AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8808/175
Lagos State University of Education, Oto/Ijanikin, Department of Counselling Psychology Education, College of Specialised and Professional Education, Kilometres 30, Badagry Expressway, P.M.B 2007 Ijanikin, Lagos State. Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Moruf Adebayo Abidogun, Lagos State University of Education, Oto/Ijanikin, Department of Counselling Psychology Education, College of Specialised and Professional Education, Kilometres 30, Badagry Expressway, P.M.B 2007 Ijanikin, Lagos State. Nigeria.
Citation: Moruf A. Abidogun, (2023), Application of Psychological Assessments in Mental Health Counselling, J, Clinical Case Reports and Studies, 4(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-8808/175
Copyright: ©, 2023, Moruf Adebayo Abidogun. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 26 July 2023 | Accepted: 10 August 2023 | Published: 15 August 2023
Keywords: psychological assessment; mental health and counselling implications
Psychological assessment of mental health is a vital practice in the field of psychology that facilitates a comprehensive understanding of an individual's cognitive, emotional, and behavioural functioning. This process involves the systematic utilization of diverse assessment tools and techniques to gather valuable information, enabling accurate diagnosis, treatment planning, and an enhanced understanding of an individual's psychological well-being. Through the integration of standardised questionnaires, clinical interviews, and observation, professionals gain insights into an individual's unique mental health condition. This paper explores the significance of psychological assessment in illuminating the intricate aspects of mental health, enabling tailored interventions that contribute to improved overall well-being.
Mental health refers to a person's emotional, psychological, and social well-being, encompassing their ability to handle stress, relate to others, and make choices. It includes our emotional, psychological, and social well-being. It affects how we think, feel, and act. It also helps determine how we handle stress, relate to others, and make choices. The history of mental health counselling was traced to the origins of philosophy on mental health from early Greek and Roman philosophers; the inhumane and humane treatments of those suffering from mental illnesses in the Middle Ages; the relevance of counselling in mental health as a profession during World War II, and the history of modern counselling in mental health paved the way for a distinct identity as a mental health counsellor (Gerig, 2014; Miguel, 2018).
Mental health is a state of well-being in which an individual realizes their own abilities, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively, and is able to make a contribution to their community (World Health Organization, 2001).
Mental health can also be understood as a dynamic state that involves a balance between one's cognitive, emotional, and behavioural faculties. According to Corey Keyes, a psychologist known for his work on the "dual continua model," mental health is not simply the absence of mental illness, but rather a continuum that ranges from languishing (low well-being) to flourishing (high well-being). This perspective underscores the importance of positive psychological functioning in addition to the absence of distress (Keyes, 2002).
Another influential concept in the field of mental health is the bio-psychosocial model, which was proposed by George Engel. This model suggests that mental health is influenced by a combination of biological, psychological, and social factors. It emphasises the interconnectedness of these factors in shaping an individual's overall well-being (Engel, 1977).
Mental health is often described in terms of resilience and the ability to adapt to life's challenges. Ann Masten, a psychologist, emphasizes the concept of resilience as the capacity to "navigate adversity in ways that result in competent functioning and well-being." This perspective underscores the dynamic nature of mental health and the importance of developing coping skills to effectively deal with stressors (Masten, 2001).
Mental health can also be seen through a positive psychology lens, as proposed by Martin Seligman. He introduced the concept of "well-being theory," which focuses on five key elements: positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment (PERMA). According to this theory, mental health involves not only the absence of distress but also the presence of positive aspects that contribute to a fulfilling life (Seligman, 2011).
The assessment invite clients to respond to questions about their mental state and subjective experiences. Psychologists and therapists depend on assessment tools to make decisions about the best course of treatment for clients seeking support for their mental health. Assessing mental health involves a multifaceted approach, encompassing both psychological. This methodologies provide insights into an individual's emotional well-being, cognitive functioning, and overall mental state.
Psychological assessment is a critical component of understanding and evaluating mental health and ill-health. It involves the systematic collection of information to diagnose, describe, and predict behaviour. Various methods and tools are used to assess an individual's emotional, cognitive, and behavioural functioning (Celestine, 2021).
Therefore, Psychological assessment of mental health involves the use of various tools, tests, and techniques to evaluate an individual's cognitive, emotional, and behavioural functioning. It aims to provide valuable information for diagnosis, treatment planning, and understanding a person's overall psychological well-being. Assessments can range from standardised questionnaires to clinical interviews, helping professionals gain insights into a person's mental health condition and tailor effective interventions.
