AUCTORES
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9392/195
Clinical Pharmacist, cand.biol.science’s for Clinical Pharmacology Russia.
*Corresponding Author: Dmitrieva Elena Germanovna, Clinical Pharmacist, cand.biol.science’s for Clinical Pharmacology Russia.
Citation: Dmitrieva E. Germanovna, (2023), Clinical Clinical a BOOK 2 part (clinical cases are approved in the practice). For Clinical Pharmacists (own researches and the analysis of references), Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study, 7(7); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/195
Copyright: © 2023, Dmitrieva Elena Germanovna. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 07 December 2023 | Accepted: 14 December 2023 | Published: 21 December 2023
Keywords: chemical processing of pharmaceutical drugs; dosage form design; drug delivery
At timely introduction Anti-diphtheria serum intoxication symptoms quickly disappear, and touches are torn away by 6-8 day. After tearing away of touches still some time remain superficial necrosis. Simultaneously decreases and the hypostasis cervical cellulose’s disappears. In the absence of timely specific treatment illness usually progresses and only in cases of the localised diphtheria probably recover, however, thus there can be complications in a kind miocarditis or peripheral paralyses.
Diphtheritic croup. At process localisation in respiratory ways there is a diphtheritic croup - the clinical syndrome accompanied by a hoarse or hoarse voice, rough barking cough and complicated (stenotic) breath.
At timely introduction Anti-diphtheria serum intoxication symptoms quickly disappear, and touches are torn away by 6-8 day. After tearing away of touches still some time remain superficial necrosis. Simultaneously decreases and the hypostasis cervical cellulose’s disappears. In the absence of timely specific treatment illness usually progresses and only in cases of the localised diphtheria probably recover, however, thus there can be complications in a kind miocarditis or peripheral paralyses.
Diphtheritic croup. At process localisation in respiratory ways there is a diphtheritic croup - the clinical syndrome accompanied by a hoarse or hoarse voice, rough barking cough and complicated (stenotic) breath.
With diphtheria of a nose children from chest age till 3 years, sometimes in more advanced age and even at adults is more often are ill. Last years it meets less often (from 10, 9 % in 1957-1958 has decreased to 2, 9 % in 1965 - 1971).
The skin diphtheria, according to various authors, makes 0, 5-20 % from other localisations. The diphtheria of a skin at children of early age, especially with the broken food, meets much more often, than is diagnosed (takes the second place after a nose diphtheria). The last is caused by anatomy-physiological features of an organism of children of this age - insufficient development of a horn layer of a skin, greater it’s susceptibility to an infection in comparison with other covers.
Diphtheria of a mucous membrane of an oral cavity - the unusual occurrence is extreme.
The diphtheritic otitis can be both primary, and secondary as a result of distribution of process of a nose, a pharynx and a throat. Disease happens localised (defeat only an average ear) and extended.
Frequency of otitises is according to weight of a current of a diphtheria and age of the child.
This disease is more often observed at children of younger age and characterised by an easy current, absence of spontaneous punching of an eardrum. Character of a current of these aseptic otitises allows to consider as their result of local display of an infectious allergy because the mucous membrane covering a cavity of an average ear, has the general embrional an origin with a mucous membrane drink.
The diphtheria of external genitals meets seldom (within 0, 1-1,1 % of cases), basically at girls of 5-8 years as secondary localisation at a pharynx or nose diphtheria.
The diphtheria of a gastroenteric path meets very seldom, is usually combined with the widespread or toxic form of a diphtheria of other localisations.
Diphtheria of lungs - extremely rare localisation of an infection. Usually it is combined with defeat by a diphtheria of the top respiratory ways (a throat, a trachea, bronchial tubes).
Diphtheria-mikst. In some cases the diphtheria can be combined with any sharp infectious disease (a measles, a scarlet fever, a whooping cough, a flu, a chicken pox, etc.) or owing to joining of a diphtheria to other infections, or their stratification on a diphtheria. The diphtheria which has joined a scarlet fever, is characterised by more expressed local inflammatory reaction with slow disappearance of filmy touches and sharper and long reaction from the party regional lymph nodes. Subtoxic and toxic forms of a diphtheria of a pharynx proceed with long hypostases and an intoxication. The general reaction is characterised hyperergia’s (proof leucocytosis, a heat).
