AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1897/129
1 Anesthesiology Service; ENCORE Hospital, Aparecida de Goiânia, Postal Code: 74905-350, Brazil,
2 Anesthesiology Service; Clianest, Goiânia, Postal Code: 74210-210, Brazil,
3 Intensive Care Unit; ENCORE Hospital, Aparecida de Goiânia, Postal Code: 74905-350, Brazil,
4 Cardiovascular Surgery, ENCORE Hospital, Aparecida de Goiânia, Postal Code: 74905-350, Brazil.
5 Scientific Coordination, ENCORE Hospital, Aparecida de Goiânia, Postal Code: 74905-350, Brazil. ual care in the intensive care unit.
*Corresponding Author: Giulliano Gardenghi. 5Scientific Coordination, ENCORE Hospital, Aparecida de Goiânia, Postal Code: 74905-350, Brazil.
Citation: Stanlley de Oliveira Loyola, Gustavo Siqueira Elmiro, Max Weyler Nery, Artur Henrique de Souza, Giulliano Gardenghi. (2022). Parameters Determining the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis, Journal of Surgical Case Reports and Images, 5(6) DOI: 10.31579/2690-1897/129.
Copyright: © 2022 Giulliano Gardenghi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 12 October 2022 | Accepted: 15 November 2022 | Published: 25 November 2022
Keywords: nalgesia; opiate substitution treatment; thoracic surgery; neuromuscular blockade
Cardiac surgery with sternotomy is related to a mechanism of intense trauma with the use of a large amount of opioids, which does not always provide good analgesic control, in addition to generating chemical dependence. The persistence of pain in the thoracic region in the postoperative period is common with conventional analgesia performed only with opioids, which slows the recovery, increasing costs and morbidity. New approaches to the analgesic control of these surgeries become important as they may be related to a better response to physiotherapy and cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and, consequently, a shorter hospital stay, which would reduce the costs of the surgery in addition to ensuring a more comfortable postoperative period for patients. Blocking the thoracic transverse muscle plane has become a promising pioneering technique for analgesic control in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery. We describe a case report in which this block gave better postoperative analgesic control, compared to the usual care in the intensive care unit.
transcutaneous procedures. Even when the surgical indication is superior in the literature to the detriment of the transcutaneous procedure, some patients opt for these because they have a minor trauma mechanism and a much more comfortable postoperative. Thus, pain in the postoperative period becomes an important factor in the patient's therapeutic decision and thus influencing in some cases even the prognosis [1].
The sternotomy performed in myocardial revascularization surgeries is associated with an intense trauma mechanism that leads to great difficulty in controlling analgesics in the postoperative period. The use of high doses of opioids is not always effective for a good analgesic control and, in addition, it can generate chemical dependence which confers greater morbidity and expenses [1]. Adequate control of postoperative pain is fundamental for the patient's full recovery, avoiding the possible chronicity of pain, contributing to better patient satisfaction, facilitating physical therapy and cardiopulmonary rehabilitation, reducing the length of hospital stay, with a reduced risk of pulmonary infection and complications [2].
An increase in the incidence of pulmonary complications can arise with postoperative ventilation restricted by pain, which can result in hypoventilation, atelectasis, pneumonia, and increased length of hospital stay. Thus, it is important to treat surgical chest pain properly and in such a way as to minimize the need for significant opioid administration [2].
Chronic and opioid abuse, currently threatening the health of the global population, has forced health care providers to reconsider possible analgesic options. Great efforts have been made to maximize analgesia, with the implantation of regional anesthetic techniques, in an attempt to reduce pain in multimodal analgesic techniques. These efforts were associated with improvements in ultrasound imaging technology and a renewed interest in the anatomical study that resulted in an increase in fascial plane blocks to assist in the provision of perioperative analgesia [3].
