AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2688-7517/064
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biopharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.
2Department Pharmaceutics and Drug Development, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu, Nigeria
3Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, State University of Medical and Applied Sciences, Igbo-Eno, Nigeria.
4Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Nnenna Ajagu, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biopharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.
Citation: Nnenna Ajagu, Nnadi I. Favour, Adaora A. Ugwu, Kalu B. Arunsi, Maureen Aneto, (2025), Undergraduate Students’ Industrial Work Experience in Pharmacy Education: A Revelation for the Future, J. Addiction Research and Adolescent Behaviour, 8(1) DOI:10.31579/2688-7517/064
Copyright: © 2025, Nnenna Ajagu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 10 March 2025 | Accepted: 19 March 2025 | Published: 26 March 2025
Keywords: knowledge; attitude; perceptions; computer science students; pharmacy students; industrial training (IT) program, SIWES
Background: The Students Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES) is a training program aimed at preparing higher education students for future industrial careers.
Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on computer and pharmacy students at Enugu State University of Science and Technology, utilizing a self-administered questionnaire. Data were cleaned and coded in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS (IBM Corp) version 27, employing descriptive statistics for variable description and inferential statistics to assess relationships between categorical variables, with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
Results: In the study, out of the 205 questionnaires distributed, 198 questionnaires were retrieved. One hundred and six (106) participants are female and ninety-two (92) males. Most (87.9%) believed that SIWES effectively exposes students to real-world job situations. Furthermore, 77.8% strongly agreed that the curriculum offers substantial learning opportunities. Notably, 40% of computer science students reported a positive view of the SIWES program, compared to only 6% of pharmacy students (χ2(1) =6.147; p=0.046). Similarly, 72.5% of computer science students viewed the curriculum favorably, compared to just 6% of pharmacy students (χ2(1) =8.217; p=0.016).
Conclusion: The students had a good knowledge of the aim of SIWES and a positive attitude toward the SIWES program.
The Students’ Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES), or industrial training, is a crucial period during which students gain practical experience with a company during a semester break [1]. This hands-on training equips students with essential skills, industry knowledge, and work ethics, allowing them to apply their university learning in real-world settings. It is a vital component of higher education curricula, enabling undergraduates to acquire work experience and expertise while completing their studies [2]. This experience enhances communication, managerial skills, confidence, and career prospects across various disciplines [1,2]. Additionally, it is important to refocus course curricula on practical knowledge and effective execution. Establishing training facilities near or within universities is essential, as many students prefer training locations close to residential areas [3].
Hands-on work experience is a longstanding tradition, originating from the apprenticeship system of the Middle Ages [4]. However, its purpose has evolved from skills training for professional practice to preparing work-ready graduates across disciplines at the institutional level [5,6], in which students gain insight into how theory applies in practice through industrial training, which is highly valued by employers seeking graduates with practical experience. Consequently, most academic institutions now integrate industrial training into their curricula, acknowledging its significance [6,7]. This training not only prepares students professionally but also enhances their self-confidence and fosters a commitment to lifelong learning [7,8]. Many alumni of educational administration programs regard industrial training as the most valuable aspect of their education [9].
Invariably, the Students Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES) is a human capital development initiative in Nigeria that provides pharmacy students with practical training in real-world pharmacy settings [10]. This program allows them to apply theoretical knowledge to patient care, drug dispensing, and other pharmacy operations, effectively bridging the gap between classroom learning and professional practice [11,12]. It is a vital part of their education, preparing them for the workforce after graduation. However, students sometimes encounter a disparity between their academic knowledge and industry requirements, along with insufficient feedback and evaluation of their performance, which can hinder the learning experience [11]. Likewise, a study among engineering students revealed the necessity of well-structured industrial training to develop professional skills and relevant experience for their future careers [13]. Such training instills confidence in organizations when hiring future employees and requires considerable focus from students, institutions, and industries [13]. These programs significantly enhance graduates' chances of securing employment in a competitive job market [14]. However, a review of the literature reveals a lack of studies focused on pharmacy students. This study aims to compare the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pharmacy students and computer science students regarding the SIWES program at Enugu State University of Science and Technology.
Study Design
The study a cross-sectional study conducted between April 2024 and August 2024 in the Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu State, Nigeria. A questionnaire was used as a research tool to compare the knowledge, attitude and perception of pharmacy students and computer science students towards industrial training. Computer science students were randomly selected for this comparison because computer science program has been the oldest department in the university and have conducted numerous successful SIWES programmers for their students.
