AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/318
1Student, MSc. Clinical Psychology, Dept. of Psychology, AIBAS.
2Assistant Professor, Dept. of Psychology, Amity University, Bengaluru.
*Corresponding Author: M. Shriya, Student, MSc. Clinical Psychology, Dept. of Psychology, AIBAS.
Citation: M. Shriya, Bismirty Bhuyan, (2025), Role of Music in Improving Focus and Memory Retention in Academic Students, Psychology and Mental Health Care, 9(2): DOI:10.31579/2637-8892/318
Copyright: © 2025, Satyendra Nath Chakrabartty. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 24 December 2024 | Accepted: 17 January 2025 | Published: 24 February 2025
Keywords: music; focus; memory retention; cognitive performance; students; education; background music
Music has been recognized as one of the influences on cognitive functions, specifically on focus and memory retention. This research explores the effect of listening to music while studying and how it impacts students' concentration and ability to retain information. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study examines quantitative measures of cognitive performance and qualitative feedback from students. The findings aim to provide a clear understanding whether music can be an effective study and shaping educational strategies to enhance academic performance.
Focusing and remembering information is important for doing well in school, especially now when there are so many pressures and distractions. Because of this, students are trying different ways to boost their grades, and using music is one of them. Studies in psychology have looked at how music affects the brain, and the results are mixed. Some research shows that listening to music in the background can help people concentrate, feel better, and ease their worries. However, other studies warn that music might actually make it harder to focus, depending on things like the type of music, how loud it is, and what task someone is doing. The relationship between music and how well we think is still a topic of discussion, showing both good and bad sides. For example, types of music like classical or instrumental can create a calm and focused space, helping people concentrate on tough tasks. On the other hand, lively or words-filled music can be distracting, especially when someone needs to focus hard, like when studying for tests or reading. This study will look into how music affects students' focus and memory. It will check if different types of music can help students stay focused and remember things better. By using surveys and cognitive tests along with interviews or observations, the study will see how much music really helps students think better. It will also look at when music is the most helpful, like which genres work best, the right volume, and what tasks are involved, to find the best music setups for doing well in school. This research hopes to give a clearer picture of how music can be used to help learning.
Need for the study:
The increasing complexity of academic expectations makes it essential to explore innovative methods to support student performance. Many students already listen to music while studying, but there is no consensus on whether this habit is beneficial or detrimental. The existing research on the impact of music on cognitive functions has produced mixed findings, leaving a gap in understanding the precise effects on focus and memory retention. This study is needed to provide more clarity and evidence-based guidance for students, educators, and researchers. By investigating how music influences cognitive abilities in academic settings, the research could inform the development of more effective study strategies and learning environments. Additionally, understanding the diverse effects of music on concentration and memory can help address individual differences among students, leading to more personalized approaches to education. The study aims to contribute to the educational field by exploring whether integrating music can enhance academic performance, making it a valuable area of research for both theoretical and practical applications.
Review of literature:
A study was conducted to examine the ‘impact of background music on the academic performance of primary school students’. The study involved 50 primary school pupils and focused on how background music influenced their concentration and task performance. The findings indicated that background music, particularly calming music, had a positive effect on students’ concentration, leading to better performance in arithmetic tasks. Compared to a control group studying in silence, students exposed to background music demonstrated higher levels of focus and accuracy, suggesting that the right kind of music can enhance cognitive performance in academic settings. ( Hallam, Price & Katsarou 2002). A study was conducted on the’ relationship between music and cognitive abilities among children’, involving 144 participants aged 6 to 15 years. The study found that children who were exposed to music lessons demonstrated improved IQ scores and performed better on memory tests. The results revisited the concept of the "Mozart Effect," suggesting that music training has a positive impact on cognitive development, particularly enhancing memory and attention skills in children. This study supports the idea that engaging in music lessons can lead to broader cognitive benefits beyond musical skills. ( Schellenberg, 2005). A study was conducted on the ‘effects of music as a distraction during cognitive tasks’, with a sample of 118 university students. The study found that loud and complex music negatively impacted students' concentration, serving as a distraction during study tasks. In contrast, soft and simple music had a neutral to positive effect on concentration, suggesting that the complexity and volume of background music play a crucial role in determining its impact on cognitive performance. This research highlights the importance of selecting the right type of music for enhancing focus during academic activities. ( Furnham & Strbac 2002).A study was conducted on the influence of ‘background music on learning performance ‘among 87 junior high school students. The study revealed that music, especially instrumental music, enhanced learning efficiency and improved memory retention. Additionally, a positive correlation was identified between listening to music and reduced anxiety levels during study sessions, suggesting that instrumental background music not only aids in academic performance but also creates a more relaxed and focused study environment for students.( Chou ,P.T & Lin, C.C 2015). A study was conducted to examine the ‘effect of background music tempo on reading comprehension and memory retention’, involving 80 undergraduate students. The findings indicated that slow-tempo music had a positive influence on both reading comprehension and memory recall, enhancing the students’ ability to retain information. In contrast, fast-tempo music negatively impacted memory retention, suggesting that the tempo of background music is a significant factor in determining its effect on cognitive tasks.( Kang & Williamson 2014). A study was conducted on the’ impact of background music on cognitive performance across different age groups’, involving 120 participants, including students and older adults. The study found that younger participants, particularly students, performed better on memory tasks when listening to classical and instrumental music compared to studying in silence. These results highlight age-related differences in how music affects cognition, with younger individuals benefiting more from music during cognitive tasks, suggesting that music may have varying impacts based on age. ( Patston & Tippett 2011)
Resarch methodology:
Aim: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of music on enhancing focus and memory retention in academic students. It seeks to determine if listening to music during study sessions can improve concentration and information recall.
