AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/225
1University of Sonora, Navojoa, Mexico.
2Luis Amigo Catholic University, Colombia.
3University of Health, CDMX, Mexico.
*Corresponding Author: Cruz García Lirios, Department of Universidad de la Salud, Mexico.
Citation: Molina Gonzalez MDR, Marino Cordoba VH, Cruz G. Lilies, (2025), Occupational Biosecurity Derived from the SDGs in the Context of the Pandemic, J. Women Health Care and Issues, 8(1); DOI:10.31579/2642-9756/225
Copyright: © 2025, Cruz García Lirios. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 06 January 2025 | Accepted: 13 January 2025 | Published: 20 January 2025
Keywords: reliability of the instrument; factor structure; reflective model; occupational safety; validity of the instrument
Job security has worried organizations in recent years. Different substrata of society have different perceptions about job security. This document explores the reliability and validity of an instrument that measures job security in a public institution in central Mexico by reviewing seven dimensions: territorial, national, public, human, public (self-protection), private and internet. Consequently, fit and residual values ⌠χ2 = 135.34 (32df) p = 0.054; GFI = 0.995; CFI = 0.990; RMSEA = 0.003⌡allowed us to accept the null hypothesis of a significant relationship between the theoretical dimensions with respect to the weighted factors.
The history of occupational biosafety has evolved significantly, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, influenced by the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly those related to health and well-being (SDG 3) and decent work and economic growth (SDG 8). Before the adoption of the SDGs in 2015, occupational biosafety was primarily focused on preventing occupational accidents and diseases, with a focus on national and international regulations and legislation. Organizations followed standards such as those of the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to protect workers.
The implementation of the SDGs introduced a more holistic perspective on occupational biosafety. SDG 3, which promotes good health and well-being, and SDG 8, which advocates for decent work and economic growth, boosted greater awareness of the importance of safe and healthy working conditions. This goal reinforces the need to ensure that all workers have access to health services and safe conditions in their workplaces, with an emphasis on the prevention of occupational diseases. The goal highlights the importance of a safe working environment as an essential component of decent employment, promoting labour standards that ensure the protection of workers.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought with it unprecedented challenges in the field of occupational biosafety. The need to protect workers from the virus led to a rapid adaptation of biosafety policies and the creation of new protocols, such as the mandatory use of personal protective equipment (PPE), social distancing, teleworking, and the implementation of strict health controls in the workplace. During the pandemic, the principles of the SDGs served as a guide for many organizations and governments in developing responses to the crisis.
The physical and mental health of workers was prioritized, with public health measures implemented to prevent the spread of the virus in workplaces. The pandemic exacerbated inequalities at work, and organizations with poor labor practices were more vulnerable. The SDGs called for ensuring fair working conditions even in times of crisis. The experience of the pandemic has accelerated the adoption of stricter biosecurity measures, which are aligned with the SDGs. Occupational biosecurity has evolved towards greater integration with public health and sustainability, recognizing that workers’ health is fundamental to sustainable economic and social development.
| Aspecto | Bioseguridad Laboral | ODS | Impacto de la Pandemia de COVID-19 |
| Objetivo principal | Protección de la salud y seguridad de los trabajadores | Salud y bienestar (ODS 3), Trabajo decente (ODS 8) | La pandemia impulsó la implementación de medidas estrictas para prevenir contagios en el trabajo. |
| Normativa y estándares | Cumplimiento de normativas de salud ocupacional (OIT, OMS) | ODS 3: Promover la salud para todos, ODS 8: Fomentar el trabajo decente | Se crearon y adaptaron nuevas normativas de bioseguridad específicas para mitigar el riesgo de COVID-19. |
| Medidas preventivas | Uso de EPP, higiene, distanciamiento, ventilación | ODS 3: Prevenir enfermedades; ODS 8: Condiciones de trabajo seguras | Se generalizó el uso obligatorio de EPP, protocolos de higiene y distanciamiento social. |
| Salud mental | Gestión del estrés laboral, apoyo psicológico | ODS 3: Salud mental y bienestar | Aumento de problemas de salud mental debido al confinamiento y miedo al contagio, con mayor énfasis en su gestión. |
| Modalidad de trabajo | Trabajo presencial con medidas de bioseguridad | ODS 8: Trabajo decente | Fuerte impulso al teletrabajo y modelos híbridos para reducir el riesgo de contagio. |