Study Setting
The study was conducted at Enugu State University of Science and Technology, on establishment, the University which was conceived on a Presidential model after Harvard University made impressive landmarks and stamped its name as the first University of Technology and first State University in Nigeria with her main campus at Agbani, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, is located at Agbani in Enugu State, Nigeria and its vision and mission are vigorously pursued.
Sampling and Sample Size
According to the SIWES coordinator for both pharmaceutical sciences and computer sciences, at the time of conducting this study there were 72 students in 500 level of the of the faculty of pharmaceutical sciences and 190 students in 400 level students of the department of computer science of Enugu State University of Science and Technology. These levels of students were selected for the study because most of the students must have undergone and completed the mandatory industrial training program. The sample size was determined using Taro Yamani's statistical formula, the number of students in pharmaceutical sciences and computer science, assuming a confidence level of 95% with a confidence interval of +/-12 in each case, a sample size of while sample size was 190 (61 and 129 from pharmaceutical sciences and Computer science respectively) were deemed fit for the study. An addition of 10% of the calculated sample size (190) was added to accommodate non-usable questionnaire due to improper filling (making a total of 205 i.e., 64 Faculty of pharmaceutical sciences students and 194, computer science students).
Simple random sampling technique was used to select students that made up the sample for the study. The sampling technique is preferred to ensure a greater degree of representation and decreasing the probability of sampling error in the sample.
Eligibility Criteria
Students who were eligible for inclusion in the study were either in 4th year computer science or 5th year in pharmaceutical science within the study period 2023/2024 academic session and were required to have been actively studying at the Enugu State University of Science and Technology. Students willingly provided informed consent to participate in the study. Students in other levels of computer science or pharmaceutical sciences were excluded. Also, students from other level asides student from other faculties and departments were excluded and those that refused consent were excluded from the study.
Study Instrument
A 19-item questionnaire was adapted questionnaire from a 2020 study by Balkhi, B in 2020(17), modified to fit the research focus. The initial draft was face-validated by four academic staff overseeing the SIWES program in pharmacy and computer science. The questionnaire consists of two parts: Section i, gathers respondents' biodata (level, gender, and department), while Section ii, features five items divided into three sub-sections assessing students' knowledge, attitude, and perception of SIWES. The instrument employs a 5-point Likert scale: Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Undecided (UD), Disagree (D), and Strongly Disagree (SD). A pilot survey with 10 respondents from the Department of Applied Microbiology and Brewing yielded a Cronbach alpha of 0.8
Data Collection
The instrument was administered directly to the respondents with the help of two research assistants. The research assistants were trained in a one-day interaction during which the researcher got them acquainted with the purpose of the study and explained to them how to administer and collect the instrument. Survey instruments were disseminated on a face-to-face basis to all students selected for the study from selected departments. Responses were promptly recorded at the location of interaction, and respondents were not permitted to retain the questionnaires for subsequent reference.
The data was cleaned with Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science version 27. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages were used to summarize all the variables. Inferential statistics such as chi-square test were used to determine the association between categorical variables. The significance level was set at p≤0.05.
Socio-demographic characteristics of Respondents (N=198)
This shows a nearly equal gender distribution, most of the participants are female 106 (53%) compared to males 92 (46%). Most of the students, 102 (51.5%) fall within the 18-25 years age group, followed by those aged 25-30years, 73 (37%), while a smaller portion is above 30 years old 22 (11%), and only 1 (0.5%) are below 18. Other details are shown in Table 1.
| Variables | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| Gender | ||
| Female | 106 | 53 |
| Male | 92 | 46 |
| Age (years) | ||
| <18> | 1 | 0.5 |
| 18 -25 | 102 | 51.5 |
| 25 – 30 | 73 | 37 |
| >30 | 22 | 11 |
| Department | ||
| Computer science | 135 | 68 |
| Pharmaceutical sciences | 63 | 32 |
| Religion | ||
| Christianity | 184 | 93 |
| Islam | 2 | 1 |
| Traditional | 12 | 6 |
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of Respondents (N=198)
Knowledge of Industrial Training
This section reveals the level of the respondents' knowledge of the Industrial Training (IT) program (Table 2). A majority, (73.2%), felt their academic background adequately supported their participation in the program. However, most students considered the pre-program orientation insufficient. Half of the respondents believed the IT program met its objectives, though many remained undecided or disagreed. Perceptions about the difference between classroom concepts and industry practices varied, with most respondents not perceiving a disparity, while a notable portion did. Importantly, (76.8%) acknowledged that they gained knowledge during the IT program. In all, less than half (45.5%) of the participants had good knowledge. A significant portion of the respondents (39.9%) fell into the moderate knowledge category. Lastly, (14.6%) of the respondents were categorized as having poor knowledge (Table 3).