Psychological Assessment of Mental Health
1. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), developed by Hathaway and McKinley in 1943, is a widely used self-report questionnaire that assesses various psychological disorders and personality traits. It provides insights into an individual's mental health and potential psychopathology.
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2)
First published in 1989, the MMPI-2 is the world’s most widely used psychometric test for measuring mental health ailments that feature as forms of psychopathology (Rogers, Robinson, & Jackson, 2016).
The scale features true–false statements, which assess 10 clinical sub-scales (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989):
In addition to these 10 primary clinical scales, the MMPI-2 contains three sub-scales to detect lying, defensiveness, and inconsistent responses. It features many additional content scales assessing specific cognitions, behaviours, physical experiences, and motivations, such as self-doubt, competitive drive, and gastrointestinal issues (Celestine, 2021).
2. Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), developed by Beck and Steer in 1990, is a self-report measure widely used to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms in adults and adolescents. It covers both physiological and cognitive symptoms of anxiety.
Commonly used mental health assessment is the Beck Anxiety Inventory. This inventory is a brief self-report test used to assess the severity of symptoms of anxiety. It includes detailed scoring to help practitioners identify whether clients’ presenting symptoms of anxiety are within a normal range or severe and debilitating.
The scale comprises 21 common symptoms of anxiety. Examples include:
Respondents indicate the frequency with which each symptom has bothered them for the past month on a 4-point scale, where 0 is ‘not at all,’ and 3 is ‘severely – it bothered me a lot.’ (Celestine, 2021).
3. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI):
The BDI, developed by Beck and colleagues in 1961, is a widely used self-report questionnaire that measures the severity of depressive symptoms. It assesses cognitive, affective, and physiological aspects of depression, helping clinicians monitor changes in symptomatology over time.
Self-report questionnaires, such as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), are valuable tools in assessing mental health conditions, allowing individuals to provide insights into their emotional experiences. Developed by Aaron T. Beck and his colleagues, the BDI is a widely used measure for quantifying the severity of depression symptoms (Beck, et.al., 1961),
The BDI consists of a series of questions that individuals respond to base on their experiences over the past two weeks. The questions cover various emotional and cognitive aspects related to depression, such as feelings of sadness, guilt, and worthlessness. Each item is scored on a scale, and the total score provides an indication of the severity of depressive symptoms.
One of the advantages of the BDI is its ease of use and accessibility. It can be administered quickly and is particularly useful for tracking changes in depression symptoms over time. However, it is important to note that the BDI is a self-report measure, meaning that the accuracy of the results depends on the individual's ability to reflect honestly on their experiences.
The BDI has been widely validated and has demonstrated good reliability and validity across different populations and cultures (Beck et al., 1988). It has also been updated over the years, with variations like the BDI-II offering improvements and refinements.
While self-report questionnaires like the BDI provide valuable insights into an individual's emotional state, they should ideally be used in conjunction with other assessment methods, such as clinical interviews, for a comprehensive understanding of mental health conditions.
Finally, a standard complement to the Beck Anxiety Inventory is the Beck Depression Inventory. Again, this inventory consists of 21 items and contains detailed scoring information to indicate whether symptoms are in a normal range or severe.
Respondents complete each item of the scale by selecting the statement that best reflects their current emotional state. For example, the first item and accompanying scoring are as follows:
4. Dissociation – Brief Dissociative Experiences Scale
Dissociation is a common characteristic of a range of mental health disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder and bipolar disorder (Hariri et al., 2015). Therefore, when clients show signs of dissociation, it may be wise to administer an assessment.
One widely used test assessing dissociation is the Brief Dissociative Experiences Scale.
This measure consists of eight items assessing the frequency with which a client has experienced various dissociative symptoms over the past seven days.
Example items from the scale are:
All items are presented on 5-point scales, where 0 is ‘not at all,’ and 4 is ‘more than once a day.’
5. Misophonia – Amsterdam Misophonia Scale
Misophonia is defined as a relatively unexplored chronic condition in which a person experiences autonomic arousal (analogous to an involuntary ‘fight-or-flight’ response) to certain innocuous or repetitive sounds such as chewing, pen clicking, and lip smacking (Edelstein, Brang, Rouw, & Ramachandran, 2013).
