AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/532
1Medical Program Director, Colorado Center for Health and Sports Science, Denver, CO.
2Clinical Professor of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
3Assistant Professor of Anatomy and Exercise Science, Colorado Christian University, Lakewood, CO.
*Corresponding Author: Neil E. Wolkodoff, Medical Program Director, Colorado Center for Health and Sports Science, Denver, CO.
Citation: Neil E. Wolkodoff, Gerald M. Haase, Joyce A. Curry, (2025), Effects of a Jellyfish Collagen-Based Amino Acid Supplement on Cognitive Function and Memory: A Pilot Investigation, J Clinical Research and Reports, 19(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/532
Copyright: © 2025, Neil E. Wolkodoff. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 26 April 2025 | Accepted: 01 May 2025 | Published: 09 May 2025
Keywords: cognitive function; jellyfish; collagen; eeg; cognition; memory; executive function; amino acids
Background/Aim
This beta investigation assessed the impact of a marine-sourced collagen supplement on measures of cognitive function. Systemic collagen has recently been purported to enhance brain function, but little research has explored this theory. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the effects of oral consumption of an encapsulated powder form of a proprietary jellyfish extract on global cognitive parameters during an eight-week open-label trial in middle-aged and older adults.
Material & Methods
23 subjects between the ages of 40 and 75 years were selected from the applicant pool for the study. Individuals with specific allergic, cardiometabolic, oncologic, or neurological conditions that may cause undue risk in participation were prospectively excluded. The study consisted of supplement consumption twice daily for eight weeks with an at-home, computer-based standard cognitive battery completed at pre-study baseline and at the end of the trial. In addition, at these same time points, an EEG profile of voltage strength and wave phase pattern was measured during reaction time and trail-making testing.
Results
Five specific metrics were used from the cognitive profile, all achieving changers that were statistically significant at P < .05. The neurocognitive index (NCI) increased from a standard score, age and gender matched, of 90.51 to 102.07. Composite, verbal and visual memory scores combined increased from 96.80 to a mean score of 110.15. Executive function increased from 96.26 to 105.22. EEG total reaction times in the p300 decreased by 130 milliseconds and combined trail-making scores demonstrated a reduction of test time by 12 seconds. Both were statistically significant. Though not analyzable, over half the individuals throughout the study period voluntarily reported positive outcomes, especially related to alertness, energy, focus, and sleep/dream patterns.
Conclusions
This pilot investigation showed that taking a proprietary oral jellyfish collagen supplement may offer meaningful benefits for overall cognitive function and brain activity. Seven different measures of cognitive performance improved significantly over the eight-week period. The supplement, derived from marine invertebrate collagen, appears to be a promising way to support brain health in healthy middle-aged and older adults. Importantly, no adverse side effects were reported, suggesting the supplement could be safely used by a large segment of the global population.
Maintenance of optimal cognitive function throughout the lifespan is becoming the most dominant health concern for the public at large, perhaps surpassing the anxiety related to serious chronic illnesses such as heart disease and cancer. Prevention strategies with orally consumable supplements to avoid decline in brain health are widely touted although few, if any, hold the potential to deliver on this promise.
Collagen is the most abundant complex structural protein in mammalian and marine species and is made up of numerous molecular isoforms, possesses unique amino acid profiles, and is present as several subtypes based on predominant tissue of origin and biological function [1,2]. This compound has proven to have a broad range of applications including in cosmetics, manufacturing, food science, materials production, and the pharmaceutical and biomedical industries [3-6]. Utilization in health care has been demonstrated in hair, skin, and nail conditions as well as wound healing, bone and joint disease, gastrointestinal health, and cognition [6-11]. The mechanisms by which collagen exerts these effects are believed to involve reductions in inflammation and oxidative stress, as well as broader anti-aging properties [12-18].
