Opinion | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2688-7517/004
1 St. Joseph Women’s Hospital, Florida, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Whitney Eldridge, St. Joseph Women’s Hospital, Florida, USA
Citation: Whitney Eldridge (2019) Pediatricians Should Know About Kratom: A Pediatrician’s Perspective, Addiction Research and Adolescent Behaviour, 2(1) DOI: 10.31579/2688-7517/004
Copyright: © Whitney Eldridge, (2019). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 05 December 2018 | Accepted: 11 January 2019 | Published: 21 January 2019
Keywords: neonatal abstinence syndrome; pediatrician; kratom; NAS
Kratom is an herbal alkaloid dietary supplement that acts agonistically at opioid receptors. It is increasingly used by those with opioid dependency to treat symptoms of opioid withdrawal. Classification and regulation of kratom is controversial. Currently it is unregulated, widely available and heavily advertised. Advocates tout its potential to help those with opioid dependency however risks to kratom use are well documented. It has been associated with dependency, withdrawal, toxicity and more recently neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) or withdrawal in newborns. For these reasons, pediatricians need to be aware of its existence and potential to impact their patients.
In the current opioid epidemic, opioid use among pregnant women and the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is on the rise [1, 2]. NAS is a constellation of withdrawal symptoms in newborns secondary to chronic in utero exposure. It is most frequently attributed to maternal prescription and illicit opioid use [3]. Compounding the stress that can come with pregnancy, mothers with opioid addiction also face guilt over opioid’s effects on their unborn babies, obstacles to finding obstetrical providers comfortable with caring for opioid-dependent mothers, and fear over social services involvement [4]. It is understandable that pregnant women with opioid addiction would look to over-the-counter non-opioid alternatives advertised as safe and effective for treatment of opioid withdrawal. Indeed, non-opioid treatments of opioid addiction would seem to offer benefits for both mother and baby. In the current opioid crisis, search for such alternatives has intensified. Kratom, an herbal supplement, is heavily advertised as a natural, non-opioid aid for opioid withdrawal and is increasingly used by those with histories of opioid dependency [5,6,7]. It is likely that pediatricians will increasingly encounter kratom exposure in newborns and pediatric patients.
Kratom is indigenous to Southeast Asia and has long been used there recreationally and medicinally to treat opium addiction [8, 9]. It is an indole alkaloid and its main components, mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, act as agonists at opioid receptors. Mitragynine is less potent than morphine, while 7-hydroxymitragynine is more potent. Their binding to opioid receptors induces an opioid-like analgesia and euphoria but seemingly without respiratory depression and other noxious symptoms attributed to morphine. Kratom also interacts with non-opioid receptors (α-2 adrenergic, serotonin and dopamine receptors) which may be associated with its perceived lack of respiratory depression [9, 20].
Chronic users of kratom can develop dependency. Abstinence results in withdrawal symptoms similar to that of opioid withdrawal: rhinorrhea, insomnia, lacrimation, myalgias, arthralgias, myoclonus, depression, anxiety, and increased pain severity [8, 13, 21-23]. Symptoms of kratom toxicity seen in adults include: palpitations, chest pain, tachycardia, hypertension, diaphoresis, altered mental status, agitation, central nervous system depression, seizures, diarrhea, abdominal pain and hepatotoxicity [22, 23]. Withdrawal has been managed with clonidine and opioids and toxicity with benzodiazepines [22, 23].