Chronic pain can develop after inadequate management of acute pain with isolated use of opioids, contributing to additional physiological and psychological stress and consuming disproportionate physical and financial resources [3]. The aim of this study was to report a case of analgesic control in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery with ultrasound-guided blockade of the thoracic transverse muscle plane (TTMP) before the physiotherapy sessions, in the intensive care unit environment. The present case report was evaluated by the research ethics committee linked to Brazil Platform and receiving its approval under number CAAE: 08 498819.8.0000.0033.
A 50-year-old male patient, overweight, sedentary, ex-smoker, with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Denies hypertension, diabetes and a positive history of early family CAD. Patient had cardiac catheterization on 05/29/2020 showing a right dominance pattern, with right coronary artery (RCA) with 100% lesion in the proximal third, anterior descending artery (ADA) with 90% lesion in the proximal third and another 100% lesion in the middle third, circumflex artery (CX) with lesions of 95% and 70% in the middle third.
On 06/03/2020, he underwent cardiac surgery for myocardial revascularization with left mammary bypass to diagonal and ADA, bypass for right marginal and RCA and bypass with left radial artery for first left marginal and sequential second left marginal. During surgery, neurological monitoring was performed by electroencephalographic bispectral index, mild sedation by pre-anesthetic medication, spinal anesthesia with 0.5% Bupivacaine 40mg + Dimorf 200mcg + Sufentanil 15mcg. He was intubated with sequential venous induction with Ketamin S + 1% propofol + Rocuronium, maintenance with sevoflurane. Activated clotting time (ACT) of 96 seconds and post protamine ACT of 154 minutes. Extracorporeal circulation time of 102 minutes and aortic clamping time of 76 minutes, successfully and without complications during the surgery.
In the first postoperative day, the patient evolved with significant dependent ventilatory pain, when evaluated by the service's assistance team, using the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) as demonstrated in figure 01, preventing physical therapy and cardiovascular rehabilitation.
Figure 1: Application of the visual analogue pain scale in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery, performed before and after blocking the thoracic transverse muscle plane
The usual pharmacological care measures were attempted orally to control pain, with no satisfactory response from the patient. He also had allodynia in the sternal region, without associated inflammatory signs, and the anesthesiology team was activated. Degermation and antisepsis were performed from the sternal region to the hemiclavicular line bilaterally with chlorhexidine and placement of sterile drapes. Positioning the longitudinally linear ultrasound probe 3 centimeters from the sternal border at the level of the 4-5th intercostal space, with a cephalic indicator on each side and the thoracic transverse muscle plane. Puncture was performed with a 17G Tuohy needle after anesthetic button and injected 20mL of 0.25% Ropivacaine on each side. Then, a 17G epidural catheter was inserted in the same plane (visible to the ultrasound) and left 5 centimeters in the referred fascial plane. At the end, fixation was performed by means of tunneling and bandage for new injections (figure 02).
Figure 2: Technique for performing thoracic transverse muscle plane block guided by ultrasound. A. Positioning of the linear probe 3 centimeters from the sternal border, at the level of the 4-5º intercostal space, longitudinal direction with cephalic indicator and identification of the plane; B. Performing an anesthetic button before inserting the Touhy 17G needle; C. Puncture performed in a plane and insertion of a 17G epidural catheter into the plane of the transverse thoracic muscle after injection of 20mL of anesthetic solution.
There was a significant reduction in pain, assessed using the VAS (Table 1).
Table I: Painful perception of the patient using the visual analogue pain scale before and after blocking the TTMP and during the physical therapy sessions performed after the blockage.
TTMP: thoracic transverse muscle plane; PO: postoperative; Data presented in absolute numbers based on the points indicated on the visual analog scale of pain by the patient
Three sessions of the TTMP block were performed, two on the first postoperative day and one on the second postoperative day, achieving a 75% reduction in painful perception in the first block, which allowed physiotherapy to be performed. The exercise session did not increase the patient's pain. The second session of the blockade was performed at night, despite the patient's pain being referred to as zero, to ensure the second physical therapy session and also a good night's sleep at the same time. Again, physical therapy was performed without increasing the patient's painful perception. The next day in the morning, the third block was performed, with the patient reporting a 2-point pain in VAS that fell to zero 30 minutes after the procedure. For the third time, physical therapy was performed without increasing the patient's painful perception, allowing pulmonary and cardiac rehabilitation to be carried out without complications. After that, the patient's painful perception remained low and new blocks were not necessary, after evaluation by the anesthesiology team. The patient was discharged on the fifth postoperative day, stable and with good analgesic control.
