AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9562/147
*Corresponding Author: Suresh Kishanrao. Family Physician & Public Health Consultant, Bengaluru, 560022
Citation: Suresh Kishanrao, (2025), Diagnosis & Management of Migraine & Sinus Headaches in Primary Care Settings, Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, 7(3); DOI:10.31579/2692-9562/147
Copyright: © 2025 Suresh Kishanrao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 23 April 2025 | Accepted: 28 April 2025 | Published: 02 May 2025
Keywords: headaches; migraine; tension headache’ sinus headache
Migraine and Sinus headaches have similar symptoms, often posing a challenge of diagnosis and management at Primary health care level. Migraine headaches are a part of Primary headaches and episodes are outcomes of stress, lack of sleep, smell, or hormonal disruption as part of premenstrual syndrome or during menstruation or any other pathological conditions. On the other hand, Sinus headaches are secondary headaches due to disorders of nose or paranasal sinuses, which usually follow acute infections of sinuses or recurrent nasal congestion due to seasonal allergies, Deviated Nasal Septum or Hay Fever.
Many patients recognize themselves by sheer previous experiences and individual specific triggers, do self-medication but approach a primary care Physician only when pain is not relieved by over-the-counter drugs or they cannot tolerate such medicines, despite controlling the triggers, and if symptoms continue to be persistent or very severe.
This article tries to empower primary care physicians to differentiate between Migraine and Sinus headaches, based on 4 different case reports in recent months.
Key Mehtods & Materials: The author uses one each of Migraine and acute Sinusitis and two challenging cases of chronic sinus headaches and managed in the last 3 months. Literature search adds guidelines for diagnosis and treatment options at primary health care settings.
A headache is a pain in our head or face that feels like pressure throbbing in nature, or constant, sharp, or dull ache, based on the type, severity, location, and frequency of the pain. Headaches are so common that if someone asks hundreds, thousands or even millions of people if they ever suffer headache, he may not encounter more than 5% who have not experienced it multiple times or at least few times during their lives. They are the most usual form of pain and are a major reason cited for days missed at work or school, as well as visits to healthcare providers. While most headaches are not dangerous, certain types can be a sign of a more serious condition. Migraine, Tension headaches and Sinus headaches are common types of headaches across the world [1].
Migraine and Sinus headaches have similar symptoms, often posing a challenge to diagnosis and management at Primary health care level. Migraine episodes are triggered by stress, lack of sleep, smell, or hormonal changes during menstruation or any other conditions, are known as Primary Headaches. Sinus headaches are due to disorders of nose or paranasal sinuses, therefore, known as secondary headaches as they usually follow acute infections of sinuses or recurrent nasal congestion due to seasonal allergies, Deviated Nasal Septum or Hay Fever. Many patients recognize themselves by sheer previous experiences and individual specific triggers, do self-medication but approach a primary care Physician only when pain is not relieved by over-the-counter drugs or they cannot tolerate such medicines, they may address moving away from the triggers, and if symptoms continue to be persistent or very sever.
The burden of migraine in India is substantial, as the estimated prevalence is around 16-20% of the population. It is more prevalent in women and rural areas. Each episode lasts for 1-3 days causing significant disability, loss productivity. Headache disorders, including migraine, are often underdiagnosed and undertreated, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, especially in remote rural areas. Migraine is often associated with psychiatric or menstrual disorders and work or social pressures.
This article tries to differentiate Migraine and Sinus headaches, based on 4 different cases, one each of Migraine and acute Sinusitis and two challenging cases of chronic sinus headaches the author came across and managed in the last 3 months. Literature search adds guidelines for diagnosis and treatment options at primary health care settings.
