AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/700
Specialist of clinical oncology and nuclear Medicine, National oncology center –Aden. Head of Health Education unit for Arab council of Academic and competencies –branch of Yemen.
Membership in Union of Afro-Asia Universities
*Corresponding Author: Amani Saleh Hadi Saeed, Specialist of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, National Oncology Center-Aden, Yemen.
Citation: Amani Saleh Hadi Saeed, (2025), Bilateral breast cancer with clinical response to chemotherapy: A case report, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 24(5); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/700
Copyright: © 2025, Alagbe John Olujimi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 25 January 2025 | Accepted: 21 February 2025 | Published: 28 March 2025
Keywords: bilateral breast cancer; invasive ductal carcinoma; prognosis; metastatic breast cancer; triple negative; hormonal therapy
Back ground: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women counting about 125 per 100000 per year new case in United States and about 1.4milion new cases worldwide. In the last twenty years early diagnosis, neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic treatment that targeted to specific molecular targets have significantly reduced the mortality from breast cancer. Distant metastasis accounts for the vast majority of deaths in patients with cancer. Breast cancer exhibits a distinct metastatic pattern commonly involving bone, liver, lung, and brain. Breast cancer can be divided into different subtypes based on gene expression profiles, and different breast cancer subtypes show preference to distinct organ sites of metastasis.
Bilateral breast cancer (BBC) is rare and is associated with unfavorable prognosis. riple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been associated with a more aggressive histology, poorer prognosis, and no responsiveness to hormone therapy. It is imperative that cancer research identify factors that drive disparities and focus on prevention.
We report A case of metastatic bilateral breast cancers, A 58-year-old female presented with bilateral breast masses of 8-years duration. On examination. she had bilateral fungated breast masses, which were hard, mobile, and irregular. On the right side, there was skin tethering and palpable axillary lymph nodes. Ultrasound examination showed a heterogeneous, irregular, ill-defined, mass-like lesion, seen in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast along with a hypoechoic. irregular mass 12*13mm in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast. FNA showed bilateral invasive ductal carcinoma. Right axillary lymph nodes were positive for adenocarcinoma. She received 4 sessions of NACT which was followed by right-side mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection and left-side mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and ranks the fifth cause of cancer death among females worldwide, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%) and 685 thousand deaths (6.9%) in 2020[1]. It has become the major reason for mortality in women in the age group of 40 to 59 years, the premenopausal women based in Central, America, Africa, and South America are more prone to be affected with breast cancer [31]
The occurrence of bilateral breast cancer is increasing nowadays with reported incidence ranging in between 1.4%-12%. [2,3]. however, in recent literature, patients with BBC showed significantly worse distant relapse -freesurfival as coped to those with unliteral breast cancer as distant metastasis were frequently reported in patients with BBC. [3,4] BC can metastasize to several organs, the most frequent metastatic sites include bone, lungs, liver and skin [5] The incidence of bilateral breast cancer has been reported to be 4.4% (2.1% synchronous and 2.3% metachronous.[6].
Patient information
A 51-year-old female presented with bilateral breast masses for 5-yeras duration. She was G1P1, lactated for 2 years, she is divorced. She had regular menstrual cycles in the past. She didn't have any chronic disease. She had bilateral breast mass but she neglected this due to social sham and financial status of patient.
On clinical examination, there was bilateral palpable breast masses, hard, mobile and irregular and crusted. On the right side, there was skin tethering and palpable axillary lymph nodes.
Diagnostic assessment on October10,2022 Ct scan chest and abdomen and pelvic there was bilateral areola-nipple proliferative soft tissue lesion with diffuse skin thicking and underlying asymmetrical breasts parenchymal infiltrative hyper density. More evident in left side with deep calcification and shrinking left breast size.
An ill-defined soft tissue density in left axilla encasing vessels.lymphiod process.
Focal chest wall muscle enhancement in anterior aspect of teras minor and latissimus dorsi muscles is seen.
Bilateral pleural effusion.moderat in left side,nopulmonary or mediastinal lesion
Solitary hepatic benign looking focal cystic lesion and splenic small focal lesion .
Multiple uterine masses of variable size (subserous and intra mural degenerated fibroids)
Diffuse abdominal wall subcutantanouse fat edematous congestion.
