AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review ariticle | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/527
Universidade da Madeira, Portugal
*Corresponding Author: Luísa Soares, Universidade da Madeira, Portugal.
Citation: João Abreu, Luísa Soares, (2025), Courage CBT Psychological Intervention in Prostate Cancer alongside with Poetry, J Clinical Research and Reports, 20(4); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/527
Copyright: © 2025, Luísa Soares. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 12 June 2025 | Accepted: 19 June 2025 | Published: 23 July 2025
Keywords: prostate cancer; cbt; psychological intervention; program; poetry
This intervention plan seeks to raise questions rather than answer them. It focuses on sharing knowledge and information with male participants in the hope that they will circulate the information to their social network. Rectal examination, prostate cancer diagnosis, psychological challenges, erectile dysfunction and even the fear of death are topics that these men rarely discuss in their daily lives. When spoken about openly throughout a proposed 6-session intervention program, certain stigmas can be demystified, understood, shared and deconstructed. This demystification is the essential point of this proposal, as it can increase early diagnoses and the search for psychological support, potentially saving lives.
Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide, killing an estimated 10,507,675 people in 2022 (Cancer Today, 2024). This pathology is characterized by diseases that develop in any organ or tissue of the human body. It develops due to the uncontrolled multiplication of tumor cells and can spread to other organs or areas of the body through a process known as metastasis (World Health Organization, 2019). Prostate cancer occurs when there is uncontrolled growth of cells in the prostate, an exclusively male gland located below the bladder and responsible for producing seminal fluid (American Cancer Society, 2019). If cancer spreads outside the prostate, cancer cells may be found in the lymph nodes surrounding the prostate gland. If these cells reach the lymph nodes, there is a very high risk of cancer spreading throughout the Lymphatic System to other nodes, bones or other organs, increasing the difficulty of treatment (Cancer Research UK, 2020). Most patients with early-stage prostate cancer do not experience any symptoms, so when prostate cancer begins to cause symptoms, it is possibly at a more advanced stage, making the healing process more challenging. Although it is often silent, there are some early warning signs such as blood in the urine, difficulty urinating, pelvic pain, frequent urge to urinate and weak urine flow (Prostate Cancer – Early-Stage: Symptoms, Diagnosis & Treatment - Urology Care Foundation, n.d.). Given the lack of visible symptoms in the early stages of prostate cancer, screening tests play an important role in early diagnosis and, consequently, with higher survival rates (Carvalho & Soares, 2025). Screening tests can be performed through a blood test or a rectal examination. The blood test measures prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, a protein produced by prostate gland cells in both blood and semen. The likelihood of having prostate cancer increases as PSA levels also increase since this protein is produced by both normal cells and cancer cells, so the presence of cancer cells can explain the increased concentration of PSA in the blood. In the case of a rectal examination, it is performed by inserting a lubricated, gloved finger into the patient's rectum to identify areas of the prostate gland that may be more prominent, hard or rough (Cancer, n.d.; Communication of the Commission's European Cancer Plan to the European Parliament and the Council (n.d.).If screening tests show any abnormalities or warning signs, patients are referred for biopsy or imaging tests to make a complete diagnosis (American Cancer Society, 2023). Subsequently, patients are referred for the treatment that best suits their needs to cure or control the disease. If the cancer has spread throughout the body, the aim is no longer to cure it but to extend the patient's life expectancy and delay the onset of symptoms (NHS, 2021; Silva & Soares, 2025). The most common approaches to treating prostate cancer are watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy (NHS, 2021). Prostate cancer treatment is often associated with side effects that can impact patients' quality of life. Erectile dysfunction, loss of fertility, urinary incontinence and extreme fatigue are some common side effects of various treatments. Discomfort in the anal region, diarrhea, and pain when urinating are some possible side effects associated with radiotherapy. Similarly, nausea, hair loss, loss of appetite and weakened immune system are adverse effects associated with chemotherapy (Prostate Cancer Foundation, 2017; NHS, 2021)
The stigma associated with screening tests
There are some obstacles to carrying out screening tests due to beliefs and stigmas present in the male sex, which result in less demand for health services (Galdas, 2005). These stigmas and beliefs are very present in prostate cancer patients for two main reasons: physical discomfort and mental discomfort adjacent to screening procedures, especially during the rectal examination (Vapiwala et al., 2021). Although the rectal examination is a critical screening test in aiding early diagnosis, this population must overcome the fear of "losing their masculinity" and accept the examination so there is greater adherence (James et al., 2017; Figueira & Soares, 2025). In response to these challenges, "Europe's Beating Cancer Plan" aims to extend screening beyond breast, colorectal and cervical cancers to include other types of cancer, such as prostate cancer (Silva & Soares, 2025; Santos & Soares, 2024; James et al., 2017).