Ashish’s Chronic Frontal Left-sided Sinus headache:
Ashis 38-year-old male gold smith by profession, approached in early April 2025, with complaints of light heaviness on the left side of the forehead, cheek and face since a week. A detailed history revealed, common cold and running nose for about 10 days preceding current episode, nasal congestion and thick discharge, loss of smelling sense. On examination temperature =1000F, pulse= 92/minute were a bit elevated, A pressure applied using thumb elicited tenderness on the frontal and maxillary sinuses and it increased the pain. He reported having such episodes once a year or two, as he was allergic to a few fumes/dusts in goldsmith work. Suspecting Chronic sinusitis, we put him on Hostacyline (Tetracycline Hydrochloride) 500mg twice a day for 5 days, by which he had great relief (75%), but not complete, therefore, the antibiotic continued for another 3 days. For the last 4 weeks he has been fine and advised on long-acting penicillin injection once a quarter.
Veena Left Maxillary Sinusitis: Veena, 65 years elderly lady, referred by a general practitioner to an ENT specialist with complaints of cold, nasal congestion constant headache worse in the forenoon for over fortnight after trying decongestants and antibiotics. A serial coronal section of paranasal sinuses was studied. It revealed Maxillary sinus normal on the right side but on the left side Mucosal thickening noted. Bony nasal septum deviated towards left. Frontal, Ethmoidal and Sphenoid sinuses and all turbinates were normal. Total CBC showed lymphocytosis reflecting chronic infection A diagnosis of Deviated Nasal Septum towards left and Left Maxillary Sinusitis made and treated with “Cedrick 200 MG” twice a day along with MONTOVENT AL TABLET (combination Levocetirizine and Montelukast- antiallergic medicine) for 2 weeks and slowly tapered. She has been fine for a week now.
Bhargavi’s Migraine: 3 May 2025 Bhargavi aged 30 years called from Hospete, Karnataka, complaining of feeling uneasy, loss of appetite and indigestion and hazy vision. She is a known patient of Migraine since menarche suffering 2-3 time a year usually triggered by premenstrual syndrome, domestic quarrel, or stress of inability to conceive the second baby despite all efforts in last 3 years. This time it was a domestic quarrel with mother-in-law. The routine treatment with Tablet paracetamol or Migrest {a combination of Domperidone (10mg) + Flunarizine (5mg) + Paracetamol (500mg) did not help this time. After counselling on domestic disturbance and secondary Fertility a advised her to take Tab Combiflam 400m twice a day and Chlorpromazine 25 mg in the night. After about 36 hrs. she was relieved of the Migraine.
Acute Sinusitis Case: A 14-year-old female presented with severe headache, to an ENT OPD of a medical college Hospital in November 2024. She had a history of upper respiratory tract infection two weeks earlier. On physical examination the girl was conscious, depressed, swelling of the forehead, soft to touch, fluctuating sensation. Following a thorough clinical examination, Frontal sinusitis was suspected and treated with maxillary and frontal sinus window drainage & combined antibiotic therapy. The patient was cured in a week’s time. A follow-up period of three months showed no recurrence, indicating a favorable outcome.
The primary headache disorders, particularly migraine and tension-type headaches, and secondary headaches of Sinus headaches pose a significant public health burden due to their high prevalence, disability, and economic costs. Along with cluster headaches, they are the common causes of pain, disability, lose productivity, and are the reasons for absenteeism in schools, colleges and worksites and impact quality of life [1]. About 96% of people experience a headache at least once in their life & about 10% of them have migraine headaches. Globally, an estimated 40% of the population, or 3.1 billion people, experience headache every year, with females more affected than males. Each day, 15.8% of the world’s population has headaches [2].
A meta-analysis of 357 publications, the vast majority from high-income countries, the estimated global prevalence of active headache disorder was 52.0% of migraine = 14.0% of TTH = 26.0% and of H15+ = 4.6%. These estimates were comparable with those of migraine and TTH in GBD 2019, the most recent iteration, but higher for headache overall [2]
A study interviewed 2066 participants from 3,040 eligible households, with 98.3% from rural areas but 52.9% in urban Delhi, in the validation subsample of 291 participants (149 rural, 142 urban), 61 did not report any headache. In the remaining 230 participants who reported headaches in the preceding year, sensitivity, specificity and kappa with (95% CI) were 0.73, 0.80 and 0.43 for migraine; 0.71, 0.80 & 0.43 for tension-type headache and 0.75, 0.93 & 0.46 for headache on ≥ 15 days/month respectively [3].
