AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9406/094
1 Hematology Department, Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria.
2 Department of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.
3 Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Achiever’s University, Ondo State, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: ESAN Ayodele Jacob, Hematology Department, Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria.
Citation: Esan A Jacob, Osime E. O, F Kolawole and Oyedele E Titilayo. (2022). Attitudes and Behaviors of Healthcare Professionals toward HIV Positive Patients in a Tertiary Hospital. Biomedical Research and Clinical Reviews. 6(3); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9406/094
Copyright: © 2022 Esan Ayodele Jacob, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 25 October 2021 | Accepted: 25 January 2022 | Published: 31 January 2022
Keywords: attitudes; healthcare professionals; hiv-patients; stigmatization and discriminatory
Background: In reality, fear of being infected at work has led to stigmatization and discriminatory treatment of HIV/AIDS patients. The consequence of such negative attitude is poor management of people with HIV/AIDS who need most care, treatment, and support.
Aim: To evaluate attitudes and behaviors of healthcare professionals toward HIV/AIDS patients in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria
Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria. 250 healthcare professionals were selected randomly, Participants completed a well-structured, self-administered questionnaire delivered to them at their workplace. Data obtained from the questionnaire was analyzed using SPSS software version 9.
Results: A total of 250 healthcare professionals participated in the study, 148(59.2%) were males and 102 (40.8%) were females. 153(61.2%) of them had been working between 0- 10 years with prevalence age group 30-40 years. Majority of Healthcare professionals (HCPs) in this study demonstrated positive attitude and behaviour toward HIV/AIDS patients. However, minority of HCPs had negative attitudes toward HIV/AIDS patients by agreed to the statements that HCPs should not share office with HIV patients, beds of HIV patients should be marked and HCPs should allow relation to marry HIV patients.
Conclusion: Healthcare professionals should have access to up-to-date information on all aspects of HIV/AIDS through effective training on the modes of HIV transmission, prevention, counselling, guidelines for safe practice and the rights of PLWHIV, this would reduce discriminatory attitudes towards PLWHIV and also improve patients' care and access to quality healthcare services.
AIDS: Acquire Immune Deficiency Syndrome
BBFs: Blood and Body Fluids
HCPs: Health Care Professionals
HCWs: Health Care Workers
HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus
PLWHIV: People Living With HIV/AIDS
Healthcare professionals operationally defined as professionally trained healthcare givers, occupy a potential position in HIV/AIDS preventative programs and management of HIV diagnosed patients (Jonathan, 2016). The attitude of Healthcare professionals (HCPs) influences the willingness and ability of PLWHA to access healthcare and influences the quality of healthcare they receive. Healthcare professionals’ attitudes may indicate their level of preparedness in caring for HIV/AIDS patients (Nooshin et al., 2015). Stigmatization and discriminatory attitudes of healthcare professionals toward HIV patients have numerous causes including: type of medical profession, lack of knowledge among HCPs about the modes and risk of HIV transmission, judgmental attitudes, assumptions about the sexual lives/immoral behaviour of people living with HIV, occupational risks from handling non-sterile injecting equipment or accidental exposure to blood or blood products, lack of access to supplies and training in infection prevention and standard precautions, despite the evidence that has revealed nonsexual contact with HIV/AIDS positive individuals and also taking careful precautions while working with blood, blood products and other body fluid of HIV patients carry no risk of HIV transmission (Mohammad and Kippax, 2010). Although the frequency of exposure to HIV patients, blood and body fluids (BBFs) among HCPs varies according to their occupation, procedures performed and use of preventive measures (Braczkowska et al., 2010). However, absence of assurance that they will be protected from the virus and without access to drugs for post-exposure prophylaxis, health workers may engage in behaviour that can prevent HIV patients and other vulnerable individuals from receiving lifesaving care and support. Stigmatization and discrimination impact negatively on interventions and act as barriers to adherence to antiretroviral therapy among PLWHA (Omosanya et al., 2013). HIV/AIDS-related stigmatization and discrimination has been defined as an undesirable, discrediting