AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8949/147
1 medical director at the General Surgery Department of the “G. Jazzolino” of Vibo Valentia italy.
2 Jazzolino Hospital Vibo Valentia
*Corresponding Author: Petracca Giovanni, medical director at the General Surgery Department of the “G. Jazzolino” of Vibo Valentia italy.
Citation: Petracca Giovanni, (2024), Reprint-Necrotizing fasciitis: a case report and a review of the literature, Dermatology and Dermatitis, 9(6); DOI:10.31579/2578-8949/147
Copyright: © 2024, Petracca Giovanni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons. Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 01 February 2024 | Accepted: 22 February 2024 | Published: 16 September 2024
Keywords: necrotizing fasciitis; shock; skin graft
Necrotizing fasciitis is a soft-tissue infection characterized by extensive necrosis of subcutaneous fat, neurovascular structures, and fascia. In general, fascial necrosis precedes muscle and skin involvement, hence its namesake. Initially, this uncommon and rapidly progressive disease process can present as a form of cellulitis or superficial abscess. However, the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with necrotizing fasciitis suggest a more serious, ominous condition. Diagnosis may be delayed because of the initial minimal skin cellulitis, even as the subcutaneous tissue suffers extensive necrosis and pronounced systemic toxicity develops. A delay in diagnosis can result in progressive advancement highlighted by widespread infection, multiple-organ involvement, and, ultimately, death. Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) might be useful in cases where signs are equivocal or diagnosis is in doubt. Computed tomography scans are estimated to have a sensitivity of 80% for detecting necrotizing soft tissue infections. We present a case of limb salvage in a 52-year-old patient with misunderstood type 2 diabetes mellitus and progressive fascial necrosis. A detailed review of the literature is presented, and current treatment modalities are described. Aggressive surgical debridement, comprehensive medical management of the sepsis and comorbidities, and timely closure of the resultant wound or wounds are essential for a successful outcome.
Necrotizing fasciitis is a soft tissue infection characterized by extensive necrosis of subcutaneous fat, neurovascular structures and fascia.
Background: the characteristic of this case was aggression and rapid extension.
Case presentation: a 59-year-old woman was observed in a very serious condition, with fever and a large necrotic area that smelled of the right inguinal-femoral region in extension to the thigh. No history of illness. Obesity.
Diagnosis may be delayed due to minimal initial cutaneous cellulite. A delay in diagnosis can lead to the progression of the disease shown by shock, multiple organ failure and, ultimately, death. Computed tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging could be useful in cases where the signs are equivocal or the diagnosis is in doubt.
A detailed review of the literature is presented and the current treatment modalities are described. In this case, the aggressive surgical debridement, the complete medical management of sepsis and comorbidities and the timely closure of the wound by dermo-epidermal grafting were essential for a positive result.
Conclusions: necrotizing fasciitis is an uncommon life-threatening soft tissue infection, which spreads rapidly and progressively along the deep fascia. The prognosis depends on accurate diagnosis and immediate treatment.
Necrotizing fasciitis is an uncommon life-threatening soft tissue infection, which spreads rapidly and progressively along the deep fascia [1].
It was named ‘necrotizing fasciitis’ in 1952, from necrosis, which means death of a portion of tissue, and fascia, which refers to the fibrous tissues that enclose and connect the muscles [2].
The predisposing conditions are mainly diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, end-stage renal disease, malignancy, liver cirrhosis, malnutrition, gout, corticosteroid use, and trauma [3-6].
Diagnosis may be delayed because of the initial minimal skin cellulitis, even as the subcutaneous tissue suffers extensive necrosis and pronounced systemic toxicity develops [7].
The progression of the disease is fulminant and the mortality is high, despite effective antibiotic treatment [8,9].
The prognosis depends on accurate diagnosis and immediate treatment. In addition to delay in diagnosis and treatment, several risk factors, such as more than one underlying condition, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and older age, have been shown to influence mortality [10].
Higher mortality in patients with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome and in disease associated with certain bacteria has been reported [11-13].
Necrotizing fasciitis death rate is very high (20-40%) [14].
A 59-years-old woman was got into observation in a very serious condition, stupor with fever and extensive necrotic area smelling of the right inguinal-femoral region in extension to the thigh (fig. 1). No history of disease. Obesity. Heart rate being 105 bpm, respiratory F of 25 acts /minute and AP of 80/60 mmHg.
Figure 1: necrotic area smelling of the right inguinal-femoral region.