Risk Factors
Anyone born with a prostate is at risk of developing prostate cancer. However, some factors increase the risk of this development, such as advanced age, family history and ethnicity (Prostate Cancer Foundation, 2017). The incidence of prostate cancer increases significantly after the age of 50, with approximately 60% of cases diagnosed in men over the age of 65. Additionally, having a father or brother diagnosed with prostate cancer increases the risk of developing the disease in men. Ethnicity is also a risk factor, as prostate cancer occurs more frequently in African American men and Caribbean men of African descent compared to men of other ethnic origins. It is important to note that the reasons for these racial and ethnic differences remain unclear (Prostate Cancer Foundation, 2017; American Cancer Society, 2020). In addition to these risk factors, inherited genetic alterations, more specifically inherited variants of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene, are associated with an increased risk of developing several types of cancer, including prostate cancer. Obesity, having had a vasectomy, smoking, contracting sexually transmitted infections, and diets rich in dairy products are risk factors that have been investigated but currently have inconclusive results (American Cancer Society, 2020). In contrast, exposure to air pollution has positive associations with the development of prostate cancer, reinforcing the evidence that supports the classification of outdoor air pollution as a carcinogenic agent for humans, as established by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, Younogo et al., 2022). Prostate cancer may also partially correlate with environmental factors such as air temperature, which influence persistent organic pollutants' deposition, absorption and degradation. Some of these pollutants are endocrine disruptors, affecting the production and transport of hormones, including androgen hormones such as testosterone. Dysregulation of testosterone and other hormones, such as cortisol and estrogen, influences the inflammatory response and cell growth balance in the prostate gland, thus increasing the risk of developing prostate cancer (St-Hilaire et al., 2010).
Prostate Cancer Statistical Data: Incidence and Mortality
Prostate cancer is the fourth most common cancer globally and the second most prevalent among men, being the fifth responsible for most deaths (Cancer Today, 2024). In 2022, there were 1,467,854 new cases and 397,430 deaths worldwide (Cancer Today, 2024). In Portugal, prostate cancer is the most common among men, with 7,529 new cases and 2,083 deaths in 2022, ranking as the third type of cancer with the most deaths in the male population (Cancer Today, 2024). At a regional level, in Madeira, Portugal, in southern Europe, it is estimated that around 150 new cases will emerge annually, with 37 deaths attributed to prostate cancer in 2022 (RTP Madeira, 2024; Regional Statistics Directorate of Madeira, 2022).
The Baby Boomer Generation and Prostate Cancer
Baby Boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, and Pre-Boomers, born between 1928 and 1945 (Luttrell et al 2024) are the groups most likely to develop prostate cancer (Serviço de Saúde Da RAM, EPERAM - RON - Registro Oncológico Nacional, 2018; Soares & Castro, 2024). The Baby Boomer generation values the quality of life and demonstrates greater demand for health services than the Pre-Boomer generation. These differences can be explained, in part, by the higher level of educational qualifications and higher income generally observed in the Baby Boomer generation (Luttrell et al., 2024; Soares & Castro, 2024).
The Psychological Impact of Prostate Cancer
Between 30% and 50% of prostate cancer patients report psychological and social difficulties, regardless of the stage of the disease, its progression or the type of treatment received. Among the most frequent psychological problems are anxiety related to the disease and its treatment, depressive symptoms, feelings of guilt and remorse after diagnosis, fear of cancer recurrence and the proximity of death (De Sousa et al., 2019). Additionally, there is a very positive correlation between erectile dysfunction, a side effect of prostate cancer treatment, and lower levels of self-esteem (Hilger et al., 2019; Özkent et al., 2020). The various stages of diagnosis and the chosen approach to treatment influence the physical, emotional, social and even sexual wellbeing of patients (Appleton et al., 2014). So, the quality of life of people diagnosed with prostate cancer is compromised in the short and long term, and this must be taken into account as an attempt is made to achieve the best possible care for these patients (Dos Santos Silva et al, 2024; Singh et al., 2010). These psychological challenges point to the need for a planned psychological intervention, and as such, the intervention plan entitled "Courage" is proposed to change behaviors (Soares, 2023; Soares et al., 2024; Zuniga et al., 2019) reduce prejudice and stigma regarding screening and acceptance of a prostate cancer diagnosis.