| Statement | SD | D | U | A | SA | Mean ± SD |
| Was there quality academic background to carry out industrial training program? | 13 (6.6) | 15 (7.6) | 25 (12.6) | 56 (28.3) | 89 (44.9) | 3.97±1.215 |
| Was there enough orientation before the industrial training program? | 62 (31.3) | 43 (21.7) | 16 (8.1) | 51 (25.8) | 26 (13.1) | 2.68±1.469 |
| Were the expected objectives achieved at the end of the training program? | 17 (8.6) | 21 (10.6) | 51 (25.8) | 55 (27.8) | 54 (27.3) | 3.55±1.236 |
| Are the concepts used in the classroom different from those in the industry? | 70 (35.4) | 22 (11.1) | 16 (8.1) | 43 (21.7) | 47 (23.7) | 2.87±1.640 |
| Was there knowledge gained during the industrial training? | - | 2 (1.0) | 5 (2.5) | 39 (19.7) | 152(76.8) | 4.72±0.560 |
Table 2: Knowledge of Respondents
SD=Strongly Disagree D=Disagree U=Undecided A=Agree SA=Strongly Agree
| Classification | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| Good knowledge | 90 | 45.5 |
| Moderate knowledge | 79 | 39.9 |
| Poor Knowledge | 29 | 14.6 |
| Total | 198 | 100 |
Table 3: Classification of Respondents knowledge (N=198)
Attitude towards industrial training
A significant majority (87.9%) strongly agreed that IT is crucial for exposing students to real work-life situations, with only 0.5% strongly disagreeing and 2.0% undecided. When asked if IT is a waste of time, 61.1% strongly disagreed, and 16.2% disagreed, further supporting the positive view of IT. However, 12.1% remained undecided, while 10.6% agreed or strongly agreed with the negative perspective. Regarding whether IT fosters self-motivation, 66.2% strongly agreed and 28.8% agreed, with only 0.5% strongly disagreeing. Opinions on the importance of the IT scheme varied: 30.3% agreed and 24.7% strongly agreed, while 27.3% were undecided, and 17.7% disagreed or strongly disagreed. Lastly, perspectives on whether IT promotes good occupational judgment were mixed, with 26.3% strongly agreeing, 25.8% agreeing, 35.4% undecided, and 12.7% disagreeing (Table 4). Nearly half of the respondents (45.5%) had a positive attitude toward the IT program, while 38.9% showed a negative attitude, and 15.7% expressed a moderate attitude (Table 5)
| Statement | SD | D | U | A | SA | Mean± SD |
| Industrial training is an important strategy to expose students to real work life situations | 1 (0.5) | - | 4 (2.0) | 19 (9.6) | 174 (87.9) | 4.84±0.484 |
| Industrial training a waste of time | 121 (61.1) | 32 (16.2) | 24 (12.1) | 9 (4.5) | 12 (6.1) | 1.78±1.191 |
| Industrial training encourages self-motivation to carry out tasks | 1 (0.5) | - | 9 (4.5) | 57 (28.8) | 131 (66.2) | 4.60±0.627 |
| Students take the scheme as an important task | 20 (10.1) | 15 (7.6) | 54 (27.3) | 60(30.3) | 49 (24.7) | 3.52±1.229 |
| Industrial training helps in exercising good occupational judgment at all times | 15 (7.6) | 10 (5.1) | 70 (35.4) | 51(25.8) | 52(26.3) | 3.58±1.154 |
Table 4: Attitude towards industrial training program (N=198)
| Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) | |
| Positive Attitude | 90 | 45.5 |
| Moderate Attitude | 31 | 15.7 |
| Negative Attitude | 77 | 38.9 |
| Total | 198 | 100 |
Table 5: Respondents’ attitude classification
Perception towards Industrial training
Most respondents had a positive view of the integration of theory into practical applications, with 48.5% strongly agreeing and 39.9% agreeing that the program effectively connected theoretical knowledge with real-world experience. Furthermore, many participants valued the social interactions fostered by the IT program, with 56.1% strongly agreeing and 36.9% agreeing. The program was also recognized for providing significant learning opportunities, as indicated by the strong agreement of 77.8% of respondents (Table 6). In all, majority of respondents (55.1%) perceived the IT program positively, indicating favorable views on its effectiveness and benefits. Conversely, 31.3% expressed negative perceptions, reflecting some dissatisfaction, while 13.6% held neutral views, indicating ambivalence. This distribution shows that although most participants viewed the program positively, a significant minority had critical opinions, highlighting diverse perspectives on its impact and effectiveness (Table 7)