Our case report was able to demonstrate decreased pain levels after the adoption of the ultrasound-guided TTMP block. In the postoperative period of cardiovascular surgeries, the control of chest pain may become a major challenge. High doses of opioids are not always effective for good analgesic control and, in addition, the incidence of opioid addiction increases as larger amounts are administered postoperatively [4], which significantly increases costs and morbidity [1].
The chronic use of opioids has become a major concern, in the USA opioid dependence has already been declared a public health emergency. In 2017 there were 47,600 deaths related to its use, which already represents more deaths each year than collisions. motor vehicles or breast cancer [4]. The prescription of opioids on discharge from the postoperative period of cardiac surgery increases the risk of chemical dependence, with approximately 1 in 10 patients undergoing cardiac surgery can develop its chronic use [4]. The TTMP block thus becomes an important adjuvant therapy not only for analgesic control, but also for reducing the need for opioids, especially after hospital discharge, and might be an option in cases like the one here described.
The persistence of pain in the thoracic region due to ineffective analgesia can limit pulmonary expansion, making it difficult to perform physiotherapy and cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in addition to increasing the likelihood of chronic pain. Poorly controlled acute surgical pain can be highly debilitating and has been associated with chronic pain seen in about 20% of patients after sternotomy5. Restricted postoperative ventilation can result in atelectasis, hypoventilation, pneumonia, and increased hospital stay2. To combat such complications, the performance of postoperative physiotherapy is essential and proves to be effective in restoring ventilatory capacity and minimizing complications, as previously demonstrated by our group [6]. In the case presented here, the analgesia induced by the TTMP block enabled all sessions to be carried out without complications.
Historically, TTMP block was initially used in the resection of breast cancer with contraindication to general anesthesia. It can be done by injecting 15 mL of levobupivacaine (0.15%) between the transverse thoracic muscle and the internal intercostal muscle between the third and fourth left ribs in connection with the sternum. A landmark to identify the TTMP is the short-axis view of the internal thoracic artery and vein, which superficially locates the transverse chest muscle. When the tip of the needle is considered to achieve TTMP on the ultrasound image, a small amount (less than 2 mL) of the local anesthetic test dose is injected after confirmation of negative aspiration. If the local anesthetic spreads are seen above the costal cartilage in the sagittal parasternal view, then the local anesthetic was injected superficially into the internal intercostal muscle. The local spread of the anesthetic deep in the costal cartilages indicates an appropriate block [7].
It is important to highlight that the TTMP blocks are not free of drawbacks. Potential complications are rare and include bleeding, infection, pneumothorax and local anesthetic intoxication8. Because this technique is performed with ultrasound guidance, it greatly reduces the risk of both pneumothorax and bleeding and poisoning by local anesthetic, it also has the advantage of not entering the neuroaxis and thus not presenting contraindications in relation to the use of anticoagulation [9].
Thus, TTMP blocks may become an optional analgesia modality in cardiovascular surgeries, considering that it not only provides better analgesic control, sparing opioids, reducing chronic pain and length of hospital stay, but also has an exceptionally low rate of possible complications. In order to obtain better pain control in the postoperative period of cardiac surgeries, involving other professionals in the discussion about therapeutic options, as in the case in question, where the anesthesiology team was called, was essential for the presentation of a new path that made it possible to decrease the patient's pain, since the conventional analgesic measures proposed by the attending physician in the intensive care unit were not effective.
The major limitation of this article is the fact that it is only a case report involving a single patient. For TTMP blocks to be considered a therapeutic option at massive levels, randomized clinical trials are necessary and shall be performed in the future.
In the present case, the TTMP block was effective in reducing pain in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery and may be a tool in the anesthesiology arsenal.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