| Flexibilidad y adaptación | Ajustes en protocolos según el riesgo de exposición | ODS 8: Adaptación a cambios en el mercado laboral | Se aceleró la necesidad de adaptabilidad en las políticas laborales, integrando bioseguridad como un factor clave. |
| Responsabilidad empresarial | Cumplimiento de normativas y cuidado del personal | ODS 8: Promover entornos de trabajo responsables | Las empresas debieron adoptar un rol más activo en la protección de la salud de sus empleados. |
| Igualdad y equidad | Acceso equitativo a medidas de bioseguridad para todos los empleados | ODS 8: No dejar a nadie atrás en el trabajo decente | Desigualdades en la aplicación de medidas; trabajadores en sectores informales más vulnerables. |
| Monitoreo y seguimiento | Evaluación constante de riesgos y cumplimiento de normas | ODS 3: Vigilancia de la salud pública | Incremento en la vigilancia y seguimiento de casos en el entorno laboral. |
Table 1: Comparison of occupational biosafety derived from the SDGs in the face of the pandemic
Aspect Occupational Biosafety SDG Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Main objective Protection of workers' health and safety good health and well-being (SDG 3), Decent work (SDG 8). The pandemic prompted the implementation of strict measures to prevent infections at work. Regulations and standards Compliance with occupational health regulations (ILO, WHO) SDG 3: Promote health for all, SDG 8: Promote decent work New specific biosafety regulations were created and adapted to mitigate the risk of COVID-19. Preventive measures Use of PPE, hygiene, distancing, ventilation SDG 3: Prevent diseases; SDG 8: Safe working conditions The mandatory use of PPE, hygiene protocols and social distancing became widespread. Mental health Workplace stress management, psychological support SDG 3: Mental health and well-being Increase in mental health problems due to confinement and fear of contagion, with greater emphasis on their management. Working mode Face-to-face work with biosecurity measures SDG 8: Decent work Strong push for teleworking and hybrid models to reduce the risk of contagion. Flexibility and adaptation Adjustments in protocols according to the risk of exposure SDG 8: Adaptation to changes in the labour market The need for adaptability in labor policies has accelerated, integrating biosecurity as a key factor. Corporate Responsibility Compliance and staff care SDG 8: Promote responsible work environments Companies have had to take a more active role in protecting the health of their employees. Equality and equity Equal access to biosecurity measures for all employees SDG 8: Leave no one behind in decent work Inequalities in the application of measures; workers in informal sectors more vulnerable. Monitoring and follow-up Constant risk assessment and compliance with standards SDG 3: Public health surveillance.
Increased surveillance and monitoring of cases in the workplace. The COVID-19 pandemic acted as a catalyst that reinforced the importance of occupational biosafety, highlighting the relevance of the SDGs in creating safe and sustainable work environments. Job security, in several countries, has suffered from a lack of absence, particularly when it comes to government participation. As mentioned by Molina-Ruiz, García-Mungía, Rojano-Chávez & Moreno-Gutiérrez (2017), public security can be understood as the work of the State to protect and safeguard its population from internal dangers or threats. In Latin American countries, public security is perceived as absent, due to the large amount of journalistic coverage that exposes this lack. In the case of Mexico, a greater amount of red notice coverage appears in the news every day, which shows a violent face of the country (Molina-Ruiz et al., 2017). The objective of this work is to establish the reliability and validity of an instrument that measures the perception of security in: Territorial security; National security; Public security (State as attorney general); human security; Public security (Self-protection); Private security; and, Internet perception of security, scope.
Public safety protection events occur around the world that pose a threat to personal and property safety and national security (Wu et al., 2016). Mexico's security problems are similar in many ways to the general context of Latin America (Romero, Magaloni and Díaz-Cayeros, 2016). However, Mexico has a particular influence from organized crime due to the levels of consumption of illegal things in the US market (Molina-Ruiz et al., 2017).
As mentioned by Aguilera-García & Uribe-Arzate (2014), it has traditionally been understood as the function of the State that consists of protecting its citizens from illegal attacks (or crimes against) their property, their physical integrity, their sexual freedom and their sexual freedom. soon. In Chianca-Dantas (2015), the meaning of public custody is inferred as the safety of people. Khalili-Dehdezi & Qaleh-Sardi (2016) present 4 specific characteristics of public custody: inherence, inseparability, comprehensiveness and focus on justice.
