AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1053/232
1Department of Pathological Anatomy, Arrazi Hospital, University Hospital of Mohammed VI - Marrakech / Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Marrakech - Cadi Ayyad University Marrakech/Morocco.
2Guelmim Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy - Ibn Zohr Agadir University Guelmim- Morocco 81000.
3Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Mohammed VI - Marrakech / Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Marrakech - Cadi Ayyad University Marrakech/Morocco.
4Department of Radiology, Arrazi Hospital, University Hospital of Mohammed VI - Marrakech / Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Marrakech - Cadi Ayyad University Marrakech/Morocco.
*Corresponding Author: Imane Boujguenna, University Hospital of Mohammed VI - Marrakech / Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Marrakech - Cadi Ayyad University Marrakech/Morocco.
Citation: H. Rachidi, I. Boujguenna, C. Dabaj, M. Dref, A. Moutaouakil, et al, (2025), Unusual Location of a Melanoma: Consider it in The Presence of Decreased Visual Acuity, J. Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics. 9(2); DOI:10.31579/2640-1053/232
Copyright: © 2025, Imane Boujguenna. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 28 February 2025 | Accepted: 07 March 2025 | Published: 14 March 2025
Keywords: melanoma; choroid; histology; immunohistochemistry
Choroidal melanoma (CM) is malignant neoplasm of melanocytes in choired. It is the most common intraocular malignant neoplasm in adults. The diagnosis is based on histological and immunohistochemical examination. These tumors have a pejorative prognosis and their evolution is marked by the appearance of metastases especially in the liver. Currently, the development of genomic analyzes has led to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in oncogenesis. Therapeutic management has become much more difficult since the appearance of conservative treatments to keep the eye. We report a new case of choroidal melanoma in a 29-year-old patient diagnosed at the pathology department of the Mohammed VI CHU (Marrakech, Morocco). The aim of this work is to study the anatomo-clinical and evolutionary aspects of this infrequent entity.
Choroidal melanoma develops from melanocytes located in the choroidal tract, which consists of the choroid, ciliary processes, and iris. It is the most common tumor among intraocular tumors [1]. Its appearance may be linked to the degeneration of melanocytes or a nevus. The clinical symptoms as well as the radiological assessment allow for the suspicion of choroidal melanoma, but the definitive diagnosis relies primarily on histopathological examination combined with immunohistochemical study. It is a serious disease marked by a high rate of metastases, particularly hepatic. We report a case of primary choroidal melanoma in a 29-year-old patient. Based on this observation, we will analyze the anatomo-clinical characteristics of choroidal melanomas and describe the morphological particularities of the different histological types.
Clinical presentation: Mr. H.E, 29 years old, with no particular pathological history, consulted for a progressive decrease in visual acuity of the right eye over the past 2 months without any other associated signs. The ophthalmological examination revealed decreased visual acuity with a normal anterior segment examination. The posterior segment examination highlighted a convex, achromic subretinal mass in the vitreous, and the ocular tension was 11 mmHg. The fundus examination revealed the presence of a pigmented lesion in the superotemporal quadrant. It was then decided to perform an ultrasound, which showed the presence of a dome-shaped hypoechoic choroidal lesion in the superotemporal region with signs of choroidal excavation and without rupture of Bruch's membrane (Figure 1). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed and showed the presence of a focal intravitreal thickening adherent to the temporal sclera of the right eye, measuring approximately 3 mm and extending over about 10 mm, convex inward in T1 hyperintensity, T2 hypointensity, associated with a vitreous detachment (Figure 2). A hepatic ultrasound showed the absence of metastases. Given these clinical and paraclinical data strongly suggesting a malignant melanoma, enucleation seemed to be the best solution, thus allowing for a pathological examination of the globe. On the macroscopic level, the optic nerve was resected up to 0.3 cm. Upon opening the sclera, a small lesion of dark color and translucent appearance was present. Upon histological examination, the lesion corresponded to a malignant tumor proliferation with a lobular architecture. It is made up of large cells, sometimes globular, sometimes spindle-shaped. The nuclei are large, housing a prominent nucleolus. Presence of abnormal mitoses estimated at 4 mitoses/10 fields at high magnification. Their cytoplasm was loaded with melanic pigments. The stromal reaction was fibro-inflammatory. Presence of associated tumor necrosis. The margin of the optic nerve was healthy. Absence of invasion of the lamina cribrosa, ciliary body, and sclera (Figure 3). The immunohistochemical study was conducted and showed a cytoplasmic staining of the tumor cells with the anti-Melan A antibody and the anti-HMB45 antibody (Figure 4). The patient was then followed up regularly and so far, no distant metastasis has been detected.
Figure 1: On ultrasound, a dome-shaped hypoechoic choroidal lesion in the superotemporal quadrand with a sign of excavation choroidal and without rupture of the Bruch's membrane.
Figure 2 : At the MRI, a temporal choroidal lesion of the right eyeball shows hyperintensity on T1, hypointensity on T2, and enhancement after contrast agent injection.