attribute, negative attitudes or action towards HIV-infected patients reducing their status in the society. Stigmatization and discrimination associated with HIV/AIDS are the greatest barriers to prevent further infections, providing adequate healthcare, support, treatment and alleviating the impact of HIV/AIDS. This may affect government efforts at curtailing the spread of HIV/AIDS (Famoroti et al., 2013). The factors affecting HIV/AIDS-related stigma and discrimination among healthcare professionals that have received most attention include exposure to PLWHA, level of medical education, knowledge about HIV and perceived infection risk at work (Hassen and Wahsheh, 2011). Interventions to reduce HIV/AIDS-related stigmatization in healthcare settings need to address different patterns of stigmatization and discrimination among healthcare professionals in different positions of authority and professional roles (Pharris, 2011). However, international principles of medical ethics and Nigerian health professional codes of conduct clearly provide for patient autonomy the right: to informed consent, quality healthcare and confidentiality of patient information (Amoran, 2011). In spite of the persistent discrimination and stigmatization associated with HIV patients, some healthcare professionals interact well and also politely communicate with them in discharging their duties. This positive attitude of caring, educating, counseling, and treatment of patients with HIV will result in improving their quality of life. The aim of this article is to evaluate attitudes and behaviors of healthcare professionals toward HIV/AIDS patients in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria.
This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria. Participants were selected randomly, 250 healthcare professionals including 50 physicians, 50 nurses, and 50 laboratory scientists 50 ward orderlies and 50 physiotherapywere selected due to frequent access to patients or patients’ blood sample as the nature of profession demanded. Participants completed a well-structured, self-administered questionnaire delivered to them at their workplace. Questionnaire was consisted of two sections: socio-demographic items and statements on attitudes and behaviors of Healthcare Professionals toward HIV positive patients. Verbal consent was received from the participants. However, Healthcare Professionals that are not willing to respond to questionnaire were excluded from the study. Data obtained from the questionnaire was analyzed using SPSS software version 9.
A total of 250 healthcare professionals participated in the study, 148(59.2%) were males and 102(40.8%) were females, Doctors had highest prevalence in male while Nurses had highest prevalence among female. Majority of the participants were aged between 30-40 years and Nurses had highest frequency. 153(61.2%) of healthcare professionals had been working between 0- 10 years and medical laboratory scientist had highest prevalence. Out of 195(78.0%) that were married, hospital orderlies had highest frequency. Among 236(94.4%) that were Christian religion, medical laboratory scientist had100%. Out of 235(94.0%) that know their HIV status, Medical laboratory scientist also had100%. 30(12.0%) of the participants had HIV/AIDS related training in last 5 years and Doctors had highest prevalence as showed in table1a. 195(78%) of HCPs were aware of HIV policy document in workplace, however hospital orderlies had highest prevalence among HCPs that do not aware or do not know about the HIV policy document in workplace. 216(86.4%) of participants had good knowledge about HIV/AIDS, also hospital orderlies had highest prevalence among participants that had fair or poor knowledge about HIV/AIDS. Out of 42(16.8%) of HCPs that were exposure to HIV infection in the last 6 months, nurses had highest prevalence. Among 215(86%) of HCPs that had access to post exposed treatments, Nurses had highest prevalence. Out of 205(82%) HCPs that had enough kits for standard precaution practices, medical laboratory scientist had highest prevalence. Among 72(28.8%) of HCPs that had direct contact with HIV patients at work, Nurses had highest prevalence. Out of 57(22.8%) HCPs that were involve in the treatment/care of HIV patients, Nurses had highest prevalence as showed in the table 1b. Statements of stigmatization and discriminatory attitudes by Healthcare professionals towards HIV patients in this present study includes HCPs working with HIV patients, emotions of HCPs towards people living with HIV and effectiveness of healthcare for HIV/AIDS patients by HCPs. In this study, majority of HCPs agreed that HIV patients should be on a separate ward and they should be notified if a patient has HIV. Majority of participants shows willingness to take care of HIV patients and believes that caring for HIV patients should be done with precautions. Also majority of HCPs that participated in the study agreed that the