AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-2757/162
1OGBUZ "Bratsk Children's City Hospital", Irkutsk region, Bratsk.
2Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk region, Irkutsk.
3State Budgetary Healthcare Institution “Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital”, Irkutsk Region, Irkutsk.
4 Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, branch of RMAPO, Irkutsk Region, Irkutsk.
*Corresponding Author: Ermachenko M.F., OGBUZ
Citation: Ermachenko M.F., Ivanov RA., Popelkov AA., Nomokonov VI., Pavlyuk RP., et al, (2025), New Coronavirus Infection as One of The Factors in The Development of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Children, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 5(6); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/162
Copyright: © 2025, Ermachenko M.F. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 03 February 2025 | Accepted: 19 February 2025 | Published: 24 February 2025
Keywords: diabetes; covid-19; children
Interaction with district pediatricians and a social worker revealed that most children with repeated hospitalizations to the intensive care unit were brought up in asocial families (drinking or drug-addicted parents). The children were not given due attention, there was a violation of diet and insulin intake, which eventually led to the development of a coma. Emergency notifications about "abuse syndrome" were sent to the parents of these children.
At the time of writing (30.01.2025), 102,607,583 people in the world fell ill with the new coronavirus infection. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the mortality rate was 2.15% (2,214,783 people died). In Russia, since the beginning of the pandemic, 24,877,276 people fell ill, of which 403,360 died, the mortality rate is 1.62% [4]. In different countries, the number of sick children from newborns to 18 years of age ranges from 0.8 to 2.8% [1,2,3,4]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many large studies have confirmed a direct relationship between the severity of the infectious disease and a history of diabetes. A meta-analysis of 8 studies involving almost 50,000 patients with COVID-19 showed that diabetes mellitus (DM) is the second most common comorbidity after hypertension [5].
According to experts, the high risk of developing infection in patients with diabetes is explained by immune disorders due to hyperglycemia and its acute and chronic consequences. In addition, elevated cytokine levels increase the risk of developing a severe form of infection [6]. Studies by Chinese scientists have found that diabetes mellitus is more common among patients with severe COVID-19 than among patients with a mild form of the disease: 16.2% versus 5.7%, and the prognosis for COV ID-19 in patients with diabetes was worse [7].
According to a number of studies, diabetes is also a risk factor for mortality in patients with COVID-19. A large national sample study showed that the mortality rate of patients with diabetes was significantly higher than that of patients without it: 10% versus 2.5% [6]. The mortality rate of patients without comorbid conditions in China was 0.9%, while in patients with diabetes it reached 7.3% [9]. A study of the clinical characteristics of deaths with COVID-19 revealed that diabetic ketoacidosis is one of the causes of patient mortality [9]. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for the development of severe pneumonia and septic course of viral infection, associated with the development of multiple organ failure and an increased risk of complications and death [8,9].
We noticed that in the city of Bratsk in the period 2019-2024 the number of sick children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes increased sharply. During the same period, outbreaks in the form of a pandemic of a new coronavirus infection were observed around the world. We decided to trace the connection between newly diagnosed diabetes and a previous illness of a new coronavirus infection. Many scientists are inclined to believe that COVID -19 attacks the cells of the pancreas, as a result of which it stops producing insulin in the required quantities. Under the influence of the corona virus, the body produces proteins whose work is called the "abnormal immune response." The body fights itself. The COVID-19 virus affects the b-cells of the pancreas, its tissue is a potential target for infection, leading to glucose metabolism disorders. This means that it can trigger the development of type 1 diabetes or cause an increase in sugar levels (decompensation of diabetes if present). It is assumed that the SARS-CoV-2 virus seriously damages the islet cells of the pancreas and contributes to the development of diabetes or its worsening. [9,10,11]
Purpose Of the Study
To analyze the reasons for the increase in the number of patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus, as well as repeated admissions of such patients with a previously established diagnosis to the anesthesiology and intensive care unit in normal years and during the pandemic of a new coronavirus infection. To trace the possible relationship between a history of a new coronavirus infection and the development of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children.
In the intensive care unit of the OGBUZ "Bratsk Children's City Hospital" for 25 years, in the period from 2000 to 2024, 340 cases of sick children with the diagnosis of: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM type 1) aged from 1 year to 18 years were hospitalized. In 321 cases, the diagnosis upon admission was: type 1 diabetes mellitus, diabetic precoma or coma, ketoacidosis and in 19 cases the diagnosis was: type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemic coma. Of the 340 cases of hospitalization: in 138 cases, DM type 1 was diagnosed in children for the first time, and in 202 cases there were repeated hospitalizations.