The experience of Misophonia can compel someone to avoid situations that may trigger this autonomic arousal, potentially making it difficult to work and socialize. Misophonic experiences have the potential to negatively impact mental health and quality of life.
One tool for assessing the experience of misophonia is the Amsterdam Misophonia Scale (Schröder, Vulink, & Denys, 2013).
This scale comprises six items assessing different features of misophonic experiences, including their frequency and the extent to which they disrupt a patient’s day-to-day functioning.
Example items from the scale are:
6. Intolerance of Uncertainty – Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale Short Form
The inability to tolerate uncertainty can have direct deleterious effects on mental wellbeing, how a client tolerates uncertainty may sometimes be a relevant focus for assessment (Celestine, 2021).)
The Short Form Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (Carleton, Norton, & Asmundson, 2007) is one of the most commonly used scales for assessing uncertainty intolerance and its effects on mental health.
This scale consists of 12 items asking respondents to indicate the extent to which they agree with a list of statements.
Example items from the scale are:
7. Structured Clinical Interviews:
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID) developed by First et al. (1995) is a comprehensive tool used by clinicians to diagnose a wide range of mental disorders.
Structured clinical interviews, like the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5), offer a comprehensive evaluation of psychiatric disorders. They involve a set of standardized questions and probes to ensure consistent and thorough assessments by clinicians.
Structured Clinical Interviews (SCIs) are systematic and standardized methods for assessing mental health conditions. They provide a structured framework for clinicians to gather information, make diagnoses, and ensure consistency across assessments. One notable example is the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5), developed by Michael B. First and his colleagues.
The SCID-5 follows the diagnostic criteria outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). It is designed to be administered by trained clinicians and offers a comprehensive set of questions for each disorder, covering symptoms, duration, and impairment. The structured nature of the interview reduces the potential for bias and ensures that all relevant criteria are addressed.
Structured clinical interviews like the SCID-5 are particularly useful when assessing complex or severe mental health conditions, as they guide the clinician through a thorough evaluation process. They enhance diagnostic accuracy and reliability by minimizing variability in questioning and interpretation (First et al., 2015).
However, it is important to note that structured interviews might not capture the full complexity of an individual's experiences. Clinicians should use their judgment and combine the interview findings with other assessment methods to form a comprehensive understanding of the individual's condition.
8. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7):
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) scale developed by Kroenke and colleagues in 2006, used to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms. According to Spitzer et al., (2006), the GAD-7 is a brief self-report tool designed to assess the presence and severity of generalized anxiety disorder symptoms. It aids in identifying anxiety-related issues and tracking treatment progress.
9. Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI):
Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), a structured diagnostic interview developed by Sheehan and colleagues in 1998. MINI covers a range of psychiatric disorders and follows criteria from the DSM-IV and ICD-10. It provides a standardized approach to diagnosing mental disorders, enhancing the reliability of assessments.
The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) is a structured diagnostic interview developed by Sheehan and colleagues to assess a wide range of psychiatric disorders. Designed for use by trained clinicians, the MINI serves as a valuable tool in diagnosing mental health conditions based on criteria from both the DSM-IV and ICD-10.
The MINI's structured format ensures consistent administration and covers major mental health disorders, including mood disorders (depression, bipolar disorder), anxiety disorders (panic disorder, social phobia), psychotic disorders (schizophrenia), substance use disorders, and more. It is comprehensive nature allows clinicians to quickly and reliably identify the presence of various mental health issues in a systematic manner (Sheehan et al., 1998)
One of the strengths of the MINI is its brevity, making it suitable for use in clinical practice, research settings, and epidemiological studies. The interview is divided into modules, each targeting a specific disorder. This modular approach enables flexibility in assessment, allowing clinicians to focus on relevant areas of concern.
The MINI has demonstrated good validity and reliability when compared to other diagnostic instruments (Lecrubier et al., 1997). It offers an efficient way to screen for a range of psychiatric disorders and provides a structured framework for making accurate diagnoses.
10. Neuropsychological testing:
Neuropsychological testing is a specialized form of assessment that evaluates cognitive functions, brain-behaviour relationships, and neurological conditions. These tests offer insights into an individual's cognitive strengths and weaknesses, helping to diagnose and understand cognitive impairments, brain injuries, and neurodevelopmental disorders.
One commonly used neuropsychological test is the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), developed by David Wechsler in 1955. The WAIS assesses various cognitive domains, including verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed. It provides a comprehensive profile of an individual's cognitive abilities and can be used for clinical and research purposes (Wechsler, 1955).