Sinus Headaches:
Sinus headaches are headaches caused by a disorder of the nose or sinuses, often due to sinus infections (sinusitis). They are characterized by pain, pressure, and fullness in the face, especially around the eyes, cheeks, forehead, and bridge of the nose. The pain may worsen with sudden head movements or when bending over. They are also known as secondary headaches as they usually follow acute infections of sinuses or recurrent nasal congestion due to seasonal allergies, Deviated Nasal Septum or Hay Fever. Sinus infection, often caused by a cold, flu, or allergies, is the most common cause. Allergies can cause sinus inflammation and congestion and Anatomical issues like deviated nasal septum in the nose or sinuses can lead to chronic sinus headaches as was in our first 2 cases [5].
Figure: 1
Common but subtle differences in Symptoms: i) Neck pain is common in Migraine but rear in Sinus headaches ii) Nasal discharge: Sinus headaches symptomatically cause nasal discharge /congestion, which is thicker, yellowish or greenish purulent. In Migraine sometimes discharge may be there, but it is clear, and watery iii) Mood changes: Migraine headache is associated with mood changes like nausea, vomiting and numbness and they are throbbing in nature. Sinus headaches do not have mood changes, and they increase as the day progresses until afternoon and reduce by evening [7]
Migraine: The chronic Migraine is defined as episodes of 15 or more days of headache per month for 3 or more months or at least 8 or more headache days in each month. Migraine may be with or without Aura. Migraine headache with aura (MHAWoA) exhibit a) recurrent episodes last for 4-72 hrs., b) unilateral pain iii) Throbbing or Pulsating quality iv) Moderate to Sever intensity pain, aggravated by physical activity v) associated with Nausea, Phonophobia and Photophobia [4,7].
Sinus Headaches: On the other hand, Sinusitis headaches are i) Correlated with Rhinosinusitis, ii) the pain is felt in face, forehead, cheeks and bridge of the nose iii) Pain is accompanied by fullness or a feeling of pressure iv) Purulent nasal discharge or congestion, hyposmia or Anosmia is common v) A pressure applied on the sinuses enhances the pain as shown in the figure [5,6].
Sinusitis is classified as Acute and Chronic with similar symptoms based on the duration. Acute sinusitis is a short-lived infection of the sinuses often linked to a cold. The symptoms of chronic sinusitis last at least 12 weeks and are caused by allergies, structural problems, or infections. There might be many bouts of acute sinusitis before it becomes chronic sinusitis.
In clinical practice 50% of migraines are misdiagnosed, especially if preceded by common cold and forceful sneezing in the recent past. Similarly, up to 90% of cases of sinus headaches, going to general practitioners, are diagnosed as migraine. People with migraine may also develop symptoms like sinusitis, like a runny nose or congestion. Migraine headaches also cause pain along the trigeminal nerve, which interacts with the sinus passages leading to confusion of it to be related to the sinuses [4].
Figure: 2
Diagnosis: Both conditions are diagnosed clinically most often. Imaging is done for the diagnosis in both cases, mostly to rule out Meningitis, encephalitis, brain tumors or Abscess. Paranasal imaging is done to rule out deviated nasal septum (DND) or severe or persistent infections as was done in Veena’s case. Cervical spine imaging is done to rule out degenerative osteoarthritis, Cervical spondylollsthesis, herniated disc or abscess.