Total number of patients in intensive care, number of patients with diabetes (abs., %) | Number of hospitalizations of diabetes mellitus newly diagnosed (abs.) | Number of cases of rehospitalization of diabetes (abs.) | |
| 2000 | 285; 7 (2.5%) | 2 | 5 |
| 2001 | 279; 3 (1.1%) | 1 | 2 |
| 2002 | 290; 7 (2.4%) | 3 | 4 |
| 2003 | 184; 4 (2.2%) | 2 | 2 |
| 2004 | 291; 6 (2.1%) | 1 | 5 |
| 2005 | 296; 4 (1.4%) | 2 | 2 |
| 2006 | 344; 4 (1.2%) | 2 | 2 |
| 2007 | 345; 2 (0,6%) | 1 | 1 |
| 2008 | 405; 3 (0,7%) | 2 | 1 |
| 2009 | 323; 4 (1,2%) | 3 | 1 |
| 2010 | 305; 9 (3,0%) | 7 | 2 |
| 2011 | 254; 5 (2,0%) | 3 | 2 |
| 2012 | 252; 6 (2,4%) | 1 | 5 |
| 2013 | 254; 12 (4,7%) | 5 | 7 |
| 2014 | 243;11 (4,5%) | 2 | 9 |
| 2015 | 206;17 (8,3%) | 7 | 10 |
| 2016 | 284; 12 (4,2%) | 2 | 10 |
| 2017 | 300; 16 (5,3%) | 7 | 9 |
| 2018 | 260; 26 (10,0%) | 8 | 18 |
| 2019 | 294; 28 (9,5%) | 8 | 20 |
| 2020 | 220; 22 (10,0%) | 10 | 12 |
| 2021 | 228; 36 (15,7%) | 16 | 20 |
| 2022 | 273; 41 (15,0%) | 17 | 24 |
| 2023 | 226; 24 (10.7%) | 12 | 12 |
| 2024 | 203; 31 (15.3%) | 14 | 17 |
| Total: | 6470; 340 (5.4) | 138 | 202 |
Table 1: The absolute and relative number of patients with type I diabetes treated in the intensive care unit is presented in.
Table 1 type I diabetes in the intensive care unit in comparison with the total number of ICU patients abs., (%).
Diagram 1: Cases of hospitalization of patients with type I diabetes (primary/recurrent) years.
Comparative diagram by year of hospitalizations of patients with the diagnosis: Newly diagnosed type I diabetes and re-hospitalized patients with the established diagnosis: type I diabetes (abs.).
Note: patients who were readmitted with a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes are marked in red; patients with a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, newly diagnosed, are marked in blue.
When analyzing Table 1 and Diagram 1, it was revealed that starting in 2020, the number of patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus has increased significantly. Over 20 years (2000–2019), the increase in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus ranged from 1–8 patients per year (an average of 4 people/year). However, starting in 2020, during the “covid” years, the number of patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus has increased sharply. The increase in patients in this group ranged from 10–17 patients (an average of 14 people/year). The number of re-hospitalizations with diabetes mellitus over 20 years (2000–2019) ranged from 1–20 cases (an average of 6 cases/year). For the period from 2020–2024. from 12 to 24 cases of re-hospitalization per year (on average 19 cases/year).
| Reasons for hospitalization of patients with diabetes in intensive care units | |
| Reasons for hospitalization | Number of cases, abs. (%) |
| Initial hospitalization: | |
| newly diagnosed diabetes | 138 (40.6%) |
| Rehospitalization: | |
| diet violation | 85(25.1%) |
| untimely insulin injection | 46(13.5%) |
| concomitant diseases | 71(20.8%) |
| Total: | 340 (100%) |
Table 2: Reasons for hospitalization of patients with type I diabetes in intensive care units.
