AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/396
University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Faculty of Medicine, Dakar -
*Corresponding Author: Aliou Alassane Ngaide, University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Faculty of Medicine / Cardiology Department, Dalal Jamm Hospital, Guédiawaye, PO Box 16506, Dakar – Senegal.
Citation: Ngone D. Gaye, Aliou A. Ngaide, Joseph S. Mingou, Rougui Diop, Malick Bodian, Alassane Mbaye, et al, (2024), Heart Sound Analysis Using SAINet Incorporating CNN and Transfer Learning for Detecting Heart Diseases, J Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 7(9); DOI: 10.31579/2641-0419/396
Copyright: © 2024, Aliou Alassane Ngaide. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 22 July 2024 | Accepted: 31 July 2024 | Published: 09 August 2024
Keywords: tuberculous pericarditis; epidemiology; diagnosis; treatment;senegal
Introduction: The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency of tuberculous pericarditis and to describe its diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic aspects.
Methodology: We conducted a retrospective descriptive and analytical study over five years from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, at the General Hospital Idrissa POUYE in Dakar. The study focused on patients aged over 18 years who were hospitalized for tuberculous pericarditis, with or without effusion, and treated with antituberculous drugs according to the protocol established by the National Tuberculosis Control Program (PNLT) of Senegal. This work was carried out in collaboration with the hospital management after obtaining approval from the cardiology department by signing the access form to patient records. Data were entered using Sphinx software version 5.1.0.2 and analyzed with SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software version 18.
Results: We identified 108 cases of pericarditis from all causes, representing a hospital prevalence of 1.95%. Among these, 42 were of tuberculous origin, with a hospital prevalence of 0.76% and 38.89% of all pericarditis cases, with a male predominance (sex ratio of 1.33). The mean age was 28.6 ± 10 years, with a predominance in the 20-29 age group (57.1%). More than half of the patients (57.1%) had a low socio-economic status, and 42.85% had a history of contact with tuberculosis. Symptoms were mainly dyspnea and chest pain (78.57% each). Tachycardia (85.7%) and pericardial friction rub (42.9%) were frequently observed. The pericardial puncture fluid was sero-hematic in 66.7%, and the study showed a positive Rivalta test with lymphocytic predominance. The adenosine deaminase (ADA) level in the pericardial puncture fluid, performed in 12.5% of patients, was positive. HIV serology was positive in 10% of cases. Cardiac ultrasound showed effusion in all patients, with a large amount in 64.29% of cases. All patients received antituberculous treatment, with 35.7% also receiving corticosteroids. The average hospital stay was 11 days, with complication rates of pericardial constriction (14.3%) and deaths (7.1%).
Conclusion: Tuberculous pericarditis remains a significant health issue, particularly among patients of low socio-economic status and those with a history of contact with tuberculosis. Despite the availability of treatments, complication and mortality rates remain considerable, highlighting the need for early diagnosis and comprehensive management.
Tuberculous pericarditis is a significant complication of tuberculosis; its diagnosis can be challenging and often delayed or missed, leading to late complications such as constrictive pericarditis and increased mortality [1]. Tuberculous pericarditis occurs in approximately 1 to 2% of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis [2]. It constitutes a relatively common condition, representing an average of 7% of cardiovascular diseases in Africa [3]. In a series of 294 immunocompetent patients in Spain with acute pericarditis, tuberculous pericarditis accounted for 4% of cases [4]. The tuberculous etiology has seen a resurgence with the advent of HIV/AIDS, particularly in Africa [5, 6]. Countries with high HIV prevalence have observed a marked increase in tuberculous pericarditis. For instance, in a series of Tanzanian patients with significant pericardial effusions in 1994, all HIV-infected patients had tuberculous pericarditis [7]. The incidence of tuberculous pericarditis in the United States has declined alongside the decreased prevalence of tuberculosis [8, 9]. However, in U.S. regions with large immigrant populations from endemic tuberculosis countries, extrapulmonary tuberculosis, including tuberculous pericarditis, is still observed with some frequency [10, 11].
In rare cases, the initial phase of tuberculous pericarditis is identified by biopsy or autopsy as isolated granulomas in the pericardium. Typically, the first recognizable phase of pericardial infection is the second phase, characterized by a lymphocytic effusion. The diagnostic yield of pericardial fluid and tissue for acid-fast bacilli smear and culture is generally highest during the effusion stage [12, 13]. Without treatment, effusion resorption and symptom resolution occur within two to four weeks in about 50% of cases [14]. Tuberculous pericarditis should be considered in the evaluation of patients with non-resolving pericarditis, especially in the context of tuberculosis exposure risk factors [4].
Antituberculous treatment has been shown to significantly reduce mortality in patients with tuberculous pericarditis, from 80 to 90% [15] to 8 to 17% in non-HIV-infected individuals [16, 17], and from 17 to 34% in HIV-infected individuals [18]. It has also been demonstrated to reduce the likelihood of constrictive pericarditis, from 88% to 10 to 20% of treated cases [19, 20].