The Psychological intervention plan
The intervention plan consists of six weekly sessions, five group sessions lasting between 60 and 120 minutes and one individual session lasting between 45 and 60 minutes. Additionally, there will be an individual session 0, applied before the start of the plan, lasting 60 minutes. A psychologist should implement this plan in the context of primary health care. The group must be composed of 10 male participants, between 60 and 78 years old (belonging to the Baby Boomer generation) and who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer. They must be able to read and write in addition to their name and not have a diagnosis of severe psychopathologies that prevent participation and understanding of activities based on cognitive behavioral therapy (such as depression or psychosis). The primary objective is to improve participants' quality of life and reduce the associated stigma, based on the theoretical model of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). CBT has been the preferred approach in oncology since group intervention, especially that which includes cognitive behavioral strategies, is more effective with cancer patients (Torres et al., 2014).
Session 0 – Screening and selection of participants
The objective of session 0 is to identify and select 10 participants for the psychological intervention program using the inclusion criteria to guarantee the group's homogeneity and the adequacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy model. This session also seeks to begin the therapeutic relationship with the participant, which will be essential for the effectiveness of the psychological intervention. Session 0 begins with an initial presentation by the psychologist and the participant, followed by a screening interview where the necessary clinical information will be collected. Subsequently, the psychologist will apply the WHO-5 Scale designed to assess the participant's wellbeing over the last 2 weeks. This Likert scale has only 5 items, with responses ranging from 0 (Never) to 5 (All the time; Bakhtiyar Aliyev et al., 2024). It is important to note that although there is a translated version of the WHO-5 scale, it is not validated for the Portuguese population. We strongly recommend that this validation be carried out, or the WHO-5 scale cannot be applied.
Session 1: Each diagnosis is a story
Session 1 aims to create a safe space for participants to share their personal experiences and demystify the topics of digital rectal examination and prostate cancer diagnosis. It begins with the psychologist introducing the group and a guest, a former prostate cancer patient. Afterward, the psychologist must consolidate some rules that must be followed in the sessions, focusing mainly on mutual respect between participants and the confidentiality. This introductory phase concludes with the participants introducing themselves to each other. Next, a brief psychoeducation session about the digital rectal exam and the diagnosis of prostate cancer, addressing the stigma surrounding the digital rectal exam, why it causes discomfort and what can be done in order to mitigate it. Psychoeducation will also serve to inform about the psychological impact this can have on participants and those people around them and how these challenges are common to many men diagnosed with prostate cancer. It will follow an invitation to share personal experiences on the topics previously discussed: digital rectal examination and the first contact with the diagnosis of prostate cancer. An important rule is that no one feels forced to start talking about what makes them uncomfortable; the guest is called to intervene and is in charge of sharing first, "breaking the ice," and potentially making participants feel encouraged to share their own experiences. Afterward, the psychologist leads a discussion about the shared experiences to include the content learned in the initial psychoeducation in their reflections. It is an incentive if the information discussed in the session is passed on to other men outside the group who belong to the participant's social circle (Santos Silva et al., 2024). This transfer of information will be relevant throughout the intervention plan, which is why there is an excellent emphasis on psych educating participants so that the skills acquired are helpful for them and their community—social surroundings. Before closing the session, each participant will receive a logbook that they should use throughout the intervention to record thoughts, emotions, concerns or desires related to their diagnosis, wellbeing, and the sessions they participate. Furthermore, participants will give feedback at the end of each session, mentioning aspects they liked most, how they felt, and what could be improved, with anonymity. Logbooks are important on two fronts: they are helpful for the participants and the psychologist. Logbooks are important for participants because they serve as a written record of their progress throughout the sessions. For psychologists they are helpful because they keep participants engaged with the intervention between sessions, in addition to having access to their view. Personal real-time monitoring of each participant provides good insight into the plan's gains and weaknesses, thus facilitating future improvements.