Laboratory parameters showed only a glycaemia alteration (338mg/100ml) and a leucocytosis (16.000 WBC with a neutrophilia equal to 80%). Thorax x-ray were normal. ECG was sinus rhythm with rate 105 bpm. CT scan shows gas bubbles in the subcutaneous tissue in the groin and thigh (figure. 2).
Figure 2: CT scan
It was then started a wide-spectrum antibiotics therapy (Meropenem 1g x 3/die; Teicoplanina 400 mg x 2/die), antifungal therapy (Flucanazolo 400 mg/die), rehydration therapy, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The patient was subjected, under general anesthesia, a debridement until the appearance of vital tissue (fig.3). Multiple biopsies carried out during the operation too underwent cultural and histomorphopathological analysis. After just 24 hours there took place a rapid development of the clinical picture with the appearance of areas of cutaneous necrosis extending to the right knee.
Figure 3: debridement until the appearance of vital tissue
Every day it was carried debridement until the gradual achievement of the fascia (two weeks after admission) (figure.4).
Figure 4: two weeks after admission.
Gradually, the general conditions have improved. Given a good toilet of the wound, he began, after about two weeks of admission, treatment with hyperbaric oxygen therapy for eight cycles. After about a month, the wound was clean with granulation tissue formation (figure. 5).
Figure 5: After about a month, granulation tissue formation.
After about two months of daily medication, there was a significant reduction of the wound surface (figure.6-7).
Figure 6: After about a month, granulation tissue formation.
Figure 7: After about a month, granulation tissue formation.
It was then underwent to surgery of wound reconstruction, by partial-thickness skin graft (fig.8-9).
Figure 8: partial-thickness skin graft.
Figura 9: partial-thickness skin graft.
After seven days, the skin graft area was healed (figure.10-11)
Figure 10: area skin graft after seven days.
Figure 11: area skin graft after seven days.
and after ten days, the skin donor site was healed (figure. 12).
Figure 12: skin donor site after ten days.
Necrotizing skin infections were first described by Jones in 1871, although at the time the term hospital gangrene was used [15].
The term necrotizing fasciitis was coined by Wilson in the 1950s to describe necrosis of the fascia and subcutaneous tissue with relative sparing of the underlying muscle [2].
Necrotizing fasciitis is characterized by rapid destruction of tissue, systemic toxicity, and, if not treated aggressively, gross morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and aggressive surgical treatment reduce risk; however, it is often difficult to diagnose NF, and sometimes patients are treated for simple cellulitis until they rapidly deteriorate [16].
Antibiotic therapy is mandatory, and early surgical exploration and debridement is critical to ensuring a good outcome.
Different terms and classifi cations have been used to describe necrotizing infections of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. These include necrotizing fasciitis, synergistic necrotizing cellulitis, streptococcal myonecrosis, and gas gangrene. This variety of classifications and terminology has been based on affected anatomy, microbial cause, and depth of infection. Awareness of this helps to reduce confusion.
FN can be classified in two types:
• Type 1 or plymicrobial: caused by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, it target patients showing one or more risk factors (subjects aged 50 or over, diabetes mellitus, immunodeficiency, past surgical operation, penetrating trauma, omphalitis in newborns, colon carcinoma pierced colich diverticola, appendicular abscess etc.) it is the most frequent type (about 80% of the cases).
• Type 2 or monomicrobial: it’s caused by group A Strptococci only (or in association whit the Staphylococcus aureus), it targets subjects of any age who do not present any risk factor; it makes up for the 20% of the cases [14].
Pathology.
Most cases commence with trauma to the skin surface (eg, from a penetrative injury or even acupuncture needles, as was the case with our patient), with seeding of bacteria. Infection starts in the deep tissue planes, and the epidermis might not be initially affected. The clinical disease is expressed when infective organisms spread through the tissue along the deep fascia. Bacteria rapidly multiply within viable tissue, although fibrous attachments between subcutaneous tissues and fasciae limit spread to areas like the hands, feet, and scalp. Lack of fi brous attachments in the trunk and limbs, however, can lead to widespread infection and tissue destruction. Infection also spreads to venous and lymphatic channels, leading to edema. The spread of bacteria results in thrombosis of blood vessels in dermal papilla, resulting in ischemia and gangrene of subcutaneous fat and dermis [17]. If the fascia is breached,infection of the muscle leading to myositis occurs. Gas-producing organisms such as Clostridium species can give rise to subcutaneous gas, from which stems the descriptive term gas gangrene.
In addition, infections with toxin-producing bacteria (S aureus and S pyogenes) can lead to a toxic shock–like syndrome. herefore, seemingly limited infection can result in septic shock and multiorgan failure.
