AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1897/149
Royal Darwin Hospital in Northern Territory Australia.
*Corresponding Author: Misha Lay, Royal Darwin Hospital in Northern Territory Australia.
Citation: Misha Lay, Philip Toonson., (2023), Case Report of Chylous Ascites as A Complication of Severe Necrotising Pancreatitis, J, Surgical Case Reports and Images 6(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-1897/149
Copyright: © 2023, Misha Lay. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 27 February 2023 | Accepted: 14 March 2023 | Published: 22 March 2023
Keywords: chylous ascites; chyle; acute pancreatitis; pseudocysts; necrotising pancreatitis; gallstones pancreatitis
Chylous ascites (CA) in the setting of acute necrotising pancreatitis is a rare clinical entity, with its pathogenesis and optimal management remaining uncertain. In Western countries, CA is most commonly attributed to malignancy, liver cirrhosis and trauma causing direct disruption to the lymphatic system leading to the leakage of chyle into the peritoneum. This case report describes a middle-aged woman who develops chylous ascites a few months after an episode of severe acute necrotising pancreatitis secondary to gallstones, complicated by infected pancreatic pseudocysts. She underwent a paracentesis, octreotide and strict dietary modifications of a low-fat and high-protein diet with effective clinical resolution of her chylous ascites. Although multiple management options for chylous ascites exist and have been explored in the limited available literature, the emphasis remains to be placed on identifying and treating its underlying aetiology.
Chylous ascites(CA) in the setting of acute necrotising pancreatitis is a rare clinicalentity [1]. The phenomenon is characterised by the accumulation of ascitic fluid containing chyle,a lipid- rich lymph fluid within the peritoneal cavity, resulting in abdominal distension and often discomfort for the patient [2]. CA is a manifestation of an underlying aetiology that causesan obstructive or traumatic disruption to the lymphatic system that ultimately leads to the leakageof chyle [2], and often portends nutritional, immunological and mechanical consequences [3]. In Western countries, it is primarily attributed to malignancies such as lymphoma, liver cirrhosis, and blunt or surgical trauma to the abdomen or retroperitoneum [3]. Congenital lymphatic anomalies in children and Mycobacterium and filariasis infections in developing countries have also been widely recognised, converse to acute pancreatitis which has rarely been recognised in published literature [2]. The pathogenesis of CA in acute pancreatitis is poorly understood, and its optimal management remains uncertain [3]. This case report describes a middle-aged woman who develops CA after a prolonged hospital admission for severe necrotising pancreatitis secondary to gallstones,and it explores her course of management and outcome. Preceding the development of CA, the patient’s clinical course was complicated by the development of infected pancreatic pseudocysts requiring percutaneous drainage and long-termantibiotics. The patientultimately required re- admission to hospital for her CA, which was managed with a therapeutic paracentesis, low- fat and high-protein modified diet, and octreotide with effective clinical improvement.
A middle-aged woman presents to the ED with jaundice, epigastric pain radiating to her back,diarrhoea,vomiting,and subjective fevers.She has a background of hypertension that is well-managed with irbesartan.The patient is a non-drinker and non-smoker,and there is no prior history of cholelithiasis. On review,she is jaundiced,tachycardic with a HR of 100bpm,normotensive BP 120/70,tachypnoeic RR 28bpm,SpO2 93% on FiO2 0.21,apyrexicand anuric with only 10mL of dark urine passed in prior 12 hours.There was tenderness on palpation of the epigastrium which radiated to her back and left shoulder on examination.Her blood investigations demonstrated raised inflammatory markers of WCC 27.6 and CRP 273.7.She had a raised lipaseof 9473 with an associated liver derangement with Br 230 ALP 98 GGT 286 ALT 370. There was a concurrent metabolic acidosis,anuric renal failurewith a raised creatinine of 653 and uraemia of 30.1. A non-contrast CT abdomen and pelvis (see Figure 1) was performed and demonstrated diffuse enlargement of the pancreas, particularly in the head and neck with marked peripancreatic fat stranding.
Appendix
Figure 1: CT abdomen and pelvis coronal view (left) demonstrating generalised oedema of the pancreas (purple arrow) with peripancreatic stranding (red arrows). In the coronal and axial view (right), multiple gallstones can also be seen within the gallbladder (blue arrow) without evidence of cholecystitis.
