AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Short communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/ijme.2019/004
*Corresponding Author: Cherepennikov Vladislav, Honorary academician of the International Academy, director of the all-Russian scientific 432046 Gusev street 6, Ulyanovsk, Russia.
Citation: Cherepennikov Vladislav (2019) Science must be protected from itself. Not perceived, not conscious of the planetary crime of the century. Construction of a general theory of physical interactions by solving faraday and maxwell's own mechanical models.J. International Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 1(1): Doi: 10.31579/ijme.2019/004
Copyright: © 2019 Cherepennikov Vladislav. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 05 November 2019 | Accepted: 06 December 2019 | Published: 16 December 2019
Keywords: mechanical essence of physical interactions
The evidence of outstanding scientists testifying to the insolvency of the quantum-relativistic subconscious is presented, and it is proposed to change the currently dominant anti-scientific paradigm by solving their own mechanical models of Faraday and Maxwell for scientific discussion and making the right decision in choosing the path of further research.
"The extraordinary seriousness of the sad consequences of the crisis in natural science for the fates of earth’s civilization is not apprehended by the mighty of this world, "bureaucratized infected monopoly nomenclature elite of the Russian Academy of Sciences /G.S. Khromov/" and not brought to the consciousness of the broad masses." Professor V.V. Kuzmin. [1]
"Almost from time immemorial, from Democritus and Epicurus, through Archimedes, Descartes, Galileo, Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Helmholtz to Hertz, Kelvin and Rayleigh clearly dominated the desire to create a mechanical picture of the world. According to the great representative of classical mechanics V. Thomson: "The true meaning of the question: do we understand or do not understand the physical phenomenon-is as follows: can we build our own mechanical model or not?»"- was forced to admit the former President of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, academician S. I. Vavilov.
"The new facts were, however, and remain now, in this sense, to understand – continues Sergey Vavilov. The collapse of the mechanical worldview and the enormous growth of mathematical symbolism drew physicists either towards a stubborn, stubborn rejection of new physics, hopeless attempts at mechanical explanation of non-mechanical phenomena, or to idealism of various forms and shades.
There were no other ways, if we talk about the spontaneous roads of experimenters who did not think about the methodological lessons of the new physics.
The metaphysical materialists are essentially vanquished, and vanquished, above all, by practice, by the concrete results of the new physics, and by the utter practical sterility of their own conjectures. In the field of solving specific fundamental issues, mechanical physics has not yielded anything over the past 30 years. These enemies, the last Mohicans, have long suffered a decisive defeat." [2], p. 26
"Looking back at the development of physics, we see that soon after its birth, the ether became a 'degenerate' in the family of physical substances. The construction of a simple mechanical model of ether proved impossible and was discarded. This was largely due to the collapse of the mechanical point of view. After so many failures, there comes a time when you should completely forget about the ether and try never to mention it again. The only way out is to assume that space has the physical property of transmitting electromagnetic waves, and not to care too much about the meaning of this statement...". [3], p. 145
However, the hopes and promises of the creators of the quantum-relativistic subconscious, rejecting the materialistic doctrine, were not fulfilled.
Today, the anti-scientific essence of the quantum-relativistic subconscious is no longer in doubt not only among scientists of the world scientific community, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, but even among the creators of this temple of epochal paradoxes.
Realizing the failure of his theories, A. Einstein was forced to admit that "physicists consider me an old fool, but I am convinced that in the future development of physics will go in a different direction than hitherto" A. Einstein. [4]
And in 1951, on his birthday, Albert Einstein was photographed with his tongue hanging out. Perhaps this is all what he was capable of in his unfavorable position.
"This picture was made back in 1951, on the day of Einstein's birth. That evening, Einstein was tired, and when he was told to pose in front of the camera, he suddenly put out his tongue and instantly photographer made this funny picture. Photo very much was pleasant to the scientist, and he gave a copy of the program host, Howard Smith, and on the other side of the card was signed: "You will like this gesture, because it is all mankind"". What he wrote in his photograph with his tongue hanging out Einstein. bolshoyvopros.ru > ...fotografii-s-vysunutym-jazykom renounced their creations and the creators of quantum theories, who said:
"This picture of material reality today is so shaky and questionable, as it was not before. We know a lot of interesting details, we learn new things every day. But we still can not select from the basic representations one that can be considered as firmly established and on the basis of which it is possible to build a solid structure. The widely held opinion of scientists proceeds from the fact that it is generally impossible to give an objective picture of reality in the sense that it was given to it earlier. Only optimists among us (to whom I include myself) take this for philosophical exaltation, for the step of despair in the face of a big crisis. We hope that this hesitation of our ideas means only a painful process of transformation, which will ultimately lead to a better result than the disorderly set of formulas that today covers our subject". E. Schrödinger. [5], p. 37.
"Can nature really be as absurd as it appears to us in these atomic experiments? Is it true that in nature there is only such an experimental situation, which is expressed by the mathematical formalism of quantum theory?
Unified Theory of field could be the subject of speculation for Einstein; to this day it is absolutely necessary theoretical physics. Of course, one might ask whether this theory is a unified field theory or any other mathematical tools are more suitable to describe the experiments. But this future theory must be united, embracing the totality of empirical fields. In the present state of physics we are still far from a complete solution of all the problems ... But the program ... has retained its philosophical strength in spite of, or rather, thanks to all the new experimental data on elementary particles and this program (against which so actively resists Academy Science in the face of academicians author offers perhaps the most exciting area of research of our time". V. Heisenberg. [6], p. 93, 96.