In Hernando (1999), it is stated that the perception of our reality is subjective and that the perception of our world depends on our particular living conditions. The perception of reality operates from a higher order, from a mesosystem that would include both (perception and reality), and in which each appears as elements and not as closed and independent units (Nescolarde-Selva, Usó-Doménech & Gash, 2014). The notion that what we see may not be what really exists, has disturbed and tormented [...] (Lotto, 2017), the entire population in each sector, class or role of our society (Molina-Ruiz et al., 2017). It is clear that different sectors of the population would have different perceptions of security.
It can also be mentioned that the cultural stigma in the country also affects and promotes the lack of public protection, due to the general way of thinking of the Mexican population, which, compared to other cultures, seems slow and with little interest. develop in academic, professional, social aspects, among others (Molina-Ruiz et al., 2017). The administration of public security is the implementation of public policies that justify the orientation of the State in the prevention of crime and the administration of justice, but only the distrust of citizens towards government action is evidenced in a growing perception of insecurity reported in Literature. in seven dimensions: territorial, national, public (government), human, public (self-protection), private and Internet.
As Molina-Ruiz (2015) mentions, Mexico can be seen from diverse areas such as economic, historical or social. In that sense, there are other sub-areas (or subscales in the social sphere) such as health, public safety, education, environmental awareness, among others. As mentioned above, different sectors of the population have different perceptions of social sub-areas (or subscales). In the case of Bachelor's students, given that their academic training provides the possibility of generating critical thinking, this sector of the population can generate a solid perception of a factor that affects the context of society.
Correlational and psychometric study was conducted with a sample of 100 students selected by his affiliation to institutions committed to the SDGs in the context of the pandemic.
Instrument. The Occupational Biosafety Scale was used (see Annex A). It includes the following dimensions: 1) Implementation of Protocols and Health, 2) Access to Health Services, 3) Monitoring and Epidemiological Surveillance, 4) Safe Working Conditions, 5) Adaptability and Response to Crisis, 6) Equity and Equal Access, 7) Commitment to Health and Safety, 8) Training and Capacity Building, 9) Communication and Transparency.
Procedure. Respondents were invited via institutional email. They were informed about the objectives and responsibilities of the project. Respondents were invited to a focus group to discuss the meaning of the indicators. Respondents were invited to a Delphi study to evaluate the items. The surveys were administered at the university facilities.
The Delphi technique was used to establish the homogeneity of the concepts in the items. We examined the exhibit in the lobby of his university library. The data were processed with the Statistical Analysis Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and Structural Analysis of Moments (AMOS). Versions 18.0. Reliability was estimated with Cronbach's alpha, Bartlett's validity test, KMO and factor weight.
Cronbach's alpha was estimated to establish the internal consistency of the general scale and the subscales. The Bootstrap parameter was calculated to establish sampling when it is not possible to fully use the data and only part of the distribution is used. Adequacy and sphericity were calculated with the Kaiser Meyer Olkin parameters and the Bartlett test. An exploratory factor analysis was performed with obliquity criteria and promax rotation of the principal axes. The hypothesis test was carried out with the estimation of the adjustment and residual parameters.
Analysis. The data were captured in Excel and processed in Google Colab (see appendix B). The coefficients of reliability, linearity, adequacy, sphericity, validity, adjustment and residuals were estimated. Values close to unity, except for the residuals, were assumed as evidence of non-rejection of the null hypothesis.
Internal consistency, according to data collection and analysis, in the global scale (0.793) and the subscales (F1 = 0.792 and 22% of the total variance explained; F2 = 0.709 and 19% of the variance explained; F3 = 0.785 and 17% of the explained variance; F4 = 0.782 and 14% of the explained variance; and F7 = 0.731 and 7% of the explained variance is discrete because it shows the differences between the study contexts in which it was analyzed conceptualized security.
In Mexico, the interpretation or idea that the country lacks security is common. This lack of protection is influenced by the presence of organized crime, the illegal trade in drugs and weapons and the corruption available in each branch of the government, among the main aspects.
The correlations of reliability and validity when the unit shows that there are other dimensions linked to the construct. In this sense, the inclusion of self-control explains the effects of state propaganda on crime prevention, law enforcement, and peace education on the lifestyles of civilian sectors.
The contribution of this study refers to the reliability and validity of an instrument that measures seven dimensions of security: territorial, national, human, public, private and digital.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