Another test, the Trail Making Test, assesses cognitive flexibility, attention, and visual-motor skills. It involves connecting numbered circles in order while alternating between numbers and letters. This test, developed by Reitan and Wolfson (1985), is widely used to evaluate executive functions and is particularly useful for detecting deficits associated with neurological conditions.
Neuropsychological tests are valuable for diagnosing conditions like traumatic brain injury, stroke, dementia, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). These tests provide objective measures of cognitive functioning, allowing clinicians to track changes over time and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.
It is important to recognize that neuropsychological testing should be conducted by trained professionals who understand the nuances of brain-behavior relationships and test administration. A comprehensive assessment often includes multiple tests to provide a well-rounded understanding of an individual's cognitive abilities.is a specialized form of assessment that evaluates cognitive functions, brain-behaviour relationships, and neurological conditions. These tests offer insights into an individual's cognitive strengths and weaknesses, helping to diagnose and understand cognitive impairments, brain injuries, and neurodevelopmental disorders.
The implications of psychological assessment for counselling are multifaceted which include:
1. Informed Interventions: Psychological assessments provide counselors with a deeper understanding of clients' mental health issues, enabling them to design more targeted and effective interventions. This personalized approach enhances the likelihood of positive outcomes.
2. Treatment Planning: Accurate assessment results aid counselors in developing tailored treatment plans. These plans can address specific areas of concern, taking into account clients' unique strengths and challenges, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of the therapeutic process.
3. Holistic Understanding: Through assessments, counsellors gain a comprehensive view of clients' cognitive, emotional, and behavioral patterns. This holistic understanding helps counsellors identify underlying factors contributing to clients' mental health struggles, leading to more insightful therapeutic discussions.
4. Measurement of Progress: Assessments provide a baseline for measuring clients' progress over time. Regularly administered assessments can help counselors track improvements, identify setbacks, and make necessary adjustments to treatment plans.
5. Client Empowerment: Involving clients in the assessment process can empower them by fostering self-awareness and insight into their own mental health. This self-awareness can be a catalyst for personal growth and active participation in the counseling journey.
6. Cultural Sensitivity: Psychological assessments can be adapted to consider cultural factors that influence clients' experiences and expressions of mental health. This promotes culturally sensitive counseling approaches that resonate with clients' backgrounds.
7. Ethical Considerations: Effective assessments require ethical administration and interpretation to ensure client privacy, consent, and well-being. Counsellors must navigate ethical dilemmas related to confidentiality, informed consent, and the potential impact of assessment results on clients.
8. Collaborative Relationship: Sharing assessment findings with clients fosters a collaborative counsellor-client relationship. This transparency promotes trust, as clients understand that interventions are tailored to their specific needs and challenges.
9. Differential Diagnosis: Accurate assessment helps counselors differentiate between various mental healths conditions, enabling more precise diagnosis.
This accuracy is crucial for developing appropriate treatment strategies.
10. Research and Evaluation: Aggregated assessment data can contribute to research efforts aimed at understanding the efficacy of different counseling approaches. This ongoing evaluation supports the evolution of evidence-based practices.
The integration of psychological assessment into counselling practice holds significant promise for enhancing the effectiveness and impact of therapeutic interventions. By systematically evaluating clients' cognitive, emotional, and behavioral aspects, counsellors can gain valuable insights that inform diagnosis, treatment planning, and progress monitoring. This comprehensive understanding allows for tailored and evidence-based interventions that address clients' unique challenges while capitalizing on their strengths. Ethical considerations, cultural sensitivity, and client collaboration are paramount throughout the assessment process. Moreover, the continual pursuit of professional development and the adaptation of assessment approaches ensure that counselors remain well-equipped to navigate the evolving landscape of mental health care. Ultimately, the thoughtful incorporation of psychological assessment amplifies the counselor's ability to guide clients towards improved psychological well-being, fostering resilience, growth, and meaningful change.
Psychological assessment plays a crucial role in identifying and understanding mental health conditions. These assessments offer valuable insights into an individual's emotional and cognitive well-being, guiding treatment and interventions.
Recommendations for effectively integrating psychological assessment into counseling practice:
By following these recommendations, counsellors can harness the power of psychological assessment to enrich their practice, enhance client outcomes, and provide a more personalized and effective counseling experience.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