"All opponents of the quantum theory are uniform, however, in one point … desirable would be a return to the concept of the reality of classical physics, or, speaking more generally, to the ontology of materialism, in other words, to the idea of an objective real world". V. Heisenberg. [7], p.16
Summarizing the opinions of scientists on the way to implement the program of overcoming the crisis situation created by the quantum-relativistic subconscious, V. Heisenberg States that "it would be desirable to return to the concept of reality of classical physics, or, speaking in a more General form, to the ontology of materialism, in other words, to the idea of an objective real world".
"The collapse of the traditional mechanism, or rather the criticism to which it was subjected, led to the following situation: science also failed. From impossibility to keep simply and exclusively traditional mechanism concluded about impossibility of science". Abel Ray. Professor of history and philosophy. [8], p. 270
"The essence of crisis of modern physics consists in breaking old laws and main principles, in rejection of an objective reality out of consciousness that is in the replacement of materialism with idealism and agnosticism …
The materialistic basic spirit of physics, as well as all modern natural sciences, will win all and all crises, but only with indispensable replacement of materialism metaphysical materialism dialectic" .V.I. Lenin. [8], p. 239.
"When we will move forward so good that we can give the mechanic ether, then, of course, it will come into a lot of things such as today assigned to physics". Friedrich Engels. [9], p. 88.
"In solving fundamental problems, we will succeed only if we establish broad international cooperation, the interaction of states, business, and combine the efforts of scientists from a wide variety of scientific schools and fields. Technological development will become truly global if it is not crushed and restrained by attempts to monopolize progress, restrict access to education, and set barriers to the free exchange of knowledge and ideas, “said the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin speaking at the second Global Summit on Production and Industrialization.
Therefore, of course, the need is finally ripe to return to the resolution of their own mechanical models of physical interactions, developed by Faraday and Maxwell, forgotten because of the dogmatic reverence for the "stupidity, absurdity and incompetence in philosophical thinking" of those who, by the definition of the great Isaac Newton, allows the interaction of bodies through the void.
"Our own science, first of all its basis - fundamental science, is now in a critical state... Science must be protected from itself, from its unviable organizational structure, from its bureaucratized nomenclature elite infected by monopolism" of the Russian Academy of Sciences. G. S. Khromov. President of the all-Union astronomical and geodetic society under the USSR Academy of Sciences. [10]
"From all the preceding it follows that the creation of a physical theory covering the widest range of phenomena is difficult and probably completely impossible on the grounds of denying the primary meaning of the medium and on the basis of objectifying action at a distance as the primary physical phenomenon.
Until now, the general physical theory does not yet exist in a complete form. But one can legitimately express that in the future physical thought will return to the fundamental views of Faraday and Maxwell, develop them by taking into account all new achievements and complete the construction of a general physical theory ... in any case, the Faraday-Maxwellian point of view on the question of direct Participation of the environment in all physical processes is the only conceivable guiding thread for the further successful development of modern physics ...
Me and for sure all the ideological opponents of the group headed by academicians A.F. Ioffe and S.I. Vavilov, object only to the erroneous methods of interpreting physical processes against those methods that lead to physical idealism, hamper the development of ideas that can correspond to the real nature of phenomena and therefore inhibit the further progress of physical science". V. F. Mitkevich. Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences. [11], p. 146.
In the materials of the author's research, "Science needs protection from pseudoscientific fraudsters who have usurped the power of the world scientific community. On the mechanical essence of physical interactions, philosophical and natural-scientific insolvency of the quantum-relativistic subconscious" Moscow. Ed. "Sputnik+", 2018 (see also http://newtonsociety.ru/science-needs-protection-2017.doc Russian and English languages) it is proposed to implement the program of overcoming the crisis provoked by the quantum-relativistic subconscious in natural science and philosophy, as well as the revival of materialistic views of outstanding scientists of all times and peoples by building a General theory of physical interactions by "changing the currently dominant anti-scientific paradigm" by solving their own mechanical models of Faraday and Maxwell, for scientific discussion and making the right decision in choosing the path of further research.
In the current conditions, when all available means, including through the curricula of schools and universities, the mass media, the public are imposed on the unscientific quantum - relativistic subconscious, in-depth study, development and propaganda of the works of the classics of natural science and dialectical materialism is the most important direction of the struggle for science, culture, against barbarism, savagery and the demise of civilization.
Without a doubt, earthly civilization, ruled by distraught governments, inciting and unleashing world fires, for which they are awarded the Nobel Prizes of the “world”, is moving by leaps and bounds to inevitable death according to the scenario of the planet Phaeton.
But there is still a chance through the joint efforts of scientists, progressive statesmen and public figures, who are not indifferent to the wide sections of the population, protecting science, saving the Earth from a nuclear catastrophe or the death of a distraught civilization is inevitable.
P.S. Given the extreme importance of "bringing to consciousness of the masses of extraordinary severity of sad consequences of crisis in natural Sciences for the fate of earth civilization", the author hopes that publishers will show interest to the materials research, assist in the translation of monographs on languages of the world and widespread dissemination.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