Risk factors.
Often, patients presenting with NF have some predisposition to infection (Diabetes, Chronic disease, Immunosuppressive drugs (eg, prednisolone), Malnutrition, Age > 60 years, Intravenous drug misuse, Peripheral vascular disease, Renal failure, Underlying malignancy, Obesity).
Precipitating events causing necrotizing fasciitis:
Traumatic: Surgery, Minor invasive procedures (eg, joint aspirations, acupuncture), Intravenous drug use, Penetrating injuries (eg, insect and animal bites).
Nontraumatic: soft tissue infection, burns, childbirth 18Risk factors for NF in the pediatric population include malnutrition and skin infections such as varicella [19,20].
Clinical features.
Patients with NF can present with constitutional symptoms of sepsis (eg, fever, tachycardia, altered mental state, diabetic ketoacidosis) alone or with evidence of skin inflammation, which makes diagnosis a little more straightforward.
Limbs are among the most common sites of infection. Common sites of infection included the lower extremities (28%), upper extremities (27%), perineum (21%), trunk (18%), and the head and neck (5%) [21].
Patients with NF are usually systemically toxic, initially presenting with fever (temperature greater than 38°C), tachycardia, diaphoresis, and possibly even an altered mental state or diabetic ketoacidosis. The physical examination should include all parts of the body to search for skin inflammation. This is especially necessary for patients who present with sepsis of which the source is not obvious [22].
Most patients present with signs of skin inflammation (ie, pain, skin edema, and erythema).
Necrotizing fasciitis typically presents with patchy discolouration of the skin with pain and swelling, but without a defined margin or lymphangitis [23].
Progression of NF is marked with the development of tense edema, a grayish-brown discharge, vesicles, bullae, necrosis, and crepitus. Hemorrhagic bullae and crepitus are sinister signs, with the likelihood of underlying fascia and muscle being compromised [24].
Localized pain is another clue to NF. As the disease is a deep-seated infection, the epidermis is minimally involved at initial presentation. The patient might complain of pain out of proportion to the degree of dermal involvement or pain that extends past the apparent margin of infection. Certain patients, notably those with diabetic neuropathy with loss of sensation, can experience minimal pain, resulting in a missed diagnosis. This is especially likely in concealed sites of infection, such as the perineum or oral cavity. A patch of anesthesia over the site of erythema is also sometimes described in NF. This is thought to be due to infarction of cutaneous nerves in necrotic subcutaneous fascia and soft tissue [25].
Disease progression
Necrotizing fasciitis can follow a hyperacute or a subacute course of progression. The patient with a hyperacute course presents with sepsis and rapidly progresses to multiorgan failure. Diagnosis of sepsis is obvious, and these patients are hospitalized. Several authors have described a subacute variation of NF [26-28].
These patients have an indolent disease course, with festering soft tissue infection. After the infection reaches a certain threshold, sudden deterioration is an important clinical feature. Aggressive surgical debridement is the cornerstone of treatment in these cases. Progression of disease is invariable in this group, and a delay in diagnosis can lead to greater soft tissue loss and mortality.
Diagnosis and decision for surgical exploration.
The criterion standard for diagnosis of NF is histology of tissue specimens obtained during surgical exploration, which was demonstrated in our case description. During surgical exploration, tissue integrity and depth of invasion can be assessed. Fascial necrosis and loss of fascial integrity indicate a necrotizing infection. Muscle involvement and necrosis are indicative of an advanced stage. To help decide which patients require surgical exploration, particularly in those with equivocal clinical signs, laboratory and radiologic tests might sometimes be useful.
Leukocytosis with neutrophilia, acidosis, altered coagulation profile, impaired renal function, raised creatinine kinase levels, and raised inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein levels, are all helpful if viewed within the whole of the clinical context.
Plain x-ray films can demonstrate subcutaneous gas, but this is a specific not a sensitive finding (positive in fewer than 25% of cases) and absence of gas does not exclude NF [29].
Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might be useful in cases where signs are equivocal or diagnosis is in doubt. Asymmetrical fascial thickening, fat stranding, and gas tracking along fascial planes are important imaging findings. Computed tomography scans are estimated to have a sensitivity of 80% for detecting necrotizing soft tissue infections [30].
In summary, if clinical suspicion is high, surgeons can opt to explore and perform tissue biopsies rather than delay treatment for imaging studies. Additional bedside tests include needle aspiration and incision biopsy. Negative results, however, cannot exclude NF. Surgical exploration is preferable. Macroscopic findings during surgical exploration include gray necrotic tissue, lack of bleeding, thrombosed vessels, “dishwater” pus, noncontracting muscle, and a positive “finger test” result, which is characterized by lack of resistance to fi nger dissection in normally adherent tissues.