In Senegal, many studies have focused on the epidemiological, clinical, and evolutionary aspects of pericarditis, but few have specifically addressed tuberculous pericarditis. Hence, our study aimed to determine the frequency of tuberculous pericarditis and describe its diagnostic, therapeutic, and evolutionary aspects.
This was a descriptive and analytical study with retrospective data collection. The study spanned a period of 5 years from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Included in the study were patients aged 18 years and above, hospitalized in the cardiology department of General Hospital Idrissa Pouye during the study period for tuberculous pericarditis with or without effusion, treated with antituberculosis drugs according to the protocol established by the Senegalese National Tuberculosis Control Program (PNLT). Tuberculous origin was presumed based on one or more suggestive signs, as specific signs of tuberculosis were absent. Presumptive signs included a history of tuberculosis contact with general health deterioration, an exudative pericardial fluid rich in lymphocytes, positive adenosine deaminase (ADA) or GeneXpert test in pericardial fluid, positive tuberculin skin test, and favorable response to antituberculous treatment.
We examined socio-demographic aspects, cardiovascular risk factors, clinical, paraclinical, therapeutic, and evolutionary data. Hospitalization duration was expressed in days, and circumstances of death were also noted. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and recorded in an exploitation form. The survey form was validated by an expert committee comprising three cardiologists and one epidemiologist with at least 4 years of experience. This work was conducted in collaboration with hospital management following approval from the cardiology department by signing the patient records access form.
Data analysis was performed using Epi Info version 7 and R Studio version 4. Descriptive analysis presented qualitative variables as frequencies and percentages, and quantitative variables as means with standard deviations, ranges, and medians. Bivariate analysis involved correlating tuberculous pericarditis with other variables. Chi-square tests (Fisher and Pearson) and Yates' corrected Chi-square test were used to compare proportions. A relationship was considered statistically significant when the p-value was less than 0.05.
During the study period, we identified 108 cases of pericarditis, all causes combined, representing a hospital prevalence of 1.95%. Among these cases, 42 were of tuberculous origin, with a hospital prevalence of 0.76% and a prevalence of 38.89% among all pericarditis cases. The majority of patients were male with a male-to-female ratio of 1.33. The mean age of patients was 28.6 ± 10 years, with a predominance in the age group of 20 to 29 years (57.1%) (Figure 1). The distribution of patients by age and gender consistently showed a clear predominance in the 20 to 29-year age group, with a balanced sex ratio (1) for this age group. Housewives and students were the most represented professions. The majority of patients (51.1%) resided in downtown Dakar. More than half of the patients (57.1%) had a low socio-economic status (Figure 2).
Figure 1: Distribution of the population by age group (n = 42).
Figure 2: Distribution of patients by socio-economic level (n = 42).
In terms of medical history, a history of tuberculosis contact was found in 42.85% of patients and pulmonary tuberculosis in 7.14% of cases. Clinically, functional signs were dominated by dyspnea and chest pain (78.57
The findings of this study provide significant insights into the epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutic characteristics of pericarditis, particularly of tuberculous origin, in a Senegalese hospital setting. The hospital prevalence of pericarditis at 1.95% and tuberculous pericarditis at 0.76% underscore the importance of this pathology in our setting. Tuberculous pericarditis, caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is found in approximately 1% of all autopsied cases of tuberculosis and in 1% to 2% of pulmonary tuberculosis cases [21]. It is the most common cause of pericarditis in Africa and in other countries where tuberculosis remains a major public health issue [22]. In a series from the Western Cape province in South Africa, tuberculous pericarditis represented 69.5% (162 out of 233) of cases referred for diagnostic pericardiocentesis [23], compared to 38.89% in our study and 36% in the study by Bouakez [24].
Most available data on tuberculous pericarditis (TBP) come from developing countries where the burden of tuberculosis is high and co-infection with M. tuberculosis and HIV is common [25]. The incidence of tuberculous pericarditis in sub-Saharan Africa is increasing due to the HIV epidemic, and this trend is likely to be seen in other parts of the world where HIV spread leads to a resurgence of tuberculosis [26, 27]. In the Western Cape, half of the patients with large tuberculous pericardial effusions are HIV-infected [23].
In these geographical regions, TBP accounts for 50 to 70% of effusive pericarditis cases in HIV-negative patients and over 90% in HIV-positive patients [8]. In developed countries, TBP is rare (4% of effusive pericarditis cases) [28, 29, 30].
The male predominance (male-to-female ratio of 1.33), relatively young mean age of patients (28.6 years), and high proportion of housewives and students indicate that pericarditis, especially tuberculous, mainly affects young adults who are often exposed to precarious living conditions, which has significant socio-economic implications. These findings were similar to those of Zabsonre [31] in Burkina Faso, who found male predominance (sex ratio 1.92), and Saïd [32] in France with a mean age of 45 years.