Table 2 shows that the main reason for hospitalization of patients with type I diabetes in the intensive care unit is newly diagnosed type I diabetes with the development of precoma or coma - 138 patients (40.6%). Among repeated hospitalizations to the intensive care unit, dietary violation in patients with type I diabetes was 85 (25.1%), of which 75 patients (88.2%) led to the development of diabetic coma. The history of the development of the disease in these children includes the use of carbohydrates in the form of chocolate, sweets, carbonated drinks . And in 10 patients (11.8%), untimely food intake against the background of insulin injection led to the development of hypoglycemic coma . In 46 patients (13.5%), independent cancellation of insulin led to the development of diabetic coma. In 71 patients (20.8%), concomitant diseases (ARI, flu, pneumonia, covid-19) led to a "breakdown" of compensatory mechanisms against the background of selected insulin therapy and the development of diabetic coma. Our analysis showed that several patients were regularly admitted to the intensive care unit with signs of coma for several years. Over twenty-five years of observation, 19 patients moved to other cities for permanent residence. 29 patients were removed from "D" registration in
the children's clinic due to them reaching 18 years of age and switching to "D" registration in adult clinics. Interaction with district pediatricians and a social worker revealed that most children with repeated hospitalizations to the intensive care unit were brought up in asocial families (drinking or drug-addicted parents). The children were not given due attention, there was a violation of diet and insulin intake, which eventually led to the development of a coma. Emergency notifications about "abuse syndrome" were sent to the parents of these children.
When a patient with suspected diabetes is admitted to the emergency room, the patient is examined by a pediatrician, endocrinologist and resuscitator, a blood sugar test is taken according to cito . Since 2020, a PCR swab for covid-19 or an express test for covid-19 is additionally taken in the emergency room to determine the profile of the department for hospitalizing patients.
Of the 138 patients admitted to the intensive care unit with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus and in 202 cases in patients with rehospitalization, there were manifestations of diabetic precoma or coma, as well as signs of severe metabolic acidosis.
Year
| Total number of patients with newly diagnosed diabetes and number of patients who underwent ELISA blood testing for immunoglobulins to SARS-CoV-2 | Ig M CP <0> CP from >=0.8 to <1> CP>=1.1 – positive and number of patients (abs. and %) | Ig G <10> >=10 – positive (Min – max values) and number of patients (abs. and %) |
| 2020 | 10(4; 40.0%) | neg. | 16.49 – 716.46 (4) |
| 2021 | 16(8; 50.0%) | 1.92 – 3.94 (2) | 29.08 – 689.79 (6) |
| 2022 | 17(10; 58.8) | 4.15 (1) | 28.76- 449.61 (9) |
| 2023 | 12(5;41.6%) | neg. | 15.38 – 790.79 (5) |
| 2024 | 14(8;57.1%) | 1.26 – 2.98 (1) | 12.45 – 890.35 (7) |
| Total: | 69(35; 49,5%) | 4 (5,8%) | 31 (44,9%) |
Table 3: Number of patients with newly diagnosed diabetes Type I, who underwent ELISA blood testing for immunoglobulins to SARS-CoV-2.
From 2020 to 2024, all patients diagnosed with type I diabetes mellitus underwent PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 in the emergency department. Detection of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is of auxiliary importance for diagnosis of current infection and is essential for assessing the immune response to the current or a previous infection. Solution about testing for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 was decided by the attending physician individually, based on clinical appropriateness (on average, ELISA blood test for immunoglobulins to SARS-CoV-2, performed in 11.2% of cases in 35 patients). For the period from 2020 to 2024, out of 69 patients with newly diagnosed diabetes, Type I in 14 patients (20.2%), a positive nasopharyngeal swab for PCR analysis for SARS-CoV-2 was noted. And in 35 patients who, as prescribed by a doctor, were tested for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, a positive Ig test was noted in 4 patients (11.4%). M to SARS-CoV-2 and 31 patients (88.6%) had a positive Ig test G to SARS-CoV-2. Two patients tested positive for Ig M to SARS-CoV-2 and Ig G to SARS-CoV-2. Thus, the analysis of Table 3 shows that mild, moderate or severe COVID-19 infection in children served as a provoking factor in the development of type I diabetes in children in different age groups. Moreover, in some patients, the development of diabetes mellitus occurred in the acute stage of covid-19 (14 patients had a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2). In 4 patients, type I diabetes developed in the period from 7 days to 2 months after suffering from covid-19 (this is indicated by an elevated level of Ig M to SARS-CoV-2). In 31 patients, diabetes mellitus developed from 3 weeks to several months after the new coronavirus infection (this is evidenced by an increased level of Ig G to SARS-CoV-2).
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