Session 2: Relaxation and Stress Management Techniques
Session 2 focuses on teaching and practicing relaxation and stress management techniques to help participants cope with anxiety and stress associated with prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. Begins with a review of the previous session and a presentation of the objective of the current session. Relaxation and stress management techniques will be worked out as early as possible so that participants can practice these skills, calm down, and self-regulate their emotions when needed. Before applying relaxation and stress management techniques, there will be psychoeducation about stress, which consists of explaining its impact on health and wellbeing, especially in people who are in an oncological context (Conceição & Bueno 2020; Soares & Dantas, 2024). The first relaxation technique to be applied is the Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercise. This technique is used to control anxiety and its symptoms. The exercise begins with participants paying attention to their diaphragm between the abdomen and chest. At the same time, they inhale deeply through the nose and then exhale slowly, always remembering that the diaphragm should expand during inspiration and decrease during expiration (Conceição & Bueno 2020).
The second technique to be applied is Jacobson's Progressive Relaxation Exercise, which aims to reduce the physical impact of stress, reduce anxiety symptoms and lower blood pressure (Conceição & Bueno, 2020):
1. Contract the forehead muscles for 5 seconds; relax for 10 seconds.
2. Smile and remain in the same position for 5 seconds; relax for 10 seconds.
3. Contract the eye muscles for 5 seconds; relax for 10 seconds.
4. Pull the head back for 5 seconds; relax for 10 seconds.
5. Close the fists, squeeze for 5 seconds; relax for 10 seconds.
6. Contract the biceps for 5 seconds; relax for 10 seconds.
7. Contract the triceps for 5 seconds; relax for 10 seconds.
8. Contract the shoulders for 5 seconds; relax for 10 seconds.
9. Tense the back for 5 seconds, relax for 10 seconds.
After Jacobson's progressive relaxation exercise, the last relaxation technique of this session is the 1-minute meditation. A brief explanation is given about the 1-minute meditation and how it can work as a quick tool to refocus the mind and calm the nervous system (Conceição & Bueno, 2020; Lucas & Soares, 2014; Lucas & Soares, 2013; Oliveira & Soares, 2011). The psychologist should then guide the participants as follows:
1. Sit upright in a straight-backed chair. Move the back slightly away from the back of the chair so that the spine can support itself. Feet can rest on the floor. Close your eyes or look down.
2. Concentrate on breathing as the air flows into the body. Perceive the different sensations generated by each inhalation and exhalation. Observe the breathing without expecting anything special to happen. There is no need to alter the natural rhythm.
3. After a few moments, the mind may start to wander. When you realize this, gently bring the attention back to breathing. The act of noticing that the mind has wandered and bringing it back without criticizing yourself is central to meditation.
4. The mind may become as still as a lake. Having a feeling of absolute peace can also be momentary. If you feel bored or irritated, it is important to realize that this emotion is also momentary. Whatever happens, allowing yourself to be the way you are is important without judgment.
5. After one minute, open your eyes slowly (Conceição & Bueno, 2020).
At the end of each technique, the psychologist should ask the participants how they felt, what was most challenging, what they found most useful and whether they understood the usefulness of these techniques and how to apply them. After applying all the relaxation and stress management techniques, there should be a general discussion about them, reinforcing that the more often they practice, the more effective they become.
Session 3: Emotional Self-Regulation and Self-Esteem
The objective of session 3 is to strengthen participants' emotional self-regulation and self-esteem. Emotional regulation has clinical relevance in patients with potentially fatal diseases, such as prostate cancer, as it can help promote inner strength and energy, alleviating symptoms of psychological distress and anxiety and improving their quality of life (Seiler & Jenewein, 2019; Soares & Silva, 2023). Therefore, it is appropriate to work on this topic so that they are better able to face the psychological challenges presented by the diagnosis and their adaptation to the treatment of prostate cancer.
Additionally, erectile dysfunction, which is a side effect of most prostate cancer treatments (Siegel et al., 2001), especially in the case of radical prostatectomies, is positively correlated with lower levels of self-esteem (Hilger et al., 2019; Özkent et al., 2020) and depressive symptoms in men diagnosed with prostate cancer who have undergone treatment (Nelson et al., 2011). Given the evidence on the low levels of self-esteem presented by prostate cancer patients who experience erectile dysfunction resulting from treatment, it becomes pertinent to address this issue in the psychological intervention plan to mitigate these possible self-esteem and self-image problems (Figueira & Soares, 2025). Session 3 begins with psychoeducation on emotional management and self-esteem (Conceição & Bueno, 2020). The focus will be on explaining the concept of emotional management and self-regulation and its importance in the context in which participants find themselves, in addition to informing about the psychological impact that erectile dysfunction can have. To promote emotional reflection on the topic, a poem will be read (Conceição & Bueno, 2020; Lucas & Soares, 2013) since, as suggested by Tegnér et al. (2009), poetry is capable of improving the emotional resilience of cancer patients, in addition to improving their anxiety levels. The chosen poem is "Invictus” by William Ernest Henley (1888):
“Invictus”
From the night that covers me
Black as the moat from Pole to Pole
I thank whatever God may be
For my unconquerable soul
In the straits of circumstances
I did not bow down or cry out loud.