In the diagnostic relation cases of joining of a diphtheria to a scarlet fever in an initial stage, when still strongly pronounced initial scarlet fever a tonsillitis are especially inconvenient.
On supervision S.C. Niconova’s, O.D.Ten (1960), the diphtheria and measles combination is characterised by fall of the general reactance of an organism. Inflammatory changes in a pharynx, an intoxication insignificant, proof leucopenia with relative limfocytosis are a little expressed. According to V.M.Molchanov (1960) measles create the raised predisposition to disease by a diphtheria that is a syndrome of strengthening of an infection (the modern term - the note of the author). More often diphtheritic process is localised in a throat and to a nose. At the croup which has developed during the late period of measles, it is necessary to suspect a diphtheria.
Diphtheritic croup proceeds at measles with some features - the mixed type of the short wind proof aphonia’s, slow resorption filmy touches, recurrent character of a stenosis and almost always the forecast very serious becomes complicated a pneumonia, therefore. The chicken pox which has joined a diphtheria, promotes heavier current of disease. Thus toxic forms of a diphtheria of a pharynx are more often observed, the aggravation latently a proceeding diphtheria of a nose is provoked for a long time, clinical displays of complications of a diphtheria worsen (miocarditis, polyneuritis), time discharge at convalescent is extended.
Certain interest represents streptodiphteria, as result combined to a diphteria-streptococcal infection. Joining of a streptococcal infection to a diphtheria promotes more frequent development of heavy forms and complications.
The clinical picture happens is so brightly expressed, that streptodiphteria is easily diagnosed. It is characterised by the expressed temperature and inflammatory reaction from a pharynx. Develops bright hyperemia the pharynx mucous membrane, delimited from the firm sky a line of demarcation, with the expressed painful syndrome along with typical filmy touches and painful regionar limphadenitis.
Clinic of a diphtheria at imparted children.
Occurrence of disease at imparted probably owing to low level of antitoxic immunity. Decrease in intensity of immunity after the transferred infectious diseases is possible. Imparted children have toxic forms of illness and complication (these are data of official medicine) much less often.
Current of a diphtheria at imparted usually smooth. Intoxication symptoms disappear for 3-5th day of illness, the pharynx is cleared for 5-7th day. At the localised form recover without whey introduction is possible.
However these features are traced only at those children at whom disease arises against residual anti-diphtheria immunity. In cases, when immunity completely is absent (refractory children), can arise heavy toxic forms with complications and a lethal outcome. The clinic of a diphtheria at such patients practically does not differ from that at not imparted.
Complications
The most typical complications of a diphtheria arise from cardiovascular system (miocarditis), peripheral nervous system (neuritis and polyneuritis) and kidneys (neuphrotic a syndrome).
Quickly appear and frustration of a warm rhythm progress. The Nephrotic syndrome is marked in the sharp period of illness, at intoxication height.
Typical complication of a diphtheria are peripheral paralyses.
Distinguish early and late diphtheritic paralyses.
Late paralyses arise on 4-5th week of illness, proceed on type polyradiculoneuritis. Are characterised by all signs of languid peripheral paralyses: decrease tendinous reflexes (usually on the bottom finitenesses), muscular weakness, coordination frustration, uncertain gait up to full immobility in finitenesses. In heavy cases probably defeat of muscles of a neck, a trunk; the patient cannot sit, hold a head.
There can be a throat paralysis (the voice and cough become silent), defeat drinks (cannot swallow food and even a saliva), a diaphragm paralysis (paradoxical movements of a belly wall - indrawing a stomach at a breath), defeat of mechanisms innervation hearts is possible.
Current diphtheritic polyradiculoneuritis (in the absence of defeat of respiratory muscles and a diaphragm) usually favorable. Paralyses disappear in 1-3 months with full restoration of structure and function of skeletal muscles.
The diagnosis
Clinical diagnostics has crucial importance as to hesitate with introduction anti-diphtheria serum and to wait results of laboratory research are not represented possible.
From methods of laboratory diagnostics the greatest value has bacteriological research. But express analyses are necessary!!!
The differential diagnosis:
The localised diphtheria of a pharynx should be differentiated from lacunary, follicular, is false-filmy and others anginas more often.
Toxic forms of a diphtheria of a pharynx differentiate from infectious mononucleosis, paratonsillar an abscess, parotitis infections.