Kratom use in the United States is on the rise and is increasingly used by those with opioid dependency to treat opioid withdrawal. It is available for purchase online and in stores as a tea, powder or capsules. Online users testify to its alleviation of opioid withdrawal and its addictive potential [5-7, 24]. Its classification as an opioid is debated. Advocates argue its alleviation of opioid withdrawal without respiratory depression make it a potential therapeutic for opioid dependency and regulating it would potentially harm those who use kratom to successfully overcome opioid addiction [25-27]. Without regulation products marketed as kratom have the potential to be adulterated to achieve a higher potency and mixed with dangerous contaminants such as a recently linked Salmonella outbreak [28-30]. Kratom is illegal in several states and the US Drug Enforcement Administration has considered scheduling kratom. In February 2018 the US Food and Drug Administration released a statement classifying kratom as an opioid based on review of the scientific literature and computational modeling of its receptor binding [31]. Policing kratom may stifle efforts to research its potential therapeutic benefits and adverse effects. [32] Currently, kratom is unregulated and widely available for purchase.
Kratom’s effects on pregnant women and the fetus and newborn are largely unknown. Few cases are reported in the literature but seem to be increasing among pregnant women with a history of chronic opioid use. Women experience withdrawal when discontinuing kratom and their newborns can develop NAS requiring pharmacologic treatment, prolonging hospital stay and potentially resulting in separation of mom and baby. Symptoms seen in newborns are typical of NAS due to opioids (diarrhea, tachypnea, excessive cry, excoriations, poor feeding) and seem to present 1—2 days after birth [22, 23, 33-37]. The American Kratom Society (https://www.americankatom.org/science) does not recommend use of kratom by pregnant or breastfeeding women. Transmission through breastmilk is unstudied, but one case reports improvement in withdrawal symptoms with breastfeeding [35]. Most of the published cases of kratom use by pregnant women do not report amounts consumed, however duration and frequency are cited as chronic and daily [22,23,33-37].
Kratom cannot be detected on standard urine drug screens but qualitative immunologic assays are in development [38, 39]. Detection in urine is by liquid chromatography or mass spectrometry. Time to results is highly variable but can take 1-2 weeks, well after signs of withdrawal present [33]. Pediatricians and obstetricians must rely on history-taking to suspect kratom exposure and should enquire about kratom use from all women with a history of opioid dependency. Some recommend screening for kratom in all pregnant women with a history of opioid use by sending urine for specialized testing [33].
Pediatricians, obstetricians and those caring for pregnant women and newborns with potential substance exposure need to be aware of kratom and its potential for dependency and withdrawal. Further research is needed to guide management of kratom-exposed newborns and pregnant women. Providers caring for pregnant women should counsel mothers on the risk of using kratom for their health and their babies’ just as they would any other legal substance with the potential to negatively impact pregnancy.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, What distinguishes International Journal of Clinical Case Report and Review is not only the scientific rigor of its publications, but the intellectual climate in which research is evaluated. The submission process is refreshingly free of unnecessary formal barriers and bureaucratic rituals that often complicate academic publishing without adding real value. The peer-review system is demanding yet constructive, guided by genuine scientific dialogue rather than hierarchical or authoritarian attitudes. Reviewers act as collaborators in improving the manuscript, not as gatekeepers imposing arbitrary standards. This journal offers a rare balance: high methodological standards combined with a respectful, transparent, and supportive editorial approach. In an era where publishing can feel more burdensome than research itself, this platform restores the original purpose of peer review — to refine ideas, not to obstruct them Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi, FCCP PULMONOLOGIST AND THORACIC IMAGING.
Dear Reader: We have published several articles in the Auctores Publishing, LLC, journal, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports in recent years (CMRR). This is an ‘open access’ journal and the following are our observations. From the initial invitation to submit an article, to the final edits of galley proofs, we have found CMRR personnel to be professional, responsive, rapid and thorough. This entire process begins with Catherine Mitchell, Editorial Coordinator. She is simply outstanding, and, I believe, unparalleled in her capacity. I cannot imagine a more responsive and dedicated Editorial Coordinator. As I read the dates and timing of her correspondence with us, it seems that she never sleeps. I hope Auctores Publishing, LLC, appreciates her efforts as much as these authors do. Thank you to Auctores Publishing, LLC, to the Editorial Staff/Board, and to Catherine Mitchell from a grateful author(s).