Under the blows of bad luck
My head bleeds but does not bend
Beyond this place of anger and tears
Only the Horror of the shadow rises,
And yet, the threat of the years
You find me, and you will find me without fear.
No matter how narrow the gate,
How loaded with punishments the scroll is,
I am the master of my destiny,
I am the captain of my soul
-William Ernest Henley, 1888
After reading the poem, a discussion will be conducted so that participants can make associations between the contents of the poem "Invictus" and the themes of emotional triggers that might occur. These associations may be possible since William Ernest Henley's poem "Invictus" seems to represent the author's attempt to motivate himself in times when there seems to be no hope for better times and seems to do so by emphasizing that regardless of the circumstances, Human beings are capable of overcoming the worst phases of life by being courageous. Enley writes this poem in the hospital after losing one of his legs due to tuberculous arthritis (Spacey, 2017), demonstrating that even with significant physical and psychological pain, he manages to be brave and face life's misfortunes, something that can inspire participants who may also be experiencing physical and psychological pain.
The List of Merit task will be done as homework to improve the participants' self-esteem. In the week between sessions 3 and 4, participants should take a paper and write down positive things they accomplished during the day that deserve credit. By listing positive situations that occurred over a week, they can better perceive their qualities and reduce self-critical thoughts (Conceição & Bueno 2020).
Session 4: Sustainability and Healthy Practices
Session 4 aims to help participants understand and manage potential eco-anxiety situations by encouraging sustainable health and wellbeing practices. The aim is to make the intervention plan more effective by encouraging environmentally friendly activities, for example, providing participants with knowledge about how to care for their ecological environment so that they have more control over their day-to-day actions. The session begins by mentioning homework and the merit list and listening to the group about their experience of doing the homework. What was most challenging? What did they like most? How do they feel after this week. Once the discussion about homework is over, the psychologist introduces the topic of sustainability and healthy practices and explains what eco-anxiety is. Although eco-anxiety has the potential to harm our wellbeing, it can also be directed towards something productive since the simple fact of feeling eco-anxiety marks a moral sensitivity in the face of climate change (Kurth & Pihkala, 2022). Eco-anxiety can be channeled into behavioral changes, which can translate into more sustainable behaviors. The idea of environmental sustainability will be presented, and the participants can adopt possible actions to a more sustainable and healthier lifestyle, namely, eating organic products and practicing physical activity. Physical exercise can slow the development of prostate cancer and mitigate some of the side effects of treatments, consequently improving quality of life (Cabral et al., 2023; Camacho et al., 2023; Zuniga et al., 2019). Food will also be discussed since excessive meat consumption has been associated with an increased risk of developing urological cancer and negatively impacting the environment (Soares & Castro, 2024).
Session 5: Self-assessment
The goal of session 5 will be to self-evaluate each person's progress throughout the sessions, recognizing progress made, identifying challenges still faced, and strengthening commitment to the practices learned. It will be a one-on-one session so that there can be more personalized monitoring and feedback. The following questions can be explored:
1. What have you achieved mentally, emotionally and behaviorally?
2. What did you expect from the psychotherapeutic process?
3. What are the most difficult challenges you have faced so far?
4. What challenges have you overcome, and how did you overcome them?
5. From a personal perspective, what changes have you experienced so far? Of all these, which ones do you consider to be the most significant for your life?
6. What learnings do you take from these group sessions into your life?
7. What behaviors do you still want to improve?
In the end, the participants self-evaluate the psychotherapeutic process from 0 to 10 (0 being very bad and 10 being very good; Conceição & Bueno, 2020). Considering the participant's responses and the grade they gave to the process, there should be a reflection about them, also justifying the holding of this session in an individual context.
Session 6 – There is still life to live
Session 6 aims to reflect as a group on the progress made throughout the intervention and prepare participants for the post-intervention plan phase by encouraging the continuity of the strategies developed and skills acquired to deal with future obstacles. The session begins with the re-application of the WHO-5 scale, which will compare the results obtained in this session with the results obtained in session 0 (Bakhtiyar Aliyev et al., 2024). This comparison will provide quantitative data on participants' wellbeing before and after the intervention, thus assessing its effectiveness.
