a 90° angle indentation, creating two cavities (incomplete septate uterus).
Figure 2B: No external opening, hematometra. The vagina is not visible, showing a hyperintense fibrous image in T1 and T2, suggesting a vaginal remnant (hypoplastic vagina).
Figures 2C, 2D, 2E: Both adnexal regions show hematosalpinx (39 x 27 mm on the right and 47 x 26 mm on the left). Ovaries appear normal, and there is thickening of the peritoneal tissue, likely superficial endometriosis.
In the context of acute abdominal pain and the risk of endometriosis and infection, an open hysterectomy was decided upon. A Pfannenstiel incision/laparotomy was performed, with a detailed examination of the abdominal and pelvic cavity.
Figure 3A: Incomplete septate uterus.
Figure 3B: Uterus with hematosalpinx.
A bicornuate uterus with hematosalpinx and adhesions of the left fallopian tube to the posterior aspect of the uterus was found. Absence of cervix and vaginal cavity (Figure 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D).
Figure 3C: Cervical aplasia.
Figure 3D: Size of the bicornuate uterus.
Figure 3E: Cut and section, Macroscopy of the uterus.
The uterus and fallopian tubes were resected. The patient progressed favorably. She did not require analgesics on the day following the surgery and was discharged 48 hours later. Histology confirms a partially septate uterus with two cavities and hematosalpinx.
Histology:
Figure 4A: Myometrium composed of short fascicles, lined by inactive endometrial mucosa with small and regular glands, and congestive vessels.
Figure 4B: Uterine septum composed of smooth muscle and fibrous tissue, lined by endometrial mucosa with identical characteristics to the mucosa of the rest of the cavity.
Figure 4C: Uterine tube with dilated lumen containing hematic content, flattened folds, and thin, congested wall.
Cervicovaginal agenesis is a rare congenital anomaly of the female genital tract. Only a few isolated cases and case series have been reported in the literature, with fewer than 200 cases published (8). While clinical history and physical examination are crucial in these cases, pelvic imaging should be considered to understand the exact anatomical anomaly. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, as well as for detecting associated renal tract abnormalities (9). The most common symptom is primary amenorrhea with cyclic abdominal pain and/or chronic pelvic pain, palpable mass in the abdomen, and urinary symptoms. This symptomatology should lead to consideration of a gynecological problem. Müllerian anomalies tend to be asymptomatic until puberty, and sometimes their expression depends on the type of anomaly. Specifically in this clinical case, the KBG syndrome complicates the diagnosis due to intellectual disability and the rare nature of the pathology. This condition is not trivial and should be considered, along with the family, when deciding on therapeutic alternatives (hysterectomy versus tracheloplasty + vaginoplasty).
According to the literature, most publications recommend hysterectomy for cervical agenesis, complete cervical and vaginal atresia, due to the high risk of cervical stenosis, adhesions, pelvic inflammatory disease, and endometriosis, even when the cervix is open. Vaginoplasty is recommended in late adolescence or early adulthood when the patient is mature enough to accept the procedure (4,6,10). For patients with obstruction of the external cervical orifice, cervicovaginal anastomosis may offer an alternative treatment to preserve menstruation and even fertility. However, experience in cervicovaginal anastomosis reconstruction is limited, and there is still much to be investigated, such as evaluating successful surgery outcomes, maintaining the cervical canal, or preventing vaginal and cervical stenosis (2,11).
According to Dietrich J et al., out of more than 19 patients with clinical characteristics of congenital complete vaginal atresia combined with cervical aplasia, 13 underwent hysterectomy (2 of them with subsequent vaginoplasty), tracheloplasty plus vaginoplasty were performed in six patients, four of whom had complications (adhesions, stenosis, pelvic inflammation), three of them required a second vaginoplasty, and one underwent hysterectomy two years later due to recurrent pelvic inflammation (6).
Embryologically, only 2% to 7% of patients with partial or total vaginal aplasia have active endometrium in uterine structures. Sporadic cases of vaginal atresia combined with a functional uterine anomaly have been described, but the coincidence of a septate uterus has not been reported, even though it comprises approximately 53.7% to 55% of all female genital anomalies (10). Only one case of vaginal atresia combined with asymmetric septate uterus was published in 2018 by Tian-Tian H. Additionally, this case is unique because no obstructive gynecological malformation was described in the KBG syndrome, and, according to the literature, this is the second case of septate uterus with cervical aplasia and complete vaginal agenesis.
Our case highlights that Müllerian duct anomalies should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cyclic abdominal pain, especially in patients with primary amenorrhea, fully estrogenized, who cannot communicate their symptoms. Early diagnosis and management are crucial in these cases to prevent disease progression.
Gynecological teams have attempted to preserve the uterus and fertility in patients with complete cervical atresia, but the sample size has been small (3,9). More high-quality, controlled multicenter clinical trials with longer follow-up are needed for further evaluation.