| Statement | SD | D | U | A | SA | Mean ±SD |
| Was there sufficient training to meet expectations? | 26 (13.1) | 44 (22.2) | 35 (17.7) | 39 (19.7) | 54 (27.3) | 3.26±1.407 |
| It to integrate theories into real-life application? | 3 (1.5) | 3 (1.5) | 17 (8.6) | 79 (39.9) | 96 (48.5) | 4.32±0.816 |
| Were there challenges and stimulating tasks during the training period? | 10 (5.1) | 16 (8.1) | 32 (16.2) | 65 (32.8) | 75 (37.9) | 3.90±1.147 |
| Was there social experience with colleagues from other schools? | 3 (1.5) | 3 (1.5) | 8 (4.0) | 73 (36.9) | 111 (56.1) | 4.44±0.777 |
| Does industrial training provide learning opportunities? | 1 (0.5) | 2 (1.0) | 3 (1.5) | 38 (19.2) | 154 (77.8) | 4.73±0.593 |
Table 6: Perception towards Industrial training (N=198)
| Classification | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| Positive perception | 109 | 55.1 |
| Neutral perception | 27 | 13.6 |
| Negative perception | 62 | 31.3 |
| Total | 198 | 100.0 |
Table 7: Classification of Respondents’ perception (N=198)
Relationship between respondents’ socio-demographics and knowledge about IT program
A higher percentage of female students (51, or 53.8%) demonstrated good knowledge of the industrial training program compared to male students (39, or 43.3%) (χ2(1) = 0.762; p = 0.683). Additionally, students aged 18-25 years showed greater knowledge of the IT program, with 50 (55.6%) possessing good knowledge compared to those in other age groups (χ2(3) = 5.231; p = 0.514). Overall, no significant association was found between gender, age, and knowledge of the IT program (Table 8).
| Variables | Good Knowledge | Moderate Knowledge | Poor Knowledge | χ2 (df) | p-value |
| Gender | 0.762 (1) | 0.683 | |||
| Female | 51 (53.8%) | 41 (51.9%) | 14 (48.3%) | ||
| Male | 39 (43.3%) | 38 (48.1%) | 15 (51.7%) | ||
| Age (years) | 5.231 (3) | 0.514 | |||
| <18> | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| 50 (55.6%) | 39 (49.4%) | 13 (44.8%) | ||
| 26-30 | 29 (32.2%) | 30 (38.0%) | 14 (48.3%) | ||
| > 30 | 10 (11.1%) | 10 (12.7%) | 2 (6.9%) | ||
| Department | 4.018 (1) | 0.134 | |||
| Computer science | 64 (71.1%) | 48 (60.8%) | 23 (79.3%) | ||
| Pharmaceutical sciences | 26 (28.9%) | 31 (39.2%) | 6 (20.7%) | ||
| Religion | 1.687 (2) | 0.793 | |||
| Christianity | 85 (94.4%) | 73 (92.4%) | 26 (89.7%) | ||
| Islam | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Traditionalist | 4 (4.4%) | 5 (6.3%) | 3 (10.3%) |
Table 8: Association between respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics and Knowledge (N=198)
Relation between respondents’ socio-demographics and attitude towards IT program
A higher percentage of female students (53 or 59.6%) exhibited a positive attitude towards the industrial training program compared to male students (37 or 40.4%) (χ2(1) = 1.909; p = 0.385). Similarly, more computer science students (54 or 60.0%) had a positive attitude towards the IT program than pharmacy students (36 or 40.0%) (χ2(1) = 6.147; p = 0.046). Overall, the department was significantly associated with the respondents' attitudes towards the IT program (Table 9)
| Variables | Positive Attitude | Neutral Attitude | Negative Attitude | χ² (df) | p-value |
| Gender | 1.909 (1) | 0.385 | |||
| Female | 53 (59.6%) | 15 (48.4%) | 38 (49.4%) | ||
| Male | 37 (40.4%) | 16 (51.6%) | 39 (50.6%) | ||
| Age (years) | 5.903 (3) | 0.437 | |||
| <18> | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| 18 -25 | 48 (53.3%) | 18 (58.1%) | 36 (46.8%) | ||
| 26 – 30 | 25 (27.8%) | 9 (29.0%) | 39 (50.6%) | ||
| >30 | 16 (17.8%) | 4 (12.9%) | 2 (2.6%) | ||
| Department | 6.147 (1) | 0.046 | |||
| Computer science | 54 (60.0%) | 21 (67.7%) | 60 (77.9%) | ||
| Pharmaceutical sciences | 36 (40.0%) | 10 (32.3%) | 17 (22.1%) | ||
| Religion | 3.800 (2) | 0.434 | |||
| Christianity | 81 (90.0%) | 31 (100.0%) | 72 (93.5%) | ||