There is also free fluid tracking into the paracolicgutters, and small amounts of scattered intraperitoneal fluid. Multiple gallstones are present in the gallbladder without any signs of cholecystitis or a dilated CBD.The patient was diagnosed with severe acute necrotising pancreatitis presumed secondary to gallstones,with an associated acute anuric kidney failure and ModifiedGlasgow Score of 3.
The patient was admitted to ICU for management of her anuric acute renal failure with CRRT. Her ICU stay was further complicated by fluid overload, bibasal pleural effusions and atelectasis requiring invasive ventilatory support for respiratory failure for a few days. She progressively improved with supportive measures over the course of a week and was discharged from the ICU to the ward. She further developed persistent pyrexia on the ward with raising inflammatory markers prompting a repeat CT abdomen and pelvis which identified multiple peripancreatic collections presumed to be evolving pseudocysts. An IR- guided percutaneous drainage of the pseudocysts with a 14Fr pigtail drain insertion was subsequently performed (see Figure 2) with frank haemopurulence output that grew E. coli and candida species.
Figure 2: CT abdomen and pelvis coronal (left) and axial (right) views demonstrating multiple infected post-necrotic peripancreatic fluid collections (red arrows) approximately 2 weeks after admission for severe necrotising pancreatitis.
Clinical improvement was achieved afterwards with IV antibiotics administration and the patient was deemed fit for dischargewith the pigtail drain kept in situ with plans for out patient clinic reviews and serial imaging. On outpatient clinic reviews, the patient had persistently high drain outputsand was commencedon regular creonwith meals whilst awaiting further discussions about the benefits of a video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement to be performed at an interstate hospital.
Approximately 3 months since discharge from hospital, the patient presents to the outpatient clinic with a new abdominal distension and discomfort that was not present during her prior clinic review 3 weeks ago. On examination, she had large ascites with minimal tenderness and no signs of peritonism. Her existing pigtail drain output for the peripancreatic pseudocysts was otherwise weaning in volume. The patient was re-admitted to hospital for further evaluation where she underwent another CT abdomen and pelvis scan which demonstrated new large-volume ascites (see Figure 3)
Figure 3: CT abdomen and pelvis coronal (left) and axial (right) views demonstrating large volume ascites (red arrows). The pigtail drain (purple arrow) situated in the peripancreatic space is left in situ with residual pseudocysts present.
The patient had no evidence of liver cirrhosis to explain the ascites. An IR USS-guided ascitic tap and 8.5Fr drain insertion was performed, with milky opaque fluid drained and sent for analysis. The fluid analysis demonstrated high triglycerides of 10.03 mmol/L and low cholesterol of <1>The management of the patient’s CA was primarilywithin the outpatient setting, with ongoingdietician input to ensure adequate nutritional demands are met and maintained from the ongoing chyle leak.
The patient improved clinically on a low-fat and high-protein diet, with resolution of her hypoalbuminaemia, resultant weight gain and improvement of her CA as demonstrated by her reducingdrain output and serial CT scan (see Figure 4).
Figure 4: CT abdomen and pelvis coronal view after therapeutic percutaneous drainage andinsertion of pigtail drain located in the lower left quadrant (light blue arrow). It demonstrates reduced volume of ascites (red arrow).
The drain output weaned down to 50mL/24 hours at approximately 1 month from the drain insertion. The drain inadvertently blocked and was removed without a re-accumulation of the chylous ascites. The peripancreatic pseudocysts also simultaneously receded on serial CT scans and the drain was removed. The patient reconditioned, gained some weight and was slowly re-introduced to higher fat-content foods such as lean meats, butter and mayonnaise prior to an eventual upgrade to a normal diet with no re-accumulation of her ascites. She also fortunately had no evidence of exocrine or endocrine pancreatic insufficiency following her severe episode of pancreatitis. The patient ultimately underwent an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy which identified small residual volumes of chylous ascitic fluid (see Figure 5).
Figure 5: Photograph of residual chylous ascitic fluid identified during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, demonstrating its milky and opaque characteristic appearance.