consequences of stigmatization and discrimination by HCPs towards HIV patients leads to denial of HIV patients having access to necessary treatment/quality healthcare which delayed initiation of HIV treatment, prevents HIV patients from disclosing their HIV status to others causing low turn-out for HIV counseling and testing. However, minority of HCPs agreed that beds of HIV patients should be marked, relatives of HIV patients should be notified even if without consent. Minority of HCPs believes that, HIV patients are responsible for their illness due to their immoral behaviors and deserve punishment for their behaviors, minority of HCPs that participated in this study exercise fear of becoming infected through patient care and believed that treating HIV patients is a waste of resources since HIV infection as no cure, their responses is showed in table 2a. Majority of HCPs that participated in this study agreed that, the mode of HIV Transmission are through unprotected sexual intercourse, transfusion of unscreened blood, sharing sharp objects with HIV infected, vaginal and semen secretions while minority of HCPs agreed that HIV can be transmitted through saliva, tears and sweat, insect bites, eating/drinking, hugging/touching or sharing the same toilet facility with HIV patients. Attitude of HCPs toward routine HIV counselling and testing (HCT) showed that majority of HCPs that participated in the study agreed with the statement of testing which attributed to the positive attitude of HCPs in the present study. However, minority of HCPs that participated in this study had attended a refresher course on HIV/AIDS. Majority of Healthcare professionals (HCPs) in this study demonstrated positive attitude and behaviour toward HIV patients during treatment of HIV/AIDS patients. However, minority of HCPs agreed that HIV/AIDS patients deserve to die and HCPs should allow relation to marry HIV patients as showed in the table 2b and 2c.
The most interesting findings of this study was the fact that most of the healthcare professionals showed positive attitudes towards HIV patients. Stigmatization and discriminating attitudes among HCPs in this present study is lower compared with other previous studies. Supporting the findings obtained in this study, it was assumed that the HCPs who were working in the tertiary hospitals would have less discriminatory attitudes than primary and secondary hospitals because in the tertiary hospitals, not all the HCPs were involved in providing healthcare and treatment to PLWHIV. Thus, HCPs from the tertiary hospitals were either involved in providing treatment or were not involved. On the other hand, HCPs in primary and secondary hospitals were all involved with either providing treatment or diagnosing HIV due to limited number of HCPs that are available (Mohammad and Kippax 2010). However, contrary to the findings in this study, Amoran reported that HIV related stigmatization is mostly prevalent in tertiary facilities among the health workers in Northern Nigeria (Amoran, 2011). This study revealed that, based on the year of working experiences, younger healthcare providers had more negative attitudes towards the care of HIV patients compared with the older healthcare providers. The rationale behind this is that older healthcare providers were more experienced to take care of these patients than younger HCPs (Caterina et al., 2014). A significant proportion of HCPs in this study had appreciable knowledge of the causes and prevention of HIV/AIDS. In spite of this, some HCPs had various misconceptions regarding how HIV/AIDS can be transmitted and how to handle the contagious nature of the disease. This study indicated that Nurses and ward orderlies were more feared of contagion while working with HIV patients compared to other HCPs in the study. These differences might be due to the nature of their duties because, Nurses and ward orderlies stay more often with the patients in the ward than other HCPs. Majority of HCPs in this study believes that the main modes of HIV transmission are unprotected sexual intercourse, unscreened blood transfusion, sharing sharp objects with HIV patients. However, very few HCPs are erroneous beliefs that HIV could be transmitted through insect bites, touching and hugging, sharing of toilet facilities with HIV infected persons. World Health Organization has reported that Casual contacts such as touching and hugging an HIV infected person does not result in HIV transmission. There is good evidence that HIV is not transmitted through close skin contact even over prolonged periods. The incidence of HIV transmission through accidental needle pricking is a rare, although HIV has been isolated from most body fluids such as blood, blood products, semen, vaginal secretions, saliva, tears, urine, breast milk, cerebrospinal and amniotic fluids, only blood, blood products, semen, vaginal secretions, donor organs/tissues and breast milk have been implicated as mode of HIV