While collagen has traditionally been sourced from mammals—primarily bovine and porcine origins—there has been growing interest in marine-based collagen sources, which are beginning to noticeably impact the industry [19–20]. Most research on mammalian collagen has focused on its effects on skin, joints, and gut health, with minimal exploration into its potential role in cognitive function. In contrast, marine-derived collagen offers a range of advantages, including economic and environmental sustainability, biocompatibility, immunological safety, ease of extraction, widespread availability, chemical stability, low antigenicity, and enhanced bioavailability [21-23]. Within marine sources, invertebrate species differ significantly from the more commonly studied vertebrates, offering additional benefits in terms of their biophysical properties, processing characteristics, functional potential, and reduced allergenic risk [24-25].
Jellyfish, a marine invertebrate, has recently gained prominence across various industrial sectors and has sparked growing scientific interest, paving the way for future applications and innovations [3,26,27]. Jellyfish-derived collagen peptides are rich in mucopolysaccharides, compounds known to support connective tissue integrity, metabolic function, immune system regulation, mitochondrial performance, and neurological stability. Extraction methods for isolating these bioactive compounds continue to advance, and comparisons with bovine collagen in medical contexts have shown promising results [28-32]. Nutritionally, jellyfish offer a favorable profile: they are low in calories, virtually fat-free, and rich in essential collagen peptides, minerals, and amino acids [19,26,33,34].
Notably, jellyfish harvesting may contribute positively to environmental sustainability, particularly given climate-related changes in marine ecosystems [35,36]. As such, jellyfish collagen aligns with key objectives in economic development, social responsibility, and ecological protection [37-39]. Safety and quality profiles of jellyfish collagen are also strong. Microbiological assessments show minimal presence of harmful bacteria, yeast, or mold, while immunological risks—such as allergic reactions and the transmission of viruses or other pathogens often associated with mammalian sources—are significantly lower [5,22,23,36]. Additionally, concerns related to heavy metals, biogenic amines, or volatile nitrogen compounds are minimal, further supporting jellyfish as a clean and viable alternative collagen source [36,39].
To properly assess the value of a unique, patented jellyfish collagen supplement, this beta investigation employed techniques validated to measure global brain health status and cognitive function. A range of computerized test batteries can detect cognitive changes and related psychological and psycho-motor tasks [40-46]. This study utilized a well-known, remote evaluation tool that was self-administered and comfortable for participants to master and for whom the effects could be reliably replicated. These metrics have been shown to be of clinical value in a variety of settings and in subjects with a broad spectrum of age ranges in detecting cognitive changes [46-50].
In addition, the pilot trial incorporated electroencephalographic (EEG) electrode measurements during timed activity to further quantify brain activation and waveform patterns. EEG is noninvasive technique that records synaptic electrical activity, capturing voltage fluctuations and reproducible brain wave patterns, allowing for relevant clinical interpretation [51-53]. The technique's reliability has led to its use in numerous research and medical settings [54-56]. Cognitive domain status also utilizes EEG measurements [53-56]. In addition, specific brain wave patterns can indicate cognitive processing and function [57-59].
Moreover, the combined use of computerized cognitive assessments and EEG monitoring has a well-established track record in human clinical trials evaluating the effects of dietary supplements and other interventions [59-61]. This study leveraged both validated modalities to comprehensively assess the potential cognitive benefits of the jellyfish collagen supplement.
The study group consisted of participants of both genders (7 males, 16 females), with ages ranging from 40 to 72 years (mean age = 53). No vulnerable populations were included in this investigation. Prior to enrollment, potential participants were screened for current medication or supplement use, which was reviewed for clinical and safety considerations. They also provided information on their lifestyle and activity routines. To ensure consistent results, participants were required to maintain stable nutrition, medications, lifestyle habits, supplements, and activity levels throughout the eight-week trial.