The differential diagnosis of a diphtheritic croup.
Now diphtheritic croup meets seldom, incomparably it is necessary to deal with a croup syndrome at acute respiratory viral infection (ARVI) is more often.
For diphtheritic croup it is characteristic weakly expressed the beginning and gradual development of the basic symptoms of disease: disphonia, reaching to aphonia’s, the rough «barking» cough getting then silent character and gradually, but progressively accruing phenomena of a stenosis. The croup at acute respiratory viral infection (ARVI) (a flu, a paraflu, etc.) differs the sudden beginning, quite often disease develops at once from an attack of an asthma and rough barking cough. Thus the voice remains sonorous or slightly grainy, but sonorous notes always remain and appear usually during an attack and crying of the child. For acute respiratory viral infection (ARVI), accompanied by a croup syndrome, quite often heat and an intoxication are characteristic catharal the phenomena.
In more rare cases diphtheritic croup should be differentiated from a syndrome of the croup arising at a measles, a chicken pox, aphthous a stomatitis and other diseases.
Sometimes there is a necessity to differentiate a croup from retropharyngeal an abscess, papillomatosis throats, alien bodies in respiratory ways.
Important! Now disease of a diphtheria is at sporadic level.
Important! For example, in 2015 in Russia 2 cases of disease are officially registered by a diphtheria.
Important! Almost all cases infection pathogenic of a straines C.ulcerans were accompanied by development of symptoms similar to a classical diphtheria that speaks presence in a chromosome of the activator of genes moderated β a-prophage bearing operon of diphtheritic toxin! But changes in the gene device occur at influence of the infection and at vaccination, including (the note of the author).
Biorithmology diseases of a diphtheria.
Important! Epidemic liftings of a diphtheria in the world are registered on the average each 25 years. In Russia other periods occurrence of flashes of illness (the note of the author) have been noted also.
Important! The situation is aggravated with that antitoxic immunity does not protect from disease by a diphtheria but only provides neutralisation of diphtheritic toxin allocated with bacteria.
Important! Cases of repeated disease by a diphtheria, in that «toxic» forms with lethal outcomes at imparted children and adults (the note of the author) are described!!!
Important! Among diphtheria complications remained serumal illness and anaphylactic a shock which have no direct relation to the illness and represent accompanying (yatropatic) illness - reaction to alien fiber Anti - diphteria serum.
Own research allows to agree with conclusions of other authors considering «cardiopatia’s» as specific, sharp defeat of heart, mentioning all its anatomic departments.
The same it is possible to tell about nervous system.
Diphtheritic «polyneuropatia» proceeds on demyelinating or aksonal-demielinizating to type and represents a specific picture of sharp defeat of nervous system (paresis craniocereberal nerves, bulbar a paralysis, a diaphragm paralysis, peripheral polyneuropatia).
Diphtheritic defeat of kidneys (infectious nephropatia «sharp defeat of kidneys» will well be co-ordinated with the modern international term.
Important! In Russia in last epidemic of a diphtheria course doses of whey fluctuated in the range from 100 thousand units to several millions (!!!).
M.H.Turjanova's researches with coauthors. (1991, 1994) have allowed to draw the conclusion - is the most effective way unitary intravenous introduction of supporting doses of the whey, providing fast inactivation toxin.
Unitary introduction of supporting doses of serum (SDS) intravenously at any form of a diphtheria already in the first days leads to presence at patients of a high caption of antitoxic antibodies whereas at intramuscular introduction the maximum concentration of antibodies are found out only for 2-3rd day, and in much lower caption. Complications from intravenous introduction of whey by authors it is not registered.
Diphtheria treatment - today.
Today sick the diphtheria offers only two kinds of treatment:
Antibiotics. The schedule of decrease in disease and death rate shows, that introduction of antibiotics has no influence. Death rate continues remain at level of one case on 24 diseased.
Antitoxin. Usually, if it near at hand, it is appointed after the test for the sensitivity, spent on a skin and on one eye. It becomes because antitoxin is made on whey of horses, and in itself is the extremely dangerous preparation. It should be used with the greatest care, especially, if the patient suffers from such allergic diseases, as an asthma or exema. In urgent cases it can be appointed and intravenously but only after 30 minutes prior to intravenous introduction the test with an intramuscular injection Anatoxin’s has been carried out. Adrenaline and Antihysmanines (antiallergic) preparations should be near at hand from the very beginning and within two weeks, for treatment of following possible complications:
Anaphylaxia, shown by a hypotension, a bronchospasm, dispnoe (the complicated breath), a diarrhoeia, urticaria and a shock.