| Islam | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.3%) | ||
| Traditionalist | 8 (8.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (5.2%) |
Table 9: Association between respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics and Attitudes (N=198)
Association between respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics and perception
Students aged 18-25 had a more positive perception of the IT program (n=56, 51.4%) compared to other age groups (χ2(3) = 6.198; p = 0.398). Additionally, a higher percentage of Computer Science students (n=54, 60%) had a positive attitude towards the IT program than Pharmacy students (n=79, 72.5%; χ2(1) = 8.217; p = 0.016). Overall, there was a significant association between the department and respondents' perceptions of the IT program (Table 10).
| Variables | Positive Perception | Neutral Perception | Negative Perception | χ² (df) | p-value |
| Gender | 1.281 (1) | 0.527 | |||
| Female | 58 (53.2%) | 17 (63.0%) | 31 (50%) | ||
| Male | 51 (46.8%) | 10 (37.0%) | 31 (50%) | ||
| Age (years) | 6.198 (3) | 0.398 | |||
| <18> | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | ||
| 18 -25 | 56 (51.4%) | 14 (51.9%) | 32 (51.6%) | ||
| 26 – 30 | 46 (42.2%) | 8 (29.6%) | 19 (30.6%) | ||
| >30 | 7 (6.4%) | 5 (18.5%) | 10 (16.1%) | ||
| Department | 8.217 (1) | 0.016 | |||
| Computer science | 79 (72.5%) | 22 (81.5%) | 34 (54.8%) | ||
| Pharmaceutical sciences | 30 (27.5%) | 5 (18.5%) | 28 (45.2%) | ||
| Religion | 1.972 (2) | 0.741 | |||
| Christianity | 100 (91.7%) | 26 (96.3%) | 58 (93.5%) | ||
| Islam | 2 (1.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Traditionalist | 7 (6.4%) | 1 (3.7%) | 4 (6.5%) |
Table 10: Association between respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics and perception (N=198)
In this study, 198 students completed the survey, primarily fourth- and fifth-year computer science and pharmacy students, comprising 68% and 32% respectively. Most respondents were aged 18-25 years (51.5%). A significant number strongly agreed that they had a solid academic foundation for industrial training. While many felt that the objectives of the SIWES program were met, however, most disagreed regarding the adequacy of orientation before the program. A review noted concerns about the SIWES program's effectiveness in bridging the gap between theory and practice [18]. Overall, respondents demonstrated a good knowledge of SIWES; notably, female students displayed better knowledge than their male counterparts, and those aged 18-25years showed greater knowledge compared to other age groups.
On the assessment of attitude, most respondents believe that IT is essential for exposing students to real work situations and fosters self-motivation in task completion. Overall, there was a positive attitude towards the program, with female students expressing more positivity about the SIWES program than male students. Additionally, computer science students had a more favorable attitude than pharmacy students. The respondents' attitudes towards the IT program were also significantly influenced by their department. This aligns with a study, which found that the SIWES positively impacted accounting education students' attitudes towards the accounting profession [19].
This study also revealed that most students strongly agree that industrial training integrates theory with real-life applications and offers opportunities to enhance what they learned in school. They also felt it aids their professional development, echoing the findings on Covenant University students' perceptions of the SIWES program, which they viewed as relevant to their studies, introducing them to new work methods and fostering personal growth [20][15]. Overall, the majority had a positive perception of the program, particularly those aged 18-25, and computer science students were more favorable than those in pharmacy. A significant statistical relationship exists between students’ perceptions and their respective departments.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