A digital search on PubMed was conducted to identify articles published from the year 2000 to the present reporting cases of complete vaginal atresia with cervical aplasia (Table 1). The following search terms were used: "Vaginal atresia," "Vaginal aplasia," "Vaginal agenesis," "Cervical atresia," "Cervical agenesis," or "Cervical aplasia." Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) Patients diagnosed with congenital complete vaginal atresia accompanied by cervical aplasia who underwent surgery for the first time and preserved their uteri; (b) primary outcomes were vaginal or cervical stenosis, pelvic inflammation; if a second surgical treatment was required, the length and width of the new vagina. Results were summarized in the following table:
Author (year) | Age of presentation (years) | Clinic presentation | Examination finding | Imaging (USD/MRI) | Management | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mei, et al (1) (2021) | Median age 14 N=19 | Periodic abdominal pain, pelvic mass Primary amenorrhea | No vaginal introitus | MRI Complete vaginal atresia and cervical aplasia | 13 hysterectomy (2 posterior vaginoplasty) 6 Tracheloplasty + vaginoplasty | 6 Tracheloplasty + vaginoplasty: 4 stenosis 2 PID 3 Second vaginoplasty 1 Hysterectomy |
Kavita Kohiual et al (8) (2021) | 13 | Acute abdominal pain, Primary amenorrhea | Blind vaginal pouch | US/MRI: Hematometra/ hematosalpinx | Cervicovaginoplasty And neovagina with McIndoe technique | Resumed normal menstrual cycles |
Meena et al (11) (2018) | 13 | Primary amenorrhea Cyclic abdominal pain history of vaginoplasty | blind vaginal | MRI: Leftsided uterine horn with hematometra, left endometriotic cyst, absent cervix | Laparoscopy excision of bilateral uterine horn | - |
Bagga et al(12) (2018) | 18 | Primary amenorrhea and cyclical abdominal pain; history of vaginoplasty | Blind vaginal pouch | MRI: Leftsided uterine horn with hematometra, left endometriotic cyst, absent cervix | Uterine horn-vaginal anastomosis by abdominoperineal approach | Resumed regular menstruation |
| Tian-Tian Han(9), et al (2018) | 23 | Dispareunia, abdominal pain, previous vaginoplasty | Abdominal pain | US: Asymmetric septate uterus MRI: distended endometrial cavity | Hysteroscopy Diagnosis and vaginal stent | - |
Acosta Leon J, et al(10) (2017) | 14 | Primary amenorrhea Cyclic pelvic pain | Small vaginal pouch | MRI: Absence of cervix and proximal vagina | 2 steps treatment: -Vaginoplasty (Yong-Monti technique)/MP -posterior uterus anastomosis | Regular menstrual cycles |
Mishra et al(13) (20216) | 16 | Primary amenorrhea Cyclic pelvic pain | Per Abdomen –deep tenderness | MRI: Hematometra /Hematosalpinx Absence of cervix and vagina | Laparotomy vaginoplasty (McIndoe method) uterovaginal anastomosis by neocervix | Regular menstrual cycles |
Jeon et al(14) (2016) | 2 cases (12/ 17) | Primary amenorrhea Cyclic pelvic pain | Blind vagina | MRI: Hematometra, Absence of cervix and vagina | Laparoscopy transvaginal uterovaginal anastomosis | Regular menstruation |
Kisku, et al(15) (2014) | Median age15 N=18 | Primary amenorrhea, Cyclic pelvic pain | Absent vaginal/ small vaginal pouch | - | Laparotomy and sigmoid neovaginoplasty utero-coloneovaginoplasty | Complications; one colon anastomotic leak, two patients developed chocolate cysts, one recurrent pelvic collection, one asymptomatic neovaginal prolapse |
Gasim et al(5) (2013) | 14 | Primary amenorrhea, Cyclic abdominal pain | Abdominopelvic mass up to xiphisternum | US: Blind upper vagina, bicornuate uterus with right hematometra | Laparotomy, hysterectomy, excision of left rudimentary horn and right salpingo-oophorectomy | - |
Kriplani et al(16) (2012) | Mean age: 15.2 N=14 | Primary amenorrhea Cyclic abdominal pain | - | - | laparoscopic assisted uterovaginal anastomosis | Successful; except one patient had restenosis, hysterectomy required |
Jain and Sircar(17) (2011) | 18 | Primary amenorrhea Cyclic abdominal pain | Absent Vagina | US: Cervical and vaginal agenesis, uterus, and right ovary normal. A 10 cm×10 cm endometriotic cyst in left ovary | Laparoscopic hysterectomy and neovagina creation by Vecchietti technique | - |
Raudrant el al (18) (2008) | 13 | Primary amenorrhea and cyclic pelvic pain | Blind vaginal pouch | US: Absence of the cervix with two rudimentary horns and a right hematometra | Laparoscopic uterovaginal anastomosis | Regular menstruation |
Fedele et al(3) (2008) | Mean age 14 N=12 | Primary amenorrhea and cyclic pelvic pain | Absent vagina/ Blind pouch | US/MRI Hematometra, hematosalpinx | Laparoscopically assisted uterovestibular anastomosis was performed in all patients. F | Regular menstrual cycles |
Gurbuz et al (19) (2005) | 15 | Primary amenorrhea, cyclic abdominal pain | Partial vaginal agenesis | US: Hematometra and absent cervix | Laparotomy and uterovaginal anastomosis | Resumed regular menstruation |
Grimbizis et al (20) (2004) | 15 | Primary amenorrhea Cyclic abdominal pain | - | US: Uteri corpus and both ovaries were normal | Laparotomy and end-to-end cervicocervical anastomosis | Regular menstruation |
Table 1: Previous Reported Cases of Cervicovagina Agenesia
Congenital complete vaginal atresia with cervical aplasia/agenesis is a rare obstructive malformation of the genital tract. The most common symptom is primary amenorrhea with cyclic abdominal pain and/or chronic pelvic pain, along with a palpable abdominopelvic mass.
The clinical presentation of this pathology, in conjunction with the KBG syndrome, complicates the diagnosis due to intellectual disability and the rare nature of the condition. This intellectual disability is considered an additional factor when deciding on the best therapeutic alternative, given the extensive evidence of complications associated with surgical reconstruction.
Although technical advancements favor reconstructive surgery for cervicovaginal agenesis, it is important to remember that these complex procedures are not without complications, which may lead to the recurrence of hematometra and, ultimately, necessitate hysterectomy. In this case, the decision to proceed with a hysterectomy was deemed the most appropriate given her social circumstances.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