Exclusion criteria included a personal or family history of allergies to fish, a serious cardiometabolic or oncologic health condition, a medical diagnosis of neurological disease, tremor, or cognitive impairment. In addition, subjects were queried about lifestyle factors for the study period to ensure consistency in exercise, dietary and work/life factors. The Institutional Review Board of the Colorado Center for Health and Sports Science approved the trial, and all participants indicated understanding of and signed the designated Informed Consent document.
The jellyfish supplement used in this investigation was KollaJell (Certified Nutraceuticals, Inc., Pauma Valley, CA). This collagen powder is a patented peptide formulation of collagen types I, II, and V, naturally sourced from wild Stomolophus meleagris and Acromitus Hardenbergi, two of the most studied and validated jellyfish species. This product was chosen for the study because it is a proprietary complete mixture containing 20 essential and nonessential amino acids, with minerals, trace elements, and calcium-binding proteins. This comprehensive extract supports physiological processes, gut-brain axis signaling molecules, immune system responses, glucose and lipid metabolism, mitochondrial energy, antioxidant protection, cognitive processes, and neuronal network function [8,11,12,14,18,28,62].
The patented extraction process used for the supplement preserves the collagen’s unique properties without the use of harsh chemicals or solvents [26]. This method results in a clean, hydrolyzed powder that is safely encapsulated into 500 mg doses per capsule (Figure 1). Participants in the trial began by taking one capsule twice daily, in the morning and evening. After approximately two weeks, they gradually increased their dosage to two capsules twice daily, resulting in a total intake of two grams per day over the eight-week study period. Five participants reported feeling overly alert if they took their second dose in the evening, so they opted to consume it in the early afternoon instead, which resolved the issue.
Figure 1: KollaJell Edible Jellyfish Peptide Product
At baseline, the participants completed the two investigative metrics before consuming the study product and after eight weeks of supplementation. The first was a standard cognitive test battery (CNS Vital Signs, Morrisville, NC). This broad-spectrum computerized neurocognitive testing instrument has been well-validated by two decades of experience in clinical and research environments [63]. The test was self-administered at home by each subject on their computer, allowing maximum familiarity and comfort. Each subject received detailed instructions, including minimum hardware/software requirements, a quiet, isolated setting that eliminates visual or sound distraction, and a dedicated, uninterrupted period. Twelve measurements were recorded during the test.
Prior to the start of the study, individual interviews with subjects indicated a strong personal interest in overall cognitive function, i.e., "Is my brain and thinking age appropriate?" This led to the inclusion of the neurocognition index (NCI) as a key measure. When queried about other individual interest areas, all subjects specifically expressed memory function in some form. Hence, the addition of composite, verbal, and visual memory. More than half of the subjects noted information planning, problem-solving, and attention in various work and social situations as important to them. These interests most closely matched executive function [64 - 67]. All 12 metric areas combine for the NCI. Measures recorded yet not individually calculated included psychomotor speed, reaction time, complex attention, cognitive flexibility, processing speed, simple attention and motor speed.
The standard score used in this system is adjusted for age and gender, allowing comparisons of each participant’s performance relative to the "normal" population. A score in this system of 100 is average, with below that number, some degree of below average, and above that number, above average. Regardless of where a participant fell within the age range, the standard score provided insight into how their results compared to age- and gender-matched norms, and how the composite score changed for the selected measurements over time. In this system, raw scores are compared to age and gender-specific norms to generate a standard score. A score of 100 represents the average for that age and gender group.
The second trial measurement was an EEG profile performed in a research laboratory center environment (WAViMed Scan EEG System, Denver, CO). This measurement permits the detection of voltage activation in different brain regions in response to simultaneous performance. The activities undertaken during the EEG session included auditory reaction time and two standard trail-making tests. The p300 total reaction time, voltage during the test, and combined trail-making scores were recorded for each subject. The p300 test is depicted in Figure 2.
Figure 2: EEG p300 using the WAViMed System
Weekly subject contacts were made to ensure compliance with study conditions. This provided a platform for weekly subjective observations on changes in quality-of-life factors as they related to dimensions such as cognitive function, sleep, daily routine, and energy levels.