*on 25May2022 left breast mass true cut biopsy report show invasive ductal carcinoma(N
* on6 July2022 Immunohistochemistry Estrogen reports 0/8
Progesterone reports 0/8
HER-2/neu protein 0 negative FISH is not required. Therapeutic intervention
**on 6,July2022 She received 4 cycles AC then 4cycles finish in 9Augest,2022
Evaluation done by Ct scan chest and abdominopelvic 25/8/2022 show: mild, bilateral breast edema with left side areoleo-nipple thiching , bilateral pleural effusion, massive in left side ,minimal ascites ,tiny cystic lesion in liver 1.5cm between segment V/VI .pedunculated myomas up to 3.5x3.7cm,diffuse abdominal wall and sub cutaneous fat edema. In comparing with CT report date 10/5/2022 there is mild increase in the pleural effusion with nearly decreased rest of the finding and no deposits in the axilla or muscles as it were previously reported (.figure1)
Figure 1(A+B): Appearance of the bilateral breast cancers at pre- chemotherapy 2/6/2022
Patient Taxol given weekly for 12weeks start in 30/8/2022 finished in 9/11/2022. ( Figure 2+3)
Figure 2(A+B): Appearance of bilateral breast cancers post 4cycles chemotherapy EC protocol (9/8/2022)
Figur 3: Appearance of bilateral breast cancer post 9 weeks monotherapy with paclitaxel (9/11/2022).
Patient complain lower limbe oedema, dopllar US done no signs of DVT, tumur marker : CA125:43.3,CA15.3:45,CEA:4.87. Advice new line chemotherapy with gemctabin+ Xeloda for three cycles than evualtion done by chest and abdomenand pelvic Ct scan in 19/3/2023 show regression course regarding bilateral plural effusion .stable regareding right adnexal and spleeinc and hepatic lesion.no bony lesion.complet resulation. of LLedoma but patient can not tolerated with gemctabin side effect tumur marker: CEA 2.5, CA15.3:26.5, CA:45. (figure5)
Figure 5: post 3 cycles gemcitabine + xeloda 19/3/2023 >>> resolve breast mass in left breast
Xeloda tab advice to continue for 3cycles ,patient tolarted and advice more three cycles + hormonal therapy Exemestan 25mg tab 13/6/2023.
Evualtion done in 26/9/2023show good respone, mild left side plural effusion, no ovarin mass. Tumur marker CEA :3, CA19.9:24.9, CA15.3:20.69, CA125:7.9. figure 6
Figure 6: post 6 cycles xeolda (capecitabine) 26/9/2023; good respond
Advice continue three cycles xeloda and continue with hormonal therapy Exemestan (2/10/2023) ( figure7)
Figure 7: Post-10 cycles xeloda 2/10/2023
2.5. Follow up
*on5 Februy,2024: chest and abdomen CT scan show: Left beast not seen with clear surgical bed and free both axilla.
Left lung upper lobe well-defined enhanced pleural based soft tissue nodule 17x28mm.
No significant changes regarding hepatic cystic lesion ,uterine and splenic lesion in compare with study at 26/9/2023 current study show stable course .
• On 26July,2024: CT scan of chest with contrast show: clear surgical bed ,no local recurrence, sub -pleural nodule 25x13mm seen at level of lingula ,at pervious exam measured 28x15mm, relative decreased size of lesion in comparison with previous exam case is with relative decreased mass size.
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvic with contrast show : low attenuation, non hancing hepatic cyst 20x14mm.in comparison with last study case in 5/2/2024 is with stationary course..
Tumor marker: CA 35.75(0.00-39)
CA125 13.39(0.001-35)
CA15.326.36(0.00-25).advice her to fellow up and continue on hormonal therapy Anastrazol 1mg po daily .
On 20Septamber 2024: come patient for follow up ,complain new skin nodules(figure 10)
Advice : continue xeloda+ Armadax protocol
Post-chemotherapy period . She was followed up for two year.
Figure 10: skin nodules in bilateral breast cancer
Patient condition improve skin nodules and advice to continues on Capecitabine and Anastrozole
Figur 8: post 13 cycles xeloda 12/12/2023
Figure 9: On hormonal therapy 16/4/2024 complete resolution of left breast mass+ right breast shows good response
Breast cancer is the most common site-specific cancer in women and is the leading cause of death from cancer for women aged 20–59 years. It accounts for 26% of all newly diagnosed cancers in females and is responsible for 15% of the cancer-related deaths in women [32].
Nevertheless, the incidence of breast cancer in Western countries is about sixfold higher than the developing countries of Africa and Asia owing to demographic factors such as longer life expectancy, better and early reporting of cases and easy access to healthcare [9]. Bilateral breast carcinomas are very rare. They form 2–5% of all breast malignancies. About 2–11% of breast cancer patients develop cancer in the opposite breast in their lifetime with an incidence rate varying from 4 to 8 per 1000 people per year. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have an annual risk of 2%–6% of developing a second primary breast cancer[33]. In December 2013, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in those patients who may have an increased likelihood of a BRCA mutation. In addition to other factors, this included those patients with bilateral breast cancer [34].