CA in the context of acute pancreatitis and its optimal management is poorly understood [7]. It is defined as the presence of milky fluid with high triglycerides of over 110mg/dL within the peritoneal cavity [8]. There are multiple proposed approaches to classifying the aetiologies for CA, such as by traumatic or atraumatic groups [2], or by the presence or absence of associated portal hypertension [5]. The pathogeneses can furthermore be categorised into main mechanisms that include obstruction to lymph flow such as from an extrinsic compression from a tumour, exudation of lymph through walls of dilated retroperitoneal vessels, traumatic disruption to the thoracic duct and leakage through a lymphoperitoneal fistula [8]. However, the pathogenesis of chylous ascites in acute pancreatitis remains uncertain due to the limited literature available recognising it as an aetiology of CA [3].
It is speculated in this case whether the development of chylous ascites in the context of necrotising pancreatitis is attributed to the leakage of pancreatic autodigestive enzymes leading to direct erosion into the surrounding pancreatic and peripancreatic lymphatic channels, similarly to the pathogenesis of haemorrhage in pancreatitis with disruption to surrounding blood vessels. It is recognised that the abundant lymphatic chains surrounding the pancreas increase in lymph flow during episodes of pancreatitis [9]. However, the patient developed chylous ascites months from her episode of severe acute necrotising pancreatitis and development of pseudocysts, challenging this mechanism.
The optimal management of chylous ascites unsurprisingly remains unclear, with existing case studies identifying various regimens and clinical outcomes that appeared individualised. The mainstay management is paracentesis, dietary modifications, somatostatin analogues, and consideration of total parental nutrition and diuretics [4]. It is emphasised that clinicians should identify and treat the underlying aetiology [6] and recognise that atraumatic aetiologies should warrant exclusion of other aetiologies such as malignancy [1]. In this case, the patient had no evidence of cirrhosis or malignancy on formal investigations, with her recent acute necrotising pancreatitis being the most likely cause of her CA. She ultimately underwent an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy to prevent further gallstone pancreatitis episodes as her chylous ascites was secondary to her necrotising pancreatitis and pseudocysts. Pharmacological agents such as somatostatin and its analogues, octreotide have been recognised to reduce intestinal, splanchnic and portal blood flow hence chyle excretion, and have been utilised in similar reported cases with clinical improvement [5].
For medically refractory patients, some case studies have described improvement from vigorous dietary modifications of fasting the patient and administering total parental nutrition for weeks duration [4]. In unique circumstances where patients remain refractory to vigorous conservative management, surgical interventions such as a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), peritoneovenous shunt, embolisation or exploratory laparotomy may be considered however is dictated by the aetiology of the CA [3]. The patient described in this case report avoided surgical intervention, as she demonstrated a favourable clinical response to a single paracentesis with pigtail drain insertion, low-fat and high-protein dietary modifications and octreotide. She also fortunately did not develop any pancreatic insufficiency or any permanent organ dysfunction after her episode of severe necrotising pancreatitis.
Chylous ascites (CA) is a rare manifestation of chyle accumulation within the peritoneum that has been rarely attributed to acute pancreatitis. The patient in this case report develops chylous ascites after an episode of severe necrotising pancreatitis secondary to gallstones, which was effectively managed with a therapeutic paracentesis, octreotide and strict dietary modifications with a low-fat and high-protein diet. It is emphasised that clinicians should focus to identify and treat the underlying aetiology of CA, and exclude sinister aetiologies such as malignancy especially in cases of atraumatic CA. Although the optimal management of CA remains poorly understood, the mainstay management is dietary modifications to reduce chyle leak and counteract resultant malnutrition and consider pharmacological therapies such as somatostatin analogues and diuretics. In unique circumstances where patients are refractory to conservative management, consideration of surgical interventions such as TIPS, embolisation and exploratory laparotomy may be undertaken.
CA – Chylous Ascites.
HR – Heart Rate.
BP – Blood pressure.
WCC – White cell count.
CRP – C-reactive protein
LFT – Liver Function Test.
ICU – Intensive Care Unit.
IR – Interventional Radiology.
USS – Ultrasound.
CRRT – Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.
CT – Computedtomography.
TPN – Total Parental Nutrition.
TIPS – Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt
No conflicts of interest identified.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