Standard scores and mean outcome changes for neurocognitive index, composite memory, visual and verbal memory, and executive function are detailed in Table 1.
The NCI improved from 91.05 to 102.41, while composite memory started at 96.9 and increased to 111.57. With respect to isolating specific memory scores, the verbal memory values changed from 94.68 to 108.3, while visual memory scores started at 98.83 and finished at 110.58. Executive function had a starting mean of 96.26 and concluded at a mean score of 105.22. All changes were statistically significant, as noted by the test scores for each category.
All five areas improved from slightly below the average standard score of 100 to above 100. Figure 3 graphically depicts these changes.
Figure 3: Graphic Depiction of Cognitive Test Changes, Pre and Post
Regarding the EEG assessments, the mean total reaction time for the p300 decreased from 300.94 milliseconds to 269.3 milliseconds, statistically significant with a P value of .004. The initial mean voltage reading was 12.27 microvolts (uV), with a final value of 11.92 uV. This change was not statistically significant at the P = .280 level. The trail-making composite test times decreased from 134.02 to 122.4 seconds, statistically significant, with a P value of .037. These results are combined in Table 3.
The topographic maps depict in visual form the brain's activation during the p300 assessment. Cool colors, like blue and green, indicate low activation. Warm colors, such as yellow, orange, and red, scale upward, indicative of more activation. As individual topo maps vary, the subjects were combined in two pre-versus post-intervention composite graphics. This image, Figure 4, mirrors visually the changes in total reaction time and decreased trail-making score time
Figure 4: Combined Subject EEG Topo Map, Pre and Post
This prospective pilot observational trial is one of the few human studies to describe the effects of a proprietary jellyfish collagen powder extract on a battery of cognitive parameters in adults. This investigation utilized two validated techniques to assess the changes in recognized, vital cognition domains. These observations have important implications for clinical relevance since the benefits were demonstrated in a broad adult population of both genders. Therefore, this attribute of the study may provide reasonable generalizability of the results to a large global audience.
The initial step in launching this beta study was identifying the optimal collagen supplement intervention that could positively impact brain health. This was accomplished by employing a product that was sourced from wild-caught, edible jellyfish (Kolla Jell™) by a patented extraction technique [26]. The resulting substance uniquely contains types I, II, and V collagen with 20 essential and nonessential amino acids, key macronutrients, calcium-binding proteins, and antioxidants. Significant amounts of glycine, tryptophan, glutamate, and tyrosine are present to produce neurotransmitters dopamine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and serotonin, essential for neuroprotection, mood regulation, and cognitive function. Another advantage of the proprietary formulation was the relatively low dose required to detect a clinically relevant effect. The study dose of only two grams per day contrasts notably to the usual daily commercial collagen dosages of five to twenty grams.
In addition, the currently employed natural source of ingredients is critical since there are ample opportunities for deception regarding jellyfish-related compounds. For example, the naturally occurring calcium-regulating protein apoaequorin may address some aspects of age-related cognitive decline [68]. However, commercial enterprises may chemically manufacture synthetic, laboratory-created versions of this protein and claim, without proper evidence, that this artificially constructed form is equivalent to the natural protein [69]. Of course, these unsubstantiated claims are subject to criminal investigation, regulatory reprimand, penalty, scientific criticism, and public rebuke.
A strength of this pilot study was a selection of relevant clinical metrics to assess cognitive changes and employ the most appropriate methodologies to achieve the goals. The CNS Vital Signs Neurocognitive Test is a validated measure of brain health parameters that demonstrates test-to-test reliability and provides objective outcome scores comparable to the research normative values [63]. It also represents an efficient modality since the study subject can complete the assessment by self-administration in an in-home, comfortable, and familiar environment.