Research question:
Does listening to music while studying improve students' focus and memory retention?
Objectives
Operational definition:
Music:
Music is made up of carefully chosen sounds or styles, like classical music, instrumental pieces, or nature sounds, played at a steady volume and speed while studying.
Focus:
Focus is how well students can pay attention and stay on task without being distracted. This is often checked using simple surveys or by looking at how they perform on tasks that require attention.
Memory retention:
Memory Retention means how well students can remember and keep the information they learn during their study time. This is tested by asking them to recall information right away or after some time, or through standardized memory tests.
Academic students:
Academic Students are those who are attending a school or college, especially those taking part in formal studies, like high school or college learners, who experience organized learning settings.
Sample:
The study's sample consisted of 100 college students aged 15 to 25 years, selected to examine the impact of music on focus and memory retention. Participants were recruited specifically from within this age range to ensure relevance to the academic student population.
Inclusion criteria: required participants to be college students aged between 15 and 25 years.
Exclusion criteria: involved excluding individuals below 15 years and above 25 years to maintain a consistent and relevant age group for the research.
Hypothesis:
Alternate Hypothesis (H₁):
Listening to music while studying will significantly improve focus and memory retention among academic students compared to studying without music.
Null Hypothesis (H₀):
Listening to music while studying will not have a significant effect on focus and memory retention among academic students compared to studying without music.
Procedure:
A sample of 100 college students aged 15 to 25 years will be recruited through academic networks and online platforms, ensuring that participants meet the age criteria and are active students. Participants will initially complete the Music Use Questionnaire (MUQ) via a Google Form, assessing their typical music habits, such as the frequency of music use while studying, preferred genres, volume levels, and perceived effects on focus. This baseline information will provide insights into each participant’s relationship with music in daily life and academic contexts. After participating in the study sessions, under both music and silence conditions, they will complete the Everyday Memory Questionnaire (EMQ), which evaluates memory retention through tasks related to daily memory functions, like remembering details and recalling studied material. The EMQ will help determine whether studying with or without music impacted their everyday memory and academic recall performance.
Scale:
| Scale Name | Items | Author and year | Scoring | Interpretation |
| Music Use Questionnaire | Shortened version of this scale with 10 items ( original =20 items) | The Music Use Questionnaire (MUSE) was developed by Chin, K., & Rickard, N. S. (2012) | Likert Scale 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree | 10-19 – low impact of music
20-29- Mild Impact Of Music
30-39 – Moderate Impact Of Music
40-50 -High Impact Of Music |
| Everyday Memory Questionnaire | Shortened Version of this scale with 10 items (original =28) | Everyday Memory Questionnaire (EMQ) developed by Sunderland, Harris, and Baddeley (1983). | Likert Scale 1 = Never 2 = Rarely 3=Occasionally 4 = Frequently 5 = Very Frequently | 10-19 -Low Frequency
20-29- Mild Frequency
30-39-Moderate Frequency
40-50 – High Frequency |
Table 1:
This summary looks at two sections (A and B) of a test, with each section having 100 test-takers. For Part A, the average score is 31.8, with scores mostly spread around 7.40 points. The middle score, known as the median, is 30.0. Part B has a lower average score of 27.2 and a median score of 27.0, with scores that are more consistent, only varying about 5.78 points. The scores in Part A go from 16 to 50, showing a bigger spread than in Part B, where scores range from 12 to 42. Because Part A has a higher spread in scores, it means there’s more difference in how people performed. Both sections have complete data with no missing scores, making it easier to analyze the results.Table 2:
The correlation matrix shows how the total scores of Part A and Part B are related. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) is -0.059, which means there is a very weak negative connection. With 98 degrees of freedom (df), the p-value is 0.563, which is not significant (p > 0.05). This tells us there is no proof of a meaningful relationship between the scores of Part A and Part B in this data set.
The results of the study show that music did not really help students focus or remember things better. There wasn’t much difference between the times when students listened to music and when it was quiet. This makes us rethink the idea that playing music in the background always helps with thinking and learning. It could be that what kind of music people like, how loud it is, or the speed of the music affected the results. Also, the tasks might have been too complicated. Other things like how hard the tasks were, what the students already knew, and the noise level in the room could have made it hard to see a clear effect.These findings are similar to some earlier studies that point out how different types of music can change how well people think. For instance, soft, instrumental, or classical music often helps with concentration, while loud or complicated music can make it hard to focus. In this study, not having control over the type of music played might have led to the unclear results.
Part A scores are much higher and vary more than Part B scores. The slight negative relationship between scores in Part A and Part B (r = -0.059, p = 0.563) indicates that there is no real connection between them. Also, scores do not show any important links to Gender or Age in either part. Since the p value Is greater than 0.005 it shows that there is no significant relationship, hence alternate hypothesis is rejected while null hypothesis is accepted
limitations:
Future research suggestions:
1. Personalized Music Approaches
Explore how personal tastes, like favorite music styles, speed, and how well someone knows a song, affect music's role in improving concentration and memory. And Create playlists using AI that are customized to help boost mental performance.
2. Exploring Music and Multitasking
Look into how background music impacts students when they try to manage different academic tasks at once. Investigate if some music styles help lessen distractions while multitasking.
3. Effects of Silence and Music
Look at how studying in total quiet compares to studying with music. This will help us figure out when music really helps and also, explore if taking short breaks of silence between songs can improve how we remember things.
4. Exploring Music's Impact on Neurodiverse Learners
Look into how music influences attention and memory among students with ADHD, autism, or learning challenges and create tailored musical activities for these students to improve their learning experiences
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