Treatment
Once the diagnosis is made, treatment must begin on multiple fronts. First, surgical consultations should be urgently requested with the intention of early wound debridement for collection of tissue cultures, excision of all nonviable tissue, and delineation of the extent of the disease. (This is also important as tissue hypoxia limits the efficacy of intravenous antibiotics). It is important to educate patients about the gravity of their condition and the risk of increased mortality if surgical debridement is not performed. Until blood culture results are available, wide spectrum coverage with intravenous antibiotics is started. These antibiotics cover S pyogenes, S aureus (including community-acquired MRSA if indicated, according to local resistance patterns), and Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes as clinically indicated.
Surgical treatment involves a large removal of all the necrotizing tissue through skin and subcutaneous incisions as far as the fascia, in parallel to the vessels and the nerves that have to be isolated and not thuced. The adipose tissue and the fascia have to be excised. The surgical openings are left open for subsequent medications carried out every 24 hours or less in the operating room, and possibly for a surgical “second-look” [14].
During the operation exudate samples and tissue biopsies will be collected and relative culural and cytological test will be carried out.
Subsequently to predict skin graft reconstruction.
Hyperbaric oxygen has also been used as an adjunct to surgery and antibiotics. Its role is still ill-defined. Some authors have reported a reduction in mortality, morbidity, and need for repeated debridement in up to two-thirds of cases [31,32]
Well-controlled randomized controlled trials are still lacking.
Moreover, a retrospective review by Golger et al showed that morbidity associated with NF was higher in patients who underwent hyperbaric oxygen therapy [21].
Prognosis
Mortality due to NF is considerable. Without surgical intervention, mortality approaches 100%. More recent data indicate a mortality of 16.4% for community-acquired necrotizing soft tissue infections and 36.3% for postprocedural necrotizing infections. All of these patients were managed in hospital with intravenous antibiotics and surgical interventions. Considering medical progress in the last 135 years, mortality is still substantial. Diabetic patients, especially those presenting with diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar hyperglycemic nonketotic acidosis have higher rates of death and longer lengths of hospital stay [33].
A delay in surgery of more than 24 hours was an independent risk factor for mortality [1].
Necrotizing fasciitis is an uncommon life-threatening soft tissue infection, which spreads rapidly and progressively along the deep fascia. The predisposing conditions are mainly diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, end-stage renal disease, malignancy, liver cirrhosis, malnutrition, gout, corticosteroid use, and trauma. The progression of the disease is fulminant and the mortality is high, despite effective antibiotic treatment. That is why early diagnosis is needed.
Wide-spectrum antibiotic therapy followed up by surgery and, when it is possible, by hyperbaric therapy as well, thus aiming at a substantial reduction of both morbidity and mortality rates, unfortunately still very high.
The prognosis depends on accurate diagnosis and immediate treatment. In addition to delay in diagnosis and treatment, several risk factors, such as more than one underlying condition, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and older age, have been shown to influence mortality.
Summary
Necrotizing fasciitis is a soft tissue infection characterized by extensive necrosis of subcutaneous fat, neurovascular structures, and fascia. In general, fascial necrosis precedes muscle and skin involvement, hence its namesake. Initially, this rare and rapidly progressive disease process may present as a form of cellulitis or superficial abscess. However, the high rates of morbidity and mortality associated with necrotizing fasciitis suggest a more serious and threatening condition. Diagnosis may be delayed due to minimal initial skin cellulitis, even if the subcutaneous tissue suffers extensive necrosis and pronounced systemic toxicity develops. A delay in diagnosis can result in disease progression evidenced by widespread infection, multiple organ involvement, and ultimately death. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might be helpful in cases where signs are equivocal or the diagnosis is in doubt. Computed tomography scans are estimated to have a sensitivity of 80% for detecting necrotizing soft tissue infections. We present a case of limb salvage in a 52-year-old patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus and progressive fascial necrosis. A detailed literature review is presented and current treatment modalities are described. Aggressive surgical debridement, comprehensive medical management of sepsis and comorbidities, and timely closure of the resulting wound(s) are essential for a successful outcome.
Declarations
- Ethical Approval and Consent to participate: not applicable
- Consent for publication: not applicable
- Availability of supporting data: not applicable
- Competing interests: not applicable
- Funding: not applicable
- Authors' contributions: not applicable
- Acknowledgements: not applicable
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