Pathological serum reactions. Symptoms include a fever, mialgia’s (pains in muscles) and skin rashes, usually in a kind urticaria, but can be as well on erythematous or macular to types. Arthritises begin with one or two joints and quickly progress, grasping many joints - usually joints wrist, anklebones, knees, and also small joints of a brush. Sharp glomerulonephritis at which in an urine deposit are found out erytrocytes and fiber; nephritic function can decrease. Can be miocarditis, neuritis, uveitis and peripheral neuropatias. Seldom meets meningoencephalitis.
Phenomenon Arthus’s – subacute the reaction of hypersensitivity similar on pathological serum of reaction, but limited exclusively a skin.
Rash Arthus’s – hemorrhage the reaction developing within 4-10 hours, and connected with expressed polymorphonuclear infiltration of venules with a hypostasis and hemorrhages.
Preventive maintenance
Major importance in diphtheria preventive maintenance active immunization, but not vaccines, and Immunomodulators (has the note of the author). It Imunofan - candles for children, pricks for adults. This preparation can be applied without research Immunogrammas. Other preparations it is necessary to select with research Immunogrammas 2 levels of complexity from 3-year-old age (the note of the author).
Pharynx processing - solutions Lugol’s, Sangviritrine’s and others (the note of the author). Throat rinsing by disinfectant solutions: 0, 02 % Furacylline’s,
0, 01 % of potassium permanganate, a solution of soda with salt (on a teaspoon of each component on a water glass).
Antitoxic Anti-diphteria whey (serum) is a measure of first aid and a unique effective remedy of treatment of all forms of a diphtheria.
Way of introduction. Anti-diphteria whey (serum) enter intramuscularly or hypodermically from 10 000 to 120 000 IU. At toxic forms intravenous introduction is supposed. The preparation dose depends on the form of illness and a condition of the patient.
The action mechanism Anti-diphteria whey.
Antitoxin connects and neutralises the toxin circulating in blood. If diphtheritic toxin has already contacted cages and has caused their damage whey does not render neutralised action, therefore, the earlier whey is entered, the treatment is more effective. But express analyses on a diphtheria (the note of the author) are for this purpose necessary.
Whey in first three days of illness is most effective. Antitoxic treatment of a diphtheria necessarily supplement with reception of antibiotics.
Early introduction of whey provides a favorable outcome even at heavy toxic forms. For the prevention anaphilactical a shock preliminary enter under a skin of whey of 0,1 ml, through 30 mines of 0,2 ml and still through 1-1,5 ч intramuscularly other quantity.
For hypersensibility revealing preliminary skin test with the horse whey dissolved in 100 times is spent.
At the localised forms of a diphtheria whey enter usually unitary but if clarification of a pharynx from touches is late, through 24 ч enter whey repeatedly. At toxic form II-III of degree Anti-diphteria whey is entered by 2 times a day throughout the first 2 or 3 days of treatment. Whey introduction stop after the obvious tendency to reduction of touches.
At an intoxication of 1 degree it can be cleaned traditional herbal medicine (the note of the author).
For reduction of symptoms of an intoxication and improvement of haemodynamics the patient with toxic diphtheria II-III of degree accepts intravenous introduction native plasmas (50-150 ml), Neocompensan’s, Reopolyglucine’s, the Haemomisinformation (50-150 ml) in a combination to drop introduction of 10 % of a solution of glucose from calculation of weight of a body of the child of 20-50 ml/kg a day.
It is forbidden to lift the patient and even to set him in bed. All procedures connected with treatment, feeding, a toilet, should is made in lying position. At toxic diphtheria I-II of degree a confinement to bed appoint on 3-5 weeks, at III degree - on 5-7 weeks.
The great value in complex therapy of a diphtheria has the nursing factor.
In this connection sick of a diphtheria it is expedient to hospitalise in boxing. At the slightest suspicion (the pneumonia, an otitis, etc.) appoint to bacterial complication antibiotics, it is possible and Sangviritrine (the note of the author).
Treatment bacteriocarrier.