Next, the logbooks will be collected, and each participant can be invited to read and discuss passages in their logbook with the group. As the diaries are anonymous, this sharing should be optional, and each participant only does so if that is their wish. Suppose there is no sharing of content present in the diary. In that case, participants should talk about their experience, about what it was like to record thoughts, emotions and concerns throughout the intervention, since for many of these male participants, this will likely be the first time they carry out an activity of this kind. Once this sharing is complete, the psychologist prepares the end of the session and thanks all participants and gives his opinion on how it was to work with the group. Before finalizing, participants will be recommended to develop a support network among themselves, which can be done online through social networks or group chats, such as WhatsApp (Santos Silva et al., 2024) or suggest that they meet in person to talk about what is troubling them, knowing that these participants now have the social and emotional skills to support themselves and others.
Prostate cancer is a problem that affects millions of men every year and ends up being fatal in many cases, especially when it is not diagnosed early. Screening tests are essential for effective treatment of prostate cancer, as well as for ensuring that side effects are minimized. Therefore, the discomfort men feel in relation to screening tests, namely digital rectal examination, is a serious and relevant problem that requires attention from health professionals and the scientific community. Therefore, we suggest that further research be carried out about what causes this discomfort and the most effective methods to alleviate it. One of the biggest challenges associated with prostate cancer is one of the side effects of its treatment - erectile dysfunction. Erectile dysfunction is strongly correlated with lower levels of self-esteem and other negative psychological impacts, such as depressive symptoms. In this sense, further research into why there is such a strong correlation between these concepts could be helpful for the physical and psychological care of these patients in the future, especially in finding out whether many men associate the value of their masculinity with their sexual vigor and, if so, try to deconstruct this concept. This intervention plan seeks to raise questions rather than answer them. It focuses on sharing knowledge and information among male participants in the hope that they will circulate the information to their social network. Rectal examination, prostate cancer diagnosis, psychological challenges, erectile dysfunction and even the fear of death are topics that these men rarely discuss in their daily lives. Certain stigmas can be demystified, understood, shared and deconstructed by being spoken about openly throughout all sessions. This demystification is essential to this intervention proposal, as it can result in early diagnoses and the search for psychological support and potentially save lives. In future research topics, more psychological wellbeing instruments can be validated for the Portuguese population, namely for the Portuguese oncology patient population. The WHO-5 instrument is suggested in this intervention plan but has not been validated yet for Portugal. Additionally, it is also recommended that research be conducted on transgender women and non-binary people diagnosed with prostate cancer, as they are an emerging population that will begin to show a higher incidence of prostate cancer diagnoses shortly. Research in this context is needed to understand what their needs are, what the psychological and social impact of the diagnosis is on trans women and non-binary people, and how future psychological intervention plans focused on trans and non-binary participants can be developed and be more efficient. Prostate cancer can be diagnosed in any human being who has a prostate gland, which is why monitoring should be provided to everyone in a personalized manner. This psychological intervention plan aims to assist men diagnosed with prostate cancer who require psychological support and proposes the theoretical model of cognitive-behavioral therapy through psychoeducation on topics such as erectile dysfunction, digital rectal examination, sustainable practices and health—mental, application of relaxation techniques, use of logbooks as homework, and even discussion of poetry. The aim is to reach a population and a problem that is often forgotten when it comes to psychological intervention.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. The peer review process of the journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions was excellent and fast, as was the support of the editorial office and the quality of the journal. Kind regards Walter F. Riesen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Walter F. Riesen.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. Thank you for publishing our article, Exploring Clozapine's Efficacy in Managing Aggression: A Multiple Single-Case Study in Forensic Psychiatry in the international journal of clinical case reports and reviews. We found the peer review process very professional and efficient. The comments were constructive, and the whole process was efficient. On behalf of the co-authors, I would like to thank you for publishing this article. With regards, Dr. Jelle R. Lettinga.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, I would like to express my deep admiration for the exceptional professionalism demonstrated by your journal. I am thoroughly impressed by the speed of the editorial process, the substantive and insightful reviews, and the meticulous preparation of the manuscript for publication. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the courteous and immediate responses from your editorial office to all my inquiries. Best Regards, Dariusz Ziora