transmission. However, Saliva is known to be a hostile body fluid for HIV, which quickly inactivates the virus (Sylvia et al., 2003). Minority of HCPs who participated in this study felt that HIV infected patients are responsible for their illness and they deserve the punishment for their immoral behaviours, that they should die rather than being admitted into the hospitals or if they are admitted, their beds should be marked in the ward. Many of HCPs that participated in the study agreed that they cannot allow their relation to marry HIV patients. As observed in this study, lack of protective and other materials needed to treat and prevent the spread of HIV infection may contributes to discriminatory behaviours by the HCPs. Supporting the findings in this study, Reis Stated that lack of protective materials contributed to the reasons for HCPs not applying universal precautions, which cause discriminatory behavior among HCPs. Healthcare professionals that lack protective materials or resources may be afraid of treating or providing quality healthcare services to PLWHIV which lead to stigmatization and discrimination toward PLWHIV. In order to do their jobs safely and effectively, health professionals must be provided with adequate supplies of essential protective materials, to reduce the fear of being infected at work (Reis et al., 2005). In this study, majority of HCPs admitted that they have moral, strong legal and professional or ethical obligation as health workers to treat HIV/AIDS patients and to encourage their admission into the wards. Also, majority of HCPs that participated in the study were willing to treat HIV/AIDS patients. However, HCPs in this study recommended that, they should be inform any time HIV patients is admitted into the ward, so that they can apply better protecting manners so as not to be infected at work place. As observed in this study, majority of HCPs that participated in the study believed that caring, educating, counseling and treatment of HIV patients will result in improving their own quality of life, these positive attitudes of healthcare providers in this study might be likely due to their positive experience of caring for HIV patients. Negative attitudes by HCPs towards HIV patients while taking care of them might be fear of being infected at work (Teamur et al., 2009). This study revealed that hospital orderlies were more afraid of contagion while working with HIV patients compared with other HCPs in this study, these differences might be due to their level of knowledge and experiences regarding working with HIV patients. In this study, majority of healthcare professionals knows their HIV status, many of them readily surrendered themselves for the test without the fear of being stigmatized/discriminate if result turn positive. Many of HCPs support mandatory HIV test for all health care providers and they believe that HIV patients should not be treated in a separate ward, many of HCPs in this study shows warm receiving of HIV patients while carrying out their duties, this is similar to the Jonathan report that HCPs often embraced or hugged HIV patients who have not visited the clinics for a long time, with a smile, addressed them politely, readily offered them a seat and asked them about their health even before they were treated or counselled (Jonathan, 2016). This quality qualifies HCPs to be role models to discuss HIV testing with clients. Findings in this study is contrary to the findings of Amoran who reported that majority of Health workers were reluctant to have an HIV test done due to fear of stigmatization and that HIV patients should be treated in a separate ward (Amoran, 2011). This suggests that HIV stigma reduction programs should be developed to target the healthcare professionals in health sector to address professional attitude, cultural and religion beliefs along with scientific matters. Minority of the healthcare professionals in this study breaches the confidentiality by giving confidential information to a patient's family member or relatives without the patient's consent, this is similar to the findings of Amoran. Supporting their decision, that patient's relatives fulfil their responsibility to help the patient find a diagnosis and treatment, that when someone is sick, it is the family members who normally take decisions on care and treatment on behalf of the sick person, sometimes such close relatives contribute financially towards cost of treatment for the patient. The patient who is deemed incapable of taking such decisions on his own depends on relatives for treatment and other necessary support. This implies that relatives have to know what type of sickness the patient is suffering from to enable them to look for appropriate treatment. Family members often accompany patients to health care settings to assist with certain aspects of patient care in case of hospital admission (Jonathan, 2016). Minority of the healthcare professionals in this study had