Carriers not toxigenic diphtheritic sticks do not require isolation and do not demand special treatment. There is necessity to treat and so-called tranzitor no carriers toxigenic a diphtheritic stick (unitary detection of a diphtheritic stick). It is Enough to irrigate a pharynx with antibacterial preparations (solution for external application Sangviritrine). The means strengthening immunity (Imunofan, Immunal and others) are necessary.
At persistent carriage a diphtheritic stick appoint Erythromycin, Tetracycline (till 14 years it is impossible!) and other antibiotics (Sangviritrine from 3-year-old age strictly in 30 minutes after meal). It is necessary to define sensitivity of microflora to Antibiotics, except Sangviritrine (the note of the author).
Primary Preventive Maintenance:
1.any bactericidal and antivirus grasses (inside and pharynx and nasopharynx rinsings) or are lemons with a peel
2.solution Lugol’s
3.solition Sangviritrine and other preparations
Secondary Preventive Maintenance:
1.Midocamycyn (Macrofoams) - macroleads. They can be applied and at a whooping cough (the note of the author) – Aetiotropical treatment - remarkable alternative of vaccines (the note of the author).
2.Polymixines P (inside) and M (externally). The preparation «works» in the alkaline environment. It is better to accept with mineral waters.
3.Octenisept - solution for external application with a spray - for diphtheria carriers. Not to use together with iodine-containing antiseptics!
4.Myrtle tincture - receiving drops.
Indications to pharmacotherapy - Aetiotropical therapy (an author's technique).
Vitamins - C - doses above averages therapeutic - intravenously!
Antioxidants – Mexidol or Mexiprim - intravenously (only the adult) in the rehabilitation period (the control saturation oxygen is necessary). To children - oxygen cocktails (during the period convalescent’s).
Cytoprotector - Cytochrome C - intravenously and intramuscularly - doses on age) - a competitive preparation to cytochrome B that diphtheritic sticks (the note of the author) develop.
Sangviritrine - only externally as the preparation possesses antistrange action (the note of the author). From 3 summer age the preparation can be applied inside in tablets - doses under indications and it is strict after meal!
Recombinant Interferons (Viferon candles for children, etc.) - aim to lower frequency and weight of specific complications.
Traditional herbal medicine (an author's technique - here I do not describe).
From pharmacotherapy, except Nurofen’s it is better than nothing to apply (Paracetamol, Tailenol and others)!!!
A food at diphtherias (diet)
At a diphtheria it is recommended to adhere to a diet №2. A food should be high-grade and high-calorie. At cooking it is necessary to consider, that it is heavy to patient to swallow. Dishes should be warm, a semi-fluid consistence, it is desirable wiped.
Important! It is possible not to eat 1-3 days, only to drink!!!
Remember! The success of treatment depends on that how much quickly to the sick will enter Anti-diphteria whey. And it can be made only in the conditions of a hospital. Delay at some o'clock per times increases risk of development of complications.
Unfortunately, till now the serious estimation of different categories of carriers of the activator of a diphtheria (the note of the author) is not spent.
Danger more all proceeds from immune carriers (in pre-vaccination time – is result propylenediene the population, now - a consequence of inoculations) as immunity has basically antitoxic character.
At such carriers it is noticed long - to 3 months vegetation and activator allocation in an environment.
Susceptibility and immunity. A susceptibility not immune people to the activator of a diphtheria the general. However possibility of development not only heavy, but also easy forms of illness, and also carriage (asymptomatic forms of an infection) testify to a certain role of nonspecific factors of protection of an organism, virulent and degrees toxigenic the activator, but especially - infecting doses at infection.
Chest children to 6 months are not susceptible to a diphtheria because of presence at them the passive immunity transferred from mother placentary by. Children at the age from 1 year till 5-6 years are most susceptible to a diphtheria. By 18-20 years immunity also is more senior reaches 85 % that is caused by acquisition of active immunity.
Important! The maintenance in blood of specific antibodies of 0, 03 AE/ML provides their protection against disease. However it does not interfere with formation carriage pathogenic microbes (the note of the author).
Important! This fact is interesting to that inoculations are directed only on neutralisation of toxin and do not possess antimicrobic action.
We understand with inoculations.