Figure 3 : Upon histological examination, it is a mixed malignant tumor proliferation with lobular architecture. It is composed of large cells, sometimes epithelioid, sometimes spindle-shaped.
Figure 4 : The immunohistochemical study revealed a cytoplasmic staining of tumor cells with the anti-Melan A antibody and the anti-HMB45 antibody.
Choroidal melanoma is the most common intraocular malignant tumor in adults with an incidence of 6 to 7.2 per million per year and represents 5% of all melanomas [2]. A growth in the number of cases reported annually has been noted and can be explained by an increase in the incidence of the disease and the attention given to its diagnosis. The average age of diagnosis is 55 years with a male predominance [3]. It is rarely observed before the age of 20 [4]. Its etiology has not yet been elucidated. Congenital melanosis and congenital nevi have been identified as predisposing factors [5]. It is more common in individuals with light skin and light-colored irises. However, the links between sun exposure and the development of choroidal melanoma have not been proven [6]. This tumor originates from the melanocytes of the choroidal tract, which consists of the iris, ciliary processes, and choroid. Clinically, the symptoms primarily depend on the topography and size of the lesion. Located most often at the level of the choroid, the tumor is generally asymptomatic at first. The increase in size subsequently causes a scotoma or poorly systematized visual disturbances, which form the alert symptoms in most cases [7]. The fundus examination remains a key test for the diagnosis and evaluation of choroidal melanoma. It is complemented by ultrasound, which typically shows a convex image at the vitreous level with low echogenicity and a less echogenic area at its posterior part due to the attenuation of the tumor tissue and also the presence of a choroidal excavation. MRI serves as an adjunct in therapeutic decision-making and allows for the specification of the lesion's characteristics, as well as its extension to the optic nerve and orbit. The lesion appears as hyperintense on T1 and proton density, and hypointense on T2 with a clear but variable enhancement [8]. In the presence of any clinical and paraclinical suspicion of a choroidal melanoma, histological confirmation is always necessary.
The performance of a cytological biopsy of an intraocular tumor is the subject of numerous controversies because it exposes the patient to the risk of dissemination, retinal detachment, and hemorrhage. Histopathological analysis remains the key examination. It allows to confirm the diagnosis of choroidal melanoma, to evaluate the histoprognostic criteria, and to specify the topographic extension [9]. From a histological perspective, two classical forms of choroidal melanoma are distinguished based on the morphotype of the tumor cells. The distinction between spindle cells and epithelioid cells can be difficult. Choroidal melanomas with spindle cells have a better prognosis and are characterized by very elongated cytoplasm with poorly visible boundaries and a small nucleus with a small or imperceptible nucleolus. Choroidal melanomas with epithelioid cells that have a more severe progression are often large, globular, with clear cytoplasmic boundaries, and contain a vesicular, voluminous, and nucleolated nucleus. In our case, the described histological form is the mixed form. The topographic analysis of choroidal melanomas must focus on the ciliary body, the iris, and the lamina cribrosa. The search for intra-vascular extension must be conducted carefully, as well as extra-scleral extension. The status of the optic nerve as well as that of the peri-nerve meningeal sheaths must be specified [9,10]. It seems important to us to emphasize a determining factor for prognosis, which is the size of the tumor. The diameter of the tumor is measured at the level of the widest implantation base. Beyond a certain thickness and width, it becomes uncertain to consider conservative treatment because the preservation of the eye may only be temporary [11]. The search for the expression of melanocytic differentiation markers (Mélan A and HMB45) is rarely done routinely [10]. These markers are useful in highlighting a minimal tumor infiltrate located intra-vascularly or intra-neurally. Its main differential diagnosis is intraocular carcinomatous metastasis. More rarely, in the presence of a tumor localized in contact with the ciliary processes, one should consider a leiomyoma or a schwannoma. Therapeutic management remains controversial and complex. Conservative treatment should be adopted whenever possible. However, if the melanoma exceeds a certain size, it is no longer reasonable to attempt to save the eye at all costs [12]. In about half of the patients, regardless of the treatment, the progression is marked by the development of metastases, often located in the liver. These metastases develop rapidly after the initial diagnosis, occurring mainly within the 3 years following local treatment. The prognosis is then poor with a median survival of 6 months. Choroidal melanoma is a very simple pathology from a genetic standpoint, which contrasts with its often severe progression. It is most often a mutation of the GNAQ or GNA11 genes that represents the initiating molecular anomaly. The nature of the acquired anomalies seems to be decisive for the course of the disease: an inactivating mutation of the BAP1 gene characterizes tumors with a high risk of metastasis, whereas mutations of SF3B1 or EIF1AX are associated with lesions with a favorable outcome [12].
Choroidal melanoma is a serious disease, marked by a high rate of metastases, particularly hepatic. Histopathological examination allows for a positive diagnosis and specifies the histoprognostic factors. Recent progress has been made, allowing for a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the oncogenesis of choroidal melanoma.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