Treatment:
Inflammation of the frontal sinus is a relatively common clinical condition occasionally progressing to frontal sinus abscess. Treatment of Sinus headache often involves i) viral infections subside naturally with antihistamines & decongestants to address allergy symptoms like nasal congestion & anti-inflammatory drugs & analgesics to relieve pain ii) for bacterial infections antibiotics are added in addition to antihistamines and analgesics. For acute sinusitis ENT specialists give Saline nasal sprays and humidifiers, Corticosteroid nasal sprays or pills for inflammation. In rare cases, Primary care physicians may have to referrer for surgical interventions like maxillary & frontal sinus window drainage or Septoplasty for Deviated Nasal septal correction [6].
Migraine treatment focuses on relieving symptoms during an attack and preventing future attacks. Symptomatic treatment includes Analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs like ibuprofen and acetaminophen, as well as prescription medications like triptans. Preventive advice includes lifestyle changes, supplements, & prescription of beta-blockers or antidepressants [3,4].
Prognosis: Viruses cause most sinus infections, which clear up in 5-10 days, and the sinus headache goes away. Sinus issues that don’t go away in 8-10 days indicate a bacterial or fungal infection as was in case of Ashis and Veena that require antibiotic or antifungal treatment.
Prevention: Taking precautions towards seasonal allergies that make spring a season of nasal congestion which may turn into a viral sinus infection. An allergies test can identify the item/s one is allergic to, and they must avoid the same. As common colds may lead to viral sinus infections, one can prevent colds by washing our hands or using hand sanitizers & staying away from people who have colds. Treatments for Nasal polyps which block our sinuses and cause sinus headaches include steroid sprays and pills, stents and surgery to remove polyps. A deviated septum can be corrected with Septoplasty.
Migraine and Sinus headaches have similar symptoms, often posing a challenge of diagnosis and management at Primary health care level.
Three groups of symptoms /Signs namely i) Neck pain is common in Migraine but rear in Sinus headaches ii) Nasal discharge: Sinus headaches symptomatically cause nasal discharge /congestion, which is thicker, yellowish or greenish purulent. In Migraine sometimes discharge may be there, but it is clear, and watery iii) Mood changes like nausea, vomiting & numbness and throbbing pain are typical of Migraine.
Migraine treatment focuses on relieving symptoms during an attack and preventing future attacks. Sinus headaches treatment focusses on nasal congestion & anti-inflammatory drugs & analgesics to relieve pain and antibiotics if bacterial infections is suspected.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. The peer review process of the journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions was excellent and fast, as was the support of the editorial office and the quality of the journal. Kind regards Walter F. Riesen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Walter F. Riesen.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. Thank you for publishing our article, Exploring Clozapine's Efficacy in Managing Aggression: A Multiple Single-Case Study in Forensic Psychiatry in the international journal of clinical case reports and reviews. We found the peer review process very professional and efficient. The comments were constructive, and the whole process was efficient. On behalf of the co-authors, I would like to thank you for publishing this article. With regards, Dr. Jelle R. Lettinga.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, I would like to express my deep admiration for the exceptional professionalism demonstrated by your journal. I am thoroughly impressed by the speed of the editorial process, the substantive and insightful reviews, and the meticulous preparation of the manuscript for publication. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the courteous and immediate responses from your editorial office to all my inquiries. Best Regards, Dariusz Ziora
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation, Auctores Publishing LLC, We would like to thank the editorial team for the smooth and high-quality communication leading up to the publication of our article in the Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. The reviewers have extensive knowledge in the field, and their relevant questions helped to add value to our publication. Kind regards, Dr. Ravi Shrivastava.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, Auctores Publishing LLC, USA Office: +1-(302)-520-2644. I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the efficient and professional handling of my case report by the ‘Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies’. The peer review process was not only fast but also highly constructive—the reviewers’ comments were clear, relevant, and greatly helped me improve the quality and clarity of my manuscript. I also received excellent support from the editorial office throughout the process. Communication was smooth and timely, and I felt well guided at every stage, from submission to publication. The overall quality and rigor of the journal are truly commendable. I am pleased to have published my work with Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, and I look forward to future opportunities for collaboration. Sincerely, Aline Tollet, UCLouvain.