The diphtheria is caused by bacterium Corynebacterium diphtheriae, which in itself is harmless enough. But, if this bacterium is infected by a specific virus then it starts to make and allocate strong toxin. This toxin also is responsible for heavy symptoms of a diphtheria. Diphtheritic toxin destroys fabrics in a drink, and forms in it a pseudo-membrane, a without toxin the bacterium can cause only a pharyngitis. If this toxin gets to blood system complications can lead miocarditis and to a time paralysis. Death rate makes 5-10 %.
The majority of people, having caught a diphtheritic bacterium, do not fall ill, and simply are the tank of bacteria and a carrier. During epidemics the majority of children are carriers, but are not ill. The majority of cases of illness occur in the winter and in the spring (the note of the author).
The vaccine from a diphtheria separately is not made, it is always combined with a tetanus (DT, Td), and usually with a whooping cough (DTaP/DTP). Also as well as for a tetanus, the vaccine represents toxoid (toxin inactivated of formalin).
And last years in Irkutsk the whooping cough walks, to very many children began to impart not AKDS, and ADS-M. From Russian vaccines AKDS it is a lot of complications on nervous system - monotonous crying after introduction and further (in other publications - the note of the author).
For inhabitants of Crimea a problem actual at least because of the neighbourhood with Ukraine. On the country the measles have already dispersed - there is a risk of distribution and a diphtheria which can go over and to Crimea.
In 1926 Glenny and its group experimented a diphtheritic vaccine and tried to improve its efficiency. Casually they have found out, that aluminium addition in a vaccine gives stronger immune reaction. Since then aluminium is added in all not live vaccines.
Glenny safety of aluminium in a vaccine did not interest 90 years ago. It does not interest anybody and today, and in vain (the note of the author).
Features of a vaccine.
As the vaccine from a diphtheria is toxoid’s, it cannot prevent infection, but can prevent complications from illness. Though, it is possible other medicines (read in the text - the note of the author). It was logical to expect, that with introduction of a vaccine death rate from a diphtheria will decrease. However it has not occurred. In spite of the fact that the quantity of cases of a diphtheria constantly decreased, death rate remained approximately at level of 10 % with 1920 on 1970, despite growing coverage of the population by inoculations.
As the diphtheritic vaccine is always combined with a tetanus/whooping cough.
The inoculation (without a whooping cough) leads to syndrome Gijena-Barre, anaphylactic to a shock and humeral neuritis, lowers level limfocytes, raises risk of allergies, and antiphospholipid to a syndrome.
In VAERS with 2000 for 2017 after an inoculation from a diphtheria without pertussis a component (DT/Td) it is registered 33 cases of death, and 188 cases of physical inability. From a diphtheria for this time were ill 6 and one has died. Considering, that in VAERS 1-10 % of all cases are registered only, the probability to die of an inoculation in hundreds times exceeds probability to be ill with a diphtheria!!!
The important note! Syndrome Gijena-Barre arises at a flu and vaccines from a flu (the note of the author).
As the vaccine from a diphtheria has appeared even in 1920, any clinical tests, especially tests of efficiency it did not pass.
The vaccine Contains Aluminium.
Diphtherias are subject basically alcoholics and the homeless, and even they are ill exclusively seldom. To be ill today with a diphtheria it is practically unreal.
Important! The diphtheria is treated by Vitamin C as diphtheritic toxin exhausts Vitamin C stocks it should be entered!!!
The probability to die of an inoculation many times over exceeds probability to be ill with a diphtheria.
Opinion of the Grandmother.
When the pediatrist convinced us to inoculate, he has stated such thought, that we should inoculate at least not to lower quantity of imparted children to a dangerous threshold when there is a danger of occurrence of flash of an infection.!!! On my question and how to be with our kid if suddenly it again has a reaction, moreover and it is more terrible, than after AKDS, he has told, it is very improbable but what to do... Certainly, such answer has not convinced me absolutely. How much I understand, the doctor, especially the pediatrist, first of all should think about health of EACH concrete child, in this case - ours. And questions of preventive maintenance of infections is, sorry, should go after that! And if you to me tell, that in it I am not right, I and to you will cease to trust because to me my grandson more expensively. I do not wish to endow its health, and, can, and a life, for the good of all the others.
The inoculation only neutralises toxins, it does not influence bacteria. However, as well as vaccine BCG. Whether there is a sense to do inoculations? For Aetiopropic treatments, neutralisations of toxins are other medicines (read in the text - the note of the author).
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.