Family history of breast cancer is a risk factor for the development of unilateral breast carcinoma; it wouldn't be an unreasonable hypothesis to think that it could be a risk factor for bilateral breast carcinoma. Some authors have submitted data supporting this hypothesis [7] . The risk factors associated with bilateral occurrence include: a positive family history of breast cancer in a first-degree relative, young age at diagnosis of primary breast cancer, histologically diagnosed invasive lobular carcinoma of the initial breast mass lesion, multicentricity and previous history of exposure to ionizing radiation [8].Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been found to account for approximately 15% of all breast cancer cases, and is associated with aggressive histology, poorer prognosis, shorter survival, and unresponsiveness to usual hormone therapy[10].TNBC disproportionally affects younger women, women of African American descent, and women with Breast Cancer gene 1 (BRCA 1) mutation diagnoses [11-15]. The current diagnostic method takes multiple steps, is expensive, and does not diagnose TNBC promptly. TNBC is currently diagnosed in higher stages, with 12% of women diagnosed at stage 1, 11% diagnosed at stage 2, 52% diagnosed at stage 3, and 25% diagnosed at stage 4{16}.. Despite the more aggressive clinical behavior of TNBCs, several studies have now demonstrated that patients with these cancers more frequently evolve to pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy [17].In the metastatic setting, however, TNBCs remain lethal despite the recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of different modalities of therapeutic agents for patients with this disease[18-19].Treatment for TNBC depends on different factors, such as the stage and the grade of the cancer. It is usually a combination of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Unlike most other types of BC, TNBC does not express estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptors. Therefore, hormone therapy is largely ineffective for treatment purposes. Nevertheless, TNBC often responds very well to chemotherapy. [20-22]. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the primary systemic treatment for TNBC, which improves pathologic complete remission, increasing surgical success, reducing the extent of surgery, and allowing assessment of treatment response[27].
Anthracyclines and taxanes are the main chemotherapeutic regimens against TNBC. Anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin, are molecules that inhibit topoisomerase II, blocking DNA replication and transcription and, consequently, arresting the cell cycle. Taxanes (e.g., paclitaxel and docetaxel) are antimitotic agents that inhibit cell division by affecting the stabilization of microtubules. Platinum-based compounds, such as carboplatin and cisplatin, interlink DNA strands, causing them to break and leading to cell apoptosis. This is particularly beneficial in the case of tumors that carry BRCA gene mutations, with underlying impaired DNA repairing mechanisms, and prevalent among TNBC patients. Other drugs, such as cyclophosphamide (causing DNA damage), fluorouracil, and capecitabine (blocking DNA synthesis) have also been used, particularly in combination or in sequential regimens with anthracyclines and/or taxanes or when the latter are contraindicated [23] However, TNBCs lack the benefit resulting from the use of targeted or hormonal systemic therapies in other subtypes. In this regard, a deeper knowledge of the molecular characteristics of TNBCs paved the way for the development of novel targeted therapeutics and patient stratification.[24]. Chemoresistance is a growing concern in TNBC therapy, with about 30–50% of patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy evolving to resistant recurrences, resulting in poor outcomes [25]. Mechanisms of resistance arise when tumor cells are exposed to cytotoxic agents, as a means of maintaining their viability. Some of these mechanisms have been demonstrated for TNBC standard therapies, and strategies to overcome them have been proposed [26] Extended adjuvant metronomic capecitabine is well tolerated with good patient compliance. Due to our small sample size, these results need to be compared in a study with a control arm, a larger sample as well as longer follow-up. The need for higher doses of capecitabine can be evaluated when the results of current ongoing trials are available [28].In recent years, some studies about capecitabine for therapy were also carried out in (neo)adjuvant therapy. They showed that addition of capecitabine to TNBC adjuvant treatment after anthracycline and paclitaxel combined adjuvant chemotherapy. shows that the DFS and OS have not been improved in addition, four cycles of sequential capecitabine after standard anthracycline and taxane regimens containing adjuvant chemotherapy, but DFS has a trend of improvement, which may be caused by the insufficient treatment cycles of capecitabine only four cycles, the insufficient number of cases, or the insufficient follow-up [29] one study show Androgen receptor (AR) status might be used to identify a subgroup of patients with ER negative tumours benefitting from adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. We interpret this to mean that patients with ER− tumors may have their tumors tested for AR and could be candidates for tamoxifen therapy. We also identified a subgroup of patients with TNBC who had AR+ tumors that may be treated with tamoxifen to improve outcome. These hypotheses generating observations need confirmation by further studies with larger number of ER− and TNBC patients in prospective cohorts [30].
Although bilateral breast cancer is not frequent, MC breast cancer is different from SC breast cancer by having more advanced grade, stage, less ER expression, more frequent rates of local relapse and distant metastasis and better response to chemotherapy in case of relapse/metastasis. Bilateral carcinoma of the breast is very rare. Microscopically, the findings usually reveal infiltrative ductal carcinoma. The treatment of choice is bilateral modified radical mastectomy. TNBC is merely an operational term that stemmed from the fact that, in the mid-2000s, the only systemic therapy available for patients with ER-, PR-, and HER2-negative disease was chemotherapy.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