Our study found a low socio-economic status in over half of the patients (57.1%), whereas it was low in all patients in the study by Aimé Arsène Yaméogo [33], which could be an aggravating factor, highlighting the importance of living conditions in the emergence of this disease.
The history of tuberculosis contact (42.85%) and pulmonary tuberculosis (7.14%) among patients underline the strong association between tuberculosis and pericarditis in our study. This is consistent with the literature [34, 35, 36, 37], which indicates that tuberculosis is a major cause of pericarditis in regions with a high prevalence of tuberculosis.
Clinical symptoms, dominated by dyspnea and chest pain (78.57%), as well as cough (42.86%), are in line with typical manifestations of pericarditis as described in the literature [24, 32, 33]. The high prevalence of tachycardia (85.7%) and pericardial friction rub (42.9%) on physical examination confirms these observations. Extracardiac signs, such as pleural effusion (71.4%) and spontaneous jugular vein distension (57.1%), indicate systemic involvement and increased disease severity.
Diagnostic investigations showed biochemical disturbances, such as leukocytosis (35.71%) and elevated CRP (92.86%), which are markers of inflammation and infection typical in tuberculosis. Pericardial fluid analysis revealed a predominance of serosanguinous fluid (66.6%) and a positive Rivalta test with lymphocytic predominance, consistent with characteristics of tuberculous pericardial effusions.
The negativity of GeneXpert MTB and AFB testing in a significant proportion of cases underscores the diagnostic challenges of tuberculous pericarditis, despite suggestive clinical and biochemical signs. The negative pericardial fluid culture in 78.57% of cases reflects the low sensitivity of traditional culture methods for tuberculosis. Early diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis (TBP) through microbiological methods is very challenging due to the low number of mycobacteria in pericardial fluid. Confirming mycobacteria in the sample through culture requires several weeks [38]. Advances in recognizing TBP rely on the introduction of molecular methods, which are based on amplifying specific genetic fragments of M. tuberculosis [37].
The antituberculous treatment protocol used, in line with national recommendations, appears appropriate given the nature of the disease. However, the administration of oral corticosteroids in 35.7% of cases and aspirin in 14.3% of cases indicates a combined therapeutic approach to manage inflammation and prevent complications.
The average hospitalization duration of 11 days, although relatively short, indicates effective hospital management. Nonetheless, the unfavorable short- and medium-term outcomes in 21.4% of cases, including complications such as pericardial constriction (14.3%) and deaths (7.1% in our study versus 13.3% in Saïd's study in Morocco [32]), highlight the severity of the disease and the need for rigorous patient follow-up after discharge.
This study has several important limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. Firstly, the sample size was limited to 108 cases of pericarditis, including 42 of tuberculous origin. This small sample size may reduce the statistical power of the study and limit the generalizability of the results. The absence of pericardial biopsy to confirm the diagnosis is also a notable limitation. This study was conducted in a public hospital, which may introduce biases related to the studied population. Patients seeking care in public hospitals may have specific socio-economic profiles, often more disadvantaged, which could influence the prevalence and clinical presentation of tuberculous pericarditis. Additionally, the hospital where the study was conducted is located in the suburbs of Dakar. This location may affect the study's results in terms of representing the general population of Dakar and Senegal.
This study highlights the significance of tuberculous pericarditis in our context and the associated diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis remains complex in Senegal, largely due to limited resources available to patients. Sophisticated diagnostic tools, such as GeneXpert MTB and microbiological cultures, showed limited sensitivity in this study. Improving socio-economic conditions, preventing and early treating tuberculosis, along with appropriate medical follow-up, are crucial to reduce the incidence and morbidity associated with this condition.
While this study provides valuable insights into tuberculous pericarditis in a specific hospital setting, it has limitations that need consideration. Further future studies with larger sample sizes, improved diagnostic tools, and diverse study sites are necessary to confirm and extend these findings. These studies should refine diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to improve outcomes for patients with tuberculous pericarditis.
This study was approved by the ethics committee of Cheikh Anta Diop University of Dakar and was carried out in collaboration with the hospital management after obtaining approval from the cardiology department by signing the access form to patient records.
Not Applicable
The data and materials of this study are available upon request and ready to be shared. For further information, please contact the corresponding author, Aliou Alassane NGAIDE.
None of the other authors have any conflicts of interest or relevant disclosures.
The study did not receive any funding.
Authors and Contributors:
Ngone Diaba GAYE and Abdoul KANE designed the study protocol, participated in the data collection and writing of the draft manuscript.
Aliou Alassane NGAIDE and Malick BODIAN oversaw the execution of the study, participated in data analysis and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Rougui DIOP and Maboury DIAO participated in study design and in data analysis.
Joseph Salvador MINGOU and Alassane MBAYE participated in statistical analysis and interpretation of results.
Sincere thanks to Professor Abdoul Kane for his unwavering support, his foresight, and his exemplary management.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