judgmental attitudes toward HIV patients believing that HIV/AIDS infection has been considered contagious as a result of immoral behavior and they should suffer for their morality. In view of this, it can be said that the unprofessional attitudes and behaviours of health workers in the present study were largely driven by judgmental attitudes toward HIV patients (Hill, 2010). Very few HCPs in this study believes that HIV/AIDS patients deserve to die because, HIV/AIDS is an incurable disease and HIV patients are bound to die of the infection no matter the efforts put in by HCPs. Supporting the findings in this study, Duh stated that stigmatization of HIV patients is based on the position that there is no cure for the disease and its patients are going to die anyway and unfounded fears about HIV/AIDS (Duh, 2008). Majority of HCPs in this study had not attended HIV/AIDS related training in last 5 years.it was observed that training, competence in the care of patients with HIV/AIDS and the prevention of HIV-related occupational risks are of paramount importance for HCPs. Regular training of HCPs, will equipped them with the requisite skills to relate well and treat HIV patients in a professional way compared to other health workers who have not received such training. This type of training will help HCPs to understand better the level of risks associated with caring for HIV patients and how to handle such risks. Training on how to care and treatment HIV patients will lead to a greater willingness by health workers to care for HIV patients with less negative attitudes and behaviours towards them. Other studies also found that HIV training equips health workers to behave well towards HIV patients during service provision. According to USAID report that, health care providers with HIV training had significantly higher knowledge scores than those without it, a result that is consistent with the possibility that HIV training can significantly improve such knowledge regarding HIV transmission and prevention. Their study further noted that AIDS education among health workers, particularly nurses, led to significant improvement in attitudes towards HIV patients (USAID, 2007). Few of HCWs in this study mentioned that they would not feel comfortable if their other patients and colleagues knew that they were involved in treating or providing care to HIV-positive patients, this is similar to previous study, that this is associated with social and economic risks influence of societal and familial prejudice and loss of earnings as working with PLHIV is negatively viewed by the society (Mohammad and Kippax, 2010; Wasiu, 2014). To reduce stigmatization and discrimination toward HIV patients in health care settings, there is need to address health care professionals’ fears about being infected on the job and the need to protect themselves through standard precautions. Fear of being infected at work is based on real risks due to their lack of access to supplies and training in infection prevention and standard precautions. There is mounting evidence that medical transmission is an important, yet largely neglected route of HIV transmission in resource-poor settings. It is becoming clear that HIV programs have paid insufficient attention to transmission in health care settings. The number of cases of HIV infection through medical transmission is certainly not trivial. Health workers’ negative attitudes and behaviours are driven by beliefs and myths about HIV/AIDS, lack of knowledge and skills in HIV/AIDS clinical management and counselling, lack of drugs and supplies, limited knowledge of the modes and risks of HIV transmission in health care settings and an over estimation of the risk of HIV infection following occupational exposure (Dahlui et al., 2015). However, international principles of medical ethics, professional obligation and Nigerian codes of conduct which clearly provide for patient autonomy; the right to informed consent, confidentiality of patient information, the right to quality healthcare and treatment would reduce the negative discriminatory attitudes among HCPs towards PLWHIV and protect their right.
Healthcare professionals should have access to up-to-date information on all aspects of HIV/AIDS through effective training on the modes of HIV transmission, prevention, counselling, guidelines for safe practice and the rights of PLWHIV, this would reduce discriminatory attitudes towards PLWHIV and also improve patients' care and access to quality healthcare services. HCPs should be competent to provide healthcare and counselling to patients, know the universal precautions and accept caring for people living with HIV/AIDS as their ethical and moral duty. A safe environment should be secured for all healthcare providers including the provision of protective equipment and materials that will shield them from exposure to HIV-infection and other blood-borne diseases.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