EEG measurement is a noninvasive method for recording the spontaneous electrical activity of the brain. This technology has been used routinely in medical and research settings to assess cortical function for almost a century and provides reliably consistent energy and wave patterns [51,52]. Due to its portability, ease of use, and virtually painless application, EEG is widely accepted in clinical settings. In this study, the EEG was especially valuable for detecting changes in brain voltage activation during three specific performance measurements.
This beta investigation showed beneficial outcomes in several parameters, including statistically significant increases in overall neurocognitive index, composite memory scores, individual verbal and visual memory, and executive function. These changes were both more expansive in the number of affected metrics and significance compared to other nutritional studies using the same or similar instruments/associated metrics [70-78].
The EEG profiles showed similar positive outcomes during the eight-week supplementation phase. Both auditory and visual responses, as well as trail-making test completion, improved to a comparable extent. While the average microvolts during the p300 wave declined slightly, they remained within the normal range. This supports the idea, proposed by some, that voltage is not necessarily the dominant predictor of cognitive function. In this study, the p300 voltage readings remained within the normal 6-15 µV range, while significant improvements were observed in total reaction time and combined trail-making scores. This was mirrored in the combined topo maps showing more activity, especially in the right side, particularly the Parietal, Temporal and Occipital regions, which combine for sensory input and processing [79-81].
Interestingly, more than half of the participants voluntarily reported benefits related to cognitive function, energy, and sleep/wake patterns, even though these aspects were not directly addressed by the study queries. With this study, the investigators were particularly mindful of the vagaries associated with clinical studies performed outside of the controlled environment of a standard trial site. Decentralized studies require constant vigilance on the investigators' part to ensure compliance with all performance aspects [82,83]. The key principles of this strategy note four distinct processes. The initial facet is the selection of the right subject, which occurs through the prospective, randomized recruitment process, eliminating those who possess any exclusion criteria. The next step involved the proper intervention, which was achieved by employing a unique natural jellyfish collagen supplement to measure the benefits. An important component, rarely addressed in nutritional studies is the consistency of lifestyle. Changes in nutritional patterns and intake, exercise, and other associated patterns can radically alter the results. The subjects had to commit to a consistent lifestyle and were monitored weekly to ensure this consistency over the eight-week period. Then, the relevant data must be used, and this was accomplished by utilizing two validated methods that assessed the necessary clinically relevant parameters. Finally, participant health and safety must be a priority. Fortunately, in this trial, no adverse side effects were reported primarily or detected secondarily.
Although the cognitive outcomes were positive, the current study did have some limitations. The open-label design without a placebo group may cause questions about the findings. However, the depth and breadth of the results in this case are compelling. The variability of the initial cognitive scores in each measurement did not affect statistical significance. An informal review of the subject starting points of those below average and those above average showed that both groups had improved in all five measures. One conclusion from this fact is the supplement worked well no matter where the subject started on the cognitive scale.
The relatively modest number of eligible subjects who completed the entire study may also engender some doubts, yet the strength of the objective data speaks for itself. All participants were personally and frequently monitored to ensure proper supplement consumption and accurate compliance with the computerized testing modalities. Future trials of longer duration and with larger subject numbers may be warranted to further confirm and more broadly generalize the current findings.
An eight-week trial of an orally consumed proprietary jellyfish collagen extract improved cognitive tests measured by an in-home computerized testing battery. The unique supplement also demonstrated a broad spectrum of brain activation and related performance during EEG monitoring. The systemically absorbed natural collagen product was well tolerated and did not cause any adverse side effects.
The authors are fully responsible for the content of the manuscript. NEW provided overall study design, data gathering and assembly, and final edits. GMH contributed to the initial paper structure and subject compliance. JAC performed initial study research review, subject recruitment and paper review. The supporting entity, Certified Nutraceuticals, Inc., had no role in study design or execution, data collection or analysis, or manuscript preparation. CN did provide product and testing support for the study.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
